Search Decisions

Decision Text

ARMY | BCMR | CY2013 | 20130021232
Original file (20130021232.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

		
		BOARD DATE:  5 August 2014

		DOCKET NUMBER:  AR20130021232


THE BOARD CONSIDERED THE FOLLOWING EVIDENCE:

1.  Application for correction of military records (with supporting documents provided, if any).

2.  Military Personnel Records and advisory opinions (if any).


THE APPLICANT'S REQUEST, STATEMENT, AND EVIDENCE:

1.  The applicant requests placement on the Temporary Disability Retirement List (TDRL).

2.  The applicant states:

	a.  He was not put on the TDRL when he was separated for disability.  He does have a 20-year letter.  He wants to have identification card privileges and be able to receive retired pay at age 60.

	b.  He served over 23 years with an honorable discharge, but he did not get an explanation when he was discharged that he would not be eligible for a military identification card or benefits by receiving separation pay.  He was not told that by receiving severance pay he waived his rights to benefits.

	c.  He never considered going to the commissary or using exchange services until recently.  He contacted the Defense Enrollment Eligibility Reporting System (DEERS) office and was told he was not eligible for an identification card.  He never thought he would have this problem or have a problem receiving retired pay at age 60, being a 23 year plus honorably-discharged veteran.

3.  The applicant provides copies of his:

* U.S. Army Reserve (USAR) Personnel Command, letter, Subject:  Notification of Eligibility for Retired Pay at Age 60 (20-Year Letter) 


* DA Form 3947 (Medical Evaluation Board (MEB) Proceedings), dated
27 April 2004
* DA Form 199 (Physical Evaluation Board (PEB) Proceedings), dated 
10 May 2004
* DD Form 214 (Certificate of Release or Discharge from Active Duty)

CONSIDERATION OF EVIDENCE:

1.  Title 10, U.S. Code, section 1552(b), provides that applications for correction of military records must be filed within 3 years after discovery of the alleged error or injustice.  This provision of law also allows the Army Board for Correction of Military Records (ABCMR) to excuse an applicant's failure to timely file within the 3-year statute of limitations if the ABCMR determines it would be in the interest of justice to do so.  While it appears the applicant did not file within the time frame provided in the statute of limitations, the ABCMR has elected to conduct a substantive review of this case and, only to the extent relief, if any, is granted, has determined it is in the interest of justice to excuse the applicant's failure to timely file.  In all other respects, there are insufficient bases to waive the statute of limitations for timely filing.

2.  Following prior service in the Regular Army, the applicant enlisted in the USAR on 22 August 1992.  He held military occupational specialty 42A (Personnel Administration Specialist).

3.  He last served on active duty from 3 January 2003 to 20 November 2004.

4.  A 5 November 2003, a USAR Personnel Command 20-year letter informed the applicant he had completed the required years of qualifying service and was eligible for retired pay on application at age 60 in accordance with Title 10, U.S. Code, Chapter 1223.

5.  His date of birth is 26 October 1961 and he will reach age 60 on 26 October 2021.

6.  The 27 April 2004 MEB Proceedings shows the applicant's conditions of degenerative joint disease, right knee with chondromalcia patella and patellofemoral syndrome, and degenerative disc disease of lumbar spine were medically unacceptable.  The board recommended referral to a PEB.  The proceedings were approved and the applicant agreed with the findings and recommendation.

7.  A PEB convened on 10 May 2004.  The DA Form 199 shows the applicant was found unfit for continued military service by reason of chronic pain, right knee and chronic low back pain, without neurologic abnormality.  The board recommended a combined rating of 20% and separation with severance pay.  The applicant concurred and waived a formal hearing on his case.

8.  On 12 May 2004, he elected the option to be discharged with entitlement to receive disability severance pay, pursuant to Title 10, U.S. Code section 1212.  The other option offered was to be transferred to the Retired Reserve pursuant to Title 10, U.S. Code section 1209, with entitlement to apply for retirement benefits upon reaching age 60.

9.  Orders 322-0312, Headquarters, Joint Readiness Training Center and Fort Polk, dated 17 November 2004, show the applicant was to be discharged effective 20 November 2004 with disability severance pay.

10.  On 20 November 2004, he was honorably separated with disability severance pay as a sergeant first class (SFC)/E-7.  He had completed 
1 year, 10 months and 18 days during the period covered by the DD Form 214 with 8 years, 9 months, and 23 days of prior active duty service and 12 years, 
1 month, and 1 day of prior inactive service. 

11.  He provided copies of:

	a.  The Texas PEB Fact Sheet, which states under Disability Ratings:  "Severance Pay is NOT a medical retirement.  If separated with severance pay, the Solider will not receive retirement or be entitled to future military benefits."  He signed indicating he had read and understood the information in the fact sheet

	b.  PEBLO Counseling Checklist/Statement, Bayne Jones Army Community Hospital, Fort Polk, LA, showing he was counseled concerning disability retirement and severance pay.

12.  Title 10, U.S. Code, section 1201, provides for the physical disability retirement of a member who has at least 20 years of service or a disability rated at least 30 percent.  Title 10, U.S. Code, section 1203, provides for the physical disability separation with severance pay of a member who has less than 20 years of service and a disability rated at less than 30 percent.

13.  Army Regulation 635-40 (Physical Evaluation for Retention, Retirement, or Separations) provides in paragraph 7-2 that a Soldier's name may be placed on 


the TDRL when it is determined that the Soldier is qualified for disability retirement under Title 10 U.S, Code section 1201 but for the fact that his disability is determined not to be of a permanent nature and stable.

14.  Title 10, U.S. Code, section 1203, provides for the physical disability separation of a member who has less than 20 years of service and a disability rating of less than 30 percent.

DISCUSSION AND CONCLUSIONS:

1.  The applicant contends he should have been placed on the TDRL.  He contends he was not informed that when he elected separation with severance pay he was waiving his rights to benefits.

2.  He was separated with a disability rating of 20 percent.  The PEB Proceedings show the board recommended his separation with severance pay and he concurred.  He was not eligible to be placed on the TDRL.

3.  The available evidence shows he elected to be separated with severance pay in lieu of the option to request transfer to the Retired Reserve with entitlement to apply for retirement benefits upon reaching age 60.

4.  The available evidence also shows he was counseled that if separated with severance pay he would not receive retirement or be entitled to future military benefits. 

5.  In view of the foregoing, there is no basis for granting applicant's requested relief.

BOARD VOTE:

________  ________  ________  GRANT FULL RELIEF 

________  ________  ________  GRANT PARTIAL RELIEF 

________  ________  ________  GRANT FORMAL HEARING

___x_____  __x______  __x___  DENY APPLICATION


BOARD DETERMINATION/RECOMMENDATION:

The evidence presented does not demonstrate the existence of a probable error or injustice.  Therefore, the Board determined the overall merits of this case are insufficient as a basis for correction of the records of the individual concerned.



      _____x_____________
      CHAIRPERSON
      
I certify that herein is recorded the true and complete record of the proceedings of the Army Board for Correction of Military Records in this case.
ABCMR Record of Proceedings (cont)                                         AR20120015570



3


ARMY BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS

 RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS


1

ABCMR Record of Proceedings (cont)                                         AR20130021232



2


ARMY BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS

 RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS


1

Similar Decisions

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2010 | 20100024907

    Original file (20100024907.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    He states he/the: * was retired for disability with eligibility to CRDP under Title 10, U.S. Code * Defense Finance and Accounting Service (DFAS) fails to pay him CRDP because it incorrectly computed his retirement status and eligibility * previously applied to this Board for correction of his discharge to show that he was placed on the Temporary Disability Retired List (TDRL), effective 16 October 2004 * is currently receiving 100 percent (%) disability compensation from the Department of...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2011 | 20110015500

    Original file (20110015500.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    The DA Form 199 (Physical Evaluation Board (PEB) Proceedings) stated, “As a Soldier with a rating of less than 30% who may have at least 20 qualifying years for Reserve retirement UP Chapter 67, Title 10, USC, you may have the option of accepting disability severance pay and forfeiting your Reserve retirement pay, or you may request transfer to inactive Reserve status and receive Reserve retired pay at age 60” (22 January 2007). These statements were interpreted to mean he was requesting...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2015 | 20150001631

    Original file (20150001631.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    These orders also show: * effective date of retirement: 18 February 2005 * date placed on retired list: 19 February 2005 * retirement type: temporary disability * component: ARNG * Statute authorizing retirement: 1202 * disability retirement: 18 years, 2 months, 27 days * Section 1405: 18 years, 11 months, 14 days * Basic pay: 22 years, 10 months 11. Title 10, U.S. Code, section 12686a (Reserves on active duty within two years of retirement eligibility: limitation on release from active...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2013 | 20130005967

    Original file (20130005967.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    The applicant requests correction of his records to show he was transferred to the Retired Reserve instead of having been retired for permanent disability. The applicant states: * in January 2003, he was a mobilized U.S. Army Reserve (USAR) Soldier serving in Kuwait * he started having respiratory problems and was diagnosed with Chronic Obstructive Pulmonary Disease (COPD) and was sent back to Fort Polk, LA, for a medical evaluation board (MEB) * on 25 December 2003, he was placed on the...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2011 | 20110009743

    Original file (20110009743.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    Concurrent Retirement and Disability Pay (CRDP) allows military retirees to receive both military retired pay and VA compensation. The applicant was retired by reason of physical disability and at the time he was processed for disability and placed on the TDRL in 2007 and permanently retired in 2010, he was not eligible for a non-regular retirement because he had not reached age 60. Therefore, at the time, the only retirement he was eligible for in 2007 and 2010 was the disability...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2006 | 20060000773C070205

    Original file (20060000773C070205.doc) Auto-classification: Denied

    A Medical Evaluation Board (MEB) narrative summary shows the applicant was evaluated for a chief complaint of left leg pain and low back pain. That Agency stated that the applicant was properly rated at 20 percent and, even if his condition was known to degenerate, he was not authorized to be retired or placed on the TDRL. (A 30 percent disability rating is not an option with either VASRD code).

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2011 | 20110012981

    Original file (20110012981.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    Army Regulation 635-5 (Separation Documents) states a DD Form 214 will be prepared at the conclusion of a period of active duty service. The applicant had 16+ years of active duty service at the time he was placed on the TDRL and 19 years, 6 months, and 2 days of qualifying service; however, regulatory guidance states a Soldier may not be retained or separated solely to increase retirement or separation benefits. The evidence of record shows he was properly retired by reason of permanent...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2014 | 20140019140

    Original file (20140019140.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    The applicant requests a 20-year Regular Army retirement with maximum medical disability (100 percent) which would qualify her for concurrent retirement and disability pay. On 17 November 2011, the applicant was released from active duty and she was placed on the TDRL on the following day with a combined disability rating of 70 percent. He stated that she had 50 days of accrued leave as of 9 November 2011 and that during her career lifetime, she had cashed in 53 days of leave, thus leaving...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2006 | 20060005394C070205

    Original file (20060005394C070205.doc) Auto-classification: Approved

    On 2 June 2004, a formal PEB upheld the findings of the informal PEB and again determined that he should be rated at zero percent based on the medical evidence. In light of the applicant’s verified residual symptoms after his gastrectomy, and in accordance with the advisory opinion, it would be appropriate to correct the applicant’s records to show that he was found unfit under VASRD code 7308 for postgastrectomy syndrome, moderate, with weight loss, diarrhea, and circulatory symptoms and...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2012 | 20120019167

    Original file (20120019167.txt) Auto-classification: Approved

    The applicant's military service records contain an NGB Form 22 showing he was honorably discharged from the MEARNG and transferred to the Retired Reserve effective 1 March 2008. Orders 322-17, U.S. Army Physical Disability Agency, dated 18 November 2010, show the applicant was removed from the TDRL and discharged from the service with severance pay due to permanent physical disability in the rank of SSG with a disability rating of 20 percent effective 1 September 2008. As a result, the...