BOARD DATE: 7 November 2013
DOCKET NUMBER: AR20130004618
THE BOARD CONSIDERED THE FOLLOWING EVIDENCE:
1. Application for correction of military records (with supporting documents provided, if any).
2. Military Personnel Records and advisory opinions (if any).
THE APPLICANT'S REQUEST, STATEMENT, AND EVIDENCE:
1. The applicant requests Combat-Related Special Compensation (CRSC).
2. The applicant states that he has been diagnosed with post-traumatic stress disorder (PTSD) stemming from his military combat service during Operation Desert Shield/Desert Storm (ODS) in 1991.
a. He receives treatment at the Department of Veterans Affairs (VA) that includes attending meetings and counseling three days a week.
b. He states that his previous requests for CRSC to the U.S. Army Human Resources Command (HRC), Fort Knox, KY have been denied.
3. The applicant provides copies of his approved retirement, five VA medical records, three VA letters, and HRC's denial of his CRSC claim.
CONSIDERATION OF EVIDENCE:
1. The applicant was inducted on 2 October 1972. He was awarded military occupational specialty 94B (Cook). He was honorably released from active duty (REFRAD) on 1 October 1974 and transferred to the U.S. Army Reserve Control Group (Annual Training) to complete his Reserve obligation.
2. He enlisted in the Army National Guard of the United States and New York Army National Guard (NYARNG) on 5 March 1976.
3. He was ordered to active duty on 21 November 1990 in support of ODS and served in Southwest Asia (SWA) from 11 January 1991 to 11 June 1991. He was honorably REFRAD on 7 July 1991 and transferred to his NYARNG unit.
4. The applicant was honorably discharged from the NYARNG on 4 May 1996 and assigned to the U.S. Army Reserve Control Group (Retired Reserve).
5. He was placed on the Retired List, in the rank of staff sergeant/pay grade E-6, effective 29 May 2012.
6. Effective 9 March 2007, the VA granted the applicant service connection with a combined rating of 50% for:
* arthritis of right wrist, post-operative residuals
* PTSD
7. On 20 February 2012, the applicant submitted a claim for CRSC based on the following:
a. On 8 March 1991, while transporting Soldiers in a vehicle, he put on the brakes and an unsecured spare tire rolled to the front of the vehicle and hit his right wrist.
b. On an unspecified dated, his first sergeant (1SG) was killed in an accident, the applicant rolled the 1SG's body over and saw his face covered with blood, and the applicant continues to have nightmares of the incident.
8. On 6 March 2012, the HRC CRSC Branch denied the applicant's claim for CRSC because he was not in a retired status.
9. The applicant resubmitted his claim for CRSC. On 26 July 2012, the HRC CRSC Branch determined that the applicant's wrist injury is not considered a combat-related event because the injury must be linked to a combat-related event. In addition, the applicant was informed that he provided no new evidence to show a combat-related event caused his PTSD. He was advised that being in a combat zone is not, in and of itself, sufficient to award CRSC.
10. The applicant submitted a request for reconsideration of his claim for CRSC. On 16 January 2013, the HRC CRSC Branch informed the applicant that, after reviewing all documentation in support of his claim, they were unable to overturn the previous adjudications because the documentation submitted still shows no new evidence to link his requested conditions to a combat-related event.
11. On 4 February 2013, the HRC CRSC Branch notified the applicant that a final CRSC determination was made on 16 January 2013 and that no further requests for reconsideration would be considered.
12. In support of his request the applicant provides the following:
a. Five VA outpatient medical records that show the applicant was treated for insomnia, anxiety, and depression during the period 14 March 2006 to
23 February 2007.
b. Three VA letters, dated 22 January, 25 January, and 15 February 2013, that show the applicant has been seen by the VA since 10 March 2006 in individual and group psychotherapy for the treatment of major depression and severe chronic PTSD. He participates once a week in individual therapy and three times a week in group therapy combined with psychotropic medication.
13. CRSC, as established by Section 1413a, Title 10, U.S. Code, as amended, states that eligible members are retired veterans with combat-related injuries who meet all of the following criteria:
* Active, Reserve or National Guard with 20 years of creditable service, or permanent medical retiree, or Temporary Early Retirement Authority retiree
* receiving military retired pay
* have 10% or greater VA rated injury
* military retired pay is reduced by VA disability payments (VA Waiver)
* an individual must be able to provide documentary evidence that their injury was a result of one of the following:
* training that simulates war (e.g., exercises, field training)
* hazardous duty (e.g., flight, diving, parachute duty)
* an instrumentality of war (e.g., combat vehicles, weapons, Agent Orange)
* armed conflict (e.g., award of the Purple Heart)
14. The Under Secretary of Defense, Military Personnel Policy, has provided policy guidance on the processing of CRSC appeals. In that guidance it was stated that in order for a condition to be considered combat-related, there must be evidence of the condition having a direct, causal relationship to war or the simulation of war.
DISCUSSION AND CONCLUSIONS:
1. The applicant submitted evidence to the HRC CRSC Branch in support of his claim for CRSC on three separate occasions. In all three instances, his requests failed to show a combat-related event caused his injuries or medical conditions.
2. The evidence of record shows the applicant incurred a wrist injury in SWA on 8 March 1991 as a result of an accident while he was transporting Soldiers in a vehicle. The evidence of record also shows the applicant attributes his PTSD to an incident that is based solely on his statement in his VA and CRSC claims in which he states his first sergeant was accidentally killed, which is not qualifying because it relates to an accident.
3. There are no records or other evidence that show his injuries and resultant medical conditions were the result of a combat-related event.
4. The CRSC criteria are specifically for those military retirees who have combat-related disabilities. Incurring disabilities while in a theater of operations or in training exercises is not, in and of itself, sufficient to grant a military retiree CRSC. The military retiree must show that the disability was incurred while engaged in combat, while performing duties simulating combat conditions, or while performing especially hazardous duties such as parachuting or scuba diving. The applicant has failed to provide documentation to show he meets any of these requirements.
5. Moreover, there is no evidence of record and the applicant did not provide any evidence to establish a direct, causal relationship to the applicant's VA rated disabilities to war or the simulation of war.
6. In view of the foregoing, there is no basis for granting the applicant's requested relief.
BOARD VOTE:
________ ________ ________ GRANT FULL RELIEF
________ ________ ________ GRANT PARTIAL RELIEF
________ ________ ________ GRANT FORMAL HEARING
__X__ ___X_____ ___X_____ DENY APPLICATION
BOARD DETERMINATION/RECOMMENDATION:
The evidence presented does not demonstrate the existence of a probable error or injustice. Therefore, the Board determined that the overall merits of this case are insufficient as a basis for correction of the records of the individual concerned.
_______ _ X _______ ___
CHAIRPERSON
I certify that herein is recorded the true and complete record of the proceedings of the Army Board for Correction of Military Records in this case.
ABCMR Record of Proceedings (cont) AR20130004618
3
ARMY BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS
RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS
1
ABCMR Record of Proceedings (cont) AR20130004618
2
ARMY BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS
RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS
1
ARMY | BCMR | CY2014 | 20140008362
Application for correction of military records (with supporting documents provided, if any). c. Thus, the events that the applicant experienced in SWA and that he offers in support of his request for CRSC fail to demonstrate a direct connection to combat or combat-related operations. The VA granted the applicant service connection for his PTSD.
ARMY | BCMR | CY2014 | 20140017427
The applicant requested the ABCMR reconsider his previous request and provided a document entitled Combat Action Badge Information. When a Solder has been awarded a Combat Action Badge, it may help make a determination for CRSC but only if that person is later diagnosed with PTSD as a direct result of the incident for which the award was given. Second, other veterans, those who were awarded CRSC, first had conditions that were rated by VA with a 10% or greater disability rating, and then...
ARMY | BCMR | CY2014 | 20140006656
The applicant states his request is based on major depressive disorder (not bipolar disorder, which the Army Board for Correction of Military Records (ABCMR) considered and denied in his original application). The Gulf War Illness and the Health of Gulf War Veterans, Findings in Brief, that the applicant provided in his original application was reviewed. The evidence of record shows the applicant requested correction of his records to show his disabilities are combat-related and his...
ARMY | BCMR | CY2013 | 20130015399
The applicant requests award of Combat-Related Special Compensation (CRSC) for injuries he received on active duty during training simulating war and using an instrument of war. On 12 August 2005, the Special Actions Branch, CRSC Division, U.S. Army Human Resources Command (HRC), considered the applicant's claim for CSRC. The medical record he provided, dated 15 January 2013, offers insufficient evidence to support a claim to CRSC.
ARMY | BCMR | CY2013 | 20130016725
Application for correction of military records (with supporting documents provided, if any). He indicates he can swear under oath that the patches are a direct result of combat or combat related training. Although the evidence shows the applicant was diagnosed with Degenerative Arthritis of the Spine, Left Spine, Eczema, and Tendon Inflammation Left Shoulder, unfortunately there is no evidence in the available record that shows these conditions were sustained as a direct result of armed...
ARMY | BCMR | CY2014 | 20140009832
Application for correction of military records (with supporting documents provided, if any). The applicant's record is void of any evidence that shows his injuries were a direct, causal relationship to war or the simulation of war. Although the evidence shows the applicant was diagnosed with Hypertensive Heart Disease, Degenerative Arthritis of the Cervical Spine, Lumbar Intervertebral Disc Syndrome with Thoracolumbar Degenerative Changes with Erectile Dysfunction, Healed Fracture; Left...
ARMY | BCMR | CY2013 | 20130019671
The applicant requests, in effect, reversal of the U.S. Army Human Resources Commands (HRC) decision to deny him combat-related special compensation (CRSC) for Degenerative Joint Disease Lumbar Spine. The applicant provides a letter, dated 9 September 2013, from HRC CRSC Branch, wherein he was notified the documentation he submitted still showed no new evidence to link his requested conditions (to include Degenerative Joint Disease Lumbar Spine) to a combat-related event. The applicant...
ARMY | BCMR | CY2014 | 20140001842
The applicant states he was told to apply to the Army Board for Correction of Military Records (ABCMR). 24 March 1987, a medical evaluation board diagnosed him with a schizophrenia disorder and referred him to a physical evaluation board. Unfortunately, there is no evidence in the available record that shows these conditions were sustained as a direct result of armed conflict, especially hazardous duty, training exercises that simulate war, or caused by an instrumentality of war.
ARMY | BCMR | CY2014 | 20140011901
The applicant provides copies of his medical records and CRSC claim. He was also informed that documentation he submitted failed to provide evidence to link his requested conditions to a combat-related event and the disapproval is now considered final. There is no evidence to show his skin condition(s) for which he is receiving service-connected compensation is related to or was caused while participating in hazardous duty, in training that simulated war, in a combat-related event, or in...
ARMY | BCMR | CY2011 | 20110018798
The 2 August 2011 HRC CRSC decision also indicates the certifying officer was unable to verify the following conditions as combat-related disabilities: VASRD* DESCRIPTION % JUSTIFICATION/COMMENTS 5252 Degenerative Joint Disease, Right Hip 10% Final disapproval Previously requested : No new evidence to show combat-related event caused condition 5242 Lumbosacral Strain with Radic-ulopathy of Lower Extremities 10% Final disapproval Previously requested : No new evidence to show...