| Mr. Carl W. S. Chun | Director | |
| Mr. William Blakely | Analyst |
| Mr. Samuel A. Crumpler | Chairperson | ||
| Mr. Mark D. Manning | Member | ||
| Mr. Robert L. Duecaster | Member |
2. The applicant requests, in effect, that he be awarded the Purple Heart (PH).
3. The applicant states, in effect, that he was never awarded the PH for the wounds he received while serving in the Republic of Vietnam (RVN). In support of his application, he submits a copy of his separation document (DD Form 214).
4. The applicant’s military records show that he was inducted into the Army on
6 May 1969, and that he was trained and served in military occupational specialty (MOS) 54D (Chemical Equipment Repairman). On 5 May 1971, he was honorably released from active duty (REFRAD), in the rank of specialist four (SP4), by reason of expiration of term of service (ETS).
5. The applicant’s Enlisted Qualification Record (DA Form 20) confirms that the applicant served in the RVN from 21 October 1969 to 17 October 1970. Item 40 (Wounds) is blank and contains no entry that indicates that he was ever wounded or injured in action. His Military Personnel Records Jacket (MPRJ) also contains no orders or other documents showing that he was ever wounded or injured in action, or that he was recommended for or awarded the PH.
6. The DD Form 214, issued to and signed by the applicant on the date of his separation from the Army shows that during his active duty tenure he earned the following awards: National Defense Service Medal; Vietnam Service Medal with
2 bronze service stars; and RVN Campaign Medal with 60 Device;
7. The applicant’s name does not appear on the official Department of the Army (DA) Vietnam Casualty Roster. Further, the applicant’s Report of Medical Examination (SF Form 88), dated 2 February 1971, which documents his separation physical examination, is also void of any entry or indication that he ever sustained or was treated for a combat related wound or injury.
8. The applicant’s MPRJ does contain a copy of General Orders Number
59, dated 22 March 1971, issued by Headquarters United States Army Infantry Center, Fort Benning, Georgia, that awarded the applicant the Army Good Conduct Medal (AGCM) for his honorable active duty service from 6 May 1969 through 5 May 1971.
9. Army Regulation 600-8-22 (Military Awards) prescribes the policy and procedures for the Army’s awards program. It states, in pertinent part, that the PH is awarded for a wound sustained as a result of hostile action. Substantiating evidence must be provided to verify that: the wound was the result of hostile action; the wound required medical treatment; and that this medical treatment was made a matter of official record.
10. Department of the Army General Order Number 8, dated 1974, authorized the award of the Republic of Vietnam Gallantry Cross with Palm Unit Citation to all personnel assigned to United States Army Vietnam or Military Assistance Command Vietnam and its subordinate units from 8 February 1962 to 28 March 1973.
CONCLUSIONS:
1. The Board notes the applicant’s contention that he is entitled to receive the PH for wounds he received in action while serving in the RVN. However, it finds insufficient evidence to support this claim. By regulation, the PH is authorized for personnel who are wounded or injured as a result of hostile action. In order to support awarding the PH, there must be evidence to show that the wound or injury for which the award was being made was treated by military medical personnel, and this treatment must have been made a matter of official record.
2. The evidence of record gives no indication that the applicant ever sustained or was treated for a wound he received in the RVN as a result of enemy action or otherwise, or that he was ever recommended for or awarded the PH. Further, both the DA Vietnam Casualty Roster and the SF 88 documenting his separation physical examination make no reference to his ever being wounded or injured in action while serving in the RVN.
3. During its review of this case, the Board did discover that the applicant was awarded the AGCM for his exemplary behavior, efficiency and fidelity for the period 6 May 1969 to 5 May 1971. In addition, he is entitled to the RVN Gallantry Cross with Palm Unit Citation based on his service in the RVN. Therefore, the Board concludes that it would be appropriate to add these awards to his record at this time.
4. In view of the foregoing, the applicant’s records should be corrected as recommended below.
RECOMMENDATION:
1. That all of the Department of the Army records related to this case be corrected by showing that the individual concerned received the first award of the Army Good Conduct Medal, for his honorable active duty service from 6 May 1969 through 5 May 1971, and the Republic of Vietnam Gallantry Cross with Palm Unit Citation, for his service in the Republic of Vietnam; and by providing him a corrected separation document that includes these awards.
2. That so much of the application as is in excess of the foregoing be denied.
BOARD VOTE:
__MM__ __SAC__ __RLD__ GRANT AS STATED IN RECOMMENDATION
________ ________ ________ GRANT FORMAL HEARING
________ ________ ________ DENY APPLICATION
Samuel A. Crumpler_
CHAIRPERSON
| CASE ID | AR2003084917 |
| SUFFIX | |
| RECON | YYYYMMDD |
| DATE BOARDED | YYYYMMDD |
| TYPE OF DISCHARGE | (HD, GD, UOTHC, UD, BCD, DD, UNCHAR) |
| DATE OF DISCHARGE | YYYYMMDD |
| DISCHARGE AUTHORITY | AR . . . . . |
| DISCHARGE REASON | |
| BOARD DECISION | Partial Relief |
| REVIEW AUTHORITY | |
| ISSUES 1. 61 | 107.0015 |
| 2. | |
| 3. | |
| 4. | |
| 5. | |
| 6. |
ARMY | BCMR | CY2002 | 2002080889C070215
The applicant states, in effect, that he was awarded the PH and it was not included in his separation document (DD Form 214). Paragraph 2-13 of the awards regulation contains guidance on awarding the Vietnam Service Medal and it states, in pertinent part, that a bronze service star is authorized with this award for each campaign a member is credited with participating in while serving in the RVN. The Board notes the applicant’s contention that he is entitled to receive the PH for wounds he...
ARMY | BCMR | CY2005 | 20050007936C070206
The applicant’s Enlisted Qualification Record (DA Form 20) shows he served in the RVN from 16 August 1970 through 15 August 1971. The applicant’s Military Personnel Records Jacket (MPRJ) contains no orders or other documents that indicate he was ever wounded in action, or awarded the PH. Therefore, the Board requests that the CMSD-St. Louis administratively correct the records of the individual concerned to show his entitlement to the Army Commendation Medal, Republic of Vietnam Gallantry...
ARMY | BCMR | CY2003 | 2003084368C070212
The applicant’s Military Personnel Records Jacket (MPRJ) contains no orders or other documents showing that he was ever wounded or injured in action, or that he was ever recommended for the PH. In order to support an award of the PH, the wound or injury for which it is being awarded must have been incurred as a result of enemy action. That all of the Department of the Army records related to this case be corrected by awarding the individual concerned the first award of the Army Good...
ARMY | BCMR | CY2002 | 2002080261C070215
The applicant’s Military Personnel Records Jacket (MPRJ) contains no orders or other documents that indicate that he was ever wounded or injured in action, or that he was recommended for or awarded the PH. Paragraph 2-13 of the awards regulation contains guidance on awarding the Vietnam Service Medal and it states, in pertinent part, that a bronze service star is authorized with this award for each campaign a member is credited with participating in while serving in the RVN. During its...
ARMY | BCMR | CY2003 | 2003089433C070403
There are no medical treatment records on file and the applicant has failed to provide any evidence to show he was ever treated for a lower back injury while serving in the RVN, or that he was ever wounded or injured in action. The evidence of record shows that at the latest, the applicant should have discovered the PH error or injustice now under consideration on the date of his separation, 9 April 1971; therefore, the time for him to file a request for correction of his record regarding...
ARMY | BCMR | CY2002 | 2002076514C070215
Department of the Army General Order Number 8, issued in 1974, authorized the award of the Republic of Vietnam Gallantry Cross with Palm Unit Citation to all personnel assigned to United States Army Vietnam or Military Assistance Command Vietnam and its subordinate units from 8 February 1962 to 28 March 1973. Lacking any derogatory information on file in the applicant’s record or a specific disqualifying action from any of his active duty unit commanders, the Board concludes that he served...
ARMY | BCMR | CY2005 | 20050004553C070206
RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS IN THE CASE OF: BOARD DATE: 19 October 2005 DOCKET NUMBER: AR20050004553 I certify that hereinafter is recorded the true and complete record of the proceedings of the Army Board for Correction of Military Records in the case of the above-named individual. The applicant also states, in effect that during another attack on his camp he was hit on the top of his head with a small piece of shrapnel, but did not report this injury because it seemed to be minor. Therefore,...
ARMY | BCMR | CY2003 | 2003085529C070212
While not a formal recommendation, the DA Form 137 submitted by the applicant indicates that his unit commander recommended the applicant for the ARCOM, which was pending at the time of his separation. Based on the unit commander’s recommendation and on a review of the applicant’s record, the Board concludes the applicant should be awarded the ARCOM for meritorious service during the period 3 April 1968 through 25 August 1969, while he was serving as an infantry squad leader at Fort Hood...
ARMY | BCMR | CY2003 | 2003087100C070212
I certify that hereinafter is recorded the true and complete record of the proceedings of the Army Board for Correction of Military Records in the case of the above-named individual. The applicant’s Military Personnel Records Jacket (MPRJ) contains no orders or other documents showing that he was ever wounded or injured in action, or that he was ever recommended for the PH. The evidence of record provides no confirmation that the applicant was ever wounded in action or that he was ever...
ARMY | BCMR | CY2006 | 20060013226
x The Board considered the following evidence: Exhibit A - Application for correction of military records. The applicant states, in effect, that while serving on active duty in the Republic of Vietnam (RVN), he received an injury to his nose. The applicant's Military Personnel Records Jacket (MPRJ) is void of any orders or other documents that indicate he was ever wounded in action, or awarded the PH by proper authority while serving on active duty.