Search Decisions

Decision Text

ARMY | BCMR | CY2009 | 20090013587
Original file (20090013587.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

		IN THE CASE OF:	

		BOARD DATE:	  7 January 2010

		DOCKET NUMBER:  AR20090013587 


THE BOARD CONSIDERED THE FOLLOWING EVIDENCE:

1.  Application for correction of military records (with supporting documents provided, if any).

2.  Military Personnel Records and advisory opinions (if any).


THE APPLICANT'S REQUEST, STATEMENT, AND EVIDENCE:

1.  The applicant requests that his DD Form 214 (Armed Forces of the United States Report of Transfer or Discharge) be corrected to show award of the Army Commendation Medal (ARCOM) and the Bronze Star Medal (BSM).

2.  The applicant states, in effect, that he was issued a BSM with no explanation and the ARCOM with papers after he arrived at home.  

3.  The applicant provides a copy of his DD Form 214 in support of his application.  

CONSIDERATION OF EVIDENCE:

1.  Title 10, U.S. Code, section 1552(b), provides that applications for correction of military records must be filed within 3 years after discovery of the alleged error or injustice.  This provision of law also allows the Army Board for Correction of Military Records (ABCMR) to excuse an applicant’s failure to timely file within the 3-year statute of limitations if the ABCMR determines it would be in the interest of justice to do so.  While it appears the applicant did not file within the time frame provided in the statute of limitations, the ABCMR has elected to conduct a substantive review of this case and, only to the extent relief, if any, is granted, has determined it is in the interest of justice to excuse the applicant’s failure to timely file.  In all other respects, there are insufficient bases to waive the statute of limitations for timely filing.

2.  The applicant was inducted into the Army of the United States on 14 November 1966.  He served in Vietnam from 4 December 1967 to on or about 2 November 1968.  His highest grade attained was sergeant, E-5.  

3.  There is no evidence of record which shows the applicant was recommended for or awarded the ARCOM.  His service personnel records do not contain orders for award of the ARCOM.  

4.  The applicant’s service personnel records contain a citation and award certificate which show the BSM was awarded to the applicant for meritorious achievement from 1 January 1968 to 31 August 1968.  There are no orders available which show the BSM was awarded to the applicant.  

5.  Review of the Awards and Decorations Computer-Assisted Retrieval System (ADCARS), an index of general orders issued during the Vietnam era between 1965 and 1973 maintained by the Military Awards Branch of the United States Army Human Resources Command, failed to reveal any orders for the ARCOM or BSM pertaining to the applicant.  Additionally, item 41 (Awards and Decorations) on his DA Form 20 (Enlisted Qualification Record) does not list the ARCOM or BSM.  

6.  The applicant was released from active duty on 6 November 1968.  His DD Form 214 does not show the ARCOM or the BSM as authorized awards.

7.  Army Regulation 600-8-22 (Military Awards) provides that the ARCOM may be awarded to any member of the Armed Forces of the United States who, while serving in any capacity with the Army after 6 December 1941, distinguished himself or herself by heroism, meritorious achievement, or meritorious service.  As with all personal decorations, formal recommendations, approval through the chain of command, and announcement in orders are required.

8.  United States Army Vietnam Regulation 672-1 (Military Awards) governed the military awards program in Vietnam during the Vietnam War.  This regulation stated that the Bronze Star Medal may have been awarded for heroism, meritorious achievement or service which did not involve aerial flight, but which was performed in connection with military operations against an armed enemy 
including combat, support, and supply operations.  As with all personal decorations, formal recommendations, approval through the chain of command, and announcement in orders are required.



DISCUSSION AND CONCLUSIONS:

1.  The applicant contends that he was sent a BSM and an ARCOM; however, there is insufficient evidence to support his claim.  

2.  There is no evidence of record which shows the applicant was recommended for or awarded the ARCOM.  Therefore, there is insufficient evidence on which to base correction of his DD Form 214 to show award of the ARCOM.

3.  Although the applicant’s service personnel record contains a citation and award certificate for the BSM, absent orders authorizing him award of the BSM, these documents alone are not sufficient to support correction of his records to show award of the BSM.  

BOARD VOTE:

________  ________  ________  GRANT FULL RELIEF 

________  ________  ________  GRANT PARTIAL RELIEF 

________  ________  ________  GRANT FORMAL HEARING

___X____  ____X__  ____X___  DENY APPLICATION

BOARD DETERMINATION/RECOMMENDATION:

The evidence presented does not demonstrate the existence of a probable error or injustice.  Therefore, the Board determined that the overall merits of this case are insufficient as a basis for correction of the records of the individual concerned.




      _______ _ X _______   ___
               CHAIRPERSON
      
I certify that herein is recorded the true and complete record of the proceedings of the Army Board for Correction of Military Records in this case.

ABCMR Record of Proceedings (cont)                                         AR20090013587



3


ARMY BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS

 RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS


1

ABCMR Record of Proceedings (cont)                                         AR20090013587



2


ARMY BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS

 RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS


1

Similar Decisions

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2013 | 20130017303

    Original file (20130017303.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    The applicant provides: * Award certificates for the BSM and two awards of the ARCOM * DD Form 214 CONSIDERATION OF EVIDENCE: 1. There are no orders for award of the BSM or ARCOM in the available records; his DA Form 20 (Enlisted Qualification Record) does not show them as authorized awards; and a review of the Awards and Decorations Computer-Assisted Retrieval System, an index of general orders issued during the Vietnam era between 1965 and 1973 maintained by the U.S. Army Human Resources...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2012 | 20120008357

    Original file (20120008357.txt) Auto-classification: Approved

    The following general orders (GO) published by Headquarters, 9th Infantry Division awarded the applicant the following awards as indicated: * GO Number 7566, dated 26 August 1968, awarded him the BSM with "V" Device for heroism in Vietnam on 24 June 1968 * GO Number 8191, dated 9 September 1968, awarded him BSM with "V" Device for heroism in Vietnam on 12 and 13 August 1968 * GO Number 2550, dated 5 March 1969, awarded him the BSM (2nd OLC) for meritorious service in Vietnam for the period...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2010 | 20100023235

    Original file (20100023235.txt) Auto-classification: Approved

    The applicant requests, in two separate applications, correction of his DD Form 214 (Armed Forces of the United States Report of Transfer or Discharge) to show the Army Commendation Medal (ARCOM), Bronze Star Medal (BSM) with "V" Device for heroism, and the BSM for meritorious achievement. He provides: * General Orders (GO) Number 6301 awarding him the ARCOM * the associated ARCOM award certificate * GO Number 6694 awarding him the BSM with "V" Device * a BSM award certificate for...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2014 | 20140021310

    Original file (20140021310.txt) Auto-classification: Approved

    However, he provided a BSM Certificate, dated 21 October 1968, which shows he was awarded the BSM for meritorious achievement during the period 2 December 1967 to 2 August 1968 in Vietnam. Also eligible for this award are individuals who qualified for award of the Vietnam Service Medal or the Armed Forces Expeditionary Medal and served for less than 6 months of service but: * were wounded as a result of hostile action * were captured by hostile forces but later escaped or were rescued or...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2013 | 20130004646

    Original file (20130004646.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    A review of the applicant's military personnel records failed to reveal any orders or other evidence that shows he was awarded the BSM or ARCOM. The applicant contends that his DD Form 214 should be corrected to show award of the BSM and two awards of the ARCOM. _______ _ _x______ ___ CHAIRPERSON I certify that herein is recorded the true and complete record of the proceedings of the Army Board for Correction of Military Records in this case.

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2008 | 20080019366

    Original file (20080019366.txt) Auto-classification: Approved

    Therefore, the applicant's records should be corrected to show these unit awards. Evidence also shows the applicant participated in four campaigns during his service in Vietnam. As a result, the Board recommends that all Department of the Army records of the individual concerned be corrected by: a. deleting from item 24 of the applicant's DD Form 214 the Vietnam Service Medal; and b. adding to item 24 of the applicant's DD Form 214 the Bronze Star Medal with "V" Device (first oak leaf...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2014 | 20140013515

    Original file (20140013515.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    The applicant provided a copy of a certificate and citation stating that he was awarded the ARCOM for meritorious service for the period 3 November 1967 to 9 December 1968 while serving as an assistant operations sergeant at Fort Gordon, Georgia. There are no available general orders awarding the applicant the BSM with "V" Device or the ARCOM. _______ _ x_______ ___ CHAIRPERSON I certify that herein is recorded the true and complete record of the proceedings of the Army Board for...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2010 | 20100019360

    Original file (20100019360.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    There are no orders or any other evidence in his official military personnel file (OMPF) that show he was recommended for or awarded the ARCOM and/or BSM. In the absence of orders or any other corroborating evidence showing he was awarded or recommended for these awards, the citations and certificates alone are insufficient for basing a correction to his DD Form 214. ____________X_____________ CHAIRPERSON I certify that herein is recorded the true and complete record of the proceedings of...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2011 | 20110004346

    Original file (20110004346.txt) Auto-classification: Approved

    The applicant requests correction of his DD Form 214 (Armed Forces of the United States Report of Transfer or Discharge) to show the Bronze Star Medal (BSM) with "V" Device and all unit awards he is entitled to that were not awarded prior to his release from active duty. Therefore, it would be appropriate at this time to correction his DD Form 214 to show the BSM (2nd Award) and with "V" Device. As a result, the Board recommends that all Department of the Army records of the individual...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2010 | 20100010872

    Original file (20100010872.txt) Auto-classification: Approved

    The applicant requests, in effect, correction of his DD Form 214 (Report of Transfer or Discharge) to show award of the Bronze Star Medal (BSM), Republic of Vietnam Campaign Medal with Device (1960) instead of the Vietnam Campaign Medal, two awards of the Overseas Service Bar, Good Conduct Medal, Meritorious Unit Commendation (MUC), and Army Commendation Medal (ARCOM). The applicant states: * He was awarded the BSM, Republic of Vietnam Campaign Medal with Device (1960), two awards of the...