Search Decisions

Decision Text

ARMY | BCMR | CY2014 | 20140000836
Original file (20140000836.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

		IN THE CASE OF: 

		BOARD DATE:	  12 February 2014

		DOCKET NUMBER:  AR20140000836 


THE BOARD CONSIDERED THE FOLLOWING EVIDENCE:

1.  Application for correction of military records (with supporting documents provided, if any).

2.  Military Personnel Records and advisory opinions (if any).


THE APPLICANT'S REQUEST, STATEMENT, AND EVIDENCE:

1.  The applicant requests a review of the military disability evaluation pertaining to a mental health (MH) condition.

2.  The applicant states, in effect, the case file should be reviewed in accordance with the Secretary of Defense directive for a comprehensive review of members who were referred for a disability evaluation between 11 September 2001 and 30 April 2012 and whose MH diagnosis was changed during that process.

3.  The applicant submitted an application through the Department of Defense (DOD) Physical Disability Board of Review (PDBR) MH Special Review Panel (SRP).

CONSIDERATION OF EVIDENCE:

1.  The PDBR SRP conducted a comprehensive review of the applicant's submissions and records for evidence of inappropriate changes in the diagnosis of an MH condition during processing through the military disability system.

2.  The DOD memorandum, dated 27 February 2013, directed the Service Secretaries to conduct a review of MH diagnoses for service members completing a disability evaluation process between 11 September 2001 and 30 April 2012 to determine if service members were disadvantaged by a changed diagnosis over the course of their physical disability process.

3.  In the processing of this case, an advisory opinion was obtained from the PDBR SRP and the applicant was provided a copy.

4.  The applicant did not respond to the advisory opinion.

DISCUSSION AND CONCLUSIONS:

1.  After a comprehensive review of the applicant's case, the SRP determined by unanimous vote that there should be no change to the applicant's disability and separation determination.

2.  The SRP considered the appropriateness of changes in the MH diagnoses; whether the provisions of Department of Veterans Affairs Schedule for Rating Disabilities (VASRD), section 4.129, were applicable; and a disability rating recommendation in accordance with the VASRD, section 4.130.  The SRP reviewed the applicant's records for evidence of inappropriate changes or elimination of a diagnosis of the MH condition during processing through the Disability Evaluation System and found none.

3.  The SRP found no evidence that supported the criteria for a diagnosis of post-traumatic stress disorder or any other MH condition and that section 4.130 and section 4.129 were not applicable.  The SRP concurred that the applicant did not appear to meet the inclusion criteria in the Terms of Reference of the MH Review Project.

4.  After due deliberation in consideration of the preponderance of the evidence, the SRP concluded there was insufficient evidence to support an unfit determination for any MH disorder at the time of evaluation in the DES or prior to separation and no ratings can be recommended.

5.  The available evidence shows the SRP's assessment should be accepted.

BOARD VOTE:

________  ________  ________  GRANT FULL RELIEF 

________  ________  ________  GRANT PARTIAL RELIEF 

________  ________  ________  GRANT FORMAL HEARING

___X____  ___X____  ___X____  DENY APPLICATION



BOARD DETERMINATION/RECOMMENDATION:

The evidence presented does not demonstrate the existence of a probable error or injustice.  Therefore, the Board determined the overall merits of this case are insufficient as a basis for correction of the records of the individual concerned.



      __________X____________
       	   CHAIRPERSON
      
I certify that herein is recorded the true and complete record of the proceedings of the Army Board for Correction of Military Records in this case.

ABCMR Record of Proceedings (cont)                                         AR20040003532



3


ARMY BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS

 RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS


1

ABCMR Record of Proceedings (cont)                                  AR20140000836



2


ARMY BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS

 RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS


1

Similar Decisions

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2014 | 20140009137

    Original file (20140009137.txt) Auto-classification: Approved

    The SRP recommends no change in the applicant’s unfitting condition diagnosis, and that the applicant’s prior separation be modified to reflect that the applicant was placed on the Temporary Disability Retired List (TDRL) at 50 percent for a period of 6 months in accordance with (IAW) the Department of Veterans Affairs Schedule for Rating Disabilities (VASRD) section 4.129 and then permanently separated by reason of physical disability with a final 80 percent rating. The SRP considered the...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2015 | 20150014152

    Original file (20150014152.txt) Auto-classification: Approved

    The PDBR SRP conducted a comprehensive review of the applicant's submissions and records for evidence of inappropriate changes in the diagnosis of an MH condition during processing through the military disability system. The SRP reviewed the records for evidence of inappropriate changes in diagnosis of the MH condition during processing through the disability evaluation system (DES). The higher 70 percent rating is for “Occupational and social impairment, with deficiencies in most areas.”...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2014 | 20140010890

    Original file (20140010890.txt) Auto-classification: Approved

    The PDBR SRP conducted a comprehensive review of the applicant's submissions and records for evidence of inappropriate changes in the diagnosis of an MH condition during processing through the military disability system. The SRP considered the appropriateness of changes in the MH diagnoses, Physical Evaluation Board (PEB) fitness determination, whether the provisions of Department of Veterans Affairs Schedule for Rating Disabilities (VASRD) section 4.129 were applicable, and whether a...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2014 | 20140002867

    Original file (20140002867.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    The PDBR SRP conducted a comprehensive review of the applicant’s submissions and records for evidence of inappropriate changes in the diagnosis of a MH condition during processing through the military disability system. The SRP considered the appropriateness of changes in the MH diagnoses, the physical evaluation board (PEB) fitness determination; and if unfitting, whether the provisions of VASRD Section 4.129 were applicable, and a disability rating recommendation in accordance with VASRD...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2014 | 20140014913

    Original file (20140014913.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    The PDBR SRP conducted a comprehensive review of the applicant’s submissions and records for evidence of inappropriate changes in the diagnosis of a MH condition during processing through the military disability system. The SRP considered the appropriateness of changes in the applicant's MH diagnoses; physical evaluation board (PEB) fitness determination; and if unfitting, whether the provisions of the Department of Veterans Affairs Schedule for Rating Disabilities (VASRD) Section 4.129...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2014 | 20140014433

    Original file (20140014433 .txt) Auto-classification: Approved

    The applicant states, in effect, the case file should be reviewed in accordance with the Secretary of Defense directive for a comprehensive review of members who were referred for a disability evaluation between 11 September 2001 and 30 April 2012, and whose MH diagnosis was changed during that process. The PDBR SRP conducted a comprehensive review of the applicant's submissions and records for evidence of inappropriate changes in the diagnosis of an MH condition during processing through...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2014 | 20140014433

    Original file (20140014433.txt) Auto-classification: Approved

    The applicant states, in effect, the case file should be reviewed in accordance with the Secretary of Defense directive for a comprehensive review of members who were referred for a disability evaluation between 11 September 2001 and 30 April 2012, and whose MH diagnosis was changed during that process. The PDBR SRP conducted a comprehensive review of the applicant's submissions and records for evidence of inappropriate changes in the diagnosis of an MH condition during processing through...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2014 | 20140011160

    Original file (20140011160.txt) Auto-classification: Approved

    The PDBR SRP conducted a comprehensive review of the applicant’s submissions and records for evidence of inappropriate changes in the diagnosis of a MH condition during processing through the military disability system. After a comprehensive review of the applicant’s case, the SRP recommended by unanimous vote that there should be no change in the applicant’s unfitting condition diagnosis and his prior determination be modified as follows: Temporary Disability Retirement (TDRL) at 50...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2013 | 20130021916

    Original file (20130021916.txt) Auto-classification: Approved

    The PDBR SRP conducted a comprehensive review of the applicant’s submissions and records for evidence of inappropriate changes in the diagnosis of a mental health condition during processing through the military disability system. After a comprehensive review of the applicant’s case, the SRP determined by unanimous vote that the applicant's unfitting mental health (MH) condition diagnosis be changed to Post Traumatic Stress Disorder (PTSD), coded 9411. The SRP determined that the...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2014 | 20140007675

    Original file (20140007675.txt) Auto-classification: Approved

    The SRP considered the appropriateness of changes in the MH diagnoses; the physical evaluation board (PEB) fitness determination; if unfitting, whether the provisions of VASRD, section 4.129, were applicable; and a disability rating recommendation in accordance with VASRD, section 4.130. The SRP noted that while the PEB had placed the applicant on the TDRL, application of VASRD, section 4.129, required a minimum disability rating of 50 percent with re-evaluation. As a result, the Board...