Search Decisions

Decision Text

ARMY | BCMR | CY2013 | 20130019053
Original file (20130019053.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

		IN THE CASE OF:	   

		BOARD DATE:	  19 June 2014

		DOCKET NUMBER:  AR20130019053 


THE BOARD CONSIDERED THE FOLLOWING EVIDENCE:

1.  Application for correction of military records (with supporting documents provided, if any).

2.  Military Personnel Records and advisory opinions (if any).


THE APPLICANT'S REQUEST, STATEMENT, AND EVIDENCE:

1.  The applicant requests correction of his DD Form 214 (Certificate of Release or Discharge from Active Duty) to show award of the Purple Heart.

2.  The applicant makes no additional statement. 

3.  The applicant provides a copy of his DD Form 214 and Revised Physical Evaluation Board (PEB) Proceedings.

CONSIDERATION OF EVIDENCE:

1.  Title 10, U.S. Code, section 1552(b), provides that applications for correction of military records must be filed within 3 years after discovery of the alleged error or injustice.  This provision of law also allows the Army Board for Correction of Military Records (ABCMR) to excuse an applicant's failure to timely file within the 3-year statute of limitations if the ABCMR determines it would be in the interest of justice to do so.  While it appears the applicant did not file within the time frame provided in the statute of limitations, the ABCMR has elected to conduct a substantive review of this case and, only to the extent relief, if any, is granted, has determined it is in the interest of justice to excuse the applicant's failure to timely file.  In all other respects, there are insufficient bases to waive the statute of limitations for timely filing.

2.  The applicant's complete military records are not available for review.  This case is being considered using the applicant's DD Form 214.

3.  The Gulf War Deployment Roster is a record of Soldiers who participated in Desert Shield/Storm and served in Southwest Asia in support of military operations during the period 2 August 1990 through December 1995.  This roster  shows the applicant's name as having served in Southwest Asia for the period   10 January to 25 February 1991.

4.  The applicant provides a DD Form 214 which shows he was a member of the Army National Guard (ARNG) and he held military occupational specialty 88M (Motor Transport Operator).  The applicant entered active duty on 13 March 1991.

5.  On 26 November 1991, the applicant was honorably released from active duty.  The narrative reason for his separation was physical disability with severance pay.

6.  The applicant provides a copy of his Revised PEB Proceedings, dated          24 October 1991, that shows he was diagnosed with left radial sensory neuropathy.  He was subsequently discharged with entitlement to separation pay due to disability based on an injury or disease received in the line of duty as the direct result of armed conflict.  

7.  There is no evidence in the available record and he has not provided any evidence showing he sustained any injuries as a result of hostile action or that he was treated for wounds sustained as a result of hostile action.

8.  Army Regulation 600-8-22 (Military Awards) provides that the Purple Heart is awarded for a wound sustained as a result of hostile action.  Substantiating evidence must be provided to verify the wound was the result of hostile action, the wound must have required treatment by medical personnel, and the medical treatment must have been made a matter of official records.

DISCUSSION AND CONCLUSIONS:

1.  In order to support award of the Purple Heart, there must be evidence confirming the wound/injury for which the award is being made was received as a direct result of or was caused by enemy action, the wound/injury must have been treated by medical personnel, and a record of this treatment must have been made a matter of official record.

2.  He provides insufficient evidence and there is no evidence of record to show he was wounded or injured as a result of hostile action, not just as a direct result of armed conflict.  Therefore, he is not entitled to award of the Purple Heart.

3.  In view of the above, his request should be denied.

BOARD VOTE:

________  ________  ________  GRANT FULL RELIEF 

________  ________  ________  GRANT PARTIAL RELIEF 

________  ________  ________  GRANT FORMAL HEARING

____x___  ___x_____  ___x___  DENY APPLICATION

BOARD DETERMINATION/RECOMMENDATION:

The evidence presented does not demonstrate the existence of a probable error or injustice.  Therefore, the Board determined that the overall merits of this case are insufficient as a basis for correction of the records of the individual concerned.




      _______ _   _x______   ___
               CHAIRPERSON
      
I certify that herein is recorded the true and complete record of the proceedings of the Army Board for Correction of Military Records in this case.



ABCMR Record of Proceedings (cont)                                         AR20130019053





3


ARMY BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS

 RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS


1

ABCMR Record of Proceedings (cont)                                         AR20130019053



2


ARMY BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS

 RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS


1

Similar Decisions

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2004 | 20040009350C070208

    Original file (20040009350C070208.doc) Auto-classification: Denied

    The applicant requests correction of his records to show award of the Purple Heart. The applicant states, in effect, that he sustained combat wounds and was treated for his injuries by military personnel while serving on combat operations in the Persian Gulf from on or about the August 1991 through an unknown period in 1992. There also is no evidence in his service personnel records that shows that he was wounded or treated for wounds as a result of hostile action in the Persian Gulf.

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2014 | 20140014850

    Original file (20140014850.txt) Auto-classification: Approved

    His unit was awarded the MUC and it should be added to his records and his retirement orders should be corrected to show his disabilities were incurred as a result of armed conflict. Although not present in the available records and the applicant has not provided his PEB proceedings, the applicant was placed on the Temporary Disability Retired List (TDRL) in the pay grade of E-6 effective 21 October 1995 with a 30% disability rating. While it is true that the applicant was granted 100%...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY1995 | 9507527C070209

    Original file (9507527C070209.TXT) Auto-classification: Denied

    APPLICANT REQUESTS: Correction of his military records to reflect award of the Purple Heart and Combat Infantryman Badge. EVIDENCE OF RECORD: The applicant's military records show: He was a member of the USAR when he was called to active duty on 14 January 1991 in support of Operation Desert Shield/Storm. In the absence of more convincing evidence that the applicant was actively engaged in ground combat or that his injuries occurred while on a combat mission, as opposed to while guarding...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2012 | 20120004914

    Original file (20120004914.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    A DA Form 2173 (Statement of Medical Examination and Duty Status), dated June 1995, shows he was seen in the emergency room for hip pain. There are no orders or medical records in his service personnel records that show he was awarded the Purple Heart. Army Regulation 600-8-22 (Military Awards) states the Purple Heart is awarded for a wound sustained in action against an enemy or as a result of hostile action.

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2006 | 20060006533C070205

    Original file (20060006533C070205.doc) Auto-classification: Denied

    Title 10, U.S. Code, Section 1552(b), provides that applications for correction of military records must be filed within 3 years after discovery of the alleged error or injustice. Discharge orders, dated 24 March 1992, state that his disability resulted from a combat-related injury. Army Regulation 600-8-22 (Military Awards) provides, in pertinent part, that the Purple Heart is awarded for a wound sustained as a result of hostile action.

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2010 | 20100011152

    Original file (20100011152.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    Title 26, U.S. Code, section 104, states that the term "combat-related injury" means personal injury or sickness which is incurred as a direct result of armed conflict, while engaged in extra hazardous service under conditions simulating war, or which is caused by an instrumentality of war. A determination that a disability is the result of an instrumentality of war may be made if the disability was incurred in any period of service as a result of such diverse causes as wounds caused by a...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2004 | 20040008097C070208

    Original file (20040008097C070208.doc) Auto-classification: Approved

    Lawrence Foster | |Member | The Board considered the following evidence: Exhibit A - Application for correction of military records. A Purple Heart certificate, dated 28 February 1991, indicates the applicant was awarded the Purple Heart for wounds received in action. As a result, the Board recommends that all Department of the Army records of the individual concerned be corrected by showing she was awarded the Purple Heart for wounds received on 28 February 1991, the Kuwait Liberation...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2002 | 2002081162C070215

    Original file (2002081162C070215.rtf) Auto-classification: Denied

    The applicant requests correction of military records as stated in the application to the Board and as restated herein. However, the Board concludes that the injury to his lower back was not the result of hostile action. Based on the foregoing and in the absence of records which show the applicant was wounded as a result of hostile enemy action, the applicant’s injury does not meet the criteria under Army Regulation 600-8-22, for award of the Purple Heart.

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2010 | 20100013923

    Original file (20100013923.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    There is no evidence in the available records and he has not provided evidence that shows his injuries were the result of hostile action. Regrettably, in the absence of military records which show he was injured as a result of hostile action, there is an insufficient basis for award of the Purple Heart in this case. _______ _ X______ ___ CHAIRPERSON I certify that herein is recorded the true and complete record of the proceedings of the Army Board for Correction of Military Records in this case.

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2008 | 20080009633

    Original file (20080009633.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    It stated that "division commanders in the grade of major general who had troops committed to the combat operation and hospital commanders receiving casualties could award the Purple Heart to Soldiers who were wounded as the direct result, repeat, direct result of enemy action." There is no evidence in the record and the applicant has provided no evidence to show that a Scud missile actually exploded anywhere near the King Abdul Aziz Hospital. In the absence of conclusive evidence that...