Search Decisions

Decision Text

ARMY | BCMR | CY2014 | 20140000832
Original file (20140000832 .txt) Auto-classification: Approved

		IN THE CASE OF:	   

		BOARD DATE:	  25 March 2014

		DOCKET NUMBER:  AR20140000832 


THE BOARD CONSIDERED THE FOLLOWING EVIDENCE:

1.  Application for correction of military records (with supporting documents provided, if any).

2.  Military Personnel Records and advisory opinions (if any).


THE APPLICANT'S REQUEST, STATEMENT, AND EVIDENCE:

1.  The applicant requests, in effect, reinstatement of his Student Loan Repayment Program (SLRP) incentives. 

2.  The applicant states, in effect, that he reenlisted on 9 July 2007 for a period of 6 years in military occupational specialty (MOS) 31B (military policeman) and the SLRP incentive of $10,500.  On 1 February 2012 he was transferred to a non-MOS specific position at the Provost Marshal’s office for what was supposed to be a career enhancing position.  His commander and administrative personnel advised him that no recoupment action would be taken as he was fulfilling his obligation and he was recommended by the commander for the position.  He took the position, and a year later he was advised by the Iowa Army National Guard (IAARNG) that recoupment of his SLRP payments would be initiated because he had not fulfilled his obligation.  He would not have accepted the transfer had he known that there were going to be financial consequences.  

3.  The applicant provides copies of responses from the IAARNG and National Guard Bureau (NGB) concerning his request for an exception to policy to retain his SLRP incentives, a transfer order, a statement from the retention noncommissioned officer (NCO), SLRP Addendum, and two counseling forms indicating that recoupment would not be affected.





CONSIDERATION OF EVIDENCE:

1.  The applicant was serving as a military policeman in the IAARNG in the pay grade of E-6 when he reenlisted for a period of 6 years and the SLRP in the amount of $10,500 on 9 July 2007.  He deployed to Iraq during the period 
27 January 2008 through 1 November 2008.

2.  He was promoted to the pay grade of E-7 on 21 September 2009 and on      28 October 2011 he was counseled by his company commander regarding his transfer to the Provost Marshal’s office.  The counseling form implies that the applicant’s bonus incentives would not be affected. 

3.  On 1 February 2012, he was transferred to the Provost Marshal’s office at the Joint Forces Headquarters at the same installation for duty as the Physical Security NCO for the IAARNG in MOS OOF4O. 

4.  The initial notification of recoupment action is not present in the available records; however, on 1 November 2013 the NGB notified the applicant that his request for an exception to policy to retain the SLRP incentive was denied, that the State Incentive Manager would terminate the incentive, and the applicant would be granted relief from recoupment action.

5.  On 10 December 2013, the IAARNG Education Services Officer notified the applicant that any recoupment amount would be forwarded for debt collection action and further advised him that he could apply to this Board for relief.

6.  The statement provided by the applicant from the unit retention NCO indicates that she and the commander advised the applicant that his SLRP benefits would not be affected as the transfer was for career progression.  Had she known at the time she would have published the orders to reflect “career progression.”

7.  A review of the applicant’s official records shows he was awarded his Bachelor of Science Degree in Health Sciences on 21 September 2009 and he was subsequently awarded his Master’s Degree in Health Sciences with a 4.0 grade point average.

8.  Army Regulation 611-201 (Military Occupational Specialty Codes) provides, in pertinent part, that MOS OOF (Drill Sergeant) may be held by personnel with any MOS and is considered career progression for all specialties. 




DISCUSSION AND CONCLUSIONS:

1.  The evidence in this case clearly shows the applicant was serving as a military policeman in the IAARNG when he was selected to fill a position in the IAARNG Joint Forces Headquarters as a Physical Security NCO and that he was advised by his commander and the unit retention NCO that acceptance of the position would not affect his SLRP benefits because the move was one of career progression.

2.  However, it appears the applicant was ill-advised and his SLRP benefits were terminated and recoupment action was initiated until the NGB terminated recoupment actions.

3.  In any event, the applicant was working in an MOS that is considered career progression for any enlisted MOS and he was working in his capacity as a military policeman in his position as a Physical Security NCO for the IAARNG.

4.  Accordingly, as a matter of equity, the applicant’s SLRP benefits should be restored and any monies collected should be returned to the applicant.

BOARD VOTE:

____x___  ____x___  ___x____  GRANT FULL RELIEF 

________  ________  ________  GRANT PARTIAL RELIEF 

________  ________  ________  GRANT FORMAL HEARING

________  ________  ________  DENY APPLICATION

BOARD DETERMINATION/RECOMMENDATION:

The Board determined the evidence presented is sufficient to warrant a recommendation for relief.  As a result, the Board recommends that all Department of the Army and State ARNG records of the individual concerned be 






corrected by showing that he was granted an exception to policy to retain his SLRP benefits and that any monies collected be returned to the applicant from ARNG funds.




      _______ _   _x______   ___
               CHAIRPERSON

I certify that herein is recorded the true and complete record of the proceedings of the Army Board for Correction of Military Records in this case.
ABCMR Record of Proceedings (cont)                                         AR20140000832



3


ARMY BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS

 RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS


1

ABCMR Record of Proceedings (cont)                                         AR20140000832



2


ARMY BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS

 RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS


1

Similar Decisions

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2014 | 20140009224

    Original file (20140009224.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    BOARD DATE: 28 August 2014 DOCKET NUMBER: AR20140009224 THE BOARD CONSIDERED THE FOLLOWING EVIDENCE: 1. On 17 March 2009, the applicant (as a prior service applicant) enlisted for MOS 13D. Evidence shows the applicant voluntarily submitted an application to OCS and was subsequently appointed as a 2LT in the IAARNG in violation of his prior service enlistment contract.

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2015 | 20150003425

    Original file (20150003425.txt) Auto-classification: Approved

    b. Annex A (Enlistment/Reenlistment Agreement – ARNG – Service Requirements and Methods of Fulfillment) to DD Form 4, dated 18 July 2012, wherein he acknowledged that: * he was enlisting in IAARNG unit identification code (UIC) WQE5AA as a non-prior service (NPS) member * he would attend basic training at Fort Jackson, SC * he would undergo training in MOS 46R (Public Affairs Broadcast Specialist) * he would accept training in an alternate MOS if offered and remain on inactive duty training...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2014 | 20140008713

    Original file (20140008713.txt) Auto-classification: Approved

    The memorandum states: * his REB Addendum showed he contracted for MOS 92G, but on 1 November 2012, he was transferred to a non-deployable TDA unit in an MOS 12H position * although he transferred for promotion (i.e., career progression), there were 92G positions in other units around the State * an NGB ETP was required to avoid bonus recoupment of approximately $9,305.00 b. c. A memorandum, subject: Request for ETP for REB (Applicant), dated 12 June 2013, from Deputy G-1, ARNG, NGB,...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2014 | 20140001357

    Original file (20140001357.txt) Auto-classification: Approved

    The applicant states: * he was given an incorrect SLRP incentive addendum when he enlisted in the IAARNG * the addendum and National Guard Bureau (NGB) policy had changed 1 month before he enlisted * the injustice is that NGB decided to terminate the bonus with recoupment due to two consecutive Army Physical Fitness Test (APFT) failures and won't pay on the past 3 years due to the incorrect bonus addendum he was given * his loans haven't been paid * the bonus addendum he was given does not...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2015 | 20150000078

    Original file (20150000078.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    The applicant states: * he was erroneously paid the SLRP incentive while deployed in 2005 * if not for the erroneous payment, he would have been eligible for SLRP when he later reenlisted in 2011 when the SLRP maximum was $50,000 * he was first made aware that he was not eligible for SLRP payment due to being a dual-status military technician through the California Army National Guard (CAARNG) Incentives Task Force audit process * he mobilized in January 2005 while serving as a dual-status...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2014 | 20140000786

    Original file (20140000786.txt) Auto-classification: Approved

    The applicant states that on 3 January 2006 he reenlisted in the Kansas Army National Guard (KSARNG) for a bonus and the Student Loan Repayment Program (SLRP) incentive for up to $20,000. The applicant was serving as a mechanic in the KSARNG in the pay grade of E-5 when he reenlisted on 3 January 2006 for a period of 6 years, a $15,000 reenlistment bonus, and participation in the SLRP. As a result, the Board recommends that all Department of the Army and National Guard records of the...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2014 | 20140004933

    Original file (20140004933.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    He disagrees with the National Guard Bureau's (NGB) decision to recoup his SLRP incentive, due to errors made by his unit, on his 6-year extension contract and FLARNG SLRP Addendum that violated the ARNG Selected Reserve Incentive Program (SRIP) 06-06. b. (1) The NGB official also stated the applicant annotated MOS 25U on his SRIP Addendum, but he was not Duty Military Occupational Skill Qualified (DMOSQ) for MOS 25U on the date of extension as required by his incentive addendum on line 2c....

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2015 | 20150003332

    Original file (20150003332.txt) Auto-classification: Approved

    He stated/acknowledged he: * was a prior service applicant who had completed the last 3 consecutive years in the ARNG; he held the primary MOS for which he was reenlisting/extending * was extending in a valid position and the critical skill MOS of 74C for which Headquarters, Department of the Army (HQDA) had authorized the SLRP and he must remain in the contracted MOS for the entire period of his extension/reenlistment contract * had 1 loan in the amount of $11,000; the total amount of...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2014 | 20140001684

    Original file (20140001684.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    The NGB stated: * the State Incentive Manager will terminate the incentive effective the date of order to AGR/military technician status * relief from recoupment is granted * the applicant became AGR/military technician after the contract start date which violates the ARNG Selected Reserve Incentive Program (SRIP) 07-06 * date of agreement/enlistment is 4 November 2007 * contracted loan addendum/agreement amount is $20,000.00 * he contracted for MOS 31B; his current MOS is 00F * the...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2015 | 20150002367

    Original file (20150002367.txt) Auto-classification: Approved

    The applicant provides copies of his – * self-authored statement (summarized above) * Memorandum for Record (MFR), SLRP Waiver Due To critical skill MOS * transfer orders * MOS orders * DA Form 4836 (Oath of Extension or Reenlistment) * NGB Request for ETP SLRP * UTARNG Notice of Incentive Eligibility Termination * SLRP Payment History * NGB Form 600-7-5-R-E (Annex L – SLRP Addendum) * two requests for ETP * ARNG Selected Reserve Incentive Program (SRIP) Guidance for Fiscal Year (FY) 2007, 1...