Search Decisions

Decision Text

ARMY | BCMR | CY2011 | 20110023448
Original file (20110023448.txt) Auto-classification: Approved

		IN THE CASE OF:	  

		BOARD DATE:  19 July 2012

		DOCKET NUMBER:  AR20110023448 


THE BOARD CONSIDERED THE FOLLOWING EVIDENCE:

1.  Application for correction of military records (with supporting documents provided, if any).

2.  Military Personnel Records and advisory opinions (if any).


THE APPLICANT'S REQUEST, STATEMENT, AND EVIDENCE:

1.  The applicant requests, in effect, correction of his DD Form 214 (Certificate of Release or Discharge from Active Duty) to show his separation date as 19 November 1989.

2.  He states his DD Form 214 shows his separation date as 17 November 1989 and his entry date as 19 November 1987 which leaves his record short "2" days for Department of Veterans Affairs (VA) benefits.  He went to Fort Knox, KY for 10 days when he enlisted in August 1987.  Additionally, he states that he could not take leave from Panama; therefore, he received pay for 45 days of leave when he was released.

3.  He provides his DD Form 214.

CONSIDERATION OF EVIDENCE:

1.  Title 10, U.S. Code, section 1552(b), provides that applications for correction of military records must be filed within 3 years after discovery of the alleged error or injustice.  This provision of law also allows the Army Board for Correction of Military Records (ABCMR) to excuse an applicant’s failure to timely file within the 3-year statute of limitations if the ABCMR determines it would be in the interest of justice to do so.  While it appears the applicant did not file within the time frame provided in the statute of limitations, the ABCMR has elected to conduct a substantive review of this case and, only to the extent relief, if any, is granted, has determined it is in the interest of justice to excuse the applicant’s failure to timely file.  In all other respects, there are insufficient bases to waive the statute of limitations for timely filing.

2.  The applicant’s DD Form 4 (Enlistment/Reenlistment Document) shows he enlisted in the U.S. Army Reserve (USAR) on 31 August 1987 under the Delayed Entry Program and he enlisted in the Regular Army on 19 November 1987 for a period of 2 years, which established his expiration term of service (ETS) date as 18 November 1989.  

3.  His DA Form 2-1 (Personnel Qualification Record – Part II) indicates he enlisted at the 46th Adjutant General Battalion (Reception Station) at Fort Knox on 19 November 1987.  He was reassigned to Fort Benning, GA for one station unit training on 30 November 1987.  

4.  Orders published, on 2 August 1989, reassigned him to the U.S. Army Transition Point, Fort Polk, LA, effective 17 November 1989, for transition processing.  His date of release from active duty is listed as 17 November 1989.  On the following date, he was transferred to the USAR Control Group (Annual Training). 

5.  His DD Form 214 indicates he entered active duty on 19 November 1987 and was released from active duty on 17 November 1989 under the provisions of Army Regulation 635-200 (Personnel Separations) at his ETS.  On the following day, he was transferred to the U.S. Army Reserve Control Group (Annual Training).  His discharge document also indicates he completed 1 year, 11 months, and 29 days of active military service.  

6.  A review of the 1989 calendar shows 18 November 1989 was a Saturday.

7.  Army Regulation 635-5 (Separation Documents) prescribes the separation documents prepared for Soldiers upon retirement, discharge, or release from active military service or control of the Army.  It states Soldiers will be separated on their scheduled transition date, except those who elect to separate on the last workday before a weekend or holiday.

8.  Army Regulation 635-200, in effect at the time, set forth the basic authority for the separation of enlisted personnel.  Paragraph 2-2 of Army Regulation 635-200 states that a Soldier enlisted or ordered to active duty normally will be discharged or released from active duty on the date he/she completes the period for which enlisted or ordered to active duty.  Paragraph 2-2d states that some Soldiers’ 


terms of service expire or they otherwise become eligible for discharge or release from active duty on a Saturday, Sunday, or legal holiday.  These Soldiers may consent to be discharged or released to or transferred to the U.S. Army Reserve on the last working day before their normal date of discharge or release.  Release from active duty or discharge will be date as of the release or discharge.

9.  Department of Veterans Affairs booklet, ”Federal Benefits for Veterans and Dependents,” provides that veterans who enlisted after 7 September 1980 or who entered active duty after 16 October 1981, must have served 24 continuous months or the full period for which they were called to active duty in order to be eligible for certain benefits.

DISCUSSION AND CONCLUSIONS:

1.  Paragraph 2-2d of Army Regulation 635-200 recognizes the fact that some Soldiers’ terms of service may expire on Saturday, Sunday, or a Holiday.  This paragraph provides that such Soldiers may consent to be separated on the last working day before their normal date of discharge, release from active duty, or transfer to the Army Reserve.

2.  Although the applicable regulations provide that a Soldier may consent to be separated on the last working day before ETS, those provisions are provided as a convenience to both the individual Soldier and the Department of the Army.  The provision is not intended in any way to deny the Soldier any benefit that the Soldier otherwise would be able to attain had the Soldier not consented to be separated on the last working day prior to the scheduled separation date.

3.  The applicant separated on the Friday before his normal ETS, a Saturday.  As a result of this early separation, through no fault of his own, he is being unduly disadvantaged in that he is being denied VA benefits that he may be entitled to receive, by virtue of his DD Form 214 not showing he completed his first full term of service, when in fact, as far as the Army was concerned he had fulfilled his contract and was separated early at the convenience of the government.

4.  Therefore, it would be in the interest of justice to correct his records to add  in block 18 (Remarks), “For the purpose of obtaining VA benefits only, the individual was separated at the convenience of the government and has fulfilled his first full term of active service.”



BOARD VOTE:

___X ___  ___X____  ___X  ___  GRANT FULL RELIEF 

________  ________  ________  GRANT PARTIAL RELIEF 

________  ________  ________  GRANT FORMAL HEARING

________  ________  ________  DENY APPLICATION

BOARD DETERMINATION/RECOMMENDATION:

The Board determined that the evidence presented was sufficient to warrant a recommendation for relief.  As a result, the Board recommends that all Department of the Army records of the individual concerned be corrected by amending his DD Form 214 by  adding to block 18 the entry "For the purpose of obtaining VA benefits only, the individual was separated at the convenience of the government and has fulfilled his first full term of active service."




      __________X_____________
                 CHAIRPERSON
      
I certify that herein is recorded the true and complete record of the proceedings of the Army Board for Correction of Military Records in this case.

ABCMR Record of Proceedings (cont)                                         AR20110023448



3


ARMY BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS

 RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS


1

ABCMR Record of Proceedings (cont)                                         AR20110023448



2


ARMY BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS

 RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS


1

Similar Decisions

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2007 | 20070007537

    Original file (20070007537.TXT) Auto-classification: Approved

    Powers Chairperson Mr. Edward E. Montgomery Member Mr. Qawiy A. Sabree Member The Board considered the following evidence: Exhibit A - Application for correction of military records. The applicant's DD Form 214 shows that on 17 May 1968, he was honorably released from active duty under the provisions of Army Regulation 635-200 (Personnel Separations) at his ETS and transferred to the United States Army Reserve Control Group (Annual Training). It provides a brief, clear-cut record of active...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2007 | 20070002552

    Original file (20070002552.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    The applicant requests that her date of separation from Active Duty be corrected on her DD Form 214 (Certificate of Release or Discharge from Active Duty) to show 17 November 1990. The applicant contends her date of release from active duty as shown on her DD Form 214 should be corrected to show she completed her 3-year service obligation on 17 November 1990. Evidence of record shows the applicant enlisted in the Regular Army on 18 November 1987 for 3 years service.

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2008 | 20080008993

    Original file (20080008993.txt) Auto-classification: Approved

    The applicant requests, in effect, that his military records be corrected to show that he completed 2 years of creditable active service. There is no evidence in the applicant's military records which shows that he consented to be released from active duty prior to his established ETS date of 4 November 1984. The applicant contends that his military records should be corrected to show that he completed 2 years of creditable active service.

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2013 | 20130019476

    Original file (20130019476.txt) Auto-classification: Approved

    The applicant requests correction of his DD Form 214 (Certificate of Release or Discharge from Active Duty) to show he was released from active duty upon completion of his expiration term of service (ETS) on 24 February 1990. His record contains: * military orders releasing him from active duty on his ETS date, 24 February 1990 (Saturday) * endorsements to those military orders which changed his effective date of release from active duty to 21 February 1990 3. The evidence of record shows...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2005 | 20050003125C070206

    Original file (20050003125C070206.doc) Auto-classification: Approved

    Michael J. Flynn | |Member | The Board considered the following evidence: Exhibit A - Application for correction of military records. The applicant requests, in effect, that he be given 1 additional day of service credit and that his report of separation (DD Form 214) be corrected to reflect that he served 2 years of active service. As a result, the Board recommends that all Department of the Army records of the individual concerned be corrected by showing that he was honorably REFRAD on...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2002 | 2002070311C070402

    Original file (2002070311C070402.rtf) Auto-classification: Approved

    He was discharged on 25 January 1967 (a DD Form 214 for this period is not available) for the purpose of enlisting in the Regular Army on 26 January 1967 for 3 years, making his expiration term of service (ETS) 25 January 1970. There is no evidence of record and the applicant provides none to show he was released from active duty on 25 January 1970. That all of the Department of the Army records related to this case be corrected by awarding the applicant the Army Good Conduct Medal for the...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2007 | 20070002791C071029

    Original file (20070002791C071029.doc) Auto-classification: Denied

    The applicant requests, in effect, that his records be corrected to show he had a full qualifying year for retirement during retirement year ending (RYE) 16 April 1971. The applicant’s chronological statement of retirement points shows he completed 18 years, 11 months, and 29 days of qualifying service for a Reserve retirement as of RYE 25 October 2006. The USAR accepts good retirement years from other components; however, the applicant did not get retirement year credit for his third year...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2001 | 2001054442C070420

    Original file (2001054442C070420.rtf) Auto-classification: Approved

    The record shows that the applicant was in Germany when her separation orders were published. She was also assigned a reentry eligibility (RE) code of RE-2 (Persons separated for the Convenience of the Government, under chapter 5 of Army Regulation 635-200, whose reenlistment is not contemplated). A soldier enlisted or ordered to active duty normally will be discharged or released from active duty on the date he or she completes the period for which enlisted or ordered to active duty.

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2004 | 20040002535C070208

    Original file (20040002535C070208.doc) Auto-classification: Denied

    The applicant requests, in effect, that his records be corrected to show he completed a full 3 years of service. He was released from active duty on 24 July 1964, under the provisions of Army Regulation 635-200 upon his expiration term of service (ETS), after completing 2 years, 11 months, and 28 days of creditable active service, and transferred to the U. S. Army Reserve to serve until his terminal date of obligation of 26 July 1967. There is no evidence of error or injustice in showing...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2003 | 2003088096C070403

    Original file (2003088096C070403.rtf) Auto-classification: Approved

    I certify that hereinafter is recorded the true and complete record of the proceedings of the Army Board for Correction of Military Records in the case of the above-named individual. The applicant requests that his military records be corrected to show that he served 2 years on active duty. It would be equitable to now show the applicant was placed on 2 days excess leave, was separated on 26 July 1964, and to amend his DD Form 214 to show he separated on 26 July 1964 after completing 2...