Search Decisions

Decision Text

ARMY | BCMR | CY2013 | 20130022310
Original file (20130022310.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

		IN THE CASE OF:	  

		BOARD DATE:	  19 August 2014

		DOCKET NUMBER:  AR20130022310 


THE BOARD CONSIDERED THE FOLLOWING EVIDENCE:

1.  Application for correction of military records (with supporting documents provided, if any).

2.  Military Personnel Records and advisory opinions (if any).


THE APPLICANT'S REQUEST, STATEMENT, AND EVIDENCE:

1.  The applicant requests reconsideration of the Board's denial of his previous request for correction of his record to show award of the Purple Heart.

2.  The applicant states he went to the Department of Veterans Affairs (VA) about his knee and it still has residuals of shrapnel in it so he believes he should get the Purple Heart.

3.  The applicant provides:

* his DD Form 214 (Armed Forces of the United States Report of Transfer or Discharge)
* two pages of a VA decision document
* original case

CONSIDERATION OF EVIDENCE:

1.  Incorporated herein by reference are military records which were summarized in the previous consideration of the applicant's case by the Army Board for Correction of Military Records (ABCMR) in Docket Number AR20130001731, on 15 August 2013.

2.  The VA decision document provided by the applicant is new evidence, which requires that the Board reconsider his request.

3.  On 8 July 1966, the applicant was inducted into the Army of the United States.  Upon completion of his training he was awarded military occupational specialty (MOS) 11B2P (Light Weapons Infantryman with parachutist qualification).

4.  His DA Form 20 (Enlisted Qualification Record) shows he was assigned to the 3rd Battalion (Airborne), 506th Infantry Regiment in Vietnam from 31 October 1967 to 27 June 1968.  This form does not show any battle wounds in item 40 (Wounds).

5.  On 2 July 1968, the applicant was released from active duty.  He had completed 1 year, 11 months, and 24 days of creditable active duty service.

6.  The applicant's DD Form 214 does not reflect award of the Purple Heart.

7.  A review of the Awards and Decorations Computer-Assisted Retrieval System, an index of general orders issued during the Vietnam era between 1965 and 1973 maintained by the Military Awards Branch of the U.S. Army Human Resources Command, failed to reveal any orders for award of the Purple Heart pertaining to the applicant.

8.  His record is void of any documents stating he was wounded in action.

9.  A review of the Vietnam casualty list did not reveal the applicant's name.

10.  The applicant provides two pages of a VA decision document.  This document shows in October 2012 he was granted service-connected disability for residuals of a shrapnel wound to his left knee. 

11.  Army Regulation 600-8-22 (Military Awards) states the Purple Heart was awarded for a wound sustained as a result of hostile action.  Substantiating evidence must have been provided to verify the wound was the result of hostile action, the wound must have required treatment by medical personnel, and the medical treatment must have been made a matter of official record.

DISCUSSION AND CONCLUSIONS:

1.  The applicant’s contention was carefully considered.  However, though the VA determined he had residuals of a shrapnel wound in his left knee, there is no available evidence to show this wound was received as a result of hostile action. 



2.  In the absence of documentary evidence showing he was wounded or injured as a result of hostile action, treated for such wounds, and the medical treatment was made a matter of official record, there is an insufficient evidentiary basis for granting the applicant's requested relief.

BOARD VOTE:

________  ________  ________  GRANT FULL RELIEF 

________  ________  ________  GRANT PARTIAL RELIEF 

________  ________  ________  GRANT FORMAL HEARING

____X____  ____X____  ___X_____  DENY APPLICATION

BOARD DETERMINATION/RECOMMENDATION:

The evidence presented does not demonstrate the existence of a probable error or injustice.  Therefore, the Board determined that the overall merits of this case are insufficient as a basis to amend the decision of the ABCMR set forth in Docket Number AR20130001731, dated 15 August 2013.



      ___________X___________
               CHAIRPERSON

I certify that herein is recorded the true and complete record of the proceedings of the Army Board for Correction of Military Records in this case.

ABCMR Record of Proceedings (cont)                                         AR20130022310



3


ARMY BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS

 RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS


1

ABCMR Record of Proceedings (cont)                                         AR20130022310



2


ARMY BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS

 RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS


1

Similar Decisions

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2010 | 20100023560

    Original file (20100023560.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    Application for correction of military records (with supporting documents provided, if any). The applicant requests award of the Purple Heart and correction of his DD Form 214 (Armed Forces of the United States Report of Transfer or Discharge) to show this award. There is no evidence of record and the applicant did not provide any substantive evidence that shows he was wounded or treated for wounds as a result of hostile action during his service in Vietnam.

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2014 | 20140013677

    Original file (20140013677.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    The applicant requests, in effect, award of the Purple Heart, issuance of the medal and citation, and correction of his DD Form 214 (Armed Forces of the United States Report of Transfer or Discharge) to show this award. There is no evidence in the available records showing the applicant was awarded the Purple Heart or that he was wounded as a result of hostile action in Vietnam. The Purple Heart requires evidence to verify the wound was the result of hostile action, treatment of the wound...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2004 | 2004104598C070208

    Original file (2004104598C070208.doc) Auto-classification: Denied

    The medical reports that the applicant submits with his request show that he was being treated for problems with his left knee. On one report, his physician indicated that the applicant had stated that he had a history of shrapnel wounds in the left hand, and had previous shrapnel wounds to his tibia. The applicant's statement that he was immediately evacuated to Japan, thus orders were never issued for award of the Purple Heart, is not consistent with the evidence of record.

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2013 | 20130017857

    Original file (20130017857.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    The applicant states: * he was combat wounded in Vietnam * during a firefight in the jungles of Vietnam he sustained shrapnel wounds in the left forearm and left side of his head 3. The Purple Heart requires evidence to verify: * the wound was the result of hostile action * treatment of the wound by medical personnel * documentation of the wound in official records 3. In the absence of corroborating evidence showing he was injured and treated for wounds as a result of hostile action in...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2009 | 20090021322

    Original file (20090021322.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    The applicant provided his Hearing Officer's Decision, dated 20 May 1996, that shows the VA granted him service connection for residuals, shell fragment wound of the left thigh. The fact that the applicant provided documentation from VA granting him service connection for residuals, shell fragment wound of the left thigh is not sufficient evidence to conclude that he is entitled to the award of the Purple Heart. There is no medical evidence available that shows the applicant was wounded or...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2005 | 20050006107C070206

    Original file (20050006107C070206.doc) Auto-classification: Denied

    There is no evidence in the available records which shows that the applicant was awarded the Purple Heart or was wounded as a result of hostile action in Vietnam. In the absence of orders or other evidence of record showing that the applicant was injured or treated for wounds as a result of hostile action, the eyewitness statement provided by the applicant is not sufficient as a basis for award of the Purple Heart. Records show the applicant should have discovered the alleged error...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2008 | 20080018560

    Original file (20080018560.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    Application for correction of military records (with supporting documents provided, if any). The applicant requests award of the Purple Heart. The DD Form 214 (Armed Forces of the United States Report of Transfer or Discharge) that he was furnished at the time of his retirement shows that among the awards listed, he was awarded the Air Medal with three oak leaf clusters while he was on active duty.

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2008 | 20080011917

    Original file (20080011917.txt) Auto-classification: Approved

    However, there is no evidence of record which verifies his injuries were a result of hostile action in Vietnam. As a result, the Board recommends that all Department of the Army records of the individual concerned be corrected by awarding the Purple Heart for wounds sustained in July 1969 and showing this award on his DD Form 214. ______________________ CHAIRPERSON I certify that herein is recorded the true and complete record of the proceedings of the Army Board for Correction of Military...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2010 | 20100026430

    Original file (20100026430.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    No combat injuries or wounds are recorded on his medical records; however, an entry "scar to left leg" was entered on his Standard Form 88 (Report of Medical Examination). In this case, the applicant's name is not shown on the Vietnam casualty roster, his DA Form 20 is not available for review, his service record is void of any orders that show he was awarded the Purple Heart, his record is void of any official Army telegrams or Western Union telegrams, and there is no conclusive evidence...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2004 | 2004100635C070208

    Original file (2004100635C070208.doc) Auto-classification: Denied

    The Board considered the following evidence: Exhibit A - Application for correction of military records. As a result, the application date for this case is 29 December 2003, which is within the statute of limitations for the Army Board for Correction of Military Records (ABCMR). The applicant's service personnel records contain two DD Forms 214 (Armed Forces of the United States Report of Transfer or Discharge) for the periods 16 September 1964 to 12 December 1965 and 13 December 1965 to...