| Mr. Carl W. S. Chun | Director | |
| Mrs. Joyce A. Hall | Analyst |
| Mr. Arthur A. Omartian | Chairperson | |
| Mr. Roger W. Able | Member | |
| Ms. Karen Y. Fletcher | Member |
2. The applicant requests in effect, the award of the Purple Heart.
3. The applicant states in effect, that he was wounded while assigned to the Republic of Vietnam (RVN). He was hit in his left leg by shrapnel. The medic who assisted him with his injury told him that since there were no shrapnel fragments present in his leg the Purple Heart would not be awarded to him.
The applicant submits several pictures of his leg in support of his application.
4. The applicant’s military records show that he enlisted in the Regular Army on 15 November 1967 for 3 years. He completed basic combat training and advanced individual training and was awarded military occupational specialty
67N20 (Helicopter Mechanic). The highest grade he achieved was pay grade
E-5.
5. The applicant arrived in RVN on or about 9 February 1969. He was assigned to the 605th Transportation Company, Vietnam as a helicopter repairman. He departed the RVN on or about 18 June 1970.
6. There are no orders in the applicant’s service records, which show that he was awarded the Purple Heart. There also is no evidence in his records, which show he was wounded or was treated for a wound as a result of hostile action.
7. The applicant’s medical records are not available for review. The applicant’s
Enlisted Qualification Record (DA Form 20) does not show an entry under item 40 (Wounds) and item 41 (Awards and Decorations). The entries do not show the Purple Heart as an authorized award.
8. The applicant’s personnel record does not show the Army Good Conduct Medal. However, his record does show that he received excellent conduct and efficiency ratings during his entire period of service. There is also no evidence of derogatory information or evidence to show that his unit commander disqualified him for the award of the Good Conduct Medal.
9. The applicant’s record shows that he served in the RVN from 9 February 1969 through 19 June 1970. He served through five campaigns the Vietnam Counter Offensive Phase VI from 2 November 1968 through 22 February 1969; the Vietnam Counter Offensive from 23 February through 8 June 1969; the Vietnam Summer-Fall 1969 from 9 June through 31 October 1969; the Vietnam Winter-Spring 1970, from 1 November 1969 through 30 April 1970 and the DA Sanctuary Counter Offensive from 1 May through 30 June 1970.
10. On 19 June 1970, the applicant was released from active duty and transferred to the U.S. Army Reserve. He had completed 2 years, 7 months and 5 days of creditable active service. His Armed Forces of the United States Report of Transfer or Discharge (DD Form 214) shows that he was authorized the National Defense Service Medal, the Vietnam Service Medal, the Vietnam Campaign Medal, and the Army Commendation Medal. It does not show the Purple Heart as an authorized award.
11. Army Regulation 600-8-22 provides, in pertinent part, that the Purple Heart is awarded for a wound sustained as a result of hostile action. Substantiating evidence must be provided to verify that the wound was the result of hostile action, the wound must have required treatment by a medical officer, and the medical treatment must have been made a matter of official record.
12. Army Regulation 600-8-22 also provides, in pertinent part, that the Army Good Conduct Medal is awarded for each 3 years of continuous enlisted active Federal military service completed on or after 27 August 1940 and, for the first award only, upon termination of service on or after 27 June 1950 or less than 3 years but more than 1 year. At the time, a soldier’s conduct and efficiency rating must have been rated as “excellent” for the entire period of qualifying service.
13. The Department of the Army Pamphlet 672-3 (Unit Citation and Campaign Participation Credit Register) shows that Department of the Army General Orders 51, 1971, awarded the Meritorious Unit Commendation for the period
1 November 1968 – 31 January 1970, to the 605th Transportation Company.
14. The Department of the Army Pamphlet 672-3 (Unit Citation and Campaign Participation Credit Register) shows that the applicant is entitled to award of the Republic of Vietnam Gallantry Cross with Palm Unit Citation based on the Department of the Army General Orders 8, dated 1974.
CONCLUSIONS:
1. There is no evidence in his record, nor has the applicant provided any evidence, which shows that he was awarded the Purple Heart or that he was wounded or treated for a wound as a result of hostile action.
2. The evidence submitted by the applicant is insufficient and does not meet the criteria for the award of the Purple Heart. Therefore, without official substantiating evidence the applicant is not entitled to award of the Purple Heart. However, if the applicant can provide substantiating evidence such as documented treatment records, which show that he was injured and was treated for an injury that resulted from hostile action, he may reapply.
3. The evidence of record shows that the applicant was entitled to the first award of the Army Good Conduct Medal for the period of 15 November 1967 to 19 June
1970, based on completion of a period of qualifying service ending with the termination of a period of Federal military service.
4. The evidence of record also shows that the applicant was assigned to a unit at the time the unit was awarded the RVN Gallantry Cross with Palm and he served in the RVN during 5 Campaigns, entitling him to wear a silver service star with the Vietnam Service Medal.
5. In view of the foregoing, the applicant’s records should be corrected as recommended below.
RECOMMENDATION:
1. That all of the Department of the Army records related to this case be corrected by awarding the individual concerned the Army Good Conduct Medal for the period 15 November 1967 through 19 June 1970.
2. That the applicant’s DD Form 214 be amended to show the award of the Army Good Conduct Medal, the Republic of Vietnam Gallantry Cross with Palm and the Republic of Vietnam Service Medal with a silver service star.
3. That so much of the application as is in excess of the foregoing be denied.
BOARD VOTE:
__aao___ __rwa___ __kyf___ GRANT AS STATED IN RECOMMENDATION
________ ________ ________ GRANT FORMAL HEARING
________ ________ ________ DENY APPLICATION
Arthur A. Omartian
______________________
CHAIRPERSON
| CASE ID | AR2001066206 |
| SUFFIX | |
| RECON | |
| DATE BOARDED | 20020204 |
| TYPE OF DISCHARGE | |
| DATE OF DISCHARGE | |
| DISCHARGE AUTHORITY | |
| DISCHARGE REASON | |
| BOARD DECISION | (GRANT) |
| REVIEW AUTHORITY | |
| ISSUES 1. | 107.0015 |
| 2. | |
| 3. | |
| 4. | |
| 5. | |
| 6. |
ARMY | BCMR | CY2015 | 20150001205
Application for correction of military records (with supporting documents provided, if any). The evidence of record does not show the applicant was awarded or issued an order for the PH. Adding to his DD Form 214: * PH * VSM with three bronze service stars * MUC * RVN Gallantry Cross with Palm Unit Citation ___________x___________ CHAIRPERSON I certify that herein is recorded the true and complete record of the proceedings of the Army Board for Correction of Military Records in this case.
ARMY | BCMR | CY2013 | 20130012877
The applicant's military records do not contain any general orders awarding him the 2nd award of the Purple Heart. While there are no orders in the applicants available records awarding him a 2nd award of the Purple Heart, his DA Form 20 verifies that he sustained multiple fragment wounds on 25 May 1970 and was a patient at the 27th Surgical Hospital. As a result, the Board recommends that all Department of the Army records of the individual concerned be corrected by: a. awarding him the...
ARMY | BCMR | CY2011 | 20110006085
The applicant's DA Form 20 (Enlisted Qualification Record) shows in: * Item 31 (Foreign Service) he served in the Republic of Vietnam (RVN) from 31 October 1968 through 3 August 1969 * Item 38 (Record of Assignments) that during his tour of duty in the RVN he was assigned to 2nd Battalion, 39th Infantry, 9th Infantry Division * Item 38 he received all "excellent" conduct and efficiency ratings throughout his service * Item 40 (Wounds) he sustained a fragmentation wound to his left leg on 2...
ARMY | BCMR | CY2010 | 20100026894
The applicant's DA Form 20 shows he was wounded on 3 May 1970 and a DA Form 8-275-3 shows he was wounded in action in Vietnam. Therefore, there is sufficient evidence to show he is entitled to award of the Purple Heart and correction of his records to show this award. As a result, the Board recommends that all Department of the Army records of the individual concerned be corrected by: a. awarding him the Purple Heart for wounds received on 3 May 1970 and the Army Good Conduct Medal (1st...
ARMY | BCMR | CY2011 | 20110010493
There are no general orders in his service personnel records that show he was awarded the Purple Heart. During the Vietnam War, U.S. Army Vietnam Regulation 672-1 (Decorations and Awards) stated the authority to award the Purple Heart was delegated to hospital commanders. As a result, the Board recommends that all Department of the Army records of the individual concerned be corrected by: a. awarding the applicant the Army Good Conduct Medal (1st Award) for the period 21 May 1968 through...
ARMY | BCMR | CY2011 | 20110010388
The applicant states he was awarded the Purple Heart in Vietnam and he feels it should be listed on his DD Form 214. This was markedly aggravated by a fall on the left shoulder subsequent to a bullet wound injury involving the right and left lower legs while engaged in combat in RVN. The evidence of record shows the applicant was awarded the Vietnam Service Medal.
ARMY | BCMR | CY2007 | 20070008364C071108
Section 24 (Decorations, Medals, Badges, Commendations, Citations, and Campaign Ribbons Awarded or Authorized) of the applicant’s DD Form 214 does not show award of the Purple Heart. The Board determined that the evidence presented was sufficient to warrant a recommendation for partial relief and to excuse failure to timely file. As a result, the Board recommends that all Department of the Army records of the individual concerned be corrected by showing award of the Purple Heart for wounds...
ARMY | BCMR | CY2008 | 20080019189
There are no orders or other evidence in the applicants military personnel records showing he was awarded a second award of the Purple Heart. There are no orders or other evidence in the applicants military personnel records showing he was awarded the Bronze Star Medal. However, there are no orders or other evidence in the applicants military personnel records that shows he was awarded the Bronze Star Medal.
ARMY | BCMR | CY2013 | 20130022223
The evidence of record shows the applicant served in Vietnam from 1 September 1969 to 1 January 1970. Therefore, he is entitled to award of the RVN Campaign Medal with Device (1960) and correction of his records to show this award. As a result, the Board recommends that all Department of the Army records of the individual concerned be corrected by: a. awarding him the Army Good Conduct Medal (1st Award) for the period 13 August 1968 to 15 June 1970; b. deleting from his DD Form 214 the...
ARMY | BCMR | CY2013 | 20130005505
This provision of law also allows the Army Board for Correction of Military Records (ABCMR) to excuse an applicant's failure to timely file within the 3-year statute of limitations if the ABCMR determines it would be in the interest of justice to do so. The applicant's request for correction of his DD Form 214 to show his award of the PH was carefully considered and determined to have merit. As a result, the Board recommends that all Department of the Army records of the individual...