Search Decisions

Decision Text

ARMY | BCMR | CY2013 | 20130021685
Original file (20130021685 .txt) Auto-classification: Approved

		IN THE CASE OF:	  

		BOARD DATE:	    8 October 2014

		DOCKET NUMBER:  AR20130021685 


THE BOARD CONSIDERED THE FOLLOWING EVIDENCE:

1.  Application for correction of military records (with supporting documents provided, if any).

2.  Military Personnel Records and advisory opinions (if any).


THE APPLICANT'S REQUEST, STATEMENT, AND EVIDENCE:

1.  The applicant requests that he be granted an exception to policy to retain his $15,000 Prior Service Enlistment Bonus (PSEB).

2.  The applicant states that the reasons behind his bonus being recouped were based on factors beyond his control and resulted from obstacles in the administrative processing.  He goes on to state that he completed the extension of his enlistment in a timely manner based on current National Guard guidance.  Additionally, he was deployed to Afghanistan during the period he was in the inactive National Guard (ING) and when he returned to an active status he was notified that he was returning to Afghanistan with his unit.  Accordingly, because his unit was preparing for deployment he was delayed in getting his extension paperwork processed.

3.  The applicant provides a three-page letter explaining his application, copies of his request for an exception to policy to the National Guard Bureau (NGB), and letters of support from his commander and command sergeant major (CSM).

CONSIDERATION OF EVIDENCE:

1.  The NGB’s denial of the applicant’s for exception to policy states he enlisted on 17 November 2007 for a $15,000 bonus.  The applicant’s PSEB addendum is not present in his official records.

2.  His records show he deployed to Iraq during the period 20090409 – 20100117.
3.  The applicant was apparently placed in the ING from 30 April 2011 to 30 April 2012.

4.  The applicant was serving in the pay grade of E-5 when he extended his enlistment on 17 July 2012 for a period of 1 year.    

5.  The applicant deployed to Afghanistan during the period 20121216 – 20130811.

6.  On 26 March 2013, the NGB denied the applicant’s request for an exception to policy to retain his $15,000 PSEB based on his not having extending his enlistment within the prescribed time directed by National Guard directives.  The NGB directed the State Incentive Manager to recoup his bonus.

7.  He was serving in the pay grade of E-6 when he extended his enlistment on 21 February 2014 for a period of 1 year.

8.  The letters of support from his commander and CSM serve to explain that the applicant extended his enlistment at the first opportunity offered by the unit and asserts that the applicant should not be punished for deficiencies made by others.

DISCUSSION AND CONCLUSIONS:

1.  Although the applicant’s bonus addendum is not present in the available records, it appears that the applicant was eligible for his PSEB at the time of his extension and his bonus was paid.  However, due to administrative errors that occurred through no fault of the applicant he was unable to extend after being released from the ING and as a result action was initiated to recoup his bonus.  However, it is not reasonable to penalize the Soldier for errors made by others and for breakdowns in processes for which the individual Soldier is not expected to know or be responsible for, especially given the applicant’s repeated service to his country in an imminent danger area.

2.  The applicant extended his enlistment reenlisted in good faith for a $15,000 PSEB; however, the State and the NGB have not honored their commitment to the applicant in that they have initiated action to recoup his PSEB.

3.  Accordingly, it would be in the interest of equity and justice to grant him an exception to policy and allow him to retain his PSEB. 



BOARD VOTE:

____X____  ___X_____  ___X_____  GRANT FULL RELIEF 

________  ________  ________  GRANT PARTIAL RELIEF 

________  ________  ________  GRANT FORMAL HEARING

________  ________  ________  DENY APPLICATION

BOARD DETERMINATION/RECOMMENDATION:

1. The Board determined that the evidence presented was sufficient to warrant a recommendation for relief.  As a result, the Board recommends that all State Army National Guard and Department of the Army records of the individual concerned be corrected by showing the NGB approved the request for exception to policy, and as a result of this correction voiding the recoupment of his PSEB and paying him back any funds already paid by the applicant towards his debt or recouped by the Defense Finance and Accounting Service.

2.  The Board wants the applicant and all others to know that the sacrifices he made in service to the United States during the Global War on Terrorism are deeply appreciated.  The applicant and all Americans should be justifiably proud of his service in arms.



      _______ _   _X______   ___
       	   CHAIRPERSON
      
I certify that herein is recorded the true and complete record of the proceedings of the Army Board for Correction of Military Records in this case.



ABCMR Record of Proceedings (cont)                                         AR20130021685





3


ARMY BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS

 RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS


1

ABCMR Record of Proceedings (cont)                                         AR20130021685



2


ARMY BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS

 RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS


1

Similar Decisions

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2013 | 20130021685

    Original file (20130021685.txt) Auto-classification: Approved

    The applicant requests that he be granted an exception to policy to retain his $15,000 Prior Service Enlistment Bonus (PSEB). The applicant states that the reasons behind his bonus being recouped were based on factors beyond his control and resulted from obstacles in the administrative processing. As a result, the Board recommends that all State Army National Guard and Department of the Army records of the individual concerned be corrected by showing the NGB approved the request for...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2014 | 20140015693

    Original file (20140015693.txt) Auto-classification: Approved

    The applicant provides: * memorandum, subject: Request for ETP for PSEB [Applicant] * DA Form 4836 (Oath of Extension of Enlistment or Reenlistment) * memorandum, subject: Notification of Incentive Discrepancy and ETP Process * memorandum, subject: ETP in Requesting Second Incentive Payment without Recoupment for [Applicant] * memorandum, subject: ETP for Requesting Grant Relief from Recoupment of Reenlistment/Extension Bonus * DD Form 4 (Enlistment/Reenlistment Document - Armed Forces of...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2014 | 20140017645

    Original file (20140017645.txt) Auto-classification: Approved

    He also referred to DOD FMR, page 9-20, paragraph 0905, dated March 2006 (in effect at the time the applicant signed his contract) that stated: "hardship and dependency separations are considered involuntary and do not require recoupment of unearned portions of bonus." The IAARNG terminated the REB incentive with recoupment. National Guard Regulation 614-1 (Inactive Army National Guard) prescribes rules for use of the ING, enlistment into the ING as part of the Recruit Force Pool (RFP),...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2013 | 20130005081

    Original file (20130005081.txt) Auto-classification: Approved

    The applicant states he enlisted in the TXARNG for 6 years for a PSEB of $15,000. A memorandum, dated 6 July 2012, from the TXARNG to NGB requests an exception to policy (ETP) for the missing signature on the applicant’s Prior Service Bonus Addendum (Annex X). The applicant initialed all of the appropriate paragraphs of Annex X at the time of his enlistment on 23 March 2009.

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2013 | 20130017938

    Original file (20130017938.txt) Auto-classification: Approved

    The applicant provides and his records contain a PSEB Addendum, dated 5 December 2008, wherein it stated, in part: a. The G-1 official stated his PSEB contract was terminated as of 22 October 2011 when he voluntarily moved to a different MOS than the MOS he contracted for and out of an MTOE unit into a TDA unit. The evidence of record shows the applicant did contract for 6 years in MOS 11B in an MTOE unit and from 22 October 2011 to 3 November 2013, he failed to do so, even if at the time...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2014 | 20140003316

    Original file (20140003316 .txt) Auto-classification: Approved

    The applicant’s REB was cancelled and recoupment directed because the applicant was in the ING for a period of 2 years and because he did not extend his enlistment to make up the 2 years within 30 days of returning to active status. Although his Reenlistment/Extension Bonus Addendum implied, there is no evidence in the available records to show that he was informed at the time of his second extension in the ING that his incentive eligibility would terminate as a result of the second...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2015 | 20150002718

    Original file (20150002718 .txt) Auto-classification: Approved

    The applicant requests that he be granted an exception to policy to retain his reenlistment extension bonus (REB). On 23 November 2014, the applicant extended his enlistment for a period of 6 years which takes his enlistment to 13 October 2021. As a result, the Board recommends that all Department of the Army and Army National Guard records of the individual concerned be corrected by showing that he is granted an exception to policy, that he is qualified to retain his REB, and that any...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2013 | 20130019398

    Original file (20130019398.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    IN THE CASE OF: BOARD DATE: 18 February 2014 DOCKET NUMBER: AR20130019398 THE BOARD CONSIDERED THE FOLLOWING EVIDENCE: 1. Application for correction of military records (with supporting documents provided, if any). Title 37, U.S. Code, section 308i (Special pay: PSEB) provides, in pertinent part, that a person who is a former enlisted member of an Armed Force who enlists in the Selected Reserve of the Ready Reserve of an Armed Force for a period of 3 or 6 years in a critical military skill...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2013 | 20130015219

    Original file (20130015219.txt) Auto-classification: Approved

    The applicant requests correction of her records to show entitlement to a $15,000 enlistment bonus and eligibility for the Student Loan Repayment Program (SLRP). The applicant provides: * memorandum from Headquarters, CAARNG, Sacramento, CA, subject: Notification of Termination/Recoupment of Incentives, dated 13 April 2012 * 2 memoranda from National Guard Bureau (NGB), U.S. Property and Fiscal Office for California, Mather, CA, subject: Incentive Notice of Indebtedness, dated 27 June 2012...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2014 | 20140016383

    Original file (20140016383.txt) Auto-classification: Approved

    He provides: * Self-authored statement * DA Form 4836 (Oath of Extension of Enlistment or Reenlistment) * Memorandum, subject: Request for ETP for REB, [Applicant], dated 5 September 2012 * Memorandum, subject: Notification of Incentive Discrepancy and ETP Process, dated 25 June 2012 * Email CONSIDERATION OF EVIDENCE: 1. A National Guard Bureau (NGB) Form 600-7-3-R-E (Annex R to DD Form 4 (Enlistment/Reenlistment Document – Armed Forces of the United States) or DA Form 4836 (Oath of...