IN THE CASE OF:
BOARD DATE: 6 July 2012
DOCKET NUMBER: AR20120001330
THE BOARD CONSIDERED THE FOLLOWING EVIDENCE:
1. Application for correction of military records (with supporting documents provided, if any).
2. Military Personnel Records and advisory opinions (if any).
THE APPLICANT'S REQUEST, STATEMENT, AND EVIDENCE:
1. The applicant requests award of the Purple Heart.
2. The applicant states he feels he should receive it for the loss of hearing due to proximity to artillery. He served for 13 months in Vietnam, making frequent trips between landing zones, often staying the night. They were almost overrun by the enemy one night with heavy artillery and gunfire. He has not been able to hear clearly since that night. He has been suffering for 43 years.
3. The applicant did not provide any evidence.
CONSIDERATION OF EVIDENCE:
1. Title 10, U.S. Code, section 1552(b), provides that applications for correction of military records must be filed within 3 years after discovery of the alleged error or injustice. This provision of law also allows the Army Board for Correction of Military Records (ABCMR) to excuse an applicants failure to timely file within the 3-year statute of limitations if the ABCMR determines it would be in the interest of justice to do so. While it appears the applicant did not file within the time frame provided in the statute of limitations, the ABCMR has elected to conduct a substantive review of this case and, only to the extent relief, if any, is granted, has determined it is in the interest of justice to excuse the applicants failure to timely file. In all other respects, there are insufficient bases to waive the statute of limitations for timely filing.
2. The applicant enlisted in the Regular Army on 21 October 1966 and he held military occupational specialty 64B (Heavy Truck Driver). He served in Vietnam from on or about 17 April 1967 to on or about 26 March 1968. He was assigned to the 1st Battalion, 50th Infantry.
3. He was honorably released from active duty on 24 May 1969 and transferred to the U.S. Army Reserve. His DD Form 214 does not list the Purple Heart.
4. Nothing in six typical sources confirm he was wounded in action and/or treated for a combat injury/wound:
* Item 40 (Wounds) of his DA Form 20 (Enlisted Qualification Record) does not reflect a combat wound or injury
* Item 41 (Awards and Decorations) of his DA Form 20 does not show award of the Purple Heart.
* His records do not contain general orders authorizing him award of the Purple Heart
* His name is not shown on the Vietnam casualty roster
* His medical records are not available for review with this case
* A review of the Awards and Decorations Computer Assisted Retrieval System - an index of general orders issued during the Vietnam era between 1965 and 1973 and maintained by the U.S. Army Human Resources Command - failed to reveal Purple Heart orders for him
5. Army Regulation 600-8-22 (Military Awards) provides that the Purple Heart is awarded for a wound sustained while in action against and enemy or as a result of hostile action. Substantiating evidence must be provided to verify that the wound was the result of hostile action, the wound must have required treatment by medical personnel, and the medical treatment must have been made a matter of official record.
DISCUSSION AND CONCLUSIONS:
1. The criteria for the Purple Heart requires the submission of substantiating evidence to verify that the injury/wound was the result of hostile action, the injury/wound must have required medical treatment by medical personnel, and the medical treatment must have been made a matter of official record.
2. The applicant's service record is void of any evidence that shows he was wounded or injured as a result of combat. His name is not listed on the Vietnam casualty roster, and his DA Form 20 does not indicate he received a combat related wound. Additionally, his medical records, which are necessary to confirm that treatment was required, are not available for review.
3. Notwithstanding the applicant's contention and his sincerity, in the absence of additional documentation that conclusively shows he was wounded or injured as a result of enemy action and treated for those wounds, there is insufficient evidence upon which to base award of the Purple Heart in this case.
BOARD VOTE:
________ ________ ________ GRANT FULL RELIEF
________ ________ ________ GRANT PARTIAL RELIEF
________ ________ ________ GRANT FORMAL HEARING
____X____ ____X____ ____X____ DENY APPLICATION
BOARD DETERMINATION/RECOMMENDATION:
The evidence presented does not demonstrate the existence of a probable error or injustice. Therefore, the Board determined that the overall merits of this case are insufficient as a basis for correction of the records of the individual concerned.
_______ _ X_______ ___
CHAIRPERSON
I certify that herein is recorded the true and complete record of the proceedings of the Army Board for Correction of Military Records in this case.
ABCMR Record of Proceedings (cont) AR20120001330
3
ARMY BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS
RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS
1
ABCMR Record of Proceedings (cont) AR20120001330
2
ARMY BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS
RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS
1
ARMY | BCMR | CY2009 | 20090011273
However, there is no evidence in the applicant's service personnel records that shows he was wounded or injured as a result of hostile action and/or treated for such wounds. The statement submitted by the applicant's former unit member is insufficient by itself to support an award of the Purple Heart in this case. Absent evidence which conclusively shows that the applicant sustained wounds or injuries as a result of hostile action or as a result of "friendly fire" in the "heat of battle,"...
ARMY | BCMR | CY2012 | 20120023034
IN THE CASE OF: BOARD DATE: 8 August 2013 DOCKET NUMBER: AR20120023034 THE BOARD CONSIDERED THE FOLLOWING EVIDENCE: 1. Application for correction of military records (with supporting documents provided, if any). Notwithstanding the applicant's contention and his sincerity, there is insufficient evidence upon which to base award of the Purple Heart in the absence of additional documentation that conclusively shows he was wounded or injured as a result of enemy action.
ARMY | BCMR | CY2011 | 20110016507
Item 40 (Wounds) of his DA Form 20 (Enlisted Qualification Record) does not show a combat wound and item 41 (Awards and Decorations) of this form does not show award of the Purple Heart. Substantiating evidence must be provided to verify that the wound was the result of hostile action, the wound must have required treatment by medical personnel, and the medical treatment must have been made a matter of official record: a. Notwithstanding his sincerity as well as that of his buddies, in the...
ARMY | BCMR | CY2008 | 20080014677
The applicant requests award of the Purple Heart for an injury documented in his medical records, dated 29 January 1971. Title 10, U.S. Code, section 1552(b), provides that applications for correction of military records must be filed within 3 years after discovery of the alleged error or injustice. Therefore, there is insufficient evidence on which to base award of the Purple Heart in this case.
ARMY | BCMR | CY2010 | 20100019105
Army Regulation 672-5-1 (Military Awards), in effect at the time, states the Army Good Conduct Medal is awarded to individuals who have completed a qualified period of active duty enlisted service. The evidence of record shows he was awarded the Vietnam Service Medal. As a result, the Board recommends that all Department of the Army records of the individual concerned be corrected by: a. awarding him the Army Good Conduct Medal (1st Award) for exemplary behavior, efficiency, and fidelity...
ARMY | BCMR | CY2008 | 20080018517
The applicant's records show he was inducted into the Army of the United States on 10 June 1969. The applicant's contention that he was wounded in the Republic of Vietnam and the supporting witness statement he submitted were carefully considered; however, there is insufficient evidence to support award of the Purple Heart to the applicant in this case. There are no general orders that show the applicant was awarded the Purple Heart and there is no evidence in his service personnel records...
ARMY | BCMR | CY2013 | 20130005886
He thinks his captain made an error in not awarding him the Purple Heart [while he was serving in Vietnam]. Although the applicant may have received stitches to his head while he was serving in Vietnam, the evidence of record does not show and he has not provided any evidence that shows these stitches were the result of a wound that was incurred as a result of enemy action. In the absence of documentation that conclusively shows he was wounded or injured as a result of enemy action, there...
ARMY | BCMR | CY2010 | 20100017690
He was treated for his shrapnel wound and other injuries and was released with his medical records to his unit. In this case, the applicant's name is not shown on the Vietnam casualty roster, his DA Form 20 does not reflect a combat wound, his record is void of any orders that show he was awarded the Purple Heart, and there is no conclusive evidence in his service personnel records that shows he was wounded or injured as a result of hostile action or treated for such wounds. There is no...
ARMY | BCMR | CY2012 | 20120011257
His service medical records are not available for review with this case and there is no evidence in his available record that shows he was wounded as a result of hostile action while serving in Vietnam. The applicant provides: a. Notwithstanding the applicant's sincerity or the sincerity of his former unit members, there is an insufficient evidentiary basis upon which to award the applicant the Purple Heart in the absence of documentation that conclusively shows he was wounded or injured...
ARMY | BCMR | CY2010 | 20100017003
His record is void of any orders that show he was awarded the Purple Heart, his name is not shown on the Vietnam casualty roster, his DA Form 20 does not indicate any combat wounds, and his medical records are not available for review with this case. Notwithstanding his sincerity, in the absence of official documentary evidence such as operation orders, morning reports, after action reports, official orders to corroborate the events that led to his alleged injury, or additional...