IN THE CASE OF:
BOARD DATE: 12 August 2014
DOCKET NUMBER: AR20130021289
THE BOARD CONSIDERED THE FOLLOWING EVIDENCE:
1. Application for correction of military records (with supporting documents provided, if any).
2. Military Personnel Records and advisory opinions (if any).
THE APPLICANT'S REQUEST, STATEMENT, AND EVIDENCE:
1. The applicant requests award of the Army Good Conduct Medal.
2. The applicant states he believes he met the criteria for and is deserving of the award of the Army Good Conduct Medal.
3. The applicant provides his DD Form 214 (Armed Forces of the United States Report of Transfer or Discharge).
CONSIDERATION OF EVIDENCE:
1. Title 10, U.S. Code, section 1552(b), provides that applications for correction of military records must be filed within 3 years after discovery of the alleged error or injustice. This provision of law also allows the Army Board for Correction of Military Records (ABCMR) to excuse an applicant's failure to timely file within the 3-year statute of limitations if the ABCMR determines it would be in the interest of justice to do so. While it appears the applicant did not file within the time frame provided in the statute of limitations, the ABCMR has elected to conduct a substantive review of this case and, only to the extent relief, if any, is granted, has determined it is in the interest of justice to excuse the applicant's failure to timely file. In all other respects, there are insufficient bases to waive the statute of limitations for timely filing.
2. The applicant enlisted in the Regular Army on 24 June 1968 and held military occupational specialty 35L (Avionic Communications Equipment Repairman). The highest rank he attained while serving on active duty was specialist five.
3. Special Orders Number 228, issued by Headquarters, U.S. Army Training Center, Fort Lewis, WA on 16 August 1968, awarded him the Sharpshooter Marksmanship Qualification Badge with Rifle Bar (M-14).
4. His DA Form 20 (Enlisted Qualification Record) shows he served in the Republic of Vietnam from 20 October 1969 to 26 December 1970. During this period he served with the following units during the cited periods:
* 605th Transportation Company, from 1 November 1969 through 1 December 1969
* 605th Transportation Company with duty at the Avionic Electrical Support Company, Central (Provisional), attached to the 34th General Support Company, from 2 December 1969 through 11 October 1970
* 165th Transportation Company with duty at the Avionic Electrical Support Company, Central (Provisional), attached to the 34th General Support Company, from 12 October 1970 to 26 December 1970
5. General Orders Number 4280, issued by Headquarters, 1st Aviation Brigade, on 27 May 1970, awarded him the Army Commendation Medal (1st Award).
6. General Orders Number 275, issued by Headquarters, 1st Aviation Brigade, on 12 January 1971, awarded him the Army Commendation Medal (2nd Award).
7. He was honorably released from active duty on 29 December 1970. His DD Form 214 shows he completed 2 years, 6 months, and 6 days on net active service, of which 1 year, 2 months, and 10 days was credited as foreign service. Additionally, his DD Form 214 shows he was awarded or authorized the:
* National Defense Service Medal
* Army Commendation Medal
* Vietnam Service Medal
* Vietnam Campaign Medal
8. There is no documentation in his available record that shows he was awarded the AGCM. A review of his available record shows he had "excellent" conduct and efficiency ratings, no derogatory information in the form of time lost, nonjudicial punishment, or suspension of favorable personnel actions, or a commander's disqualification that would have precluded him from being recommended for and awarded the first award of the Army Good Conduct Medal, for the period 24 June 1968 through 29 December 1970.
9. Army Regulation 672-5-1 (Awards), in effect at the time, provided that the Army Good Conduct Medal was awarded to individuals who completed a qualified period of active duty enlisted service. This period was 3 years except in those cases when the period for the first award ended with the termination of a period of Federal military service. The enlisted person must have had all "excellent" conduct and efficiency ratings and no convictions by a court-martial.
10. Army Regulation 600-8-22 (Military Awards) states one bronze service star is authorized with the Vietnam Service Medal for each Vietnam campaign for which a member is credited with participating. Appendix B shows that during his service in the Republic of Vietnam, the applicant participated in the following four campaigns:
* Vietnam Summer-Fall 1969 (9 June 1969 - 31 October 1969)
* Vietnam Winter-Spring 1970 (1 November 1969 - 30 April 1970)
* DA Sanctuary Counteroffensive (1 May 1970 - 30 June 1970)
* Vietnam Counteroffensive, Phase VII (1 July 1970 - 30 June 1971)
11. Department of the Army Pamphlet 672-3 (Unit Citation and Campaign Participation Credit Register) lists the awards received by units serving in the Republic of Vietnam. This pamphlet shows:
a. The 605th Transportation Company was cited for award of the Meritorious Unit Commendation for the period 1 November 1968 to 31 January 1970, by Department of the Army General Orders (DAGO) Number 51, dated 1971.
b. Headquarters and Headquarters Company, 34th General Support Group was cited for award of the:
* Meritorious Unit Commendation for the period 1 February 1970 to
31 July 1970, by DAGO Number 71, dated 1973
* Republic of Vietnam Gallantry Cross with Palm Unit Citation for the period 1 October 1970 to 31 August 1972, by DAGO Number 6, dated 1974
DISCUSSION AND CONCLUSIONS:
1. He served honorably during the period 24 June 1968 through 29 December 1970. There is no derogatory information in the form of nonjudicial punishment
or suspension of favorable personnel actions that would disqualify him for the first award of the Army Good Conduct Medal. Additionally, there are no entries in his record to indicate that his commander denied him this award and he received "excellent" conduct and efficiency ratings. It appears he met the criteria for this award. Therefore, as a matter of equity, it would be appropriate to award him the Army Good Conduct Medal (1st Award) and to correct his DD Form 214 to add it.
2. General orders awarded him the Army Commendation Medal (2nd Award); therefore, he is entitled to correction of his DD Form 214 to add this award.
3. The evidence of record shows he participated in four campaigns while serving in Vietnam; therefore, he is entitled to correction of his DD Form 214 to show four bronze service stars affixed to his previously-awarded Vietnam Service Medal.
4. General orders awarded his units in Vietnam the Meritorious Unit Commendation (2nd Award) and the Republic of Vietnam Gallantry Cross with Palm Unit Citation during his periods of assignment. These unit awards are not shown on his DD Form 214; therefore, he is entitled to correction of his DD Form 214 to add these unit awards.
5. Special orders awarded him the Sharpshooter Marksmanship Qualification Badge with Rifle Bar (M-14). This marksmanship badge is not shown on his DD Form 214; therefore, he is entitled to correction of his DD Form 214 to add this badge.
BOARD VOTE:
____X____ ___X_____ ____X____ GRANT FULL RELIEF
________ ________ ________ GRANT PARTIAL RELIEF
________ ________ ________ GRANT FORMAL HEARING
________ ________ ________ DENY APPLICATION
BOARD DETERMINATION/RECOMMENDATION:
The Board determined that the evidence presented was sufficient to warrant a recommendation for relief. As a result, the Board recommends that all Department of the Army records of the individual concerned be corrected by:
a. awarding him the Army Good Conduct Medal (1st Award) for the period
24 June 1968 through 29 December 1970;
b. deleting from his DD Form 214 the Army Commendation Medal and the Vietnam Service Medal; and
c. adding to his DD Form 214 the:
* Army Commendation Medal (2nd Award)
* Army Good Conduct Medal (1st Award)
* Meritorious Unit Commendation (2nd Award)
* Republic of Vietnam Gallantry Cross with Palm Unit Citation
* Sharpshooter Marksmanship Qualification Badge with Rifle Bar (M-14)
_______ _ _X______ ___
CHAIRPERSON
I certify that herein is recorded the true and complete record of the proceedings of the Army Board for Correction of Military Records in this case.
ABCMR Record of Proceedings (cont) AR20130021289
3
ARMY BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS
RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS
1
ABCMR Record of Proceedings (cont) AR20130021289
2
ARMY BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS
RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS
1
ARMY | BCMR | CY2013 | 20130005397
Army Regulation 672-5-1 (Military Awards), in effect at the time, provided that the Army Good Conduct Medal was awarded to individuals who completed a qualified period of active duty enlisted service. Regrettably, in the absence of orders, there is insufficient evidence to correct his DD Form 214 to show award of the Army Commendation Medal. As a result, the Board recommends that all Department of the Army records of the individual concerned be corrected by: * awarding him the Army Good...
ARMY | BCMR | CY2009 | 20090020203
The applicant's service record contains orders which show he performed duty as a crew member in the Republic of Vietnam. Therefore, should be awarded the Army Good Conduct Medal (First Award) and is entitled to correction of his records to show this award. As a result, the Board recommends that all Department of the Army records of the individual concerned be corrected by: a. awarding him the Army Good Conduct Medal (1st Award) for the period 30 September 1968 through 28 August 1971 and b....
ARMY | BCMR | CY2011 | 20110018543
His DA Form 20 (Enlisted Qualification Record) shows in: * item 38 (Record of Assignments), he was assigned to the 8th Signal Detachment on 7 July 1969 (redesignated as the 317th Maintenance Company on 1 December 1969) to 21 June 1970 * item 38, he received all "excellent" conduct and efficiency ratings through his service * item 41 (Awards and Decorations) the: * Army Commendation Medal * National Defense Service Medal * Vietnam Service Medal * Republic of Vietnam Campaign Medal with Device...
ARMY | BCMR | CY2013 | 20130000119
While it appears the applicant did not file within the time frame provided in the statute of limitations, the ABCMR has elected to conduct a substantive review of this case and, only to the extent relief, if any, is granted, has determined it is in the interest of justice to excuse the applicant's failure to timely file. His DD Form 214 shows he was awarded or authorized the: * National Defense Service Medal * Bronze Star Medal * Army Commendation Medal * Vietnam Service Medal * Vietnam...
ARMY | BCMR | CY2013 | 20130008863
Army Regulation 672-5-1 (Awards), in effect at the time, stated the Army Good Conduct Medal was awarded for each 3 years of continuous enlisted active Federal military service completed on or after 27 August 1940. The applicant was awarded the Vietnam Medal and he served in Vietnam during three campaigns; therefore, he is entitled to correction of his DD Form 214 to show three service stars for wear on the previously-awarded Vietnam Service Medal. Awarding him the Army Good Conduct Medal...
ARMY | BCMR | CY2001 | 2001066206C070421
The medic who assisted him with his injury told him that since there were no shrapnel fragments present in his leg the Purple Heart would not be awarded to him. There are no orders in the applicant’s service records, which show that he was awarded the Purple Heart. The evidence of record also shows that the applicant was assigned to a unit at the time the unit was awarded the RVN Gallantry Cross with Palm and he served in the RVN during 5 Campaigns, entitling him to wear a silver service...
ARMY | BCMR | CY2013 | 20130013866
The applicant requests correction of his DD Form 214 (Armed Forces of the United States Report of Transfer or Discharge) for the period ending on 10 March 1970 to: * show his date of birth (DOB) as 1947 * add the Bronze Star Medal (2nd Award) 2. GO awarded him the Army Good Conduct Medal (1st Award) during the period of his enlisted service; therefore, he is entitled to correction of his DD Forms 214 for the period ending on 10 March 1967 and 10 March 1970 to add this award. As a result,...
ARMY | BCMR | CY2009 | 20090004867
Army Regulation 672-5-1 (Military Awards), in effect at the time, provides that the Army Good Conduct Medal is awarded to individuals who have completed a qualified period of active duty enlisted service. Records show the applicant was awarded the Vietnam Service Medal. As a result, the Board recommends that all Department of the Army records of the individual concerned be corrected by: a. awarding him the Army Good Conduct Medal for the period of service from 29 March 1968 to 6 November...
ARMY | BCMR | CY2002 | 2002081738C070215
The applicant’s DA Form 20 (Enlisted Qualification Record) for his period of service, 17 May 1966 to 26 March 1968, shows no information in Item 40 (Wounds) and Item 41 (Awards and Decorations) does not list either the Purple Heart or the CIB. Therefore, as a result, the Board determined that he should be awarded the CIB and his records should be corrected to show this badge. Further, that his DD Form 214, dated 24 August 1970, be corrected to show the above awards plus the GCMDL one...
ARMY | BCMR | CY2013 | 20130013747
Application for correction of military records (with supporting documents provided, if any). His original DD Form 214 for the period ending 30 January 2005 shows the Meritorious Unit Commendation (3rd Award) and Valorous Unit Award as authorized awards. As a result, the Board recommends denial of so much of the application that pertains to amending his DD Form 214 for the period ending 30 January 2005 to show the following awards: * Silver Star * Joint Meritorious Unit Award * Expert...