Search Decisions

Decision Text

ARMY | BCMR | CY2014 | 20140000181
Original file (20140000181.txt) Auto-classification: Approved

		
		BOARD DATE:	  9 September 2014

		DOCKET NUMBER:  AR20140000181 


THE BOARD CONSIDERED THE FOLLOWING EVIDENCE:

1.  Application for correction of military records (with supporting documents provided, if any).

2.  Military Personnel Records and advisory opinions (if any).


THE APPLICANT'S REQUEST, STATEMENT, AND EVIDENCE:

1.  The applicant requests correction of his DD Form 214 (Armed Forces of the United States Report of Transfer or Discharge) for the period ending 21 November 1973 to show:

	a.  his small arms training (apparently he means marksmanship qualification badges) and

	b.  he held military occupational specialties (MOS's) "R1B2O" and "R2B2O."

2.  The applicant states these items are not shown on his DD Form 214 and records.

3.  The applicant provides:

* DD Form 214
* DA Form 20 (Enlisted Qualification Record)
* letter from a Member of Congress, dated 1 November 2013

CONSIDERATION OF EVIDENCE:

1.  Title 10, U.S. Code, section 1552(b), provides that applications for correction of military records must be filed within 3 years after discovery of the alleged error or injustice.  This provision of law also allows the Army Board for Correction of Military Records (ABCMR) to excuse an applicant's failure to timely file within the 3-year statute of limitations if the ABCMR determines it would be in the interest of justice to do so.  While it appears the applicant did not file within the time frame provided in the statute of limitations, the ABCMR has elected to conduct a substantive review of this case and, only to the extent relief, if any, is granted, has determined it is in the interest of justice to excuse the applicant's failure to timely file.  In all other respects, there are insufficient bases to waive the statute of limitations for timely filing.

2.  The applicant enlisted in the Regular Army on 9 April 1968 for a period of 3 years.  He completed his training and was awarded MOS 91A (medical corpsman).

3.  Item 29 (Qualification in Arms) of the DA Form 20 contained in his records shows he qualified as Sharpshooter with the M-14 rifle on 16 May 1968.  There are no other entries in this item.  Item 41 (Awards and Decorations) of this 
DA Form 20 shows entitlement to the Sharpshooter Marksmanship Qualification Badge with Rifle Bar (M-14).  No other marksmanship qualification badges are shown in this item.

4.  Headquarters, U.S. Army Training Center and Fort Leonard Wood, Special Orders Number 144, dated 23 May 1968, awarded him the Sharpshooter Marksmanship Qualification Badge with Rifle Bar (M-14).

5.  Item 29 of the DA Form 20 provided by the applicant shows a second entry which indicates he qualified as Marksman with the .45 caliber pistol in July 1970.  However, there are no orders for this marksmanship qualification badge in the available records.  Item 41 of this DA Form 20 shows entitlement to the Sharpshooter Marksmanship Qualification Badge with Pistol Bar.

6.  Headquarters, U.S. Army Hospital, Special Orders Number 181, dated 14 October 1968, awarded him primary MOS 91B2O (medical specialist) and primary MOS 91A1O was withdrawn.

7.  He arrived in Vietnam on 27 February 1969 and he was assigned to the 36th Evacuation Hospital as a medical specialist on 3 March 1969.  He was honorably discharged on 21 November 1969 for immediate reenlistment.  He reenlisted on 22 November 1969 for a period of 4 years.  He departed Vietnam on 28 November 1969.

8.  He arrived in Vietnam for his second tour of duty on 26 July 1970.  He was assigned to Headquarters and Headquarters Company, 1st Battalion, 7th Cavalry Regiment, from 12 August 1970 to 25 July 1971.

9.  Headquarters, 3d Brigade (Separate), General Orders Number 1410, dated 26 July 1971, awarded him the Army Commendation Medal (ARCOM).

10.  Records show he participated in five campaigns during his assignments in Vietnam.  

11.  On 21 November 1973, he was honorably released from active duty.

12.  His DD Form 214 for the period ending 21 November 1973 shows he was awarded or authorized the:

* Bronze Star Medal
* Army Good Conduct Medal (2nd Award)
* Air Medal (2nd Award)
* Combat Medical Badge
* National Defense Service Medal
* Republic of Vietnam Campaign Medal with Device (1960)
* Vietnam Service Medal
* two overseas service bars

13.  Item 23a (Specialty Number and Title) of his DD Form 214 for this period shows the entry "91B2O Medical Specialist."

14.  Army Regulation 600-8-22 (Military Awards) sets forth requirements for award of basic marksmanship qualification badges.  The qualification badge is awarded to indicate the degree – Expert, Sharpshooter, and Marksman – in which an individual has qualified in a prescribed record course.  An appropriate bar is furnished to denote each weapon with which the individual has qualified.

15.  Army Regulation 600-8-22 states a bronze service star is worn on the appropriate service ribbon for each credited campaign, including the Vietnam Service Medal.  A silver service star is authorized in lieu of five bronze service stars.

16.  Department of the Army Pamphlet 672-3 (Unit Citation and Campaign Participation Credit Register) lists the awards received by units serving in Vietnam.  This pamphlet shows the 1st Battalion, 7th Cavalry Regiment, was cited for award of the:

* Republic of Vietnam Gallantry Cross with Palm Unit Citation for actions during the period 21 February 1970 to 28 February 1971 in Department of the Army General Orders Number 42, dated 1972
* Republic of Vietnam Gallantry Cross with Palm Unit Citation for actions during the period 17 September 1965 to June 1971 in Department of the Army General Orders Number 54, dated 1974

17.  Department of the Army Pamphlet 672-3 states not more than one Republic of Vietnam Gallantry Cross Unit Citation will be worn by any individual.  Although multiple awards of this unit citation are not authorized for wear, official military and historical records will indicate all awards received.  However, where a single unit received duplicate Vietnamese unit awards during the same period of time, only one award will be recorded in official military and historical records.

18.  The governing regulation for MOS's does not show "R1B2O" or "R2B2O" as authorized MOS's.

DISCUSSION AND CONCLUSIONS:

1.  Orders show the applicant was awarded the Sharpshooter Marksmanship Qualification Badge with Rifle Bar (M-14).  Therefore, his DD Form 214 for the period ending 21 November 1973 should be corrected to show this marksmanship badge.

2.  There are no orders for the Marksman Marksmanship Qualification Badge with Pistol Bar or Sharpshooter Marksmanship Qualification Badge with Pistol Bar in the available records and the record copy of his DA Form 20 does not show these qualifications.  In the absence of orders, the entries on the DA Form 20 he provided which shows he qualified as Marksman and Sharpshooter with the .45 caliber pistol alone are not sufficient as a basis for adding this marksmanship qualification badge to his DD Form 214 for the period ending 21 November 1973.

3.  Since the governing regulation for MOS's does not show "R1B2O" or "R2B2O" as authorized MOS's, there is no basis for amending item 23a of his DD Form 214 for the period ending 21 November 1973.

4.  Orders show he was awarded the ARCOM.  Therefore, his DD Form 214 for the period ending 21 November 1973 should be corrected to show this medal.

5.  He participated in five campaigns during his service in Vietnam which entitles him to one silver service star with his Vietnam Service Medal.  Therefore, his DD Form 214 for the period ending 21 November 1973 should be corrected to show this service star.


6.  His unit in Vietnam was cited for two awards of the Republic of Vietnam Gallantry Cross with Palm Unit Citation while he was assigned to the unit.  However, the period for the first award is entirely contained within the period for the second award.  Therefore, his DD Form 214 for the period ending 21 November 1973 should be corrected to show only one unit award.

BOARD VOTE:

________  ________  ________  GRANT FULL RELIEF 

___x_____  __x______  __x___  GRANT PARTIAL RELIEF 

________  ________  ________  GRANT FORMAL HEARING

________  ________  ________  DENY APPLICATION

BOARD DETERMINATION/RECOMMENDATION:

1.  The Board determined the evidence presented is sufficient to warrant a recommendation for partial relief.  As a result, the Board recommends that all Department of the Army records of the individual concerned be corrected by adding the following awards to his DD Form 214 for the period ending 21 November 1973:

* ARCOM
* Republic of Vietnam Gallantry Cross with Palm Unit Citation
* Sharpshooter Marksmanship Qualification Badge with Rifle Bar (M-14)
* one silver service star with his already-awarded Vietnam Service Medal

2.  The Board further determined the evidence presented is insufficient to warrant a portion of the requested relief.  As a result, the Board recommends denial of so much of the application that pertains to amending item 23a of his DD Form 214 for the period ending 21 November 1973 or adding award of the Marksman Marksmanship Qualification Badge with Pistol Bar.



      __________x_______________
                  CHAIRPERSON
      
I certify that herein is recorded the true and complete record of the proceedings of the Army Board for Correction of Military Records in this case.

ABCMR Record of Proceedings (cont)                                         AR20140000181



3


ARMY BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS

 RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS


1

ABCMR Record of Proceedings (cont)                                         AR20140000181



5


ARMY BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS

 RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS


1

Similar Decisions

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2010 | 20100013967

    Original file (20100013967.txt) Auto-classification: Approved

    Application for correction of military records (with supporting documents provided, if any). The applicant provides his DD Form 214. The evidence of record also shows he was awarded the Vietnam Service Medal.

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2005 | 20050003356C070206

    Original file (20050003356C070206.doc) Auto-classification: Approved

    The applicant's DD Form 214 for the period ending 12 December 1967 shows the Vietnam Service Medal, the National Defense Service Medal, the Vietnam Campaign Medal, the first award of the Good Conduct Medal, and the Sharpshooter Marksmanship Qualification Badge with Rifle Bar as authorized awards. As a result, the Board recommends that all Department of the Army records of the individual concerned be corrected by: a. deleting the entry in item 10a on his DD Form 214 for the period ending 20...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2006 | 20060013076

    Original file (20060013076.txt) Auto-classification: Approved

    The applicant requests, in effect, correction of his Report of Separation from Active Duty (DD Form 214) to show his seven awards of the Army Good Conduct Medal and to remove the duplicate award of the National Defense Service Medal. Army Regulation 672-5-1, in effect at the time, provides that the Army Good Conduct Medal is awarded to individuals who have completed a qualified period of active duty enlisted service. As a result, the Board recommends that all Department of the Army records...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2006 | 20060000142C070205

    Original file (20060000142C070205.doc) Auto-classification: Approved

    The applicant’s DD Form 214 for the period ending 30 September 1970 shows the National Defense Service Medal, the Vietnam Service Medal, the Republic of Vietnam Campaign Medal with Device 1960, the Combat Infantryman Badge, and the Sharpshooter Marksmanship Qualification Badge with Rifle Bar as authorized awards. The applicant’s DD Form 214 for the period ending 26 October 1973 shows the National Defense Service Medal, the Vietnam Service Medal with one bronze service star, the Republic of...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2011 | 20110010023

    Original file (20110010023.txt) Auto-classification: Approved

    The applicant states he was wounded in action in the Republic of Vietnam (RVN); however, his records do not show award of the Purple Heart. The applicant served a qualifying period of active enlisted service for the first award of the Army Good Conduct Medal from 8 November 1965 to 7 November 1968. a. As a result, the Board recommends that all Department of the Army records of the individual concerned be corrected by: a. awarding him the Purple Heart for wounds received in action in the...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2008 | 20080006117

    Original file (20080006117.txt) Auto-classification: Approved

    He then served in principal duty as a Supply Sergeant (Duty MOS 76Y), Headquarters and Headquarters Battery, Division Artillery, 1st Infantry Division (USARPAC, RVN) on 22 October 1969 until his departure from the RVN on 3 March 1970; d. Item 39 (Campaigns) shows he participated in the Tet 69 Counteroffensive, 1969 campaign; and e. Item 41 (Awards and Decorations) shows the applicant was authorized the Army Commendation Medal, National Defense Service Medal, Vietnam Service Medal, Republic...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2014 | 20140011856

    Original file (20140011856.txt) Auto-classification: Approved

    The DD Form 214 he was issued shows in: * item 22c (Foreign and/or Sea Service) - he had 11 months and 28 days of foreign service * item 24 (Decorations, Medals, Badges, Commendations, Citations and Campaign Ribbons Awarded or Authorized) - the National Defense Service Medal * item 30 (Remarks) does not show the dates of any foreign service 5. Therefore, his DD Form 214 should be corrected to show these unit awards. As a result, the Board recommends that all Department of the Army records...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2012 | 20120021601

    Original file (20120021601.txt) Auto-classification: Approved

    The applicant requests correction of his DD Form 214 (Armed Forces of the United States Report of Transfer or Discharge) to show award of the Purple Heart. However, he contends he was awarded the Purple Heart and provides a USARV Casualty Report that clearly shows he sustained an injury on 6 December 1970 that was caused by the enemy and that also shows he was treated at the 93rd Evacuation Hospital in Vietnam. As a result, the Board recommends that all Department of the Army records of...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2007 | 20070017465

    Original file (20070017465.txt) Auto-classification: Approved

    Army Regulation 672-5-1, in effect at the time, provided that the Army Good Conduct Medal was awarded to individuals who had completed a qualified period of active duty enlisted service. The applicant’s records clearly show that he distinguished himself in the performance of his duties during his initial 3 year period of service as evidenced by award of the Bronze Star Medal, Army Commendation Medal, Combat Infantryman Badge, and Parachutist Badge. As a result, the Board recommends that...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2012 | 20120020890

    Original file (20120020890.txt) Auto-classification: Approved

    The evidence of record shows the applicant completed a period of honorable service wherein he received all "excellent" conduct and efficiency ratings with no convictions by a court-martial. Therefore, it would be appropriate at this time to award him the Army Good Conduct Medal (1st Award) for the period 23 November 1971 through 21 November 1973 and to correct his DD Form 214 to show this award. As a result, the Board recommends that all Department of the Army records of the individual...