IN THE CASE OF:
BOARD DATE: 22 July 2014
DOCKET NUMBER: AR20130019067
THE BOARD CONSIDERED THE FOLLOWING EVIDENCE:
1. Application for correction of military records (with supporting documents provided, if any).
2. Military Personnel Records and advisory opinions (if any).
THE APPLICANT'S REQUEST, STATEMENT, AND EVIDENCE:
1. The applicant requests an upgrade of his bad conduct discharge (BCD).
2. The applicant states:
* he became depressed and made bad decisions after entering the military and he is appealing his discharge in the event he is eligible to reenter the military in some capacity
* he has conquered his depression and bad decision-making
* although it may not look like it on paper, but he was a good Soldier and he loved being a Soldier and desires another opportunity
* he had manic depression while in the military
* he joined the military straight from college where he was basically attending just for sports
* sports seemed to be the only thing taking his mind off death or trying to die
* he was depressed all the time and blamed himself for his cousin's passing
* he rose to the rank of E-4 quickly and he was an honor graduate
* his marriage was not doing well and depression seeped back into his life
* his wife finally left him
* there were two incidents followed by a period of being absent without leave (AWOL) that he deeply regrets
* he and another Soldier had to be separated after an argument and he later had to stand before his platoon to apologize
* unbeknown to him, he brought an underage female into his home
* he admitted to all wrongdoing and was charged with carnal knowledge
* his military career was derailed due to his own fault, but he has conquered that giant in his life
* he has gained the courage and humility to put his life back together
3. The applicant provides self-authored statements.
CONSIDERATION OF EVIDENCE:
1. Title 10, U.S. Code, section 1552(b), provides that applications for correction of military records must be filed within 3 years after discovery of the alleged error or injustice. This provision of law also allows the Army Board for Correction of Military Records (ABCMR) to excuse an applicant's failure to timely file within the 3-year statute of limitations if the ABCMR determines it would be in the interest of justice to do so. While it appears the applicant did not file within the time frame provided in the statute of limitations, the ABCMR has elected to conduct a substantive review of this case and, only to the extent relief, if any, is granted, has determined it is in the interest of justice to excuse the applicant's failure to timely file. In all other respects, there are insufficient bases to waive the statute of limitations for timely filing.
2. The applicant enlisted in the Regular Army on 6 March 1990.
3. General Court-Martial Order Number 3, issued by Headquarters, U.S. Army Air Defense Artillery Center and Fort Bliss, Fort Bliss, TX, dated 7 January 1993, shows that pursuant to his pleas he was found guilty of:
* committing carnal knowledge with a female under the age of 16 years on or about 20 June 1992
* taking indecent liberties with a female under the age of 16 years on or about 20 June 1992
* being AWOL on or about 20 October until 17 November 1992
4. He was sentenced to a forfeiture of all pay and allowances, reduction to pay grade E-1, confinement for 9 months, and a BCD.
5. On 6 April 1993, the U.S. Army Court of Military Review affirmed the findings and sentence.
6. On 25 June 1993, the U.S. Court of Military Appeals denied his request for a review of the decision of the U.S. Army Court of Military Review.
7. On 3 August 1993, Headquarters, 7th Infantry Division (Light), Fort Ord, CA, issued General Court-Martial Order Number 61 ordering the execution of the affirmed sentence.
8. On 29 September 1993, he was discharged under the provisions of Army Regulation 635-200 (Personnel Separations - Enlisted Personnel), chapter 3, section IV (Dishonorable and BCD).
9. The applicant provides self-authored statements about events leading to his discharge.
10. His service medical records are not available for review and he does not provide any medical documentation confirming a diagnosis of depression.
11. Army Regulation 635-200 sets forth the basic authority for the separation of enlisted personnel.
a. Chapter 3 provides that a Soldier will be given a punitive discharge (dishonorable discharge or BCD) pursuant only to an approved sentence of a general or special court-martial. The appellate review must be completed and the affirmed sentence ordered duly executed.
b. Paragraph 3-7a provides that an honorable discharge is a separation with honor and entitles the recipient to benefits provided by law. The honorable characterization is appropriate when the quality of the members service generally has met the standards of acceptable conduct and performance of duty for Army personnel, or is otherwise so meritorious that any other characterization would be clearly inappropriate.
c. Paragraph 3-7b provides that a general discharge is a separation from the Army under honorable conditions. When authorized, it is issued to a Soldier whose military record is satisfactory but not sufficiently meritorious to warrant an honorable discharge.
12. Court-martial convictions stand as adjudged or modified by appeal through the judicial process. In accordance with Title 10, U.S. Code, section 1552, the authority under which this Board acts, the ABCMR is not empowered to set aside a conviction. Rather it is only empowered to change the severity of the sentence imposed in the court-martial process and then only if clemency is determined to be appropriate. Clemency is an act of mercy, or instance of leniency, to moderate the severity of the punishment imposed.
DISCUSSION AND CONCLUSIONS:
1. The evidence of record does not support the applicant's request for an upgrade of his BCD.
2. He was convicted of carnal knowledge, taking indecent liberties with a minor, and being AWOL. His conviction and sentence by a general court-martial were effected in accordance with applicable law and regulations and the discharge appropriately characterizes the misconduct for which he was convicted. He was not given the BCD until after his conviction and sentence had been reviewed and affirmed by the U.S. Army Court of Military Review.
3. His medical records are not available and he fails to provide any evidence he suffered from depression. However, even if such evidence were available, it would not mitigate the seriousness of the offenses for which he was tried and convicted and, in any case, could have been raised during the court-martial/appellate process.
4. Any redress by this Board of the finality of a court-martial conviction is prohibited by law. The Board is only empowered to change a discharge if clemency is determined to be appropriate to moderate the severity of the sentence imposed. Absent any mitigating factors, the type of discharge directed and the reasons therefore were appropriate. As a result, clemency is not warranted in this case.
BOARD VOTE:
________ ________ ________ GRANT FULL RELIEF
________ ________ ________ GRANT PARTIAL RELIEF
________ ________ ________ GRANT FORMAL HEARING
____X___ ___X___ ___X____ DENY APPLICATION
BOARD DETERMINATION/RECOMMENDATION:
The evidence presented does not demonstrate the existence of a probable error or injustice. Therefore, the Board determined that the overall merits of this case are insufficient as a basis for correction of the records of the individual concerned.
_______ _ X_______ ___
CHAIRPERSON
I certify that herein is recorded the true and complete record of the proceedings of the Army Board for Correction of Military Records in this case.
ABCMR Record of Proceedings (cont) AR20130019067
3
ARMY BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS
RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS
1
ABCMR Record of Proceedings (cont) AR20130019067
2
ARMY BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS
RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS
1
ARMY | BCMR | CY2014 | 20140021063
While it appears the applicant did not file within the time frame provided in the statute of limitations, the ABCMR has elected to conduct a substantive review of this case and, only to the extent relief, if any, is granted, has determined it is in the interest of justice to excuse the applicant's failure to timely file. The evidence of record shows the applicant was convicted by a GCM and he received a BCD. However, it does not mitigate the serious misconduct that led to his court-martial...
ARMY | BCMR | CY2009 | 20090009186
This provision of law also allows the Army Board for Correction of Military Records (ABCMR) to excuse an applicants failure to timely file within the 3-year statute of limitations if the ABCMR determines it would be in the interest of justice to do so. The applicant did not "serve" in the Army for 7 years. The applicant's court-martial conviction and discharge were effected in accordance with applicable laws and regulations and his discharge appropriately characterizes the misconduct for...
ARMY | BCMR | CY2008 | 20080017569
IN THE CASE OF: BOARD DATE: 11 August 2009 DOCKET NUMBER: AR20080017569 THE BOARD CONSIDERED THE FOLLOWING EVIDENCE: 1. This document further shows the applicant had time lost under Title 10, U.S. Code, section 972, from 27 March 1992 to 26 November 1993. The evidence of record shows the applicant was convicted by a GCM and he received a BCD.
ARMY | BCMR | CY2014 | 20140004295
Headquarters, U.S. Army Correctional Brigade, Fort Riley, KS, General Court-Martial Order Number 475, dated 15 August 1990, shows that after completion of all required post-trial and appellate reviews the convening authority ordered the applicant's dishonorable discharge sentence executed. The applicant was discharged from the Army on 5 September 1990. The conviction and discharge were effected in accordance with applicable laws and regulations and the discharge appropriately characterizes...
ARMY | BCMR | CY2011 | 20110013281
BOARD DATE: 5 January 2012 DOCKET NUMBER: AR20110013281 THE BOARD CONSIDERED THE FOLLOWING EVIDENCE: 1. The applicant requests, in effect, that his bad conduct discharge be upgraded to either a general or honorable discharge. This provision of law also allows the Army Board for Correction of Military Records (ABCMR) to excuse an applicants failure to timely file within the 3-year statute of limitations if the ABCMR determines it would be in the interest of justice to do so.
ARMY | BCMR | CY2014 | 20140003375
The applicant requests that his bad conduct discharge (BCD) be upgraded to an honorable or general discharge. This provision of law also allows the Army Board for Correction of Military Records (ABCMR) to excuse an applicant's failure to timely file within the 3-year statute of limitations if the ABCMR determines it would be in the interest of justice to do so. On 9 October 2002, he enlisted in the Regular Army in the pay grade of E-4 for a period of 3 years.
AF | BCMR | CY2003 | BC-2002-02842
The military judge found the applicant guilty of all charges and sentenced him to be reduced to the grade of E-1, be confined for 10 months, and to receive a bad conduct discharge. Therefore, based on the available evidence of record, we find no compelling basis upon which to recommend granting the relief sought in this application. _________________________________________________________________ The following members of the Board considered Docket Number 02-02842 in Executive Session on...
ARMY | BCMR | CY2010 | 20100027104
Application for correction of military records (with supporting documents provided, if any). On 27 March 1990, the applicant was discharged under the provisions of chapter 3, Army Regulation 635-200 (Personnel Separations), by reason of court-martial with a BCD. On 23 April 1997, the Army Discharge Review Board (ADRB), after careful consideration of the applicant's military record, and all other available evidence, determined the applicant's discharged was proper and equitable.
ARMY | BCMR | CY2008 | 20080010840
When authorized, it is issued to a Soldier whose military record is satisfactory but not sufficiently meritorious to warrant an honorable discharge. Conviction and discharge were effected in accordance with applicable law and regulations, and the discharge appropriately characterizes the misconduct for which the applicant was convicted. Therefore, the applicant's record of service is insufficiently meritorious to warrant a general discharge.
ARMY | BCMR | CY2008 | 20080012361
The former spouse stated that the applicant retired in February 1988 after 20 years in the U.S. Army. In accordance with Title 10, United States Code, section 1552, the authority under which this Board acts, the Army Board for Correction of Military Records is not empowered to set aside a conviction. Therefore, the applicant's record of service is insufficiently meritorious to warrant an honorable discharge or a general discharge.