IN THE CASE OF: BOARD DATE: 7 April 2015 DOCKET NUMBER: AR20140015026 THE BOARD CONSIDERED THE FOLLOWING EVIDENCE: 1. Application for correction of military records (with supporting documents provided, if any). 2. Military Personnel Records and advisory opinions (if any). THE APPLICANT'S REQUEST, STATEMENT, AND EVIDENCE: 1. The applicant requests correction of his DD Form 214 (Armed Forces of the United States Report of Transfer or Discharge) to show the Purple Heart. 2. The applicant states the Purple Heart is missing from his DD Form 214 due to an administrative error. 3. The applicant provides a newspaper article, dated 8 September 1969. CONSIDERATION OF EVIDENCE: 1. Title 10, U.S. Code, section 1552(b), provides that applications for correction of military records must be filed within 3 years after discovery of the alleged error or injustice. This provision of law also allows the Army Board for Correction of Military Records (ABCMR) to excuse an applicant's failure to timely file within the 3-year statute of limitations if the ABCMR determines it would be in the interest of justice to do so. While it appears the applicant did not file within the time frame provided in the statute of limitations, the ABCMR has elected to conduct a substantive review of this case and, only to the extent relief, if any, is granted, has determined it is in the interest of justice to excuse the applicant's failure to timely file. In all other respects, there are insufficient bases to waive the statute of limitations for timely filing. 2. The applicant was inducted into the Army of the United States on 14 January 1969 and he held military occupational specialty 11D (Armor Reconnaissance Specialist). He served in Vietnam from 10 June to 28 August 1969 while assigned to the 1st Battalion, 46th Infantry, 198th Infantry Brigade. 3. He was wounded in action on 16 August 1969 and he was hospitalized at the 95th Evacuation Hospital, Vietnam. 4. General Orders (GO) Number 199, dated 18 August 1969, issued by Headquarters (HQ), 95th Evacuation Hospital, awarded him the Purple Heart for wounds received in action on 16 August 1969. 5. He was medically evacuated from Vietnam and on 29 August 1969 he was assigned in a patient status to the U.S. Army Hospital, Camp Zama, Japan. 6. On 20 October 1969, he was assigned in a casual status to the Transportation Detachment, Japan, while awaiting transportation back to the United States. 7. On 9 December 1969, he was assigned to the 3rd Squadron, 3rd Armored Cavalry, Fort Lewis, WA. 8. He was honorably released from active duty on 15 January 1971 and he was transferred to the U.S. Army Reserve. He completed 2 years and 2 days of totalactive service with no lost time. 9. The DD Form 214 he was issued shows award of the: * National Defense Service Medal * Vietnam Service Medal * Vietnam Campaign Medal * Combat Infantryman Badge * Marksman Marksmanship Qualification Badge with Rifle Bar (M-14) 10. Item 29 (Qualification in Arms) of his DA Form 20 (Enlisted Qualification Record) shows he qualified as expert with the 81mm mortar. 11. Item 38 (Record of Assignments) of his DA Form 20 shows he received all "excellent" conduct and efficiency ratings throughout his service except for the period from 20 October to 8 December 1969 (48 days) when he was in a casual status and between assignments and received "unknown" ratings. 12. His record is void of any derogatory information, convictions by a court-martial, or a commander's disqualification that would have precluded him from being awarded the Army Good Conduct Medal (1st Award). 13. Army Regulation 672-5-1 (Military Awards), in effect at the time, provided that the Army Good Conduct Medal was awarded to individuals who completed a qualified period of active duty enlisted service. This period was 3 years except in those cases when the period for the first award ended with the termination of a period of Federal military service of less than 3 years but more than 1 year. The enlisted person must have had all "excellent" conduct and efficiency ratings and no convictions by a court-martial. "Unknown" ratings did not disqualify an individual from being awarded the Army Good Conduct Medal. 14. Army Regulation 600-8-22 (Military Awards) states the Vietnam Service Medal is awarded to all members of the Armed Forces of the United States for qualifying service in Vietnam after 3 July 1965 through 28 March 1973. A bronze service star is authorized with this award for each Vietnam campaign a member is credited with participating in. A review of his records shows that during his service in Vietnam he participated in two campaigns. 15. Department of the Army (DA) Pamphlet 672-3 (Unit Citation and Campaign Participation Credit Register) lists the awards received by units serving in Vietnam. This pamphlet shows the 1st Battalion, 46th Infantry was cited for award of the: * Valorous Unit Award for the period 11 through 31 August 1969, by DAGO Number 43, dated 1972 * Republic of Vietnam Gallantry Cross with Palm Unit Citation for the period 16 April through 28 August 1969, by DAGO Number 6, dated 1974 DISCUSSION AND CONCLUSIONS: 1. GO awarded the applicant the Purple Heart which is not shown on his DD Form 214. Therefore, he is entitled to correction of his DD Form 214 to show this award. 2. He served honorably from 14 January 1969 to 15 January 1971. He served in Vietnam and received all "excellent" conduct and efficiency ratings except for a period of less than 2 months when he was between assignments and received "unknown" ratings. His record is void of a commander's disqualification or any derogatory information that would have disqualified him from receiving the Army Good Conduct Medal (1st Award). Therefore, it would be appropriate to award him the 1st award of the Army Good Conduct Medal based on completion of a qualifying period of Federal military service and correct his DD Form 214 to show this award. 3. His record confirms he participated in two campaigns during his service in Vietnam. Therefore, he is entitled to two bronze service stars for wear on his already-awarded Vietnam Service Medal and correction of his DD Form 214 accordingly. 4. GO awarded his unit in Vietnam the Valorous Unit Award and the Republic of Vietnam Gallantry Cross with Palm Unit Citation during the period he was assigned to the unit. Therefore, he is entitled to correction of his DD Form 214 to show these unit awards. 5. His record shows he qualified as expert with the 81mm mortar; therefore, it would be appropriate to correct his DD Form 214 to show the Expert Marksmanship Qualification Badge with Mortar Bar (81mm). BOARD VOTE: ____x___ ___x____ ___x____ GRANT FULL RELIEF ________ ________ ________ GRANT PARTIAL RELIEF ________ ________ ________ GRANT FORMAL HEARING ________ ________ ________ DENY APPLICATION BOARD DETERMINATION/RECOMMENDATION: The Board determined that the evidence presented was sufficient to warrant a recommendation for relief. As a result, the Board recommends that all Department of the Army records of the individual concerned be corrected by: * awarding the applicant the Army Good Conduct Medal (1st Award) for the period 14 January 1969 through 15 January 1971 * deleting from his DD Form 214 the Vietnam Service Medal * adding to his DD Form 214 the: * Purple Heart * Army Good Conduct Medal (1st Award) * Vietnam Service Medal with two bronze service stars * Valorous Unit Award * Republic of Vietnam Gallantry Cross with Palm Unit Citation * Expert Marksmanship Qualification Badge with Mortar Bar (81mm) ___________x____________ CHAIRPERSON I certify that herein is recorded the true and complete record of the proceedings of the Army Board for Correction of Military Records in this case. ABCMR Record of Proceedings (cont) AR20140015026 3 ARMY BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS 1 ABCMR Record of Proceedings (cont) AR20140015026 2 ARMY BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS 1