Search Decisions

Decision Text

ARMY | BCMR | CY2014 | 20140001144
Original file (20140001144.txt) Auto-classification: Approved

		
		BOARD DATE:	17 July 2014 

		DOCKET NUMBER:  AR20140001144 


THE BOARD CONSIDERED THE FOLLOWING EVIDENCE:

1.  Application for correction of military records (with supporting documents provided, if any).

2.  Military Personnel Records and advisory opinions (if any).


THE APPLICANT'S REQUEST, STATEMENT, AND EVIDENCE:

1.  The applicant requests the remission/cancellation of his indebtedness for a $15,000 reenlistment bonus. 

2.  The applicant states, in effect, that he was paid a $15,000 reenlistment bonus under the Selected Reserve Incentive Program (SRIP) and he completed his military occupational specialty (MOS) qualifications and deployed to Iraq as a team leader.  However, his bonus addendum has come up missing and the California Army National Guard (CAARNG) has initiated recoupment action for the $15,000 he was paid. 

3.  The applicant provides copies of the notification from the CAARNG notifying him of his debt, retirement points statement, his reenlistment contract, DD Forms 214 (Certificates of Release or Discharge from Active Duty), Academic Evaluation Report, MOS orders, orders transferring him to and from the inactive Reserve, discharge orders, orders to active duty, Combat Infantryman Badge (CIB) orders, certificate of training, a letter referring him for evaluation under the Physical Disability Evaluation System, and his personnel qualification record.

CONSIDERATION OF EVIDENCE:

1.  The applicant was serving in the CAARNG on 10 May 2007 when he reenlisted for a period of 6 years and a $15,000 reenlistment bonus in MOS 11B.

2.  The applicant completed his training as an infantryman on 29 September 2007 and was deployed to Iraq during the period 20081018 – 20090805.
3.  The applicant was determined to be medically unfit for retention and was medically discharged on 23 December 2011.

4.  On 5 March 2013, officials at the CAARNG notified the applicant that his bonus was subject to recoupment due to the lack of a contract authorizing payment of the reenlistment bonus.

5.  In the processing of this case a staff advisory opinion was obtained from the Office of the Deputy Chief of Staff G-1 which opines that it is clear he served beyond his initial term of service as evidenced by the fact that he deployed to Iraq and was subsequently medically discharged.  Accordingly, his contract should be reconstructed and debt recoupment action should be terminated.  The advisory opinion was provided to the applicant for comment and he responded to the effect that he concurred with the opinion. 

DISCUSSION AND CONCLUSIONS:

1.  The applicant’s contentions and supporting documents have been noted and appear to have merit.

2.  Although not contained in the available evidence, it is reasonable to presume that the required addenda did at some point exist as he was paid the $15,000 reenlistment bonus by the Defense Finance and Accounting Service (DFAS) and it is well known that DFAS does not disburse funds without authorization documents for disbursements.

3.  In light of the recommendations from the Office of the Deputy Chief of Staff
G-1, the applicant’s contract should be reconstructed and recoupment action should be stopped.

4.  Therefore, as a matter of equity, the recoupment action should be rescinded, any monies recouped should be returned to the applicant, and all credit agencies should be notified that the debt was invalid.

BOARD VOTE:

____x____  ___x_____  _x____  GRANT FULL RELIEF 

________  ________  ________  GRANT PARTIAL RELIEF 

________  ________  ________  GRANT FORMAL HEARING

________  ________  ________  DENY APPLICATION
BOARD DETERMINATION/RECOMMENDATION:

The Board determined that the evidence presented was sufficient to warrant a recommendation for relief.  As a result, the Board recommends that all Department of the Army and Army National Guard records of the individual concerned be corrected by showing the CAARNG rescinded the recoupment action pertaining to his reenlistment bonus and refunding to him any monies collected.




      _______ _  x_______   ___
       	   CHAIRPERSON
      
I certify that herein is recorded the true and complete record of the proceedings of the Army Board for Correction of Military Records in this case.

ABCMR Record of Proceedings (cont)                                         AR20140001144



3


ARMY BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS

 RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS


1

ABCMR Record of Proceedings (cont)                                         AR20140001144



2


ARMY BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS

 RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS


1

Similar Decisions

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2014 | 20140003499

    Original file (20140003499.txt) Auto-classification: Approved

    The applicant requests correction of his records to show relief from recoupment of his reenlistment bonus (REB) by the California Army National Guard (CAARNG). CW4 SG states he was on tour with F Battery, 144th Field Artillery in Afghanistan and he swore the applicant into reenlistment in February “2006.” The applicant was under his command and he reenlisted for 6 years with a $15,000 bonus for his MOS. As a result, the Board recommends that all Department of the Army and State ARNG...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2014 | 20140020941

    Original file (20140020941.txt) Auto-classification: Approved

    Application for correction of military records (with supporting documents provided, if any). Therefore, it would be appropriate and serve the interest of justice and equity to correct his record by showing the CAARNG authorized him to receive the SLRP benefit on 4 December 2004 in the amount of $6,000 for his extension in the CAARNG for 6 years. As a result, the Board recommends that all Department of the Army and Army National Guard records of the individual concerned be corrected by: *...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2015 | 20150000078

    Original file (20150000078.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    The applicant states: * he was erroneously paid the SLRP incentive while deployed in 2005 * if not for the erroneous payment, he would have been eligible for SLRP when he later reenlisted in 2011 when the SLRP maximum was $50,000 * he was first made aware that he was not eligible for SLRP payment due to being a dual-status military technician through the California Army National Guard (CAARNG) Incentives Task Force audit process * he mobilized in January 2005 while serving as a dual-status...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2013 | 20130022385

    Original file (20130022385.txt) Auto-classification: Approved

    Application for correction of military records (with supporting documents provided, if any). He stated: * review of the applicant's record showed he extended his ARNG enlistment on 10 April 2005 for 6 years in MOS 88M for an REB of $15,000.00 * the applicant served the full term of his extended contract and his MOS appeared on the 2005 Selected Reserve Incentive Program (SRIP) list 7. As a result, the Board recommends that all Department of the Army and State Army National Guard records of...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2013 | 20130002139

    Original file (20130002139.txt) Auto-classification: Approved

    The applicant states: * the military overpaid his student loans in 2008 – he was not aware that an overpayment had occurred since the payments were made directly to the Department of Education while he was deployed to Iraq * he was entitled to $9,000.00 in student loan repayment benefits; however, payments totaling $14,400.00 were applied toward his loans * after redeployment from Iraq, he was released from active duty in Virginia, not California, and his Virginia address is reflected on his...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2014 | 20140004525

    Original file (20140004525.txt) Auto-classification: Approved

    This form shows: * he indicated he was a prior service applicant and he agreed to reenlist for 6 years * he held a PMOS for the position in which he was immediately reenlisting and he was reenlisting for a valid position within unit identification code WPCWB2 (Company B, 181st Engineer Battalion) * he indicated he had 2 loans in the amount of $14,057.01 and the total amount of repayment of the qualifying loans would not exceed $20,000 * he would furnish his unit personnel with all promissory...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2013 | 20130012617

    Original file (20130012617.txt) Auto-classification: Approved

    The applicant states: * after the CAARNG's incentive bonus scandal was publicized and the misconduct of Master Sergeant (MSG) Txxx Jxxxx was revealed, the CAARNG established the Incentive Task Force (ITF) to investigate all bonuses paid by the State * during his 12 continuous years of service in the CAARNG, he received a total of three (3) incentive bonuses (an $8,000 enlistment bonus in 2001, a $15,000 reenlistment bonus in 2007, and a $10,000 officer accession bonus (OAB) in 2008) * during...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2013 | 20130018890

    Original file (20130018890.txt) Auto-classification: Approved

    The applicant states he extended his enlistment for 6 years in 2006 for the SLRP. Based on the foregoing, his records should be corrected to show he is/was eligible for the SLRP in accordance with the terms of his extension contract and issuing him a new annex/addendum to his DA Form 4836 for the SLRP in connection with his extension in the CAARNG on 27 April 2006 that includes a completed and signed the Loan Repayment Program Addendum that clearly specify the terms of the Reserve Service...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2013 | 20130002328

    Original file (20130002328.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    The applicant requests payment of his student loans per his 2010 California Army National Guard (CAARNG) Student Loan Repayment Program (SLRP) contract. He signed a Selected Reserve ARNG SLRP incentive addendum on 9 April 2010 with the CAARNG. He was not authorized to receive the SLRP incentive because he had previously received an SLRP incentive from the USAR.

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2014 | 20140002359

    Original file (20140002359.txt) Auto-classification: Approved

    The opinion states the applicant requested relief from the recoupment of an REB and SLRP offered at the time of her reenlistment in the CAARNG. She also received on 22 August 2007 an REB payment of $7,500.00 as a later payment for her REB in 2003. The applicant contends that her military records should be corrected to show she is authorized the REB and SLRP funds she received.