Search Decisions

Decision Text

ARMY | BCMR | CY2013 | 20130021508
Original file (20130021508.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

		IN THE CASE OF:	   

		BOARD DATE:	  23 July 2014

		DOCKET NUMBER:  AR20130021508 


THE BOARD CONSIDERED THE FOLLOWING EVIDENCE:

1.  Application for correction of military records (with supporting documents provided, if any).

2.  Military Personnel Records and advisory opinions (if any).


THE APPLICANT'S REQUEST, STATEMENT, AND EVIDENCE:

1.  The applicant requests the Army Commendation Medal (ARCOM) be added to his DD Form 214 (Armed Forces of the United States Report of Transfer or Discharge).

2.  The applicant states he was awarded the ARCOM, but it's not listed on his 
DD Form 214.

3.  The applicant provides:

* an award certificate for the ARCOM
* DD Form 214

CONSIDERATION OF EVIDENCE:

1.  Title 10, U.S. Code, section 1552(b), provides that applications for correction of military records must be filed within 3 years after discovery of the alleged error or injustice.  This provision of law also allows the Army Board for Correction of Military Records (ABCMR) to excuse an applicant's failure to timely file within the 3-year statute of limitations if the ABCMR determines it would be in the interest of justice to do so.  While it appears the applicant did not file within the time frame provided in the statute of limitations, the ABCMR has elected to conduct a substantive review of this case and, only to the extent relief, if any, is granted, has determined it is in the interest of justice to excuse the applicant's failure to timely file.  In all other respects, there are insufficient bases to waive the statute of limitations for timely filing.
2.  The applicant enlisted in the Regular Army on 16 November 1965 for a period of 3 years.  He served as a supply clerk in Vietnam from October 1967 to October 1968.  He was honorably released from active duty on 5 October 1968 as an overseas returnee.

3.  His DD Form 214 does not show the ARCOM as an authorized award.

4.  There are no orders for the ARCOM in the available records.

5.  Item 41 (Awards and Decorations) of his DA Form 20 (Enlisted Qualification Record) does not show entitlement to the ARCOM.

6.  A review of the Awards and Decorations Computer-Assisted Retrieval System, an index of general orders issued during the Vietnam era between 1965 and 1973 maintained by the U.S. Army Human Resources Command Military Awards Branch, failed to reveal any orders for the ARCOM pertaining to the applicant.

7.  He provides an award certificate for the ARCOM for exceptionally meritorious achievement during the period 1 March to 31 July 1968.

8.  Army Regulation 600-8-22 (Military Awards) states the ARCOM may be awarded to any member of the Armed Forces of the United States who, while serving in any capacity with the Army after 6 December 1941, distinguishes himself or herself by heroism, meritorious achievement, or meritorious service.  As with all personal decorations, formal recommendations, approval through the chain of command, and announcement in orders are required.

DISCUSSION AND CONCLUSIONS:

There are no orders for the ARCOM in the available records.  In the absence of orders, the ARCOM award certificate provided by the applicant alone is not sufficient as a basis for adding this award to his DD Form 214.  Regrettably, there is an insufficient evidentiary basis for granting the applicant's requested relief.









BOARD VOTE:

________  ________  ________  GRANT FULL RELIEF 

________  ________  ________  GRANT PARTIAL RELIEF 

________  ________  ________  GRANT FORMAL HEARING

___x____  ___x____  ____x____  DENY APPLICATION

BOARD DETERMINATION/RECOMMENDATION:

The evidence presented does not demonstrate the existence of a probable error or injustice.  Therefore, the Board determined that the overall merits of this case are insufficient as a basis for correction of the records of the individual concerned.




      ___________x______________
               CHAIRPERSON
      
I certify that herein is recorded the true and complete record of the proceedings of the Army Board for Correction of Military Records in this case.

ABCMR Record of Proceedings (cont)                                         AR20130021508



3


ARMY BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS

 RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS


1

ABCMR Record of Proceedings (cont)                                         AR20130021508



2


ARMY BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS

 RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS


1

Similar Decisions

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2014 | 20140021310

    Original file (20140021310.txt) Auto-classification: Approved

    However, he provided a BSM Certificate, dated 21 October 1968, which shows he was awarded the BSM for meritorious achievement during the period 2 December 1967 to 2 August 1968 in Vietnam. Also eligible for this award are individuals who qualified for award of the Vietnam Service Medal or the Armed Forces Expeditionary Medal and served for less than 6 months of service but: * were wounded as a result of hostile action * were captured by hostile forces but later escaped or were rescued or...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2014 | 20140013515

    Original file (20140013515.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    The applicant provided a copy of a certificate and citation stating that he was awarded the ARCOM for meritorious service for the period 3 November 1967 to 9 December 1968 while serving as an assistant operations sergeant at Fort Gordon, Georgia. There are no available general orders awarding the applicant the BSM with "V" Device or the ARCOM. _______ _ x_______ ___ CHAIRPERSON I certify that herein is recorded the true and complete record of the proceedings of the Army Board for...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2014 | 20140002737

    Original file (20140002737.txt) Auto-classification: Approved

    There is no evidence in his military records that shows he was recommended for or awarded a second ARCOM. In the absence of orders or any other evidence indicating he was awarded the second award of the ARCOM, the NPRC letter he provided is insufficient evidence on which to base correction his DD Form 214 to show two awards of the ARCOM. As a result, the Board recommends that all Department of the Army records of the individual concerned be corrected by deleting the Vietnam Service Medal...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2009 | 20090013587

    Original file (20090013587.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    There is no evidence of record which shows the applicant was recommended for or awarded the ARCOM. There is no evidence of record which shows the applicant was recommended for or awarded the ARCOM. Therefore, there is insufficient evidence on which to base correction of his DD Form 214 to show award of the ARCOM.

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2013 | 20130014219

    Original file (20130014219.txt) Auto-classification: Approved

    The applicant provides: * social security card * award certificate for the ARCOM * DD Form 214 * DD Form 215 (Correction to DD Form 214) CONSIDERATION OF EVIDENCE: 1. The applicant's DD Form 398 (Statement of Personal History), dated 2 November 1968, shows his SSN as "XXX-XX-X84X." The applicant's DD Form 398 shows he recorded his SSN as "XXX-XX-X84X" in November 1968 in connection with his enlistment.

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2009 | 20090020050

    Original file (20090020050.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    The applicant requests correction of his DD Form 214 (Armed Forces of the United States Report of Transfer or Discharge) to show he was awarded the Army Commendation Medal (ARCOM). Therefore, there is insufficient evidence to correct his DD Form 214 to show award of the ARCOM. __________X________ CHAIRPERSON I certify that herein is recorded the true and complete record of the proceedings of the Army Board for Correction of Military Records in this case.

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2009 | 20090000262

    Original file (20090000262.txt) Auto-classification: Approved

    The applicant’s DD Form 214 shows that he was awarded the Vietnam Service Medal, but it does not show that he was awarded any bronze service stars to signify campaign participation credit. Army Regulation 672-5-1 (Awards), in effect at the time of the applicant's separation, provided that the Good Conduct Medal was awarded to individuals who distinguished themselves by their conduct, efficiency and fidelity during a qualifying period of active duty enlisted service. As a result, the Board...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2009 | 20090014574

    Original file (20090014574.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    The applicant provided a copy of his certificate and citation dated 6 June 1969 awarding him the ARCOM for meritorious service from 3 July 1968 to 22 June 1969. DISCUSSION AND CONCLUSIONS: Although the applicant provided the certificate and citation for award of the ARCOM, there are no orders in the available records and the applicant did not provide any orders that show he was awarded this medal. Therefore, in the absence of such evidence, there is an insufficient basis on which to add...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2014 | 20140011222

    Original file (20140011222 .txt) Auto-classification: Approved

    The Vietnam Service Medal (VSM) is awarded to all members of the Armed Forces of the United States for qualifying service in Vietnam after 3 July 1965 through 28 March 1973. The evidence of record shows: a. GOs awarded the applicant the – * ARCOM for meritorious service * ARCOM (1st OLC) for meritorious achievement b. the applicant qualified for award of the VSM and he participated in four campaigns during his service in Vietnam. As a result, the Board recommends that all Department of the...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2013 | 20130010425

    Original file (20130010425.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    This provision of law also allows the Army Board for Correction of Military Records (ABCMR) to excuse an applicant's failure to timely file within the 3-year statute of limitations if the ABCMR determines it would be in the interest of justice to do so. He provides a citation for the ARCOM for meritorious service for the period February 1968 to February 1969. _____________x____________ CHAIRPERSON I certify that herein is recorded the true and complete record of the proceedings of the Army...