Search Decisions

Decision Text

ARMY | BCMR | CY2014 | 20140000151
Original file (20140000151.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

		IN THE CASE OF: 

		BOARD DATE:	  26 August 2014

		DOCKET NUMBER:  AR20140000151 


THE BOARD CONSIDERED THE FOLLOWING EVIDENCE:

1.  Application for correction of military records (with supporting documents provided, if any).

2.  Military Personnel Records and advisory opinions (if any).


THE APPLICANT'S REQUEST, STATEMENT, AND EVIDENCE:

1.  The applicant requests amendment of his reentry eligibility (RE) code.

2.  The applicant states, in effect:

* he turned himself in from being absent without leave (AWOL)
* he cannot get a good job
* he wants to enlist

3.  The applicant provides no additional evidence.

CONSIDERATION OF EVIDENCE:

1.  Title 10, U.S. Code, section 1552(b), provides that applications for correction of military records must be filed within 3 years after discovery of the alleged error or injustice.  This provision of law also allows the Army Board for Correction of Military Records (ABCMR) to excuse an applicant's failure to timely file within the 3-year statute of limitations if the ABCMR determines it would be in the interest of justice to do so.  While it appears the applicant did not file within the time frame provided in the statute of limitations, the ABCMR has elected to conduct a substantive review of this case and, only to the extent relief, if any, is granted, has determined it is in the interest of justice to excuse the applicant's failure to timely file.  In all other respects, there are insufficient bases to waive the statute of limitations for timely filing.

2.  The applicant enlisted in the Regular Army on 23 September 2008.  He completed his training and was awarded military occupational specialty 25U (signal support systems specialist).

3.  He was AWOL on 27 January 2009 and returned to military control on 9 March 2009.  On 23 March 2009, charges were preferred against him for the AWOL period.

4.  On 23 March 2009, he consulted with counsel and requested discharge for the good of the service in lieu of trial by court-martial under the provisions of Army Regulation 635-200 (Personnel Separations Active Duty Enlisted Administrative Separations), chapter 10.  He acknowledged that by submitting his request for discharge he was guilty of a charge against him that authorized the imposition of a bad conduct or dishonorable discharge.  He indicated in his request he understood he might be discharged under conditions other than honorable, he might be ineligible for many or all benefits administered by the Department of Veterans Affairs, he might be deprived of many or all Army benefits, and he might be ineligible for many or all benefits as a veteran under both Federal and State laws.  He acknowledged he might expect to encounter substantial prejudice in civilian life because of a discharge under other than honorable conditions.  He elected not to make a statement in his own behalf.

5.  On 9 April 2009, the separation authority approved the applicant's voluntary request for discharge and directed the issuance of an under other than honorable conditions discharge.

6.  On 1 May 2009, he was discharged for the good of the service in lieu of trial by court-martial under the provisions of Army Regulation 635-200, chapter 10, with his service characterized as under other than honorable conditions.  He completed 5 months and 27 days of creditable active service with 41 days of time lost.

7.  His DD Form 214 (Certificate of Release or Discharge from Active Duty) shows:

* item 25 (Separation Authority) – Army Regulation 635-200, chapter 10
* item 26 (Separation Code) – KFS
* item 27 (Reentry Code) – 4
* item 28 (Narrative Reason for Separation) – in lieu of trial by court-martial

8.  Army Regulation 601-210 (Active and Reserve Components Enlistment Program) covers eligibility criteria, policies, and procedures for enlistment and processing into the RA, USAR, and Army National Guard.  Table 3-1 includes a list of RE codes.

	a.  RE-1 applies to persons completing an initial term of active service who were fully qualified when last separated.

	b.  RE-3 applies persons who are not considered fully qualified for reentry or continuous service at the time of separation but disqualification is waivable.

	c.  RE-4 applies to Soldiers who are separated from their last period of service with a nonwaivable disqualification.  They are ineligible for enlistment.

9.  Army Regulation 635-5-1 (Separation Program Designator (SPD) Codes) prescribes the specific authorities (statutory or other directives), reasons for separating Soldiers from active duty, and the SPD codes to be entered on the DD Form 214.  SPD code KFS applies to Soldiers voluntarily discharged in lieu of trial by court-martial.

10.  The SPD/RE Code Cross Reference Table, dated 15 June 2006, shows that Soldiers assigned an SPD code of KFS will be assigned an RE code of 4.

DISCUSSION AND CONCLUSIONS:

1.  The applicant's contentions that he cannot get a good job and he wants to enlist were carefully considered.  However, the evidence of record confirms his RE code was assigned based on his discharge under the provisions of Army Regulation 635-200, chapter 10.  The RE code associated with this type of discharge is 4.  Therefore, the applicant received the appropriate RE code associated with his discharge and he is ineligible for enlistment.

2.  In view of the foregoing, there is no basis for granting the applicant's request.

BOARD VOTE:

________  ________  ________  GRANT FULL RELIEF 

________  ________  ________  GRANT PARTIAL RELIEF 

________  ________  ________  GRANT FORMAL HEARING

___X____  ___X___  ___X_____  DENY APPLICATION



BOARD DETERMINATION/RECOMMENDATION:

The evidence presented does not demonstrate the existence of a probable error or injustice.  Therefore, the Board determined the overall merits of this case are insufficient as a basis for correction of the records of the individual concerned.



      __________X____________
                  CHAIRPERSON

I certify that herein is recorded the true and complete record of the proceedings of the Army Board for Correction of Military Records in this case.

ABCMR Record of Proceedings (cont)                                         AR20140000151



3


ARMY BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS

 RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS


1

ABCMR Record of Proceedings (cont)                                         AR20140000151



2


ARMY BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS

 RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS


1

Similar Decisions

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2011 | 20110014940

    Original file (20110014940.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    In his request for discharge, he acknowledged he understood if the discharge request was approved, he might be discharged under other than honorable conditions. It states the SPD code KFS is the appropriate code to assign to Soldiers discharged in lieu of trial by court-martial under the provisions of Army Regulation 635-200, chapter 10. Chapter 3 of this regulation prescribes basic eligibility for prior service applicants for enlistment, and includes a list of Armed Forces reentry codes,...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2013 | 20130002981

    Original file (20130002981.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    On 25 May 2011, the separation authority approved the applicant's voluntary request for discharge and directed his discharge under other than honorable conditions. He was discharged under other than honorable conditions for the good of the service in lieu of trial by court-martial on 21 June 2011 under the provisions of Army Regulation 635-200, chapter 10. The evidence of record confirms the applicant's RE code was assigned based on his discharge under the provisions of Army Regulation...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2011 | 20110004755

    Original file (20110004755.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    Chapter 10 of the version in effect at the time provided that a member who committed an offense or offenses for which the authorized punishment included a punitive discharge, could submit a request for discharge for the good of the service at any time after court-martial charges were preferred. It states that the SPD code KFS is the appropriate code to assign to Soldiers separated under the provisions of Army Regulation 635-200, chapter 10, by reason of for the good of the service - in lieu...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2011 | 20110014222

    Original file (20110014222.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    The applicant requests correction of his DD Form 214 (Certificate of Release or Discharge from Active Duty) to show his reentry (RE) code as 1 vice 4 so he can enlist in any branch of the service without a waiver. In his request for discharge, he acknowledged he understood if the discharge request was approved, he might be discharged under other than honorable conditions. This regulation provides that prior to discharge or release from active duty individuals will be assigned RE codes...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2013 | 20130001880

    Original file (20130001880.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    THE APPLICANT'S REQUEST, STATEMENT, AND EVIDENCE: 1. On 19 February 2010, the separation authority approved the applicant's voluntary request for discharge and directed the issuance of an under other than honorable conditions discharge. Army Regulation 635-200 states that prior to discharge or release from active duty, individuals will be assigned RE codes based on their service records or the reason for discharge.

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2011 | 20110012977

    Original file (20110012977.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    He states: * he needs these codes changed so he can enlist in the Army * his discharge was upgraded from under other than honorable conditions (UOTHC) to uncharacterized * his wife was very ill with lupus at the time and she was unable to care for herself and their children 3. Army Regulation 635-200 states that individuals will be assigned RE codes based on their service records or the reason for discharge prior to discharge or release from active duty. The applicant's request that his RE...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2009 | 20090010658

    Original file (20090010658.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    THE APPLICANT'S REQUEST, STATEMENT, AND EVIDENCE: 1. On 9 January 2003, the Army Discharge Review Board denied the applicant's request for an honorable discharge. The applicant’s brief record of service included 41 days of lost time.

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2009 | 20090009712

    Original file (20090009712.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    However, his RE Code will not allow enlistment. Army Regulation 635-5-1 (Separation Program Designator (SPD) Codes) provides the specific authorities (regulatory or directive), reasons for separating Soldiers from active duty, and the SPD codes to be entered on the DD Form 214. The applicant's military service records show that he voluntarily requested discharge for the good of the service in lieu of trial by court-martial and acknowledged guilt of the charges against him.

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2011 | 20110012399

    Original file (20110012399.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    A DD Form 458 (Charge Sheet) shows the Commander, Personnel Control Facility, Fort Sill, OK, charged the applicant with one specification each of being AWOL from 4 August to 13 December 2009. On 17 December 2009, after consulting with counsel, he voluntarily requested discharge under the provisions of chapter 10, Army Regulation 635-200 (Personnel Separations - Enlisted Separations), for the good of the service in lieu of trial by court-martial. The regulation provides that prior to...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2011 | 20110020416

    Original file (20110020416.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    Incorporated herein by reference are military records which were summarized in the previous consideration of the applicant's case by the Army Board for Correction of Military Records (ABCMR) in Docket Number AR20100025407, on 14 April 2011. The regulation states the reason for discharge based on separation code "KFS" is "in lieu of trial by court-martial" and the regulatory authority is Army Regulation 635-200, chapter 10. The evidence of record shows the applicant was charged with and...