Search Decisions

Decision Text

ARMY | BCMR | CY2013 | 20130011263
Original file (20130011263.txt) Auto-classification: Approved

		IN THE CASE OF:	  

		BOARD DATE:  6 March 2014

		DOCKET NUMBER:  AR20130011263 


THE BOARD CONSIDERED THE FOLLOWING EVIDENCE:

1.  Application for correction of military records (with supporting documents provided, if any).

2.  Military Personnel Records and advisory opinions (if any).


THE APPLICANT'S REQUEST, STATEMENT, AND EVIDENCE:

1.  The applicant requests, in effect, to retain his eligibility for payment of his student loans as part of his enlistment in the Utah Army National Guard (UTARNG) under the Student Loan Repayment Program (SLRP).

2.  The applicant states he is qualified to retain his eligibility for the SLRP because he was hired as a military technician (Mil Tech) after the effective date of Education and Incentives Operational Message (EIOM) NGB-EDU-09-001, dated 29 October 2008.

3.  The applicant provides:

* a statement of declaration
* 3 memoranda
* Annex L to DD Form 4 (Enlistment/Reenlistment Document),              SLRP Addendum
* Standard Form 50

CONSIDERATION OF EVIDENCE:

1.  The applicant enlisted in the UTARNG on 2 December 2008.  As part of his enlistment he completed a SLRP addendum stating he had one loan in the amount of $45,654.00.  The total amount of repayment for the qualifying loan would not exceed $20,000.00.

2.  Section V (Termination Without Recoupment) of the addendum states he  understood that his SLRP eligibility would be terminated if he accepted a Mil Tech position. 

3.  On 21 December 2009, he accepted a position as a Mil Tech with the UTARNG's Aviation Support Facility.

4.  On 6 October 2011, his commander requested an exception to policy (ETP) on his behalf so he could be paid the remaining $17,000.00 of his SLRP.  His commander stated based on EIOM NGB-EDU-09-001, dated 29 October 2008, the applicant qualified to keep his SLRP benefits because he was hired as a Mil Tech after the effective date of the message.

5.  Evidence shows the applicant served in Afghanistan for the period 9 April 2012 through 5 December 2012.

6.  His record contains a memorandum from the Deputy G1, ARNG, dated        17 December 2012, denying the applicant's request for ETP to retain the $20,000.00 SLRP incentive.  The State Incentive Manager was instructed to terminate the incentive without recoupment.  The applicant was instructed to file a claim with the Army Board for Correction of Military Records (ABCMR) if he believed an error or injustice still exists.

7.  During the processing of this case, on 16 October 2013, an advisory opinion was obtained from the Chief, Personnel Policy Division, National Guard Bureau (NGB).  The advisory official opined:

   a.  The applicant was eligible for the SLRP at the time of his enlistment on            2 December 2008.  The applicant had $47,854.00 in eligible loans with an annual entitlement of $3,000.00.  A payment of $3,000.00 was made to the applicant on 15 January 2010.

   b.  The applicant became a Mil Tech on 21 December 2009, before reaching his second anniversary date.  In accordance with Department of Defense Instruction 1205.21, enclosure 8.1.4.3, "continued eligibility for an incentive is terminated if a service member accepts a Mil Tech or Active Guard Reserve (AGR) position where membership in a Reserve component is a condition for employment (except for temporary assignment as a Mil Tech for a period of six months or less."

   c.  On 18 April 2012, UTARNG submitted an ETP on behalf of the applicant to the Oversight Branch at the NGB.  The ETP was denied with a determination to terminate the incentive without recoupment on 17 December 2012.  This decision is supported by the SLRP addendum signed by the Soldier, which states in Section V, "I understand that my SLRP eligibility will be terminated if I accept a Mil Tech position or Title 10 or Title 32 AGR tour."

   d.  The EIOMs that the applicant references only applied to bonus incentives and not SLRP.  The Department of the Army (DA) published guidance on                   14 September 2012, which the ARNG subsequently implemented in EIOM       13-003 Disposition of SLRP contracts for Select AGR and Mil Tech Personnel on   14 March 2013.  In accordance with DA guidance and EIOM 13-003, a Soldier who contracted for SLRP and accepted an AGR or Mil Tech position between     9 October 2008 and 3 November 2010 is eligible for ETP consideration as stipulated in Army Regulation 601-210 (Active and Reserve Components Enlistment Program).

   e.  At the time the applicant became a full-time Mil Tech, ARNG policy regarding his eligibility in the SLRP was not clearly defined.  The advisory official recommended the ABCMR approve the applicant's request to allow him to retain his eligibility for the SLRP; terminate recoupment of funds; and reimburse the applicant funds, if any, previously recouped.

   f.  The State concurred with this recommendation.

8.  On 17 October 2013, a copy of the advisory opinion was forwarded to the applicant for information and to allow him the opportunity to submit comments or a rebuttal.  He did not respond.

DISCUSSION AND CONCLUSIONS:

1.  The applicant's request to retain his eligibility for payment of his student loans as part of his enlistment in the UTARNG under the SLRP has been carefully examined and found to have merit.

2.  The available evidence indicates the applicant had qualifying student loans that were approved for the SLRP incentive.  Evidence further indicates that he received a SLRP payment in the amount of $3,000.00 in January 2010.  The applicant became a Mil Tech on 21 December 2009, in apparent violation of the enlistment addendum which authorized him the SLRP incentive; however, at the time the applicant became a Mil Tech, ARNG policy regarding eligibility in the SLRP was not clearly defined as evidenced from the EIOM's of the time.  

3.  It is very reasonable to presume the applicant would not have accepted a Mil Tech position had he not been certain the referenced EIOMs supported his continued receipt of the SLRP incentive.  
4.  Based on the foregoing, the applicant is entitled to the requested relief.

BOARD VOTE:

____X___  ____X___  ___X__ _  GRANT FULL RELIEF 

________  ________  ________  GRANT PARTIAL RELIEF 

________  ________  ________  GRANT FORMAL HEARING

________  ________  ________  DENY APPLICATION

BOARD DETERMINATION/RECOMMENDATION:

   The Board determined that the evidence presented was sufficient to warrant a recommendation for relief.  As a result, the Board recommends that all Department of the Army, National Guard, and State records of the individual concerned be corrected by allowing him to retain his eligibility for the SLRP; terminate any recoupment of funds; and reimburse the applicant funds, if any, previously recouped from ARNG funds.
 



      _______ _  X ______   ___
               CHAIRPERSON
      
I certify that herein is recorded the true and complete record of the proceedings of the Army Board for Correction of Military Records in this case.



ABCMR Record of Proceedings (cont)                                         AR20130011263





3


ARMY BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS

 RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS


1

ABCMR Record of Proceedings (cont)                                         AR20130011263



4


ARMY BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS

 RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS


1

Similar Decisions

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2013 | 20130021599

    Original file (20130021599.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    She indicated or acknowledged she understood: * she was currently in the ARNG and was extending for 6 years in the ARNG, in the non-critical MOS of 42F and non-critical unit (4th Personnel Service Detachment) that was authorized the SLRP incentive * she was not enlisting for an AGR tour (under Title 10 or Title 32) nor was she enlisting for a technician position * she had 3 loans in the amount of $20,000 and the total amount of qualifying loans would not exceed $20,000 * her SLRP eligibility...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2014 | 20140020070

    Original file (20140020070.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    The applicant requests an exception to policy (ETP) to retain eligibility for the Student Loan Repayment Program (SLRP) incentive for which he contracted when he extended his enlistment in the Virginia Army National Guard (VAARNG) on 20 January 2007. The applicant states the National Guard Bureau (NGB) denied his request for an ETP to retain his eligibility for the SLRP incentive due to the facts that: * he accepted an Active Guard Reserve (AGR) position * the SLRP addendum to his extension...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2014 | 20140005392

    Original file (20140005392.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    The applicant provides: * notification of incentive eligibility termination * signature authority memorandum for record * second review request for exception to policy for SLRP for the applicant * DA Form 4836 (Oath of Extension of Enlistment or Reenlistment) * National Guard Bureau (NGB) Form 600-7-5-R-E (SLRP Addendum) * Student Loan Data Download * two DA Forms 2823 (Sworn Statement) * multiple student loan vouchers * NGB memorandum of clarification of SLRP benefits upon acceptance of an...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2014 | 20140006358

    Original file (20140006358.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    If accepting an AGR or Mil Tech position where membership in a Reserve component is a condition of employment, and member has served at least 6 months of the incentive contract following receipt of the initial incentive payment. NGB memorandum NGB-EDU-09-001, subject: Change to AGR and Mil Tech Termination and Recoupment Rules, dated 29 October 2008, states in paragraph 2a that any enlisted Soldier currently under contract for an incentive governed by Memorandum, NGB-ARM, 10 August 2007,...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2013 | 20130019789

    Original file (20130019789.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    The applicant requests, in effect, an exception to policy (ETP) to retain eligibility for the Student Loan Repayment Program (SLRP) incentive written in her enlistment contract. The applicant states: * her enlistment contract outlined that the SLRP would be revoked if she took a new duty assignment as a technician or an Active Guard Reserve (AGR) position * the National Guard Bureau (NGB) published Education and Incentives Operational Message (EIOM) 13-003 to provide instructions for ETP...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2014 | 20140017103

    Original file (20140017103.txt) Auto-classification: Approved

    She formally requested an ETP from the State Incentive Manager on 1 October 2012, wherein she requested relief from, and termination of, the levied recoupment action in the amount of $20,428.45 that resulted from the termination of her incentive entitlements. (8) Furthermore, had she executed a written agreement the bonus would have been terminated in accordance with Department of Defense Instruction (DoDI) 1205.21 (Reserve Component Incentive Programs Procedures), paragraph E3.l.8.2,...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2014 | 20140012615

    Original file (20140012615.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    The applicant states: * he enlisted in the SDARNG on 19 September 2008 after a 6-year break in service and contracted for the SLRP as an enlistment incentive * on 27 September 2009, he accepted a full-time position as a military technician (MT) in the SDARNG * prior to accepting the MT position, he specifically asked how it would impact his enlistment incentive and was advised by a supervisory human resources specialist that his incentives would not be impacted * National Guard Bureau (NGB)...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2015 | 20150001892

    Original file (20150001892.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    He confirmed that he entered the CLRP on 8 April 2010, the request was approved and documentation executed, and the applicant entered the AGR program on 18 July 2010 when Soldiers could retain their incentive as an AGR or Mil-Tech. There is no evidence of record of any other anniversary payments. The evidence of record shows the applicant accepted an AGR position with a 3-year active duty commitment beginning 18 July 2010 and he performed the duties of Officer Strength Manager – Recruiter...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2013 | 20130016655

    Original file (20130016655.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    On 1 October 2009, she accepted her AGR position and was told she would keep her enlistment incentives and she was referred to NGB-EDU-09-058, dated 14 September 2009, Subject: Clarification of Continuing SLRP Benefits Upon Acceptance of an AGR and/or Military Technician Position, which states Soldiers ordered to active duty in the State (Title 32) AGR program and (Title 32) Military Technician Program will be entitled to SLRP payments as long as they are serving under their initial contract...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2013 | 20130019213

    Original file (20130019213.txt) Auto-classification: Approved

    The applicant states: a. The applicant provides: * NGB memorandum, Subject: Request for ETP for SLRP, dated 23 September 2013 * NGB memorandum, Subject: Clarification of Continuing SLRP Benefits upon acceptance of an AGR and/or Military Technician Position, dated 14 September 2009 * ETP request * SLRP Addendum * email between the applicant and members of the Wisconsin Army National Guard (WIARNG) * two DA Forms 2475 and allied documents CONSIDERATION OF EVIDENCE: 1. The applicant accepted...