Search Decisions

Decision Text

ARMY | BCMR | CY2013 | 20130019455
Original file (20130019455.txt) Auto-classification: Denied


		BOARD DATE:	  1 July 2014

		DOCKET NUMBER:  AR20130019455 


THE BOARD CONSIDERED THE FOLLOWING EVIDENCE:

1.  Application for correction of military records (with supporting documents provided, if any).

2.  Military Personnel Records and advisory opinions (if any).


THE APPLICANT'S REQUEST, STATEMENT, AND EVIDENCE:

1.  The applicant requests correction of his DD Form 214 (Armed Forces of the United States Report of transfer or Discharge) to show his foreign service in Vietnam.

2.  The applicant states his DD Form 214 does not reflect his service in Vietnam.  He departed Travis Air Force Base, CA on 2 November 1972 for Vietnam and he was stationed at Camp Alpha in Saigon.

3.  The applicant provides copies of his DD Form 214 and orders transferring him to Vietnam.

CONSIDERATION OF EVIDENCE:

1.  Title 10, U.S. Code, section 1552(b), provides that applications for correction of military records must be filed within 3 years after discovery of the alleged error or injustice.  This provision of law also allows the Army Board for Correction of Military Records (ABCMR) to excuse an applicant's failure to timely file within the 3-year statute of limitations if the ABCMR determines it would be in the interest of justice to do so.  While it appears the applicant did not file within the time frame provided in the statute of limitations, the ABCMR has elected to conduct a substantive review of this case and, only to the extent relief, if any, is granted, has determined it is in the interest of justice to excuse the applicant's failure to 


timely file.  In all other respects, there are insufficient bases to waive the statute of limitations for timely filing.

2.  The applicant enlisted in the Regular Army on 8 December 1971 for a period of 2 years.  He completed his basic training at Fort Polk, LA and his advanced individual training as a seaman at Fort Eustis, VA.  He was advanced to the pay grade of E-4 on 7 July 1972.

3.  On 28 August 1972, orders were published that directed the applicant’s reassignment to the Overseas Replacement Station at Oakland, CA for further travel and assignment to Vietnam.  His report date to Oakland was 26 October 1972. 

4.  On 2 November 1972, orders were published by the Army Personnel Center in Oakland that directed the applicant’s movement to Vietnam with a report date of 5 November 1972.

5.  A review of his official record failed to show any evidence of the applicant ever arriving in Vietnam.  

6.  His record also do not contain the facts and circumstances surrounding his administrative discharge under the provisions of Army Regulation 635-200 (Personnel Separations Enlisted Personnel) by reason of hardship; however, his record contains a DD Form 214 that shows the applicant was assigned to the Third Army Support Group at Homestead Air Force Base, FL when he was honorably discharged on 29 January 1973, under the provisions of Army Regulation 635-200, chapter 6, due to hardship.  He served 1 year, 1 month, and 21 days of active service and his DD Form 214 reflects no foreign service.

DISCUSSION AND CONCLUSIONS:

1.  While the sincerity of the applicant’s claim that he served in Vietnam is not in question, there simply is no evidence in the available records to show that he actually entered or departed the country of Vietnam during his period of active duty service.

2.  Therefore, in the absence of such evidence, it must be presumed that he did not serve in Vietnam and that his DD Form 214 is correct.  Accordingly, in the absence of evidence to the contrary, there appears to be an insufficient evidentiary basis for granting the applicant's requested relief.


BOARD VOTE:

________  ________  ________  GRANT FULL RELIEF 

________  ________  ________  GRANT PARTIAL RELIEF 

________  ________  ________  GRANT FORMAL HEARING

___X_____  __X______  _X___  DENY APPLICATION

BOARD DETERMINATION/RECOMMENDATION:

The evidence presented does not demonstrate the existence of a probable error or injustice.  Therefore, the Board determined that the overall merits of this case are insufficient as a basis for correction of the records of the individual concerned.



      _________X_____________
               CHAIRPERSON
      

I certify that herein is recorded the true and complete record of the proceedings of the Army Board for Correction of Military Records in this case.



ABCMR Record of Proceedings (cont)                                         AR20130019455





3


ARMY BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS

 RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS


1

ABCMR Record of Proceedings (cont)                                         AR20130019455



2


ARMY BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS

 RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS


1

Similar Decisions

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2009 | 20090011396

    Original file (20090011396.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    The applicant's records show he was inducted into the Army of the United States and entered active duty on 20 March 1969. However, there is no evidence that he arrived in Oakland, proceeded to Vietnam, or returned from Vietnam. In the absence of additional documentary evidence that conclusively shows the exact date of departure (day, month, and year) and exact date of return (day, month, year), there is insufficient evidence to grant the applicant the requested relief.

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2008 | 20080019272

    Original file (20080019272.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    The applicant provides: a. a copy of a VA Form 21-4138 (Statement in Support of Claim); b. a copy of Special Order Number 151, Headquarters, The United States Army Medical Training Center (USAMTC), Fort Sam Houston, TX, dated 18 July 1969, assigning him to the US Army Overseas Replacement Station, Oakland, CA, not later than 19 August 1969, for transfer to Vietnam; and c. a copy of an Illinois Department of Veterans Affairs Form 200. The record shows the applicant never reported to the...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2008 | 20080015477

    Original file (20080015477.txt) Auto-classification: Approved

    (Record of Service - Foreign and/or Sea Service this Period), Item 19 (Indochina or Korea Service Since August 5, 1964), and Item 26 (Decorations, Medals, Badges, Commendations, Citations and Campaign Ribbons Awarded or Authorized), of his DD Form 214 (Report of Separation from Active Duty), be corrected. to shows the applicant served 0 years, 6 months, and 19 days in Vietnam; b. correct Item 19 to show the applicant did perform service in Vietnam on or after 5 August 1964; c. correct Item...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2010 | 20100001060

    Original file (20100001060.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    The applicant states that: a. he cannot remember any dates surrounding his military service; b. he does recall he was in Vietnam for almost a year to the date c. his Vietnam service shown in item 30 of his DD Form 214 is wrong; and d. he was separated on temporary records because a captain swore to him there was no record of him being in the Army. The applicant contends item 22c and item 30 of his DD Form 214 should be corrected. Regarding the applicant’s request for a complete history of...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2009 | 20090006238

    Original file (20090006238.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    In order to make his accounts of traumatic stress more believable to his DVA doctors, the applicant requests his time served in Vietnam be increased. The applicant’s DD Form 214 shows he completed 2 years of high school. In order to justify correction of a military record, the applicant must show to the satisfaction of the Board, or it must otherwise satisfactorily appear, that the record is in error or unjust.

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2014 | AR20140010296

    Original file (AR20140010296.txt) Auto-classification: Approved

    * he highlights item 6, titled "Service for Pay" which shows a "1" under YRS and a date of 29 October 1970 under "DATE COMP" * Army Regulation 37-104-2 identifies item 6 as designed to show years of service as well as the date of the last full year of service completed * the applicant was inducted on 29 October 1969 and had exactly one year of service for pay purposes on 29 October 1970 * item 8 is identified in Army Regulation 37-104-2 as showing the pay period for that pay voucher; this...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2014 | 20140002024

    Original file (20140002024.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    The applicant requests correction of his DD Form 214 (Armed Forces of the United States Report of Transfer or Discharge) to show he served in the Republic of Vietnam (RVN), was assigned to Company D, 52nd Infantry Regiment, held military occupational specialty (MOS) 11B1O (Rifleman), and was awarded the Combat Infantryman Badge (CIB). His DA Form 20 (Enlisted Qualification Record) shows in – * item 22 (MOS) – * Primary MOS (PMOS) 76P2O, Stock Control Specialist, 23 April 1971 * Secondary...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2014 | 20140005090

    Original file (20140005090.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    The applicant requests correction of his DD Form 214 (Armed Forces of the United State Report of Transfer or Discharge) to show his foreign service in Vietnam. Records show: * he was issued orders to report to Vietnam in July 1969 * he submitted an application for compassionate reassignment * he was attached to the Casual Detachment at Fort Sam Houston, TX, on 4 August 1969 pending receipt of permanent change of station reassignment orders from the overseas unit * his compassionate...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2011 | 20110003742

    Original file (20110003742.txt) Auto-classification: Approved

    His DA Form 20 (Enlisted Qualification Record) shows: a. item 31 (Foreign Service) - he served in Korea from 19 January 1964 to 17 February 1965, a period of 1 year and 1 month; and b. Therefore, he is entitled to the Army Good Conduct Medal (1st Award) for the period 12 March 1963 through 18 February 1965 and he is entitled to correction of his DD Form 214 to show this award. As a result, the Board recommends that all Department of the Army records of the individual concerned be corrected...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2008 | 20080010167

    Original file (20080010167.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    Application for correction of military records (with supporting documents provided, if any). The applicant requests, in effect, that Item 12 (Last Duty of Assignment and Major Command) and Item 23a (Specialty Number & Title) of his separation document (DD Form 214) be corrected. His record also confirms that on the date of his REFRAD, he held the PMOS of 94B, as evidenced by orders on file in his MPRJ and an entry on his DA Form 20, and that this PMOS is properly listed in Item 23a of his...