Search Decisions

Decision Text

ARMY | BCMR | CY2013 | 20130021447
Original file (20130021447.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

		IN THE CASE OF:	  

		BOARD DATE:	  14 August 2014

		DOCKET NUMBER:  AR20130021447 


THE BOARD CONSIDERED THE FOLLOWING EVIDENCE:

1.  Application for correction of military records (with supporting documents provided, if any).

2.  Military Personnel Records and advisory opinions (if any).


THE APPLICANT'S REQUEST, STATEMENT, AND EVIDENCE:

1.  The applicant requests correction of his DD Form 214 (Report of Separation from the Armed Forces of the United States) to show award of the Bronze Star Medal (BSM) with "V" Device.

2.  The applicant states:

* the BSM with "V" Device was in his possession, but it was stolen when his house was burglarized
* the military has no indication that the medal was awarded, but it was received and stolen
* since it was stolen, he is requesting a replacement

3.  The applicant provides:

* his DD Form 214
* a DA AGO Form 638 (Recommendation for Award - Heroism)
* two witness statements

CONSIDERATION OF EVIDENCE:

1.  Title 10, U.S. Code, section 1552(b), provides that applications for correction of military records must be filed within 3 years after discovery of the alleged error or injustice.  This provision of law also allows the Army Board for Correction of Military Records (ABCMR) to excuse an applicant's failure to timely file within the 3-year statute of limitations if the ABCMR determines it would be in the interest of 
justice to do so.  While it appears the applicant did not file within the time frame provided in the statute of limitations, the ABCMR has elected to conduct a substantive review of this case and, only to the extent relief, if any, is granted, has determined it is in the interest of justice to excuse the applicant's failure to timely file.  In all other respects, there are insufficient bases to waive the statute of limitations for timely filing.

2.  The applicant's complete military records are not available for review.  A fire destroyed approximately 18 million service members' records at the National Personnel Records Center in 1973.  It is believed that the applicant's records were lost or destroyed in that fire.  However, there were sufficient documents remaining in a reconstructed record to conduct a fair and impartial review of this case.

3.  The applicant's available records show he was inducted into the Army of the United States on 24 October 1952.

4.  He submitted:

	a.  a DA AGO Form 638, dated 9 July 1953, which shows the applicant was recommended for award of the BSM with "V" Device by his then Battalion Commander for heroism on 12 June 1953, when the enemy launched a fierce assault attack against his unit and he provided the defenders with accurate and continuous fire support.  After all the men in his crew were wounded, he manned the mortar himself until all of his ammunition was expended.  The applicant refused to seek shelter until he had cared for his wounded comrades and they were safely evacuated.  He remained at the knoll throughout the night firing his personal weapon until assured that the foe had been driven from the knoll.

	b.  two witness statements, dated 12 July 1953, from members of his unit who stated that after every member of his mortar squad was wounded he continued to man the weapon by himself and provide fire support until his ammunition supply was depleted. 

5.  On 23 October 1954, he was honorably released from active duty and transferred to the U.S. Army Reserve after completing a total of 2 years of active military service.





6.  His DD Form 214 shows in item 27 (Decorations, Medals, Badges, Commendations, Citations, and Campaign Ribbons) shows he was awarded or authorized the:

* United Nations Service Medal
* Army Good Conduct Medal
* Korean Service Medal with one bronze service star
* Combat Infantryman Badge
* National Defense Service Medal
* Purple Heart 

7.  Army Regulation 600-8-22 (Military Awards) states the BSM is awarded in time of war for heroism and for meritorious achievement or service, not involving participation in aerial flight, in connection with military operations against an armed enemy, or while engaged in military operations involving conflict with an opposing armed force in which the United States is not a belligerent party.  As with all personal decorations, formal recommendations, approval through the chain of command, and announcement in orders are required.

DISCUSSION AND CONCLUSIONS:

1.  The applicant's contention that he was awarded the BSM with "V" Device is acknowledged; however, his record does not contain any orders nor has he provided any orders or other corroborating evidence showing he was awarded the BSM with "V" Device.

2.  The applicant's service in Korea and his sincerity are not in question.  However, his available record contains no orders or other documents which confirm he was awarded the BSM with "V" Device while serving in Korea.  The regulatory burden of proof necessary to support adding the BSM with "V" Device to his DD Form 214 has not been met.

BOARD VOTE:

________  ________  ________  GRANT FULL RELIEF 

________  ________  ________  GRANT PARTIAL RELIEF 

________  ________  ________  GRANT FORMAL HEARING

____x___  ____x____  ___x__  DENY APPLICATION


BOARD DETERMINATION/RECOMMENDATION:

The evidence presented does not demonstrate the existence of a probable error or injustice.  Therefore, the Board determined that the overall merits of this case are insufficient as a basis for correction of the records of the individual concerned.



      ____________x____________
                 CHAIRPERSON
      
I certify that herein is recorded the true and complete record of the proceedings of the Army Board for Correction of Military Records in this case.



ABCMR Record of Proceedings (cont)                                         AR20130021447





3


ARMY BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS

 RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS


1

ABCMR Record of Proceedings (cont)                                         AR20130021447



2


ARMY BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS

 RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS


1

Similar Decisions

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2015 | 20150005433

    Original file (20150005433.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    By that time the enemy force had moved within 100 meters and despite helicopter gun ship support, the helicopters were raked by crew served automatic weapons fire and small arms as they landed. The commander ordered that aircraft to pick him up, with his aircraft following in support. [Applicant's] fire kept the enemy away from them.

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2013 | 20130001035

    Original file (20130001035.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    On 14 August 2012, this Board also determined there was no evidence of record or independent evidence submitted by the applicant that would support a conclusion that the applicant's award recommendation was not properly processed. Commanders at the time of the act, or shortly thereafter, determined the applicant's actions were so noteworthy as to warrant award of the Army Commendation Medal with "V" Device. However, the Army Decorations Board determined the degree of action and service...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2011 | 20110021485

    Original file (20110021485.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    d. Mr. HEH states he served with the applicant in Vietnam and they were both exposed to heavy shelling, rocket attacks, and small arms fire from the enemy. His request for correction of his records to show award of the Purple Heart and BSM with "V" device was carefully considered; however, it is not supported by the available evidence of record. The applicant’s claim that he sustained fragment wounds to his back during a rocket attack is not supported by the available evidence.

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2009 | 20090012378

    Original file (20090012378.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    The applicant provides a self-authored statement, dated 17 July 2009; a DA Form 638 (Recommendation for Award) for the BSM, dated 4 April 2005, and citation; a commander's statement, dated 8 April 2005; two DA Forms 2823 (Sworn Statements); an ARCOM with Valor certificate, dated 15 August 2005; and his DD Form 214 (Certificate of Release or Discharge from Active Duty) in support of his application. There is no evidence of record that indicates the applicant or anyone in his chain of command...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2012 | 20120004977

    Original file (20120004977.txt) Auto-classification: Approved

    The applicant's Official Military Personnel File (OMPF) does not contain any general orders awarding him the 2nd or 3rd award of the Purple Heart. While there are no orders in the applicant’s available records awarding him the 2nd and 3rd award of the Purple Heart, the reasons cited on his orders awarding him the Silver Star and the BSM with "V" Device verify his heroic actions and contact with hostile forces on 10 December 1967 and 3 April 1968. As a result, the Board recommends that all...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2009 | 20090005420

    Original file (20090005420.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    The PH and BSM with "V" Device are not included in the list of awards contained in item 24 and there is no indication the applicant pursued award of the PH or BSM with "V" Device at any time prior to his separation from active duty. Further, there are no medical treatment records on file that show he was ever treated for a combat-related wound or injury while he was serving on active duty. Therefore, it would not be appropriate award the applicant the PH at this time.

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2013 | 20130020063

    Original file (20130020063.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    Application for correction of military records (with supporting documents provided, if any). The applicant’s record shows that he was clearly cited for his heroism when he distinguished himself by valorous action on 1 November 1965 in connection with military operations against an enemy of the United States in the RVN. Based upon the available evidence it is determined that the BSM with “V” Device was the appropriate award for the cited action.

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2012 | 20120004848

    Original file (20120004848.txt) Auto-classification: Approved

    The applicant requests that his WD AGO Form 53-55 (Enlisted Record and Report of Separation Honorable Discharge) be corrected to show one bronze service star on his Philippine Liberation Medal and a machinegun bar on his Expert Marksmanship Qualification Badge. However, there is no evidence of record and the applicant has not provided any evidence to show he was authorized award of an automatic rifle or machinegun bar to his Expert Marksmanship Qualification Badge. Adding the awards of the...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2010 | 20100021204

    Original file (20100021204.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    He was awarded the Silver Star for actions which occurred on 16 July 1953, during the time he was wounded. The applicant's DD Form 214 shows he was awarded: * Silver Star * Korean Service Medal with one bronze service star * United Nations Service Medal * Combat Infantryman Badge * Purple Heart * National Defense Service Medal It does not show the Bronze Star Medal with "V" Device. The evidence of record shows the applicant was awarded the Bronze Star Medal with "V" Device.

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2006 | 20060002048C070205

    Original file (20060002048C070205.doc) Auto-classification: Approved

    The applicant requests, in effect, correction of his records to show that he was awarded the Combat Infantryman Badge, the Army Achievement Medal, and awarded several certificates of training and achievement. The applicant provides a copy of his DD Form 214 (Certificate of Release or Discharge from Active Duty), a copy of orders awarding him the BSM with "V" Device, the Combat Infantryman Badge, and the Army Achievement Medal, and several certificates of training and achievement, in support...