Search Decisions

Decision Text

ARMY | BCMR | CY2013 | 20130020530
Original file (20130020530.txt) Auto-classification: Approved

		IN THE CASE OF:	  

		BOARD DATE:  16 January 2014

		DOCKET NUMBER:  AR20130020530 


THE BOARD CONSIDERED THE FOLLOWING EVIDENCE:

1.  Application for correction of military records (with supporting documents provided, if any).

2.  Military Personnel Records and advisory opinions (if any).


THE APPLICANT'S REQUEST, STATEMENT, AND EVIDENCE:

1.  The applicant requests correction of her DD Form 214 (Certificate of Release or Discharge from Active Duty) for the period ending 26 October 2006 to show in item 2 (Department, Component, and Branch) that her component was U.S. Army Reserve (USAR) instead of Army National Guard of the United States (ARNGUS).

2.  The applicant states, in effect, her DD Form 214 incorrectly reflects her component as "ARNGUS" instead of "USAR."  She states she was never affiliated with the National Guard and she cannot be credited with her USAR active duty time because of the ARNGUS entry.

3.  The applicant provides:

* DD Forms 214 for the period ending 26 October 2006, 6 October 2010, and 30 September 2012
* DD Form 4 (Enlistment/Reenlistment Document), dated 22 March 2006
* Defense Finance and Accounting Service (DFAS) Forms 702 (DFAS Military Leave and Earnings Statement) for the period between 28 April and 12 July 2006
* Orders 181-00030, issued by the U.S. Army Intelligence Center, Fort Huachuca, AZ
* DA Form 2-1 (Personnel Qualification Record)


CONSIDERATION OF EVIDENCE:

1.  Title 10, U.S. Code, section 1552(b), provides that applications for correction of military records must be filed within 3 years after discovery of the alleged error or injustice.  This provision of law also allows the Army Board for Correction of Military Records (ABCMR) to excuse an applicant's failure to timely file within the 3-year statute of limitations if the ABCMR determines it would be in the interest of justice to do so.  While it appears the applicant did not file within the time frame provided in the statute of limitations, the ABCMR has elected to conduct a substantive review of this case and, only to the extent relief, if any, is granted, has determined it is in the interest of justice to excuse the applicant's failure to timely file.  In all other respects, there are insufficient bases to waive the statute of limitations for timely filing.

2.  The applicant enlisted in the USAR on 22 March 2006 for a period of 8 years.  She was ordered to active duty for training (ADT) on 12 April 2006.  She completed her training as an intelligence analyst and she was honorably released from active duty training on 26 October 2006 and she was returned to her USAR unit.  She completed 6 months and 15 days of creditable active service during this period.

3.  The DD Form 214 she was issued at the time of her release from ADT indicates in item 2 that her component was ARNGUS.

DISCUSSION AND CONCLUSIONS:

1.  The applicant's contention that her DD Form 214 for the period ending
26 October 2006 incorrectly reflects her component as "ARNGUS" has been noted and found to have merit.

2.  The applicant was serving in the USAR at the time she was ordered to ADT.  However, at the time of her release from ADT her DD Form 214 was incorrectly prepared to show her component was ARNGUS instead of USAR.

3.  In view of the foregoing, the applicant's DD Form 214 for the period ending
26 October 2006 should be corrected as recommended below.


BOARD VOTE:

____X___  ____X___  ___X__ _  GRANT FULL RELIEF 

________  ________  ________  GRANT PARTIAL RELIEF 

________  ________  ________  GRANT FORMAL HEARING

________  ________  ________  DENY APPLICATION

BOARD DETERMINATION/RECOMMENDATION:

The Board determined that the evidence presented was sufficient to warrant a recommendation for relief.  As a result, the Board recommends that all Department of the Army records of the individual concerned be corrected by deleting from item 2 of her DD Form 214 for the period ending 26 October 2006 the current entry and replacing it with the entry "ARMY/USAR."




      _______ _  X ______   ___
               CHAIRPERSON
      
I certify that herein is recorded the true and complete record of the proceedings of the Army Board for Correction of Military Records in this case.

ABCMR Record of Proceedings (cont)                                         AR20130020530



3


ARMY BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS

 RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS


1

ABCMR Record of Proceedings (cont)                                         AR20130020530



2


ARMY BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS

 RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS


1

Similar Decisions

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2012 | 20120021114

    Original file (20120021114.txt) Auto-classification: Approved

    The applicant requests correction of her records as follows: * issuance of a new scroll in the rank of captain (CPT) and with a date of rank as 29 July 2011 * service credit for the gap between 29 July 2011 and 4 November 2012 * issuance of a DD Form 214 (Certificate of Release or Discharge from Active Duty) for full performance of active duty for training (ADT) from February to September 2012 * cancellation of her transfer orders to the U.S. Army Reserve (USAR) unit in Starke, FL 2. The...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2012 | 20120001730

    Original file (20120001730.txt) Auto-classification: Approved

    A DD Form 214 shows the applicant entered active duty on 7 January 2005, she was honorably REFRAD on 6 February 2006 based on completion of required active service. The evidence of record also shows the applicant had continuous service as a member of the USAR from 31 January 2000 through the date she was REFRAD on 6 February 2006. b. Thus, records show the applicant's HOR was incorrectly recorded on her orders when she was ordered to active duty in support of OEF on 7 January 2005.

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2011 | 20110011403

    Original file (20110011403.txt) Auto-classification: Approved

    The applicant requests correction of her DD Form 214 (Certificate of Release or Discharge from Active Duty) for the period ending 1 April 2007 to show her component as "RA (Regular Army" instead of "USAR (U.S. Army Reserve)." Her enlistment contract is not available for review with this case; however, her official records contain multiple documents that show: * the Dallas Military Entrance Processing Station published Orders 6159044 enlisting her for a 3-year active duty commitment * her DA...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2010 | 20100014581

    Original file (20100014581.txt) Auto-classification: Approved

    The applicant requests the entry in item 2 (Department, Component and Branch) of her DD Form 214 (Certificate of Release or Discharge from Active Duty) with a separation date of 19 August 2003 be corrected to show her component as U.S. Army Reserve (USAR). Her records show she enlisted in the USAR on 17 October 2002 and reported for her initial active duty for training on 5 February 2003. As a result, the Board recommends that all Department of the Army records of the individual concerned...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2013 | 20130018804

    Original file (20130018804.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    Application for correction of military records (with supporting documents provided, if any). While the applicant did in fact enter active duty for training on 11 June 1998, she did so under the split-training program and the initial entry was to attend basic training and not to attain MOS certification. Therefore, the Board determined that the overall merits of this case are insufficient as a basis for correction of the records of the individual concerned.

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2013 | 20130020333

    Original file (20130020333.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    The applicant requests, in effect, correction of the characterization of service on her DD Form 214 (Certificate of Release or Discharge from Active Duty) for the period ending 1 May 1991 to show "honorable" or "general, under honorable conditions" instead of "uncharacterized." Army Regulation 635-5 (Separation Documents), in effect at the time, stated a DD Form 214 was a synopsis of the Soldier's most recent period of continuous active duty service. Though evidence shows she was...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2010 | 20100026132

    Original file (20100026132.txt) Auto-classification: Approved

    The applicant's military personnel records do not contain a DD Form 220 (Active Duty Report) documenting the period of active duty from 13 May to 25 May 1985. There is no evidence the applicant was issued a DD Form 220 to document the period of active duty that is under review. Therefore, it would be appropriate to issue the applicant a DD Form 220 documenting the period of active duty from 13 May to 25 May 1985.

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2015 | 20150003674

    Original file (20150003674.txt) Auto-classification: Approved

    The applicant requests correction of her DD Form 214 (Certificate of Release or Discharge from Active Duty) for the period ending 28 February 2012 to show: * award of the Joint Chiefs of Staff Identification Badge vice Army Staff Identification Badge * all her military education she completed from 1984 to 2007 2. The evidence of record confirms the applicant was authorized the Joint Chiefs of Staff Identification Badge on 5 October 2002 and it was properly shown on her DD Form 214 for the...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2014 | 20140020390

    Original file (20140020390.txt) Auto-classification: Approved

    The applicant contends item 24 of her 21 August 2006 DD Form 214 should be corrected to show the characterization of her service was honorable. The evidence of record shows that only the honorable characterization may be awarded a Soldier upon completion of his/her period for which called or ordered to ADT. As a result, the Board recommends that all Department of the Army records of the individual concerned be corrected by: a. voiding the 21 August 2006 DD Form 214 that is under review in...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2006 | 20060011502

    Original file (20060011502.txt) Auto-classification: Approved

    Upon completion of this 106 day period of active duty training she was released from active duty training with an uncharacterized separation under the provisions of Army Regulation 635-200, chapter 4 for "Completion of Required Active Service" and assigned a Separation Program Designator (SPD) Code of "MBK." Chapter 4 of the regulation provides the guidance for "Separation for Expiration of Service Obligation" and states that a Soldier will be discharged or released from active duty upon...