Search Decisions

Decision Text

ARMY | BCMR | CY2014 | 20140000324
Original file (20140000324.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

		IN THE CASE OF:	

		BOARD DATE:	    19 February 2014

		DOCKET NUMBER:  AR20140000324 


THE BOARD CONSIDERED THE FOLLOWING EVIDENCE:

1.  Application for correction of military records (with supporting documents provided, if any).

2.  Military Personnel Records and advisory opinions (if any).


THE APPLICANT'S REQUEST, STATEMENT, AND EVIDENCE:

1.  The applicant requests a review of the military disability evaluation pertaining to a mental health condition.

2.  The applicant states, in effect, the case file should be reviewed in accordance with the Secretary of Defense directive for a comprehensive review of members who were referred for a disability evaluation between 11 September 2001 and 
30 April 2012 and whose mental health diagnosis was changed during that process.

3.  The applicant submitted an application through the DOD Physical Disability Board of Review (PDBR) Mental Health Special Review Panel (SRP).

CONSIDERATION OF EVIDENCE:

1.  The PDBR SRP conducted a comprehensive review of the applicant’s submissions and records for evidence of inappropriate changes in the diagnosis of a mental health condition during processing through the military disability system.  

2.  The Department of Defense memorandum, dated 27 February 2013, directed the Service Secretaries to conduct a review of mental health diagnoses for service members completing a disability evaluation process between 11 September 2001 and 30 April 2012 in order to determine if service members were disadvantaged by a changed diagnosis over the course of their physical disability process.
3.  In the processing of this case, an advisory opinion was obtained from the PDBR SRP and the applicant was provided a copy.

4.  The applicant did not respond to the advisory opinion.  

DISCUSSION AND CONCLUSIONS:

1.  After a comprehensive review of the applicant's case, the SRP determined by unanimous vote that there be no change to the applicant’s disability and retirement determination.

2.  The SRP determined that no mental health (MH) diagnoses were changed to the applicant's possible disadvantage in the disability evaluation process and that he did not meet the inclusion criteria in the Terms of Reference of the MH Review Project.

3.  The SRP reviewed the entire applicant’s record for evidence that a rating greater that 50 percent should have been granted at Temporary Disability Retired List (TDRL) entrance.  The SRP agreed that the applicant did not meet the rating criteria for the next higher 70 percent rating at entry onto the TDRL.  Additionally, the Physical Evaluation Board (PEB) assigned a permanent disability rating of 50 percent based on that TDRL interim evaluation.  The SRP reviewed the applicant’s record for evidence that the next higher 70 percent rating should have been granted.  

4.  After due deliberation in consideration of the preponderance of the evidence, the SRP concluded that based on the entirety of the record there was no reasonable doubt that a disability rating greater than 50 percent at TDRL exit can be supported by the evidence present for review.

5.  The available evidence shows the SRP's assessment should be accepted.

BOARD VOTE:

________  ________  ________  GRANT FULL RELIEF 

________  ________  ________  GRANT PARTIAL RELIEF 

________  ________  ________  GRANT FORMAL HEARING

___X____  ___X____  ___X____  DENY APPLICATION



BOARD DETERMINATION/RECOMMENDATION:

The evidence presented does not demonstrate the existence of a probable error or injustice.  Therefore, the Board determined the overall merits of this case are insufficient as a basis for correction of the records of the individual concerned.  



      __________X_____________
       	   CHAIRPERSON
      
I certify that herein is recorded the true and complete record of the proceedings of the Army Board for Correction of Military Records in this case.

ABCMR Record of Proceedings (cont)                                         AR20040003532



3


ARMY BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS

 RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS


1

ABCMR Record of Proceedings (cont)                                  AR20140000324



2


ARMY BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS

 RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS


1

Similar Decisions

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2014 | 20140011160

    Original file (20140011160.txt) Auto-classification: Approved

    The PDBR SRP conducted a comprehensive review of the applicant’s submissions and records for evidence of inappropriate changes in the diagnosis of a MH condition during processing through the military disability system. After a comprehensive review of the applicant’s case, the SRP recommended by unanimous vote that there should be no change in the applicant’s unfitting condition diagnosis and his prior determination be modified as follows: Temporary Disability Retirement (TDRL) at 50...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2014 | 20140001859

    Original file (20140001859.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    The applicant requests a review of the military disability evaluation pertaining to a mental health (MH) condition. The PDBR SRP conducted a comprehensive review of the applicant’s submissions and records for evidence of inappropriate changes in the diagnosis of an MH condition during processing through the military disability system. The SRP determined that since the Physical Evaluation Board (PEB) placed the applicant on the TDRL with a rating greater than 50 percent, the provisions of...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2014 | 20140016190

    Original file (20140016190.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    The applicant states, in effect, the case file should be reviewed in accordance with the Secretary of Defense directive for a comprehensive review of members who were referred for a disability evaluation between 11 September 2001 and 30 April 2012, and whose MH diagnosis was changed during that process. The PDBR SRP conducted a comprehensive review of the applicant's submissions and records for evidence of inappropriate changes in the diagnosis of an MH condition during processing through...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2015 | 20150014152

    Original file (20150014152.txt) Auto-classification: Approved

    The PDBR SRP conducted a comprehensive review of the applicant's submissions and records for evidence of inappropriate changes in the diagnosis of an MH condition during processing through the military disability system. The SRP reviewed the records for evidence of inappropriate changes in diagnosis of the MH condition during processing through the disability evaluation system (DES). The higher 70 percent rating is for “Occupational and social impairment, with deficiencies in most areas.”...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2014 | 20140011238

    Original file (20140011238.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    The applicant requests a review of the military disability evaluation pertaining to a mental health (MH) condition. The SRP noted the higher 70 percent rating was for “occupational and social impairment, with deficiencies in most areas, such as work, school, family relations, judgment, thinking, or mood.” Available treatment records at the time leading up to TDRL entry recorded a history of suicidal ideation without plan or intent, but no visits to the emergency room and no psychiatric...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2015 | 20150003882

    Original file (20150003882.txt) Auto-classification: Approved

    The SRP recommended no change to the physical evaluation board (PEB) adjudication of the permanent retirement rating of 30 percent for the unfitting mental health condition. The SRP reviewed the records for evidence of inappropriate changes in diagnosis of the applicant's MH condition during processing through the military Integrated Disability Evaluation System (IDES). The SRP noted that the PEB assigned a disability rating of 30 percent without application of VASRD Section 4.129 (Mental...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2014 | 20140009057

    Original file (20140009057.txt) Auto-classification: Approved

    The applicant requests a review of the military disability evaluation pertaining to a mental health (MH) condition. The PDBR SRP conducted a comprehensive review of the applicant’s submissions and records for evidence of inappropriate changes in the diagnosis of a mental health condition during processing through the military disability system. The SRP further agreed that physical evaluation board (PEB) adjudication of unfitting PTSD was supported by the evidence; therefore, the diagnosis...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2014 | 20140003670

    Original file (20140003670.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    The SRP reviewed the records for evidence of inappropriate changes in diagnosis of the MH condition during processing through the military disability evaluation system and determined the MH diagnosis was not changed to the applicant's possible disadvantage in the disability evaluation. The SRP questioned the C&P examiner's conclusion regarding financial management competency, given the subsequent assessment and conclusions by the NARSUM psychiatrist (including a Global Assessment of...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2014 | 20140002867

    Original file (20140002867.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    The PDBR SRP conducted a comprehensive review of the applicant’s submissions and records for evidence of inappropriate changes in the diagnosis of a MH condition during processing through the military disability system. The SRP considered the appropriateness of changes in the MH diagnoses, the physical evaluation board (PEB) fitness determination; and if unfitting, whether the provisions of VASRD Section 4.129 were applicable, and a disability rating recommendation in accordance with VASRD...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2015 | 20150007334

    Original file (20150007334.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    The applicant submitted an application through the DOD Physical Disability Board of Review (PDBR) MH Special Review Panel (SRP). The PDBR SRP conducted a comprehensive review of the applicant’s submissions and records for evidence of inappropriate changes in the diagnosis of a MH condition during processing through the military disability system. There was no evidence of impairment in thinking, and although poor judgment was recorded in the removal examination, this opinion was directly...