Search Decisions

Decision Text

ARMY | BCMR | CY2014 | 20140013677
Original file (20140013677.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

		BOARD DATE:	  17 March 2015

		DOCKET NUMBER:  AR20140013677 


THE BOARD CONSIDERED THE FOLLOWING EVIDENCE:

1.  Application for correction of military records (with supporting documents provided, if any).

2.  Military Personnel Records and advisory opinions (if any).


THE APPLICANT'S REQUEST, STATEMENT, AND EVIDENCE:

1.  The applicant requests, in effect, award of the Purple Heart, issuance of the medal and citation, and correction of his DD Form 214 (Armed Forces of the United States Report of Transfer or Discharge) to show this award.

2.  The applicant states:

* he served in Vietnam and was wounded in combat
* in February 2014 the Department of Veterans Affairs (VA) granted him compensation for disabilities derived from shrapnel
* he justly deserves the award

3.  The applicant provides:

* VA documentation, dated 21 February 2014
* DD Form 214

CONSIDERATION OF EVIDENCE:

1.  Title 10, U.S. Code, section 1552(b), provides that applications for correction of military records must be filed within 3 years after discovery of the alleged error or injustice.  This provision of law also allows the Army Board for Correction of Military Records (ABCMR) to excuse an applicant's failure to timely file within the 3-year statute of limitations if the ABCMR determines it would be in the interest of justice to do so.  While it appears the applicant did not file within the time frame provided in the statute of limitations, the ABCMR has elected to conduct a substantive review of this case and, only to the extent relief, if any, is granted, has determined it is in the interest of justice to excuse the applicant's failure to timely file.  In all other respects, there are insufficient bases to waive the statute of limitations for timely filing.

2.  The applicant was inducted into the Army of the United States on 12 December 1967.  He served as an infantry indirect fire crewman in Vietnam from July 1968 to July 1969.

3.  Records show he underwent a separation physical examination on 16 July 1969 which makes no mention of any injuries or wounds sustained as a result of hostile action in Vietnam.  His Standard Form 89 (Report of Medical History), dated 16 July 1969, shows in:

	a.  item 34 (Have you consulted or been treated by clinics, physicians, healers, or other practitioners within the past 5 years?  (If yes, give complete address of doctor, hospital, clinic, and details)), a check mark in the "Yes" box and the entry "Vietnam."

	b.  item 35 (Have you treated yourself for illnesses other than minor colds?  (If yes, which illnesses)), a check mark in the "Yes" box and the entry "Sharpnel [sic]."

4.  Item 35 (Upper Extremities) of his Standard Form 88 (Report of Medical Examination), dated 16 July 1969, shows he was rated as normal.

5.  He was honorably released from active duty on 16 July 1969.

6.  His DD Form 214 does not show the Purple Heart as an authorized award.

7.  There is no evidence in the available records showing the applicant was awarded the Purple Heart or that he was wounded as a result of hostile action in Vietnam.

8.  Item 40 (Wounds) of his DA Form 20 (Enlisted Qualification Record) is blank.

9.  His name does not appear on the Vietnam casualty roster.

10.  A review of the Awards and Decorations Computer-Assisted Retrieval System, an index of general orders issued during the Vietnam era between 1965 and 1973 maintained by the U.S. Army Human Resources Command Military Awards Branch, failed to reveal any orders for the Purple Heart pertaining to the applicant.

11.  He provided a letter from the VA, dated 21 February 2014, which shows the VA determined the following conditions were related to his military service and he was granted a 0-percent evaluation for each disability:

* left elbow strain due to shrapnel (previously claimed residuals of cellulitis, left arm, below elbow and residuals of boil, left elbow)
* scar, left elbow, associated with left elbow strain due to shrapnel (previously claimed residuals of cellulitis, left arm, below elbow and residuals of boil, left elbow)

12.  Army Regulation 600-8-22 (Military Awards) provides that the Purple Heart is awarded for a wound sustained as a result of hostile action.  Substantiating evidence must be provided to verify the wound was the result of hostile action, the wound must have required treatment by military medical personnel, and the medical treatment must have been made a matter of official record.

DISCUSSION AND CONCLUSIONS:

1.  The applicant contends he was wounded in combat in Vietnam.

2.  Army Regulation 600-8-22 establishes basic requirements for award of the Purple Heart and all other awards.  The Purple Heart requires evidence to verify the wound was the result of hostile action, treatment of the wound by military medical personnel, and documentation of the wound in official records

3.  His Standard Form 89, dated 16 July 1969, which shows he reported he sought medical treatment for a shrapnel injury, and the VA documentation were noted.  However, there is no evidence of record and he provided no evidence that definitively shows he was wounded or injured as a result of hostile action in Vietnam or that shows what medical treatment, if any, he received at the time.  Therefore, there is insufficient evidence upon which to award him the Purple Heart or add the Purple Heart to his DD Form 214.

BOARD VOTE:

________  ________  ________  GRANT FULL RELIEF 

________  ________  ________  GRANT PARTIAL RELIEF 

________  ________  ________  GRANT FORMAL HEARING

___X_____  __X______  _X___  DENY APPLICATION

BOARD DETERMINATION/RECOMMENDATION:

The evidence presented does not demonstrate the existence of a probable error or injustice.  Therefore, the Board determined the overall merits of this case are insufficient as a basis for correction of the records of the individual concerned.



      _________X_______________
                  CHAIRPERSON
      
I certify that herein is recorded the true and complete record of the proceedings of the Army Board for Correction of Military Records in this case.

ABCMR Record of Proceedings (cont)                                         AR20140013677



3


ARMY BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS

 RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS


1

ABCMR Record of Proceedings (cont)                                         AR20140013677



2


ARMY BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS

 RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS


1

Similar Decisions

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2010 | 20100007970

    Original file (20100007970.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    He also states, "I'm asking the Board to reconsider my request due to I have written twice to be awarded a Purple Heart for my injury that occurred by the enemy in Vietnam." The applicant indicates the Army Board for Correction of Military Records (ABCMR) previously considered and denied the applicant’s request for award of the Purple Heart. The neuropsychiatric examination provided by the applicant, also dated 15 January 1969, shows he stated he was wounded in June 1966 and received...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2004 | 2004104598C070208

    Original file (2004104598C070208.doc) Auto-classification: Denied

    The medical reports that the applicant submits with his request show that he was being treated for problems with his left knee. On one report, his physician indicated that the applicant had stated that he had a history of shrapnel wounds in the left hand, and had previous shrapnel wounds to his tibia. The applicant's statement that he was immediately evacuated to Japan, thus orders were never issued for award of the Purple Heart, is not consistent with the evidence of record.

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2003 | 2003084889C070212

    Original file (2003084889C070212.rtf) Auto-classification: Approved

    on this medical form shows the applicant reported that he sustained a shrapnel wound to his left elbow on 18 June 1969 in Vietnam. However, in this case, the provided supporting statement and medical evidence of record are credible evidence that the applicant did in fact receive the wounds claimed and only the exigencies of the battlefield prevented him from being treated by medical personnel. That all of the Department of the Army records related to this case be corrected by awarding the...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2015 | 20150001047

    Original file (20150001047.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    The applicant requests correction of his military service records to show he sustained an injury on 25 October 1967 and was awarded the Purple Heart. A review of the applicant's military personnel records failed to reveal any orders or other evidence that shows he was awarded a second award of the Purple Heart. The applicant's request for correction of his military service records to show he sustained wounds/injuries on 25 October 1967 and was awarded a second award of the Purple Heart was...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2012 | 20120005454

    Original file (20120005454.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    The applicant requests correction of his records to show award of the Purple Heart. A review of the applicant's military personnel records failed to reveal any evidence he was awarded the Purple Heart. The medical records that the applicant provides show he was wounded in action on 9 June 1969 when he sustained injuries to his neck and right elbow and a fragment wound to his left hip.

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2005 | 20050004719C070206

    Original file (20050004719C070206.doc) Auto-classification: Approved

    The applicant requests award of the Purple Heart for shrapnel wounds incurred in Vietnam. Therefore, he is entitled to correction of his records to show this unit award. Therefore, he is entitled to correction of his records to show this unit award.

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2005 | 20050006023C070206

    Original file (20050006023C070206.doc) Auto-classification: Denied

    The applicant provides his DD Form 214 (Armed Forces of the United States Report of Transfer or Discharge), Veterans Administration (VA) Request for Information, VA Rating Decision, and medical records. The evidence also shows that the applicant participated in three campaigns during his service in Vietnam. Evidence shows that the applicant’s records contain administrative error which does not require action by the Board.

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2008 | 20080011917

    Original file (20080011917.txt) Auto-classification: Approved

    However, there is no evidence of record which verifies his injuries were a result of hostile action in Vietnam. As a result, the Board recommends that all Department of the Army records of the individual concerned be corrected by awarding the Purple Heart for wounds sustained in July 1969 and showing this award on his DD Form 214. ______________________ CHAIRPERSON I certify that herein is recorded the true and complete record of the proceedings of the Army Board for Correction of Military...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2009 | 20090021322

    Original file (20090021322.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    The applicant provided his Hearing Officer's Decision, dated 20 May 1996, that shows the VA granted him service connection for residuals, shell fragment wound of the left thigh. The fact that the applicant provided documentation from VA granting him service connection for residuals, shell fragment wound of the left thigh is not sufficient evidence to conclude that he is entitled to the award of the Purple Heart. There is no medical evidence available that shows the applicant was wounded or...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2008 | 20080018346

    Original file (20080018346.txt) Auto-classification: Approved

    The evidence of record shows that the applicant completed a qualifying period of service for award of the Good Conduct Medal. Evidence of record shows the applicant participated in three campaigns during his service in Vietnam. As a result, the Board recommends that all Department of the Army records of the individual concerned be corrected by: a. deleting from item 24 of his DD Form 214 the Vietnam Service Medal; b. awarding the applicant the Purple Heart for wounds received as a result...