Search Decisions

Decision Text

ARMY | BCMR | CY2011 | 20110014940
Original file (20110014940.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

	

		BOARD DATE:	  19 January 2012

		DOCKET NUMBER:  AR20110014940 


THE BOARD CONSIDERED THE FOLLOWING EVIDENCE:

1.  Application for correction of military records (with supporting documents provided, if any).

2.  Military Personnel Records and advisory opinions (if any).


THE APPLICANT'S REQUEST, STATEMENT, AND EVIDENCE:

1.  The applicant requests correction of item 27 (Reentry (RE)) code of his DD Form 214 (Certificate of Release or Discharge from Active Duty) to show a
3 vice 4.

2.  The applicant states he believes his RE code should be upgraded from 4 to at least a 3.  He completed 6 weeks of basic training at Fort Knox, KY and went home on Christmas leave.  While on leave, he was informed his mother was diagnosed with cancer so he did not return to Kentucky as he wanted to spend as much time with his mother as possible.  His mother passed away of cancer on 3 December 2010.  He now wants to go back into the military, complete his training, and make things right.  He would like to serve his country.

3.  The applicant provides a certificate of death, four pages of medical records, and six pages of medical bills.

CONSIDERATION OF EVIDENCE:

1.  The applicant's records show he enlisted in the Regular Army on 5 November 2008.  He attended basic training while assigned to the 194th Armor Brigade, Fort Knox, KY.

2.  On 3 January 2009, he was reported absent without leave (AWOL) from his assigned unit and on 3 February 2009, he was dropped from the unit rolls.

3.  On 3 August 2009, he was apprehended by civil authorities and returned to military control on the same date.

4.  On 6 August 2009, court-martial charges were preferred against him for one specification of being AWOL from 3 January to 3 August 2009.

5.  On 6 August 2009, he consulted with legal counsel who advised him of the basis for the contemplated trial by court-martial for an offense punishable by a bad conduct or dishonorable discharge, the maximum permissible punishment authorized under the Uniform Code of Military Justice (UCMJ), the possible effects of an under other than honorable conditions discharge, and of the procedures and rights that were available to him.  Following consultation with legal counsel, he requested discharge for the good of the service in lieu of trial by court-martial under the provisions of Army Regulation 635-200 (Personnel Separations – Enlisted Personnel), chapter 10, in lieu of trial by court-martial.

6.  In his request for discharge, he acknowledged he understood if the discharge request was approved, he might be discharged under other than honorable conditions.  He also acknowledged he understood he might be deprived of many or all Army benefits, he might be ineligible for many or all benefits administered by the Department of Veterans Affairs, he might be deprived of his rights and benefits as a veteran under both Federal and State laws, and he might expect to encounter substantial prejudice in civilian life.

7.  On 28 September 2009, the separation authority approved the applicant's voluntary request for discharge and directed that he receive an under other than honorable conditions discharge.  On 19 October 2009, he was discharged accordingly.  He completed 4 months and 15 days of creditable active service and had 210 days of time lost due to being AWOL.

8.  The DD Form 214 he was issued confirms he was discharged under the provisions of Army Regulation 635-200, chapter 10, in lieu of trial by court with a character of service of under other than honorable conditions.  This DD Form 214 shows a separation program designator (SPD) code of "KFS" and an RE code of "4."

9.  The applicant provides a medical document that shows his mother was diagnosed with cancer on 2 October 2010.  He also provides a certificate of death that shows she died on 3 December 2010.

10.  Army Regulation 635-200 sets forth the basic authority for the separation of enlisted personnel.  Chapter 10 provides that a member who has committed an offense or offenses for which the authorized punishment includes a punitive discharge may submit a request for discharge for the good of the service in lieu of trial by court-martial.  The request may be submitted at any time after charges have been preferred and must include the individual's admission of guilt.  Although an honorable or general discharge is authorized, a discharge under other than honorable conditions is normally considered appropriate.

11.  Army Regulation 635-5-1 (SPD Codes) provides the specific authorities (regulatory or directive), reasons for separating Soldiers from active duty, and the SPD codes to be entered on the DD Form 214.  It states the SPD code KFS is the appropriate code to assign to Soldiers discharged in lieu of trial by court-martial under the provisions of Army Regulation 635-200, chapter 10.  The SPD/RE Code Cross Reference Table stipulates that an RE code of 4 will be assigned to members separated with an SPD code of KFS.

12.  Army Regulation 601-210 (Active and Reserve Components Enlistment Program) covers eligibility criteria, policies, and procedures for enlistment and processing into the RA and the United States Army Reserve.  This regulation provides that prior to discharge or release from active duty individuals will be assigned RE codes based on their service records or the reason for discharge.  Chapter 3 of this regulation prescribes basic eligibility for prior service applicants for enlistment, and includes a list of Armed Forces reentry codes, including RA RE codes.  Table 3-1 includes a list of the RA RE codes:

	a.  RE-1 applies to Soldiers completing their term of active service who are considered qualified to reenter the U.S. Army.  They are qualified for enlistment if all other criteria are met.

	b.  RE-3 applies to Soldiers who are not considered fully qualified for reentry or continuous service at time of separation, but disqualification is waivable.  They are ineligible unless a waiver is granted.

	c.  RE-4 applies to Soldiers who are separated with a nonwaivable disqualification.

DISCUSSION AND CONCLUSIONS:

The evidence of record shows the applicant was charged with the commission of an offense punishable under the UCMJ with a punitive discharge.  Discharges under the provisions of Army Regulation 635-200, chapter 10, are voluntary requests for discharge in lieu of trial by court-martial.  His assigned RE code of 
4 and SPD code of KFS were based on his narrative reason for discharge.  This is the only RE code permitted with an SPD code KFS.  The RE code is correctly entered on his DD Form 214.  Therefore, he is not entitled to the requested relief.
BOARD VOTE:

________  ________  ________  GRANT FULL RELIEF 

________  ________  ________  GRANT PARTIAL RELIEF 

________  ________  ________  GRANT FORMAL HEARING

___X_____  ___X_____  ___X__  DENY APPLICATION

BOARD DETERMINATION/RECOMMENDATION:

The evidence presented does not demonstrate the existence of a probable error or injustice.  Therefore, the Board determined that the overall merits of this case are insufficient as a basis for correction of the records of the individual concerned.



      _______ _ X  _______   ___
               CHAIRPERSON
      
I certify that herein is recorded the true and complete record of the proceedings of the Army Board for Correction of Military Records in this case.

ABCMR Record of Proceedings (cont)                                         AR20110014940



3


ARMY BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS

 RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS


1

ABCMR Record of Proceedings (cont)                                         AR20110014940



2


ARMY BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS

 RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS


1

Similar Decisions

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2009 | 20090020210

    Original file (20090020210.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    He was discharged on 14 November 2007 under the provisions of Army Regulation 635-200 (Personnel Separations - Enlisted Personnel), chapter 10, in lieu of trial by court-martial. The regulation states the reason for discharge based on separation code "KFS" is "in lieu of trial by court-martial" and the regulatory authority is Army Regulation 635-200, chapter 10. Army Regulation 635-200 states, in pertinent part, that prior to discharge or release from active duty, individuals will be...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2013 | 20130001880

    Original file (20130001880.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    THE APPLICANT'S REQUEST, STATEMENT, AND EVIDENCE: 1. On 19 February 2010, the separation authority approved the applicant's voluntary request for discharge and directed the issuance of an under other than honorable conditions discharge. Army Regulation 635-200 states that prior to discharge or release from active duty, individuals will be assigned RE codes based on their service records or the reason for discharge.

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2013 | 20130002981

    Original file (20130002981.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    On 25 May 2011, the separation authority approved the applicant's voluntary request for discharge and directed his discharge under other than honorable conditions. He was discharged under other than honorable conditions for the good of the service in lieu of trial by court-martial on 21 June 2011 under the provisions of Army Regulation 635-200, chapter 10. The evidence of record confirms the applicant's RE code was assigned based on his discharge under the provisions of Army Regulation...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2011 | 20110004755

    Original file (20110004755.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    Chapter 10 of the version in effect at the time provided that a member who committed an offense or offenses for which the authorized punishment included a punitive discharge, could submit a request for discharge for the good of the service at any time after court-martial charges were preferred. It states that the SPD code KFS is the appropriate code to assign to Soldiers separated under the provisions of Army Regulation 635-200, chapter 10, by reason of for the good of the service - in lieu...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2014 | 20140000151

    Original file (20140000151.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    On 23 March 2009, he consulted with counsel and requested discharge for the good of the service in lieu of trial by court-martial under the provisions of Army Regulation 635-200 (Personnel Separations Active Duty Enlisted Administrative Separations), chapter 10. However, the evidence of record confirms his RE code was assigned based on his discharge under the provisions of Army Regulation 635-200, chapter 10. Therefore, the applicant received the appropriate RE code associated with his...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2011 | 20110014222

    Original file (20110014222.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    The applicant requests correction of his DD Form 214 (Certificate of Release or Discharge from Active Duty) to show his reentry (RE) code as 1 vice 4 so he can enlist in any branch of the service without a waiver. In his request for discharge, he acknowledged he understood if the discharge request was approved, he might be discharged under other than honorable conditions. This regulation provides that prior to discharge or release from active duty individuals will be assigned RE codes...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2009 | 20090010658

    Original file (20090010658.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    THE APPLICANT'S REQUEST, STATEMENT, AND EVIDENCE: 1. On 9 January 2003, the Army Discharge Review Board denied the applicant's request for an honorable discharge. The applicant’s brief record of service included 41 days of lost time.

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2006 | 20060009417C070205

    Original file (20060009417C070205.doc) Auto-classification: Denied

    THE APPLICANT'S REQUEST, STATEMENT, AND EVIDENCE: 1. In his request the applicant stated he understood he could request discharge for the good of the service because charges had been filed against him under the UCMJ, which could authorize the imposition of a bad conduct or dishonorable discharge. Pertinent Army regulations provide that prior to discharge or release from active duty, individuals will be assigned reentry codes, based on their service records or the reason for discharge.

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2009 | 20090012274

    Original file (20090012274.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    The applicant requests upgrade of his general, under honorable conditions discharge to an honorable discharge, with a corresponding change to his reentry (RE) code and narrative reason for separation. His second period of service ended when he was separated for unsatisfactory performance under the provisions of chapter 13, Army Regulation 635-200 (Personnel Separations - Enlisted Personnel), with a characterization of service of general, under honorable conditions. His third period of...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2012 | 20120011787

    Original file (20120011787.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    On 21 November 1990, the separation authority approved the applicant's voluntary request for discharge under the provisions of Army Regulation 635-200, chapter 10, and directed the issuance of an under other than honorable conditions discharge. There is no evidence that shows the applicant applied to the Army Discharge Review Board for upgrade of his discharge within that board's 15-year statute of limitations. Army Regulation 635-200 further states that prior to discharge or release from...