Search Decisions

Decision Text

ARMY | BCMR | CY2014 | 20140000742
Original file (20140000742.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

		IN THE CASE OF:	  

		BOARD DATE:	 14 October 2014 

		DOCKET NUMBER:  AR20140000742 


THE BOARD CONSIDERED THE FOLLOWING EVIDENCE:

1.  Application for correction of military records (with supporting documents provided, if any).

2.  Military Personnel Records and advisory opinions (if any).


THE APPLICANT'S REQUEST, STATEMENT, AND EVIDENCE:

1.  The applicant requests, in effect, reconsideration of his previous request for promotion to the rank/pay grade of colonel (COL)/O-6 and placement on the Retired List in that rank/pay grade.

2.  The applicant states, in effect, he is providing new evidence that was not previously considered by the Board.

3.  The applicant provides:

* copies of two historical photographs with captions and notations
* letter from a Senate representative, dated 4 December 2013
* self-authored timeline showing his record of civilian and military service (previously considered)
* civilian résumé
* Army Board for Correction of Military Records (ABCMR) Docket Number AR20130002560
* memorandum for promotion to the rank of lieutenant colonel (LTC), dated 28 October 1983
* mobilization designation (MOBDES) assignment memorandum, dated 19 November 1980 (previously considered)
* reassignment orders to a COL position, dated 26 March 1986 (previously considered)
* unit reassignment orders, dated 7 August 1979 (previously considered)
* self-authored active duty service list (previously considered)
* letters from Congressional and Senate representatives, dated 28 July 1980, 25 August 1986, 15 December 1986, and 17 August 1987 (previously considered)
* letter from the Secretary of Veterans Affairs, dated 8 January 1993 (previously considered)
* copies of photographs of himself
* Certificate of Retirement, dated 2 November 2001 (previously considered)
* Association of Military Surgeons of the United States Certificate, dated 1 October 2009
* letter from the Harvard Medical School, dated 18 August 1980
* letter from the New School for Social Research, dated 4 June 1991
* letter from the Veterans Administration, dated 27 August 1984
* invitation to the Sixty-Second Annual National Convention of The American Legion from 16-21 August 1980 as a distinguished guest
* letter from the Office of the Chief Medical Director, Department of Medicine and Surgery
* newspaper article
* Freedom Team Salute Certificate of Appreciation (previously considered)
* Meritorious Service Medal orders and transmittal letter, dated 28 March 1995 (previously considered)
* Reserve Officers Association Life Member Certificate, dated 3 July 1997
* 2000 Disabled American Veterans Commanders Club Certificate of Appreciation
* Cold War Certificate of Recognition
* U.S. Army Reserve Certificate of Appreciation, dated October 1980
* memorandum from Company A, 1st Battalion, 3rd Training Regiment (Basic), Fort Leonard Wood, MO, dated 17 December 1959
* fellowship acceptance letter from the American College of Hospital Administrators, dated 22 December 1983
* page 1 of a self-authored letter, dated 15 January 2013
* spiral-bound copy of extracts of his military service records

CONSIDERATION OF EVIDENCE:

1.  Incorporated herein by reference are military records which were summarized in the previous consideration of the applicant's case by the ABCMR in Docket Number AR20130002560 on 17 October 2013.

2.  The applicant's records show:

* he was born on 2 November 1941
* he enlisted in the Army National Guard (ARNG) on 21 November 1958
* he was appointed as a commissioned officer in the ARNG on 21 November 1962
* he was appointed as a commissioned officer in the U.S. Army Reserve (USAR) on 21 November 1965

3.  Headquarters, U.S. Army Health Services Command, memorandum, dated 19 November 1980, subject:  MOBDES Assignment, states he was selected for assignment to a COL/O-6 position in area of concentration (AOC) 67 (Medical Service Corps (MSC)) as the executive officer of the Kirk U.S. Army Hospital.

4.  A USAR Components Personnel and Administration Center memorandum, dated 28 October 1983, subject:  Promotion as a Reserve Commissioned Officer of the Army under Title 10 of the U.S. Code, states he was promoted as a Reserve commissioned officer to the rank of LTC in the MSC effective 12 August 1983.

5.  USAR Personnel Center (ARPERCEN) orders, dated 26 March 1986, reassigned him to an Individual Mobilization Augmentee COL/O-6 position in the U.S. Army Medical Department Activity effective 19 March 1986.  These orders show his rank as LTC and his AOC as 67A (Health Care Administration).

6.  An ARPERCEN memorandum, dated 9 February 1994, subject:  Attainment of Maximum Service, stated his records indicated he completed this service and he must be discharged or retired by 4 February 1992.  He was informed that he could request transfer to the Retired Reserve or discharge and he was encouraged to elect transfer to the Retired Reserve to retain his commission.  The attached computation sheet showed his mandatory removal date was calculated as 4 February 1992.  He elected transfer to the Retired Reserve.  All documents associated with his notification and election of options show his rank as LTC.

7.  ARPERCEN Orders C-03-410321, dated 15 March 1994, released him from the USAR Control Group and assigned him to the Retired Reserve effective 15 March 1994.  These orders show his rank as LTC.

8.  His U.S. Army Reserve Personnel Command (AR-PERSCOM) Form 249-2-E (Chronological Statement or Retirement Points), dated 8 October 1999, shows he completed 33 years of qualifying service for retired pay at age 60.  This form shows his rank as LTC.

9.  AR-PERSCOM Orders P-08-304407, dated 11 August 2001, retired him and placed him on the Retired List in the rank of LTC effective 2 November 2001.

10.  On 2 November 2001, he reached age 60.

11.  On 17 October 2013, the ABCMR denied his request for promotion to the rank/pay grade of COL/O-6 and placement on the Retired List in that grade.  The ABCMR concluded that he did not provide sufficient evidence showing he was selected for promotion to COL in the USAR prior to his retirement in 1994.

12.  There is no evidence showing he was considered and selected for promotion to COL by any Reserve Components Promotion Selection Board prior to his transfer to the Retired Reserve in 1994.

13.  The applicant provided numerous certificates and correspondence recognizing and/or commending his military service.

14.  Army Regulation 135-155 (ARNG and USAR – Promotion of Commissioned Officers and Warrant Officers Other Than General Officers), in effect at the time, prescribed the policies and procedures for promotion of USAR and ARNG officers.

	a.  Paragraph 2-8 provided that selection boards would convene at the discretion of the Secretary of the Army for consideration for promotion to COL.

	b.  Paragraph 4-5 provided that a Reserve officer would be transferred to the Retired Reserve in the highest grade satisfactorily held.

	c.  Paragraph 4-9 provided that officers selected for promotion to the grade of COL required Senate confirmation.

15.  Army Regulation 140-10 (USAR – Assignments, Attachments, Details, and Transfers), in effect at the time, prescribed policies, criteria, and procedures for assignment, detail, removal, and transfer of members of the USAR.

	a.  Paragraph 2-25 provided that series 67 MSC officers may be mandatorily assigned to positions for which they are AOC qualified.  They may only volunteer for assignment to Army Promotion List (APL) positions, provided they can become branch qualified within 3 years.  They understand they are not eligible for unit vacancy promotion in the APL position until appointed in the APL branch.

	b.  Paragraph 7 stated that LTC's could not exceed 28 years of service or age 60 and COL's could not exceed 30 years of service or age 60 for separation of officers for maximum age and/or service.

16.  Title 10, U.S. Code, section 1370(a), states that unless entitled to a higher retired grade under some other provisions of law, a commissioned officer of the Army who retired under any provision of law other than chapter 61 or chapter 1223 of this title shall be retired in the highest grade in which he served on active duty satisfactorily for not less than 6 months as determined by the Secretary of the Army.

DISCUSSION AND CONCLUSIONS:

1.  The applicant was promoted to the rank of LTC effective 30 September 1982.

2.  He held the rank of LTC on the date he retired from the USAR and he was placed on the Retired List in the rank of LTC effective 2 November 2001.

3.  His records show he held multiple COL-level positions while serving in the rank of LTC and he received numerous accolades for his performance.  However, there is no evidence of record and he did not provide evidence showing he was selected for promotion to the rank of COL in the USAR.  Selection for promotion would have also required Senate confirmation.

4.  In view of the foregoing, there is an insufficient evidentiary basis for granting the applicant's requested relief.

BOARD VOTE:

________  ________  ________  GRANT FULL RELIEF 

________  ________  ________  GRANT PARTIAL RELIEF 

________  ________  ________  GRANT FORMAL HEARING

____X____  ___X_____  ___X_____  DENY APPLICATION

BOARD DETERMINATION/RECOMMENDATION:

1.  The evidence presented does not demonstrate the existence of a probable error or injustice.  Therefore, the Board determined the overall merits of this case are insufficient as a basis to amend the decision of the ABCMR set forth in Docket Number AR20130002560, dated 17 October 2013.


2.  The Board wants the applicant and all others concerned to know this action in no way diminishes the sacrifices made by him in service to our Nation.  The applicant and all Americans should be justifiably proud of his service in arms.



      _____________X____________
                  CHAIRPERSON
      
I certify that herein is recorded the true and complete record of the proceedings of the Army Board for Correction of Military Records in this case.

ABCMR Record of Proceedings (cont)                                         AR20140000742



3


ARMY BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS

 RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS


1

ABCMR Record of Proceedings (cont)                                         AR20140000742



2


ARMY BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS

 RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS


1

Similar Decisions

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2013 | 20130002560

    Original file (20130002560.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    c. Orders T-09-543857, issued by ARPERCEN, dated 14 September 1985, ordering him to active duty for training for 5 days. His ARPC Form 249-E, dated 8 October 2013, shows he was retired on 16 March 1994, in the rank of LTC, upon completion of 33 qualifying years of service for retired pay. The evidence of record shows the applicant was promoted to LTC in the USAR on 28 September 1982.

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2008 | 20080008046

    Original file (20080008046.txt) Auto-classification: Approved

    The applicant also references paragraph 4 of "Consideration of Evidence" and paragraph 2 of "Discussion and Conclusion" in which the Board commented that no material error existed based on the failure of statements directed to be placed in his Official Military Personnel File (OMPF) per paragraph 4b of Army Board for Correction of Military Records (ABCMR) Decision Docket Number AR2001062261, dated 10 October 2001. The applicant further references ABCMR Decision Document Number AC97-08966,...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2012 | 20120001025

    Original file (20120001025.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    The applicant states he was not promoted to COL on his promotion eligibility date (PED). He was selected by the 2010 board and the DOR for this board is the date of assignment to a COL position. The PED for AGR officers is the date the officer reaches maximum TIG, the date of assignment to the higher grade, or in the case an officer is selected on their second or subsequent consideration and the officer's maximum TIG has passed, the PED is the date of appointment in the next higher grade...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2010 | 20100030440

    Original file (20100030440.txt) Auto-classification: Approved

    If the report of a special selection board, approved by the President, recommends for promotion to the next higher grade an officer not currently eligible for promotion, or a former officer whose name was referred to it, the Secretary of the Army may act through the Army Board for Correction of Military Records (ABCMR) to correct the military record of the officer or former officer to correct an error or remove an injustice resulting from not being selected for promotion by the board which...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2013 | 20130007325

    Original file (20130007325.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    The applicant states he believes it is the policy of the Army to promote Soldiers upon retirement to the grade achieved, if the Soldier is on a promotion list at the time of retirement. Department of the Army, Office of the Assistant Secretary of the Army (Manpower and Reserve Affairs (M&RA)) memorandum, dated 27 January 2009, subject: Grade of Officers When Retiring or Separating for Physical Disability, provides that officers recommended for promotion by Title 10 promotion boards, special...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2011 | 20110023381

    Original file (20110023381.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    The applicant requests promotion to the rank/grade of colonel (COL)/O-6 effective 15 September 2010, the date he was placed on the Retired List. He was considered and recommended for promotion by the fiscal year (FY) 2010 COL Army Promotion List (APL) promotion selection board and his name was placed on the recommended for promotion list awaiting Senate confirmation. The applicant was considered and recommended for promotion to COL by the FY2010 APL promotion selection board; however, he...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2013 | 20130015834

    Original file (20130015834.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    Application for correction of military records (with supporting documents provided, if any). The PEB recommended he be retired due to permanent disability with a combined disability rating of 90 percent. Department of the Army, Office of the Assistant Secretary, Manpower and Reserve Affairs memorandum, dated 27 January 2009, subject: Grade of Officers When Retiring or Separating for Physical Disability, states officers recommended by Title 10 Promotion Boards, Special Selection Boards, or...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2010 | 20100011648

    Original file (20100011648.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    The applicant provides the following documentary evidence: a. ABCMR Record of Proceedings, Docket Number AC95-08778, dated 19 March 1997; b. a letter from the Commander of American Legion Post 37, dated 28 March 2008; c. U.S. Army Reserve Personnel Center (ARPERCEN), St. Louis, MO, Orders C-05-421624, dated 17 May 1994, transferring him to the Retired Reserve, effective 12 May 1994; d. a memorandum from U.S. Total Army Personnel Command (USTAPC), St. Louis, dated 14 October 1994, notifying...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2013 | 20130005895

    Original file (20130005895.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    The applicant requests, in effect, correction of records to show he was placed on the Retired List in the rank of colonel (COL)/pay grade O-6. ARPERCEN Orders P-06-303425, dated 24 June 1997, placed the applicant on the Retired List in the retired grade of LTC effective 12 March 1997. Orders filed in his records show his last promotion was to the rank/pay grade of LTC/O-5.

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2006 | 20060001282C070205

    Original file (20060001282C070205.doc) Auto-classification: Denied

    The applicant states he was misinformed as to his eligibility for promotion while serving in his TPU (Troop Program Unit) captain’s position. On 30 June 1995 his request for transfer from the Engineer Branch to the Civil Affairs Branch, in the specialty skill identifier (SSI) 38A, was approved. The applicant was promoted to major upon his transfer to the IRR.