Search Decisions

Decision Text

ARMY | BCMR | CY2014 | 20140000594
Original file (20140000594.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

		IN THE CASE OF:	  

		BOARD DATE:	  21 August 2014

		DOCKET NUMBER:  AR20140000594 


THE BOARD CONSIDERED THE FOLLOWING EVIDENCE:

1.  Application for correction of military records (with supporting documents provided, if any).

2.  Military Personnel Records and advisory opinions (if any).


THE APPLICANT'S REQUEST, STATEMENT, AND EVIDENCE:

1.  The applicant requests award of the Purple Heart.

2.  He states he was wounded during enemy action but never received the Purple Heart.  He always thought that the medics who treated him failed to turn in the request.  Some of the other men said the medics were drunk.  

3.  He adds that his platoon sergeant came into the bunker and pulled him out of the water.  As he regained consciousness he saw that the water he was in was blood red.  

4.  He asked the sergeant if he was injured and the sergeant replied that he was. The sergeant took out a handkerchief and placed it over the applicant's right eye. As it turned out a piece of shrapnel from a mortar hit him below the right eyebrow.  He has tried to get in contact with the other Soldiers who were there that night but most have died. 

5.  The applicant also states he was able to get in contact with one man named TLT from Rocky Mount, NC.  He talked to TLT shortly after TLT had surgery for prostate cancer.  TLT told him he thought the medics who treated him were drunk and that he would write a statement for the applicant.  He talked with TLT several times by phone then one night he received a call from TLT's wife who told him TLT had passed away. 

6.  The applicant provides his DD Form 214 (Armed Forces of the United States Report of Transfer or Discharge).
CONSIDERATION OF EVIDENCE:

1.  Title 10, U.S. Code, section 1552(b), provides that applications for correction of military records must be filed within 3 years after discovery of the alleged error or injustice.  This provision of law also allows the Army Board for Correction of Military Records (ABCMR) to excuse an applicant's failure to timely file within the 3-year statute of limitations if the ABCMR determines it would be in the interest of justice to do so.  While it appears the applicant did not file within the time frame provided in the statute of limitations, the ABCMR has elected to conduct a substantive review of this case and, only to the extent relief, if any, is granted, has determined it is in the interest of justice to excuse the applicant's failure to timely file.  In all other respects, there are insufficient bases to waive the statute of limitations for timely filing.

2.  The applicant enlisted in the Regular Army on 21 December 1967 for 3 years. He served in military occupational specialty 36K (Field Wireman). 

3.  His DA Form 20 (Enlisted Qualification Record) shows he served in Vietnam from 3 June 1968 to 16 August 1969.  Item 40 (Wounds) of this form is blank. 

4.  On 11 October 1970, he was honorably released from active duty and transferred to the U.S. Army Reserve.  He completed 2 years and 9 months of total active service.

5.  The applicant’s name does not appear on the Vietnam casualty roster showing he was wounded.

6.  A review of the Awards and Decorations Computer-Assisted Retrieval System, an index of general orders issued during the Vietnam era between 1965 and 1973 maintained by the Military Awards Branch of the United States Army Human Resources Command, failed to reveal any orders awarding him the Purple Heart.   

7.  Army Regulation 600-8-22 (Military Awards) states the Purple Heart is awarded for a wound sustained while in action against an enemy or as a result of hostile action.  Substantiating evidence must be provided to verify that the wound was the result of hostile action, the wound must have required treatment, and the medical treatment must have been made a matter of official record.  

DISCUSSION AND CONCLUSIONS:

1.  His request for award of the Purple Heart was carefully considered; however, it is not supported by the available evidence of record.  
2.  To be awarded the Purple Heart, substantiating evidence must be presented to show that the Soldier was wounded as the result of hostile action, the wound must have required treatment, and the medical treatment must have been made a matter of official record.

3.  Lacking any corroborating evidence of record such as official medical documentation, showing the applicant was treated for an injury that was the direct result of or caused by enemy action, the regulatory burden of proof necessary to support award of the Purple Heart has not been satisfied in this case.  Additionally, the applicant's name does not appear on the Vietnam casualty roster.

4.  In the absence of such evidence, there is an insufficient basis on which to grant the requested relief.  

BOARD VOTE:

________  ________  ________  GRANT FULL RELIEF 

________  ________  ________  GRANT PARTIAL RELIEF 

________  ________  ________  GRANT FORMAL HEARING

___x____  ____x___  ____x ___  DENY APPLICATION

BOARD DETERMINATION/RECOMMENDATION:

1.  The evidence presented does not demonstrate the existence of a probable error or injustice.  Therefore, the Board determined that the overall merits of this case are insufficient as a basis for correction of the records of the individual concerned.

2.  The applicant and all others concerned should know that this action in no way diminishes the sacrifices made by him in service to our Nation.  The applicant and all Americans should be justifiably proud of his service in arms.  



      _______ _   _x______   ___
               CHAIRPERSON
      
I certify that herein is recorded the true and complete record of the proceedings of the Army Board for Correction of Military Records in this case.


ABCMR Record of Proceedings (cont)                                         AR20140000594





3


ARMY BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS

 RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS


1

ABCMR Record of Proceedings (cont)                                         AR20140000594



2


ARMY BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS

 RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS


1

Similar Decisions

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2008 | 20080000677

    Original file (20080000677.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    The applicant states that he was wounded on 27 March 1968 when a rocket-propelled grenade (RPG) exploded next to him, causing his ears and nose to bleed and causing him to become momentarily blinded. This individual’s award citation noted in part, “ The platoon sergeant (i.e., the applicant) became momentarily disabled from an anti-tank round striking a few feet from him .” 7. Regrettably, without evidence to show that he was treated for those wounds there is insufficient evidence to...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2012 | 20120001330

    Original file (20120001330.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    The applicant did not provide any evidence. Title 10, U.S. Code, section 1552(b), provides that applications for correction of military records must be filed within 3 years after discovery of the alleged error or injustice. Notwithstanding the applicant's contention and his sincerity, in the absence of additional documentation that conclusively shows he was wounded or injured as a result of enemy action and treated for those wounds, there is insufficient evidence upon which to base award...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2011 | 20110016507

    Original file (20110016507.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    Item 40 (Wounds) of his DA Form 20 (Enlisted Qualification Record) does not show a combat wound and item 41 (Awards and Decorations) of this form does not show award of the Purple Heart. Substantiating evidence must be provided to verify that the wound was the result of hostile action, the wound must have required treatment by medical personnel, and the medical treatment must have been made a matter of official record: a. Notwithstanding his sincerity as well as that of his buddies, in the...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2014 | 20140017020

    Original file (20140017020.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    The communications center where the applicant was assigned was also under attack and explosions were occurring all around them. Army Regulation 600-8-22 (Military Awards) provides that the Purple Heart is awarded for a wound sustained as a result of hostile action. Based on these statements, it appears the applicant ran from the communications center during the mortar fire attack and ran into the wall surrounding the building and knocked himself unconscious.

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2013 | 20130005886

    Original file (20130005886.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    He thinks his captain made an error in not awarding him the Purple Heart [while he was serving in Vietnam]. Although the applicant may have received stitches to his head while he was serving in Vietnam, the evidence of record does not show and he has not provided any evidence that shows these stitches were the result of a wound that was incurred as a result of enemy action. In the absence of documentation that conclusively shows he was wounded or injured as a result of enemy action, there...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2009 | 20090005429

    Original file (20090005429.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    White phosphorus results in painful chemical burn injuries. If Soldiers are hit by pieces of white phosphorus, it could burn right down to the bone. In this case, the applicant’s name is not shown on the Vietnam casualty roster; his DA Form 20 does not indicate any combat wounds; his record is void of any orders that show he was awarded the Purple Heart; and his available medical records do not indicate he was wounded and/or injured as a result of hostile action.

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2008 | 20080018517

    Original file (20080018517.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    The applicant's records show he was inducted into the Army of the United States on 10 June 1969. The applicant's contention that he was wounded in the Republic of Vietnam and the supporting witness statement he submitted were carefully considered; however, there is insufficient evidence to support award of the Purple Heart to the applicant in this case. There are no general orders that show the applicant was awarded the Purple Heart and there is no evidence in his service personnel records...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2009 | 20090011273

    Original file (20090011273.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    However, there is no evidence in the applicant's service personnel records that shows he was wounded or injured as a result of hostile action and/or treated for such wounds. The statement submitted by the applicant's former unit member is insufficient by itself to support an award of the Purple Heart in this case. Absent evidence which conclusively shows that the applicant sustained wounds or injuries as a result of hostile action or as a result of "friendly fire" in the "heat of battle,"...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2008 | 20080009009

    Original file (20080009009.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    The applicant provided statements from a former combat medic with the 82nd Airborne in Vietnam. Army Regulation 600-8-22 (Military Awards) provides, in pertinent part, that the Purple Heart is awarded for a wound sustained as a result of hostile action. The applicant states that he was wounded while engaged in enemy activity in Vietnam and that he was treated by a medic.

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2009 | 20090014568

    Original file (20090014568.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    Application for correction of military records (with supporting documents provided, if any). Item 24 does not show award of the Purple Heart. Army Regulation 600-8-22 (Military Awards) provides, in pertinent part, that the Purple Heart is awarded for a wound sustained while in action against an enemy or as a result of hostile action.