IN THE CASE OF:
BOARD DATE: 19 February 2014
DOCKET NUMBER: AR20140000662
THE BOARD CONSIDERED THE FOLLOWING EVIDENCE:
1. Application for correction of military records (with supporting documents provided, if any).
2. Military Personnel Records and advisory opinions (if any).
THE APPLICANT'S REQUEST, STATEMENT, AND EVIDENCE:
1. The applicant requests a review of the military disability evaluation pertaining to a mental health (MH) condition.
2. The applicant states, in effect, the case file should be reviewed in accordance with the Secretary of Defense directive for a comprehensive review of members who were referred for a disability evaluation between 11 September 2001 and 30 April 2012 and whose MH diagnosis was changed during that process.
3. The applicant submitted an application through the Department of Defense (DOD) Physical Disability Board of Review (PDBR) MH Special Review Panel (SRP).
CONSIDERATION OF EVIDENCE:
1. The PDBR SRP conducted a comprehensive review of the applicant's submissions and records for evidence of inappropriate changes in the diagnosis of a MH condition during processing through the military disability system.
2. The DOD memorandum, dated 27 February 2013, directed the Service Secretaries to conduct a review of MH diagnoses for service members completing a disability evaluation process between 11 September 2001 and 30 April 2012 to determine if service members were disadvantaged by a changed diagnosis over the course of their physical disability process.
3. In the processing of this case, an advisory opinion was obtained from the PDBR SRP and the applicant was provided a copy.
4. The applicant did not respond to the advisory opinion.
DISCUSSION AND CONCLUSIONS:
1. After a comprehensive review of the applicant's case, the SRP determined by unanimous vote that there should be no change to the applicant's disability and separation determination.
2. The SRP considered the appropriateness of changes in the MH diagnoses; whether the provisions of the Department of Veterans Affairs Schedule for Rating Disabilities (VASRD), section 4.129 were applicable; and a disability rating recommendation in accordance with VASRD, section 4.130.
3. The SRP first determined the diagnoses of adjustment disorder with disturbance of emotions and conduct had not been changed to the applicant's disadvantage during his processing through the Disability Evaluation System (DES). The prior diagnosis of chronic major depression appeared to have already been changed prior to the beginning of the DES process. The SRP therefore concluded the applicant's case did not appear to meet the inclusion criteria in the Terms of Reference for the MH Review Project.
4. The physical evaluation board determined the adjustment disorder did not constitute a physical disability and was not ratable in the absence of an underlying ratable causative disorder as specified in DOD Instruction 1332.38, dated 14 November 1996, enclosure 5.1.3.9.4. The applicant was separated on 22 November 2011 with a combined disability rating of 20 percent for the non-MH conditions.
5. The SRP then turned to the question of fitness. The commander's statement reflected only the applicant's physical disabilities with no indication that an MH issue affected his ability to fulfill duty requirements and affirmed on the questionnaire that the applicant had effective work relationships with both supervisors and co-workers. There were no physical profile factors other than S1 and the narrative summary noted his adjustment disorder (diagnosis 4) met retention standards.
6. The SRP concluded that the preponderance of evidence did not support either a change in diagnosis or any MH condition rising to the level of being unfit at the time of separation.
7. The available evidence shows the SRP's assessment should be accepted.
BOARD VOTE:
________ ________ ________ GRANT FULL RELIEF
________ ________ ________ GRANT PARTIAL RELIEF
________ ________ ________ GRANT FORMAL HEARING
___X___ ___X____ ___X____ DENY APPLICATION
BOARD DETERMINATION/RECOMMENDATION:
The evidence presented does not demonstrate the existence of a probable error or injustice. Therefore, the Board determined the overall merits of this case are insufficient as a basis for correction of the records of the individual concerned.
___________X______________
CHAIRPERSON
I certify that herein is recorded the true and complete record of the proceedings of the Army Board for Correction of Military Records in this case.
ABCMR Record of Proceedings (cont) AR20040003532
3
ARMY BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS
RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS
1
ABCMR Record of Proceedings (cont) AR20140000662
2
ARMY BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS
RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS
1
ARMY | BCMR | CY2014 | 20140009110
The applicant requests a review of the military disability evaluation pertaining to a mental health (MH) condition. The PDBR SRP conducted a comprehensive review of the applicant's submissions and records for evidence of inappropriate changes in the diagnosis of an MH condition during processing through the military disability system. The SRP also considered whether the MH condition, regardless of the specific diagnosis or associated symptoms, was unfitting for continued military service.
ARMY | BCMR | CY2014 | 20140011245
The applicant requests a review of the military disability evaluation pertaining to a mental health (MH) condition. The PDBR SRP conducted a comprehensive review of the applicant's submissions and records for evidence of inappropriate changes in the diagnosis of an MH condition during processing through the military disability system. The SRP consensus was that there was not a preponderance of evidence on which the SRP could base a recommendation for diagnosis change to PTSD.
ARMY | BCMR | CY2014 | 20140011245
The applicant requests a review of the military disability evaluation pertaining to a mental health (MH) condition. The PDBR SRP conducted a comprehensive review of the applicant's submissions and records for evidence of inappropriate changes in the diagnosis of an MH condition during processing through the military disability system. The SRP consensus was that there was not a preponderance of evidence on which the SRP could base a recommendation for diagnosis change to PTSD.
ARMY | BCMR | CY2014 | 20140010896
The PDBR SRP conducted a comprehensive review of the applicants submissions and records for evidence of inappropriate changes in the diagnosis of a mental health condition during processing through the military disability system. The SRP noted that while anxiety disorder, not otherwise specified (NOS) was documented as a diagnosis in March 2009, the diagnosis was changed to adjustment disorder by her providers in June 2009 and that was the diagnosis accepted in the narrative summary...
ARMY | BCMR | CY2014 | 20140006633
The applicant requests a review of the military disability evaluation pertaining to a mental health (MH) condition. The PDBR SRP conducted a comprehensive review of the applicants submissions and records for evidence of inappropriate changes in the diagnosis of a mental health condition during processing through the military disability system. The SRP reviewed the records for evidence of inappropriate changes in diagnosis of the MH condition during processing through the military...
ARMY | BCMR | CY2014 | 20140010504
The PDBR SRP conducted a comprehensive review of the applicants submissions and records for evidence of inappropriate changes in the diagnosis of a mental health condition during processing through the military disability system. The Department of Defense memorandum, dated 27 February 2013, directed the Service Secretaries to conduct a review of mental health diagnoses for service members completing a disability evaluation process between 11 September 2001 and 30 April 2012 in order to...
ARMY | BCMR | CY2014 | 20140016185
The PDBR SRP conducted a comprehensive review of the applicant's submissions and records for evidence of inappropriate changes in the diagnosis of an MH condition during processing through the military disability system. After a comprehensive review of the applicant's case, the SRP determined by unanimous vote that there should be no change of the applicant's Temporary Disability Retired List (TDRL) entry disability determination. The SRP reviewed the records for evidence of inappropriate...
ARMY | BCMR | CY2014 | 20140013564
The applicant states, in effect, the case file should be reviewed in accordance with the Secretary of Defense directive for a comprehensive review of members who were referred for a disability evaluation between 11 September 2001 and 30 April 2012 and whose MH diagnosis was changed during that process. The PDBR SRP conducted a comprehensive review of the applicants submissions and records for evidence of inappropriate changes in the diagnosis of a MH condition during processing through the...
ARMY | BCMR | CY2013 | 20130021731
The applicant submitted an application through the Department of Defense (DOD) Physical Disability Board of Review (PDBR) MH Special Review Panel (SRP). The PDBR SRP conducted a comprehensive review of the applicant's submissions and records for evidence of inappropriate changes in the diagnosis of an MH condition during processing through the military disability system. The SRP determined the applicant's MH conditions referred for review were not ratable by the PEB.
ARMY | BCMR | CY2014 | 20140011771
The PDBR SRP conducted a comprehensive review of the applicant's submissions and records for evidence of inappropriate changes in the diagnosis of an MH condition during processing through the military disability system. The SRP reviewed the records for evidence of inappropriate changes in diagnosis of the MH condition during processing through the military Disability Evaluation System (DES). The evidence of the available records shows the diagnosis of adjustment disorder, not otherwise...