Search Decisions

Decision Text

ARMY | BCMR | CY2013 | 20130019476
Original file (20130019476.txt) Auto-classification: Approved

		
		BOARD DATE:	  26 June 2014

		DOCKET NUMBER:  AR20130019476 


THE BOARD CONSIDERED THE FOLLOWING EVIDENCE:

1.  Application for correction of military records (with supporting documents provided, if any).

2.  Military Personnel Records and advisory opinions (if any).


THE APPLICANT'S REQUEST, STATEMENT, AND EVIDENCE:

1.  The applicant requests correction of his DD Form 214 (Certificate of Release or Discharge from Active Duty) to show he was released from active duty upon completion of his expiration term of service (ETS) on 24 February 1990.

2.  The applicant states he enlisted for two years; however, he was released early because of the limited availability of return air travel from Germany.

3.  The applicant provides no additional information.

CONSIDERATION OF EVIDENCE:

1.  Title 10, U.S. Code, section 1552(b), provides that applications for correction of military records must be filed within 3 years after discovery of the alleged error or injustice.  This provision of law also allows the Army Board for Correction of Military Records (ABCMR) to excuse an applicant's failure to timely file within the 3-year statute of limitations if the ABCMR determines it would be in the interest of justice to do so.  While it appears the applicant did not file within the time frame provided in the statute of limitations, the ABCMR has elected to conduct a substantive review of this case and, only to the extent relief, if any, is granted, has determined it is in the interest of justice to excuse the applicant's failure to timely file.  In all other respects, there are insufficient bases to waive the statute of limitations for timely filing.

2.  He enlisted in the Regular Army on 25 February 1988 for a period of 2 years and later assigned to Headquarters and Headquarter Battery, 2nd Battalion, 20th Field Artillery, Germany.  His record contains:

* military orders releasing him from active duty on his ETS date, 
24 February 1990 (Saturday)
* endorsements to those military orders which changed his effective date of release from active duty to 21 February 1990

3.  His DD Form 214 shows he was released from active duty on 21 February 1990 under the provisions of paragraph 4, Army Regulation 635-200 (Personnel Separations-Enlisted Personnel) by reason of "EXPIRATION TERM OF SERVICE" and he was transferred to a U.S. Army Reserve unit.  He completed a total of 1 year, 11 months, and 27 days of creditable active service.

4.  Army Regulation 635-5 (Separation Documents), in effect at the time, prescribes the separation documents prepared for Soldiers upon retirement, discharge, or release from active military service or control of the Army.  It establishes standardized policy for the preparation of the DD Form 214.  It states to use the remarks section for entries required by HQDA for which a separate item is not available on the form and for completing entries that are too long for their blocks.

5.  Army Regulation 635-200 states that a Soldier enlisted or ordered to active duty normally will be discharged or released from active duty on the date he or she completes the period for which enlisted.  However, a Soldier whose term of service expires or who otherwise becomes eligible for separation on a Saturday, Sunday, or legal holiday may consent to be released from active duty and be transferred to the USAR on the last working day before the normal date of discharge or release, if otherwise appropriate.

6.  In addition, it was common practice to separate a Soldier assigned to an overseas location earlier than his ETS date based on the availability of return transportation.

DISCUSSION AND CONCLUSIONS:

1.  The evidence of record shows the applicant was released from active duty on 21 February 1990, 3 days prior to his established ETS date of 24 February 1990. It can be presumed that because his original ETS date fell on a Saturday his separation date was adjusted to the last work day of the week in accordance with applicable regulatory guidance.  Further, it is common practice in overseas locations to adjust a Soldier's separation date based on the availability of return transportation.  Given these provisions it appears his separation date is correctly shown on his DD Form 214.  Therefore, there is no reason to change his separation date.

2.  However, as a matter of equity, it would be appropriate to correct his DD Form 214 to show he completed his first full term of service.

BOARD VOTE:

________  ________  ________  GRANT FULL RELIEF 

___X_____  __X______  __X__  GRANT PARTIAL RELIEF 

________  ________  ________  GRANT FORMAL HEARING

________  ________  ________  DENY APPLICATION

BOARD DETERMINATION/RECOMMENDATION:

1.  The Board determined that the evidence presented was sufficient to warrant a recommendation for partial relief.  As a result, the Board recommends that all Department of the Army records of the individual concerned be corrected by adding in item 18 of his DD Form 214 the entry "SOLDIER SEPARATED AT THE CONVENIENCE OF THE GOVERNMENT.  SOLDIER HAS COMPLETED FIRST FULL TERM OF SERVICE FOR THE PURPOSE OF POST SERVICE BENEFITS AND ENTITLEMENTS."

2.  The Board further determined that the evidence presented was insufficient to warrant a portion of the requested relief.  As a result, the Board recommends denial of so much of the application that pertains to correct the date he was released from active duty to show 24 February 1990. 



      _______ _   X_______   ___
               CHAIRPERSON
      
I certify that herein is recorded the true and complete record of the proceedings of the Army Board for Correction of Military Records in this case.

ABCMR Record of Proceedings (cont)                                         AR20130019476



3


ARMY BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS

 RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS


1

ABCMR Record of Proceedings (cont)                                         AR20130019476



3


ARMY BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS

 RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS


1

Similar Decisions

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2007 | 20070007537

    Original file (20070007537.TXT) Auto-classification: Approved

    Powers Chairperson Mr. Edward E. Montgomery Member Mr. Qawiy A. Sabree Member The Board considered the following evidence: Exhibit A - Application for correction of military records. The applicant's DD Form 214 shows that on 17 May 1968, he was honorably released from active duty under the provisions of Army Regulation 635-200 (Personnel Separations) at his ETS and transferred to the United States Army Reserve Control Group (Annual Training). It provides a brief, clear-cut record of active...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2005 | 20050003125C070206

    Original file (20050003125C070206.doc) Auto-classification: Approved

    Michael J. Flynn | |Member | The Board considered the following evidence: Exhibit A - Application for correction of military records. The applicant requests, in effect, that he be given 1 additional day of service credit and that his report of separation (DD Form 214) be corrected to reflect that he served 2 years of active service. As a result, the Board recommends that all Department of the Army records of the individual concerned be corrected by showing that he was honorably REFRAD on...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2007 | 20070002552

    Original file (20070002552.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    The applicant requests that her date of separation from Active Duty be corrected on her DD Form 214 (Certificate of Release or Discharge from Active Duty) to show 17 November 1990. The applicant contends her date of release from active duty as shown on her DD Form 214 should be corrected to show she completed her 3-year service obligation on 17 November 1990. Evidence of record shows the applicant enlisted in the Regular Army on 18 November 1987 for 3 years service.

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2008 | 20080008993

    Original file (20080008993.txt) Auto-classification: Approved

    The applicant requests, in effect, that his military records be corrected to show that he completed 2 years of creditable active service. There is no evidence in the applicant's military records which shows that he consented to be released from active duty prior to his established ETS date of 4 November 1984. The applicant contends that his military records should be corrected to show that he completed 2 years of creditable active service.

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2011 | 20110023448

    Original file (20110023448.txt) Auto-classification: Approved

    The applicant requests, in effect, correction of his DD Form 214 (Certificate of Release or Discharge from Active Duty) to show his separation date as 19 November 1989. The applicant’s DD Form 4 (Enlistment/Reenlistment Document) shows he enlisted in the U.S. Army Reserve (USAR) on 31 August 1987 under the Delayed Entry Program and he enlisted in the Regular Army on 19 November 1987 for a period of 2 years, which established his expiration term of service (ETS) date as 18 November 1989. ...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2004 | 20040002535C070208

    Original file (20040002535C070208.doc) Auto-classification: Denied

    The applicant requests, in effect, that his records be corrected to show he completed a full 3 years of service. He was released from active duty on 24 July 1964, under the provisions of Army Regulation 635-200 upon his expiration term of service (ETS), after completing 2 years, 11 months, and 28 days of creditable active service, and transferred to the U. S. Army Reserve to serve until his terminal date of obligation of 26 July 1967. There is no evidence of error or injustice in showing...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2007 | 20070002791C071029

    Original file (20070002791C071029.doc) Auto-classification: Denied

    The applicant requests, in effect, that his records be corrected to show he had a full qualifying year for retirement during retirement year ending (RYE) 16 April 1971. The applicant’s chronological statement of retirement points shows he completed 18 years, 11 months, and 29 days of qualifying service for a Reserve retirement as of RYE 25 October 2006. The USAR accepts good retirement years from other components; however, the applicant did not get retirement year credit for his third year...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2009 | 20090004016.

    Original file (20090004016..txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    The applicant requests, in effect, that his National Guard Bureau (NGB) Form 22 (Report of Separation and Record of Service) be corrected to reflect that he served for 13 years. On 12 February 1990, the applicant was honorably discharged from the VAARNG and the United States Army Reserve due to the expiration of his service obligation (ETS). The applicant's contention that he served 13 years in the ARNG has been noted; however, he has failed to show through the evidence of record and the...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2005 | 20050010886C070206

    Original file (20050010886C070206.doc) Auto-classification: Denied

    The applicant requests, in effect, that the Record of Nonjudicial Punishment (DA Form 2627), dated 28 February 2003, be set aside, with all rights, privileges and property restored; that it be removed from his Official Military Personnel File (OMPF); that the Officer Evaluation Report (OER), dated 29 November 2002, be removed from his OMPF; that his administrative separation be reversed and his records corrected to reflect that he was honorably released from active duty (REFRAD) on 12...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2007 | 20070012206

    Original file (20070012206.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    The applicant requests, in effect, that item 12b (Separation Date This Period), of his DD Form 214 (Certificate of Release or Discharge from Active Duty) be corrected. Therefore, there is insufficient evidence to correct item 12b, of his DD Form 214, to show that he completed 24 months of active duty service. It is evident that the applicant requested early release from active duty to join a TPU 10 days prior to his original scheduled ETS of 28 February 1986.