Search Decisions

Decision Text

ARMY | BCMR | CY2013 | 20130021675
Original file (20130021675.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

		IN THE CASE OF:	  

		BOARD DATE:	  26 August 2014

		DOCKET NUMBER:  AR20130021675 


THE BOARD CONSIDERED THE FOLLOWING EVIDENCE:

1.  Application for correction of military records (with supporting documents provided, if any).

2.  Military Personnel Records and advisory opinions (if any).


THE APPLICANT'S REQUEST, STATEMENT, AND EVIDENCE:

1.  The applicant requests an exception to policy to transfer educational benefits to his family member under the transfer of educational benefits (TEB) provision of the Post-9/11 GI Bill.

2.  The applicant states he was unaware that he had to initiate the transfer while he was still in service. 

3.  The applicant provides his DD Form 214 (Certificate of Release or Discharge from Active Duty), ending on 28 May 2007.

CONSIDERATION OF EVIDENCE:

1.  Title 10, U.S. Code, section 1552(b), provides that applications for correction of military records must be filed within 3 years after discovery of the alleged error or injustice.  This provision of law also allows the Army Board for Correction of Military Records (ABCMR) to excuse an applicant's failure to timely file within the 3-year statute of limitations if the ABCMR determines it would be in the interest of justice to do so.  While it appears the applicant did not file within the time frame provided in the statute of limitations, the ABCMR has elected to conduct a substantive review of this case and, only to the extent relief, if any, is granted, has determined it is in the interest of justice to excuse the applicant's failure to timely file.  In all other respects, there are insufficient bases to waive the statute of limitations for timely filing.


2.  The applicant's records show he enlisted in the Regular Army on 14 February 1994.  He served through multiple reenlistments in a variety of assignments.  He was honorably discharged on 28 May 2007 by reason of having completed his required active service.  His DD Form 214 shows he completed 13 years, 
3 months, and 15 days of active service. 

3.  Public Law 110-252 limits the eligibility to transfer unused benefits to those members of the Armed Forces who are serving on active duty or a member of the Selected Reserve.  

4.  On 22 June 2009, DOD established the criteria for eligibility and transfer of unused educational benefits to eligible family members.  The policy states any member of the Armed Forces on or after 1 August 2009 who, at the time of the approval of the individual's request to transfer entitlement to educational assistance under this section, is eligible for the Post-9/11 GI Bill and:

	a.  has at least 6 years of service in the Armed Forces on the date of election and agrees to serve 4 additional years in the Armed Forces from the date of election; or

	b.  has at least 10 years of service in the Armed Forces (active duty and/or Selected Reserve) on the date of election, is precluded by either standard policy (service or DOD) or statute from committing to 4 additional years, and agrees to serve for the maximum amount of time allowed by such policy or statute, or

	c.  is or becomes retirement eligible during the period from 1 August 2009 through 1 August 2013.  A service member is considered to be retirement eligible if he or she has completed 20 years of active duty or 20 qualifying years of Reserve service.

DISCUSSION AND CONCLUSIONS:

1.  The applicant served on active duty from 14 February 1994 through 28 May 2007.  The law requires a member to be on active duty or in the Selected Reserve on or after 1 August 2009 at the time he/she requests the transfer.  The applicant was neither on active duty nor in the Selected Reserve at the time this program was implemented.  Therefore, he is not eligible to transfer his education benefits under the TEB provision of the Post-9/11 GI Bill to his family members.

2.  The applicant's service and his sincerity are not in question.  However, the requirements of this program are set in the law and any changes to this law are not within the purview of this Board.  There is neither an error nor an injustice in his case and as such, he is not entitled to the requested relief.
BOARD VOTE:

________  ________  ________  GRANT FULL RELIEF 

________  ________  ________  GRANT PARTIAL RELIEF 

________  ________  ________  GRANT FORMAL HEARING

____X____  ___X_____  ___X_____  DENY APPLICATION

BOARD DETERMINATION/RECOMMENDATION:

The evidence presented does not demonstrate the existence of a probable error or injustice.  Therefore, the Board determined that the overall merits of this case are insufficient as a basis for correction of the records of the individual concerned.



      _______ _   _X______   ___
               CHAIRPERSON
      
I certify that herein is recorded the true and complete record of the proceedings of the Army Board for Correction of Military Records in this case.

ABCMR Record of Proceedings (cont)                                         AR20130021675



3


ARMY BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS

 RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS


1

ABCMR Record of Proceedings (cont)                                         AR20130021675



2


ARMY BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS

 RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS


1

Similar Decisions

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2014 | 20140014094

    Original file (20140014094.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    On 17 July 2014, he was informed by Mr. T____ E____, VA Education Services, that the application for the TEB option should have been offered to him prior to separation from the service. However, this was the first time he learned there was a requirement to be approved for TEB prior to separation from the service and this option should have been offered to him upon his release from the NCARNG and at the time of retirement. He is asking that the Board correct his records to show he requested...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2013 | 20130005799

    Original file (20130005799.txt) Auto-classification: Approved

    The applicant requests correction of his records to show he made a timely application, prior to his effective date of retirement, to transfer his unused education benefits to his eligible dependent, in accordance with the Transfer of Education Benefits (TEB) provision of the Post-9/11 GI Bill. The evidence shows the applicant was fully eligible to transfer his unused education benefits under the TEB provision of the Post-9/11 GI Bill prior to his retirement date of 30 September 2009. As a...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2014 | 20140015550

    Original file (20140015550.txt) Auto-classification: Approved

    The evidence shows the applicant was fully eligible to transfer his unused education benefits under the TEB provision of the Post-9/11 GI Bill prior to his retirement date of 12 September 2009. Therefore, as a matter of equity, his records should be corrected to show he made a timely application to transfer at least 1 month of his unused education benefits to his eligible dependents, in accordance with the TEB provisions of the Post-9/11 GI Bill, prior to his transfer to the Retired Reserve...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2012 | 20120008006

    Original file (20120008006.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    The applicant had 8 years of service upon her separation from the Selected Reserves so her children were not eligible to receive the benefits; furthermore, she was not eligible to transfer benefits to her children because the law requires Soldiers to be on active duty or in the Selected Reserve on or after 1 August 2009. c. A Soldier may only transfer to eligible family members. If the applicant had been in the Selected Reserve or on active duty on 1 August 2009, she would have incurred an...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2012 | 20120010851

    Original file (20120010851.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    The applicant had more than 20 years of service upon his retirement, but he was not eligible to transfer to either his spouse or his children because the law requires Soldiers to be in the service on or after 1 August 2009. c. A Soldier may only transfer to eligible family members. If the applicant had been in the service on 1 August 2009, he would not have incurred an additional service obligation, but he was not eligible because he left service prior to 1 August 2009. e. A Soldier must...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2012 | 20120008643

    Original file (20120008643.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    The advisory official recommended disapproval of the applicant's request because the applicant was not a member of the service on or after 1 August 2009. The applicant in this case had more than sufficient years of service upon his retirement, but he was not eligible to transfer the benefit because the law requires Soldiers to be in the service on or after 1 August 2009. c. A Soldier may only transfer to eligible family members. The policy states, in part, that those who retire on or...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2013 | 20130013482

    Original file (20130013482.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    If the service member allocates 0 months and subsequently leaves military service they are not authorized to transfer unused benefits; and d. a Soldier not serving on active duty or as a member of the Selected Reserve and subsequently requests the transfer of unused benefits to family members should not be granted relief based on unawareness of law, program rules, or procedures unless they left the service during the implementation phase (first 90 days) of the program. A Soldier must be on...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2012 | 20120009565

    Original file (20120009565.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    The applicant had 23 years of service upon his separation from the ARNG; furthermore, he was not eligible to transfer benefits to dependent because the law requires Soldiers to be on active duty or in the Selected Reserve on or after 1 August 2009. a. If the applicant had been in the Selected Reserve or on active duty on 1 August 2009, he would not have incurred an additional service obligation, but he was not eligible because he was not on active duty and left the ARNG prior to 1 August...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2014 | 20140019598

    Original file (20140019598.txt) Auto-classification: Approved

    After applying for retirement after 20 years of active service in early 2009, he received an approved retirement date of 1 September 2009, during which time the Post-9/11 GI Bill was being launched. The evidence shows the applicant was fully eligible to transfer his unused education benefits under the TEB provision of the Post-9/11 GI Bill prior to his retirement date of 31 August 2009. As a result, the Board recommends that all Department of the Army records of the individual concerned be...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2013 | 20130011075

    Original file (20130011075.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    On 22 June 2009, the Department of Defense (DOD) established the criteria for eligibility and transfer of unused education benefits to eligible family members. A service member is considered to be retirement eligible if he or she has completed 20 years of active duty or 20 qualifying years of Reserve service. The evidence of record shows the applicant was serving as a member of the USAR in the rank of LTC until he was transferred to the Retired Reserve on 30 November 2009.