Search Decisions

Decision Text

ARMY | BCMR | CY2011 | 20110012981
Original file (20110012981.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

		IN THE CASE OF:	  

		BOARD DATE:	  20 December 2011

		DOCKET NUMBER:  AR20110012981 


THE BOARD CONSIDERED THE FOLLOWING EVIDENCE:

1.  Application for correction of military records (with supporting documents provided, if any).

2.  Military Personnel Records and advisory opinions (if any).


THE APPLICANT'S REQUEST, STATEMENT, AND EVIDENCE:

1.  The applicant requests, in effect, to be credited with 20 years of qualifying service for retirement.

2.  The applicant states he was forced out 5 months and 10 days prior to reaching 20 years and should have been retired with 20 years of service under the "round up" rule.  He states he was a Reserve Soldier serving on active duty.  He is only receiving retired pay for 16 years; however, his U.S. Army Reserve (USAR) Personnel Command Form 249-E (Chronological Statement of Retirement Points) shows he had 19 years, 6 months, and 20 days of qualifying service for retirement.

3.  The applicant provides copies of his Chronological Statement of Retirement Points, DD Form 214 (Certificate of Release or Discharge from Active Duty), and retirement orders.

CONSIDERATION OF EVIDENCE:

1.  The applicant was serving as a USAR chief warrant officer four when he was ordered to active duty in support of Operation Iraqi Freedom on 7 December 2003.  He deployed to Kuwait/Iraq from 14 January 2004 to 14 January 2005.

2.  On 14 September 2006 after undergoing a physical evaluation board (PEB), he was placed on the Temporary Disability Retired List (TDRL).  He was 51 years of age at the time he was placed on the TDRL.

3.  On 4 April 2011, a PEB convened at Fort Sam Houston, Texas, and determined the applicant should be removed from the TDRL and permanently retired with a 100-percent disability rating.  The applicant concurred with the findings and recommendations of the PEB and waived a formal hearing of his case.

4.  On 21 April 2011, he was removed from the TDRL and he was permanently retired effective 22 April 2011 with a 100-percent disability rating.  He completed 16 years, 9 months, and 28 days of active duty service.

5.  The Chronological Statement of Retirement Points provided by the applicant, dated 28 March 2011, shows he had 19 years, 6 months, and 20 days of qualifying service for a non-regular retirement at age 60.  That service includes active duty and inactive duty service.

6.  Title 10, U.S. Code, chapter 61, provides for disability retirement or separation for a member who is physically unfit to perform the duties of his or her office, rank, grade, or rating because of a disability incurred while entitled to basic pay.

7.  Army Regulation 635-40 (Physical Evaluation for Retention, Retirement, or Separation) provides that an individual may be placed on the TDRL (for a maximum period of 5 years as allowed by Title 10, U.S. Code, section 1210) when it is determined that the individual's physical disability is not stable and he or she may recover and be fit for duty or the individual's disability is not stable and the degree of severity may change within the next 5 years so as to change the disability rating.  It also provides that members placed on the TDRL do not accrue service credit for the period they are on the TDRL.

8.  Army Regulation 635-5 (Separation Documents) states a DD Form 214 will be prepared at the conclusion of a period of active duty service.  An individual whose name is placed on the TDRL is considered to have been released from active duty service and, as such, is issued a DD Form 214.  While on the TDRL, individuals do not accumulate active duty service and a new DD Form 214 is not issued when their names are removed from the TDRL as they were not in an active duty status while on the TDRL.

9.  Army Regulation 635-5 further states a Soldier may not be retained or separated solely to increase retirement or separation benefits.  


DISCUSSION AND CONCLUSIONS:

1.  The applicant's contention that he should have been granted credit for 20 years of qualifying service for retired pay has been noted and is found to lack merit.

2.  The applicant had 16+ years of active duty service at the time he was placed on the TDRL and 19 years, 6 months, and 2 days of qualifying service; however, regulatory guidance states a Soldier may not be retained or separated solely to increase retirement or separation benefits.  While it appears the applicant believes he should be credited with time spent on the TDRL, time spent on the TDRL is not creditable for active duty service or USAR retirement.  In view of the foregoing, there is no basis for granting the applicant credit for 20 years of active duty or Reserve service and he does not meet USAR retirement eligibility.

3.  While the applicant contends that the "round-up" rule should be applied to his service computation, there is no such rule that applies to service computation.  Additionally, the service he desires to be rounded up is his qualifying service for a non-regular retirement.  However, he will not be eligible for a non-regular retirement as he was retired for disability.  

4.  The evidence of record shows he was properly retired by reason of permanent disability and fully credited with the active duty service he had performed at the time he was placed on the TDRL and he failed to provide evidence to show otherwise.  Accordingly, there appears to be no basis to grant his request.

BOARD VOTE:

________  ________  ________  GRANT FULL RELIEF 

________  ________  ________  GRANT PARTIAL RELIEF 

________  ________  ________  GRANT FORMAL HEARING

___x____  ____x___  ____x ___  DENY APPLICATION

BOARD DETERMINATION/RECOMMENDATION:

The evidence presented does not demonstrate the existence of a probable error or injustice.  Therefore, the Board determined that the overall merits of this case 

are insufficient as a basis for correction of the records of the individual concerned.



      _____________X____________
                 CHAIRPERSON
      
I certify that herein is recorded the true and complete record of the proceedings of the Army Board for Correction of Military Records in this case.
ABCMR Record of Proceedings (cont)                                         AR20110012981



3


ARMY BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS

 RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS


1

ABCMR Record of Proceedings (cont)                                         AR20110012981



2


ARMY BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS

 RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS


1

Similar Decisions

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2013 | 20130005967

    Original file (20130005967.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    The applicant requests correction of his records to show he was transferred to the Retired Reserve instead of having been retired for permanent disability. The applicant states: * in January 2003, he was a mobilized U.S. Army Reserve (USAR) Soldier serving in Kuwait * he started having respiratory problems and was diagnosed with Chronic Obstructive Pulmonary Disease (COPD) and was sent back to Fort Polk, LA, for a medical evaluation board (MEB) * on 25 December 2003, he was placed on the...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2008 | 20080004798

    Original file (20080004798.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    Army Regulation 635-40 (Physical Evaluation for Retention, Retirement, or Separation) establishes the Army Physical Disability Evaluation System and sets forth policies, responsibilities, and procedures that apply in determining whether a soldier is unfit because of physical disability to reasonably perform the duties of his or her office, grade, rank, or rating. If the Soldier meets the following criteria, the Soldier will be removed from the TDRL, permanently retired for physical...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2012 | 20120019528

    Original file (20120019528.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    His NGB Form 22 and ARNG Retirement Points History Statement show he completed 19 years and 9 months of creditable service for retired pay. Army Regulation 635-40 (Physical Evaluation for Retention, Retirement, or Separation) governs the evaluation of physical fitness of Soldiers who may be unfit to perform their military duties because of physical disability. The NGB recommends realignment of the applicant's points to show 20 years of service in order to make him eligible for CRDP.

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2013 | 20130009681

    Original file (20130009681.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    Correction of her retirement orders to show she was retired for a disability vice in accordance with (IAW) Title 10, U.S. Code (USC), chapter 61. c. Correction of her DD Form 214 and retirement orders to show she received a permanent disability retirement effective 4 November 2004 vice being placed on the Temporary Disability Retired List (TDRL). Orders Number D139-27, issued by the U.S. Army Physical Disability Agency (USAPDA), dated 19 May 2010, show: * she held the rank of SGT * she was...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2009 | 20090009537

    Original file (20090009537.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    Application for correction of military records (with supporting documents provided, if any). These orders also show the applicant had completed 16 years, 3 months, and 7 days of creditable service for disability retirement under Title 10, U.S. Code, section 1405, and 18 years, 2 months, and 18 days of creditable service for basic pay. This document further shows the applicant placed his signature on the DA Form 199 on 21 March 2001.

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2013 | 20130018439

    Original file (20130018439.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    Army Regulation 635-40 sets forth the basic authority for the evaluation of physical fitness of Soldiers who may be unfit to perform their military duties because of a physical disability. Army Regulation 635-200 states that prior to discharge or release from active duty individuals will be assigned RE codes based on their service records or the reason for discharge. However, the evidence of record shows he was determined unfit for duty in 2007.

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2013 | 20130016048

    Original file (20130016048.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    Counsel requests correction of the applicant's records as follows: * reinstatement in the U.S. Army Reserve (USAR) Active Guard Reserve (AGR) Program * payment of all back pay and allowances from 5 April 2004, the date he was declared fit for duty, to the date of reinstatement * removal and/or correction of his military records which indicate he was not in the AGR Program when he was supposed to be * correction of his records to show no break in service from 5 April 2004 to the date of...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2012 | 20120002237

    Original file (20120002237.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    The applicant requests correction of his DD Form 214 (Certificate of Release or Discharge from Active Duty) to show: * 24 years of service * the narrative reason for separation as "disability, permanent" 2. HRC will issue permanent retirement orders when an appropriate authority has determined a Soldier should be removed from the TDRL and permanently retired for disability. The evidence of record does not support the applicant's request for correction of his DD Form 214 for the period...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2015 | 20150003337

    Original file (20150003337.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    The applicant requests, in effect, correction of his records to show he was not found unfit and not placed on the temporary disability retired list (TDRL) and/or permanently retired. b. Paragraph 7-7 states medical examiners and adjudicative bodies will carefully evaluate each case and will recommend removal of the Soldier’s name from the TDRL as soon as the Soldier’s condition permits. If the Soldier meets the following criteria, the Soldier will be removed from the TDRL, permanently...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2011 | 20110009743

    Original file (20110009743.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    Concurrent Retirement and Disability Pay (CRDP) allows military retirees to receive both military retired pay and VA compensation. The applicant was retired by reason of physical disability and at the time he was processed for disability and placed on the TDRL in 2007 and permanently retired in 2010, he was not eligible for a non-regular retirement because he had not reached age 60. Therefore, at the time, the only retirement he was eligible for in 2007 and 2010 was the disability...