Search Decisions

Decision Text

ARMY | BCMR | CY2013 | 20130022385
Original file (20130022385.txt) Auto-classification: Approved

	
		BOARD DATE:	  25 September 2014

		DOCKET NUMBER:  AR20130022385 


THE BOARD CONSIDERED THE FOLLOWING EVIDENCE:

1.  Application for correction of military records (with supporting documents provided, if any).

2.  Military Personnel Records and advisory opinions (if any).


THE APPLICANT'S REQUEST, STATEMENT, AND EVIDENCE:

1.  The applicant requests that a Reenlistment/Extension Bonus (REB) Addendum be added to his record.  

2.  He states he was fully eligible for and signed an REB Addendum, but the California Army National Guard (CAARNG) failed to file the document in his Official Military Personnel File maintained in the integrated Personnel Electronic Records Management System (iPERMS).  On 10 April 2005, he reenlisted in the CAARNG, and he was informed he was eligible for an enlistment bonus.  He chose to accept a $15,000 bonus for a 6-year extension of his enlistment.  He fulfilled his obligation and continues to serve in good standing.  His extension was filed correctly in iPERMS, but the REB Addendum was not filed.  When he was deployed with his unit, he held military occupational specialty (MOS) 88M (Motor Transport Operator), and it was outside of his responsibilities to ensure all necessary paperwork was filed correctly.  For reasons beyond his control, not all of the proper documents were submitted.  He was unaware that the REB Addendum was not in his record in iPERMS until he received a letter stating the CAARNG was going to recoup the bonus from him if he could not produce the document.  He has searched his personal records unsuccessfully for the REB Addendum.  He signed all required documents in good faith. 

3.  He provides:

* Defense Finance and Accounting Service Military Leave and Earnings Statement
* memorandum, subject:  Request for Documentation Supporting Your Incentive(s)
* Incentives Task Force Bonus Audit Form
* printouts of pages from the Information Management and Reporting Center (iMARC) and Defense Manpower Data Center
* ARNG Retirement Points History Statement
* DA Form 4836 (Oath of Extension of Enlistment or Reenlistment)
* orders 
* two pages from National Guard Bureau (NGB) Policy Number 05-02

CONSIDERATION OF EVIDENCE:

1.  On 11 January 1991, the applicant enlisted in the CAARNG.  He continued his service through extensions, and he is currently serving in the CAARNG as a staff sergeant/E-6.  

2.  Effective 13 August 2004, he was awarded primary MOS 88M.  

3.  On 10 April 2005, while deployed in support of Operation Iraqi Freedom, he extended his enlistment for 6 years.  The DA Form 4836 completed at that time shows he acknowledged he had been counseled on all Selected Reserve Incentive Program (SRIP) and GI Bill benefits, and he acknowledged he was eligible for and accepted a $15,000.00 REB.  The form shows a bonus control number (BCN) was assigned.  

4.  His record in iPERMS does not contain an REB Addendum specifying the conditions he had to meet to receive and retain his $15,000.00 REB.  

5.  He provides the following:

	a.  Printouts of pages from iMARC show he was paid his $15,000.00 REB in two installments of $7,500.00.  These pages show the same BCN as that shown on his DA Form 4836 and show that his REB had been validated and had passed verification.  

	b.  An Incentives Task Force Bonus Audit Form, dated 2 April 2013, shows a review of his record found he was "no go" for an REB due to the absence of a bonus addendum in iPERMS.  The auditor noted that he was MOS qualified (MOSQ) in MOS 88M when he extended his enlistment and had received two $7,500.00 payments in January 2006.  The auditor also noted the applicant was a Military Technician (MilTech).  The auditor found he was subject to full recoupment, and a senior reviewer concurred.  

	c.  A memorandum, subject:  Request for Documentation Support Your Incentive(s), dated 6 May 2013, shows he was notified that an audit of his bonus showed a discrepancy and that he was subject to recoupment of his REB in the amount of $15,000.  He was advised that he had 30 days to submit the required supporting documentation or request an exception to policy.

6.  On 7 February 2014, during the processing of this case, the Chief, Incentives and Budget Branch, Enlisted Accessions Division, Office of the Deputy Chief of Staff, G-1, provided an advisory opinion.  The advisory official recommended the applicant be granted relief to retain any bonus payments he had received and that any debt incurred based on such bonus payments be cancelled.  He stated:

* review of the applicant's record showed he extended his ARNG enlistment on 10 April 2005 for 6 years in MOS 88M for an REB of $15,000.00
* the applicant served the full term of his extended contract and his MOS appeared on the 2005 Selected Reserve Incentive Program (SRIP) list

7.  The applicant was provided a copy of the advisory opinion for his review and comment.  He did not respond within the time allotted.

8.  Army Regulation 135-7 (Incentive Programs) provides that an REB may be awarded to a Selected Reserve Soldier who meets all immediate reenlistment or extension eligibility criteria and is reenlisting or extending for a valid position vacancy in a designated unit or MOS authorized for award of an immediate REB.

9.  NGB Policy Number 05-02 established policy for the ARNG SRIP for the period 14 December 2004 through 30 September 2005.  It stated:

	a.  Soldiers would be eligible for the REB if they met the following qualifications:

* reenlist/extend for 3 or 6 years
* reenlist or extend in an Modification Table of Organization and Equipment unit
* Soldier must have not more than 16 years at expiration term of service
* Soldier must be MOSQ for the position for which re-enlisting or extending
* must be in a valid vacant position
* may receive multiple reenlistment/extension bonuses during their career
* must not be Active Guard Reserve (AGR) or a MilTech

	b. The 6-year re-enlistment or extension bonus was $15,000.00 payable in a lump sum effective upon re-enlistment or extension.

10.  Change 1 to NGB Policy Number 05-02, dated 14 January 2005, authorized deployed AGR and MilTech Soldiers to participate in SRIP incentives provided they reenlisted/extended while deployed/mobilized.  The memorandum noted that the proper annexes were to be attached to the enlistment or extension packet.  

DISCUSSION AND CONCLUSIONS:

A review of the evidence shows that the absence of an REB Addendum is the only basis for recouping the applicant's $15,000.00 REB.  He was fully qualified for the REB under the SRIP policy in effect when he extended his enlistment while deployed in 2005 and he was issued a BCN.  It would be appropriate to correct his record by adding an appropriate REB Addendum dated 10 April 2005.  As a result of this correction, any action to recoup his REB should be cancelled and he should be repaid any monies already recouped, if any.  

BOARD VOTE:

____x____  __x______  __x___  GRANT FULL RELIEF 

________  ________  ________  GRANT PARTIAL RELIEF 

________  ________  ________  GRANT FORMAL HEARING

________  ________  ________  DENY APPLICATION

BOARD DETERMINATION/RECOMMENDATION:

The Board determined that the evidence presented was sufficient to warrant a recommendation for relief.  As a result, the Board recommends that all Department of the Army and State Army National Guard records of the individual concerned be corrected by showing an appropriate REB Addendum dated 







10 April 2005 was prepared and added to his records.  As a result of this correction, any action to recoup his REB should be cancelled and he should be repaid any monies already recouped, out of Army National Guard funds, if any.  



      _______ _  x _______   ___
       	   CHAIRPERSON
      
I certify that herein is recorded the true and complete record of the proceedings of the Army Board for Correction of Military Records in this case.


ABCMR Record of Proceedings (cont)                                         AR20130022385





3


ARMY BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS

 RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS


1

ABCMR Record of Proceedings (cont)                                         AR20130022385



5


ARMY BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS

 RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS


1

Similar Decisions

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2013 | 20130012617

    Original file (20130012617.txt) Auto-classification: Approved

    The applicant states: * after the CAARNG's incentive bonus scandal was publicized and the misconduct of Master Sergeant (MSG) Txxx Jxxxx was revealed, the CAARNG established the Incentive Task Force (ITF) to investigate all bonuses paid by the State * during his 12 continuous years of service in the CAARNG, he received a total of three (3) incentive bonuses (an $8,000 enlistment bonus in 2001, a $15,000 reenlistment bonus in 2007, and a $10,000 officer accession bonus (OAB) in 2008) * during...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2013 | 20130013240

    Original file (20130013240.txt) Auto-classification: Approved

    The applicant states: * it is true he was not DMOSQ at the time of his extension * he was DMOSQ by 2 May 2007, well before his 12 July 2007 contract effective date * regarding acceptance of the AGR position, policy has since changed to allow a Soldier to retain incentives * he entered into a contract trusting he was eligible for the REB and SLRP * per the terms he had fully performed his end of the contract * he would not have agreed to the extension if not for the REB and SLRP 5. The...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2015 | 20150000083

    Original file (20150000083.txt) Auto-classification: Approved

    The advisory official recommended relief from recoupment of the applicant’s SLRP in the amount of $6,000.00, contracted on 19 January 2007. He further stated that the applicant did not extend within the proper time frame to receive the $15,000.00 REB, the bonus addendum was not dated or signed by a verifying service representative, and the applicant was in a non DMOSQ 13R position at the time of extension. Partial payment of $1,250.00 of his $2,500.00 REB (3-year commitment), dated on 22...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2014 | 20140007216

    Original file (20140007216.txt) Auto-classification: Approved

    f. In a memorandum, subject: [ABCMR] Appeal for [Applicant], dated 19 November 2013, the ITF Commander confirms the findings of ITF audits and states: * the applicant relied on MSG J____ and his command and there is no evidence of fraud on his part * the applicant has three certified debts – $22,500.00 (REB), $10,000.00 (OAB), and $6,000.00 (SLRP) * as of 13 November 2013, he had repaid $1,096.57 of his SLRP debt * he did not sign his SLRP addendum or REB addendum at the time of his...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2014 | 20140007216

    Original file (20140007216 .txt) Auto-classification: Approved

    f. In a memorandum, subject: [ABCMR] Appeal for [Applicant], dated 19 November 2013, the ITF Commander confirms the findings of ITF audits and states: * the applicant relied on MSG J____ and his command and there is no evidence of fraud on his part * the applicant has three certified debts – $22,500.00 (REB), $10,000.00 (OAB), and $6,000.00 (SLRP) * as of 13 November 2013, he had repaid $1,096.57 of his SLRP debt * he did not sign his SLRP addendum or REB addendum at the time of his...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2014 | 20140018107

    Original file (20140018107.txt) Auto-classification: Approved

    The applicant provides, in order of submission: * DA Form 4836, dated 15 April 2007 * page 2 of his NGB Form 600-7-3-R-E (Annex R to DD Form 4 (Enlistment/ Reenlistment Document – Armed Forces of the United States) or DA Form 4836 – REB Addendum – ARNG of the United States) (14 December 2004) * CAARNG memorandum, dated 19 August 2012, subject: Request for Documentation Supporting Your Incentive(s) * U.S. District Court for the Central District of California Plea Agreement for former CAARNG...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2014 | 20140003377

    Original file (20140003377.txt) Auto-classification: Approved

    The applicant requests, in effect, correction of his military records to show his entitlement to a $7,500.00 Prior Service Enlistment Bonus (PSEB) vice a $10,000.00 Enlistment Affiliation Bonus (EAFB) and cancellation of the recoupment payment of $3,750.00. The advisory opinion further stated: * The applicant enlisted in the CAARNG on 12 February 2007 and he signed a $10,000.00 EAFB addendum * He was not eligible to receive the bonus because he did not transition from active duty and had...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2013 | 20130015239

    Original file (20130015239.txt) Auto-classification: Approved

    The applicant requests, in effect, correction of his records by changing dates to show he is entitled to the $2,500.00 reenlistment bonus (REB) and $20,000.00 Student Loan Repayment Program (SLRP) incentive written in his enlistment contract. To receive the incentive, the applicant should have contracted for a term of service other than 3x5, 6x2, or 8x0 and have at least one qualifying loan. f. To be eligible for the $2,500.00, a properly-executed REB addendum is required at the time of...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2013 | 20130011919

    Original file (20130011919.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    The applicant requests correction of his records to show he remains entitled to his $15,000 Reenlistment Bonus (REB) and cancellation of any recoupment action. An NGB Form 600-7-3-R-E (Annex R to DD Form 4 or DA Form 4836 Reenlistment/Extension Decentralized State Incentive Pilot Program Addendum), dated 19 September 2011. c. A DA Form 4836 (Oath of Extension of Enlistment or Reenlistment), dated 13 June 2012. d. A Joint Force Headquarters - Montana memorandum, Subject: Exception to Policy...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2013 | 20130014644

    Original file (20130014644.txt) Auto-classification: Approved

    The applicant requests correction of his military records by showing he was authorized a bonus control number for his Reenlistment/Extension Bonus (REB) contract and authorization for his student loan repayment program (SLRP) during his enlistment with the California Army National Guard (CAARNG). A Memorandum for Record, dated 30 January 2012, from the ITF informed the applicant that he had not provided sufficient documentation to substantiate his incentive for SLRP. The applicant contends...