Search Decisions

Decision Text

ARMY | BCMR | CY2010 | 20100011152
Original file (20100011152.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

		IN THE CASE OF:	  

		BOARD DATE:	  19 October 2010

		DOCKET NUMBER:  AR20100011152 


THE BOARD CONSIDERED THE FOLLOWING EVIDENCE:

1.  Application for correction of military records (with supporting documents provided, if any).

2.  Military Personnel Records and advisory opinions (if any).


THE APPLICANT'S REQUEST, STATEMENT, AND EVIDENCE:

1.  The applicant requests award of the Purple Heart.

2.  The applicant states he was injured while serving in the Gulf War. 

3.  The applicant provides reassignment/discharge orders in support of his application.

CONSIDERATION OF EVIDENCE:

1.  Title 10, U.S. Code, section 1552(b), provides that applications for correction of military records must be filed within 3 years after discovery of the alleged error or injustice.  This provision of law also allows the Army Board for Correction of Military Records (ABCMR) to excuse an applicant’s failure to timely file within the 3-year statute of limitations if the ABCMR determines it would be in the interest of justice to do so.  While it appears the applicant did not file within the time frame provided in the statute of limitations, the ABCMR has elected to conduct a substantive review of this case and, only to the extent relief, if any, is granted, has determined it is in the interest of justice to excuse the applicant’s failure to timely file.  In all other respects, there are insufficient bases to waive the statute of limitations for timely filing.

2.  The applicant was ordered to active duty from the Army National Guard on 
12 September 1990 in support of Operation Desert Shield/Storm.  He served as a food service specialist in Southwest Asia (SWA) from 27 September 1990 to 
19 May 1991.   
3.  Item 15 (Details of accident or history of disease) on a DA Form 2173 (Statement of Medical Examination and Duty Status), dated 23 July 1991, states in September 1990  while on duty at Fort Rucker, AL, the applicant fell from a truck while loading weapons.  He deployed for SWA the next morning and did not seek medical care.  After arrival in SWA he began to experience groin pain and limited use of his left leg.  He underwent surgery for hernia repair while in SWA.

4.  A medical record report, dated 27 January 1992, states, in pertinent part, the applicant has a history of low back pain and left lower extremity pain since a fall in September 1990.  He apparently fell backwards while loading weapons into a truck.  He landed directly on a gun rack striking the lower back. 

5.  A DA Form 199 (Physical Evaluation Board (PEB) Proceedings), dated 
2 March 1992, shows a PEB found the applicant physically unfit due to chronic low pain, intermittent, with left radicular symptoms without radiculopathy, status post injury in September 1990.  The PEB recommended a combined rating of 10 percent and that the applicant be separated with severance pay.  On 12 May 2009, the applicant concurred with the findings and recommendations and waived a formal hearing.  A revised DA Form 199, dated 27 March 1992, amended item 10a to read "The Soldier's retirement is based on disability from injury or disease received in the line of duty as a direct result of armed conflict or caused by an instrumentality of war and incurring in line of duty during a period of war as defined by law."  On 30 March 1992, the U.S. Army Physical Disability Agency approved the PEB's findings and recommendation.

6.  On 15 April 1992, the applicant was honorably discharged by reason of physical disability with severance pay (10 percent).  

7.  The applicant's DD Form 214 (Certificate of Release or Discharge from Active Duty) for the period ending 15 April 1992 does not show the Purple Heart as an authorized award.  

8.  There are no orders for the Purple Heart in the available records.

9.  Item 9 (Awards, Decorations and Campaigns) on the applicant's DA Form 2-1 (Personnel Qualification Record) does not show entitlement to the Purple Heart.

10.  In support of his claim, the applicant provided reassignment/discharge orders, dated 10 April 1992, which states, in pertinent part, "DISABILITY DID RESULT FROM A COMBAT-RELATED INJURY."

11.  Army Regulation 600-8-22 (Military Awards) provides that the Purple Heart is awarded for a wound sustained as a result of hostile action.  Substantiating evidence must be provided to verify that the wound was the result of hostile action, the wound must have required treatment by medical personnel, and the medical treatment must have been made a matter of official record.  

12.  Title 26, U.S. Code, section 104, states that the term "combat-related injury" means personal injury or sickness which is incurred as a direct result of armed conflict, while engaged in extra hazardous service under conditions simulating war, or which is caused by an instrumentality of war.

13.  The Army Combat-Related Special Compensation website provides information pertaining to combat-related injuries that qualify through an instrumentality of war (combat vehicles, weapons, Agent Orange, etc.).  It states that incurrence during actual period of war is not required.  However, there must be a direct causal relationship between the instrumentality of war and disability.  The disability must be incurred incident to a hazard or risk of the service.  An instrumentality of war is a vehicle, vessel, or device designated primarily for military service and intended for use in such service at the time of the occurrence or injury.  It may include such instrumentalities not designated primarily for military service if use of or occurrence involving such instrumentality subjects the individual to a hazard peculiar to military service.  A determination that a disability is the result of an instrumentality of war may be made if the disability was incurred in any period of service as a result of such diverse causes as wounds caused by a military weapon, accidents involving military combat vehicle, injury or sickness caused by fumes, gases, or explosion or military ordinance, vehicles, or material.

DISCUSSION AND CONCLUSIONS:

1.  The evidence of record does not support the applicant's contention he was injured while serving in the Gulf War.  Medical evidence of record shows he injured his back when he fell from a truck while loading weapons in September 1990 at Fort Rucker, AL.  He deployed to SWA the next day.   

2.  The reassignment/discharge orders provided by the applicant which show his disability resulted from a combat-related injury was noted.  However, the law states the term "combat-related injury" means personal injury or sickness which is incurred as a direct result of armed conflict, while engaged in extra hazardous service under conditions simulating war, or which is caused by an instrumentality of war.  In your case, it was determined your disability was caused by an instrumentality of war.  



3.  There is no evidence of record which shows the applicant was wounded or injured as a result of hostile action.  There are no orders for the Purple Heart in the available records.  Regrettably, there is insufficient evidence on which to base award of the Purple Heart in this case.

BOARD VOTE:

________  ________  ________  GRANT FULL RELIEF 

________  ________  ________  GRANT PARTIAL RELIEF 

________  ________  ________  GRANT FORMAL HEARING

____X____  ___X_____  ____X____  DENY APPLICATION

BOARD DETERMINATION/RECOMMENDATION:

The evidence presented does not demonstrate the existence of a probable error or injustice.  Therefore, the Board determined that the overall merits of this case are insufficient as a basis for correction of the records of the individual concerned.




      _______ _   _X______   ___
               CHAIRPERSON
      
I certify that herein is recorded the true and complete record of the proceedings of the Army Board for Correction of Military Records in this case.



ABCMR Record of Proceedings (cont)                                         AR20100011152





3


ARMY BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS

 RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS


1

ABCMR Record of Proceedings (cont)                                         AR20100011152



2


ARMY BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS

 RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS


1

Similar Decisions

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2012 | 20120016669

    Original file (20120016669.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    The applicant requests correction of his DA Form 199 (Physical Evaluation Board (PEB) Proceedings) under Items 10a to 10c to show his right hip injury as a disability that was incurred in the line of duty (LOD) as a result of an instrumentality of war. The regulation states in: a. Paragraph 4-19(2)(b) states in block 10C the board will record its determination of whether the injury was combat-related as defined by Title 26, U.S. Code, section 104. b. Paragraph 4-19j that in making a...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2013 | 20130001878

    Original file (20130001878.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    The applicant provides: * Orders 241-0001, dated 29 August 2005 * A DA Form 2173 (Statement of Medical Examination and Duty Status) * Department of Defense (DOD) Physical Disability Board of Review (PDBR) decision * DD Form 214 (Certificate of Release or Discharge from Active Duty) * Orders 058-809 (Retired Reserve orders) * DA Form 199 (Physical Evaluation Board (PEB) Proceedings) * DA Form 3947 (Medical Evaluation Board (MEB) Proceedings) CONSIDERATION OF EVIDENCE: 1. It does not mean...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2010 | 20100026619

    Original file (20100026619.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    He further states, in effect, the applicant is entitled to CRSC because he has received a 10 percent (%) disability rating percentage from the Department of Veterans Affairs (VA) for the injury to his toe, which was incurred when an ammunition trailer, an "instrumentality of war," fell on his foot. Counsel provides a DA Form 8-275-3 that shows the applicant was admitted to the 93d Evacuation Hospital at 1530 hours on 6 February 1970 for a laceration to his left great toe. Department of...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2002 | 2002070907C070402

    Original file (2002070907C070402.rtf) Auto-classification: Denied

    In accordance with Army Regulation 15-185, the application and the available military records pertinent to the corrective action requested were reviewed to determine whether to authorize a formal hearing, recommend that the records be corrected without a formal hearing, or to deny the application without a formal hearing if it is determined that insufficient relevant evidence has been presented to demonstrate the existence of probable material error or injustice. The applicant requests...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2014 | 20140008778

    Original file (20140008778.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    He states he believes the Physical Evaluation Board (PEB) based its decision and rating of 20% on just one shoulder injury instead of injuries to both shoulders. The PEB made the recommended findings that, if retired because of disability, his retirement would not be based on disability from injury or disease received in the line of duty as a direct result of armed conflict or caused by an instrumentality of war and incurring in line of duty during a period of war as defined by law. The...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2011 | 20110003869

    Original file (20110003869.txt) Auto-classification: Approved

    The applicant's military records show he enlisted in the Regular Army on 3 August 1982. On 14 August 2002, a second MEB convened and having considered the medical evidence of record, again referred the applicant's case to a PEB. The evidence of record confirms the applicant enlisted in the RA and continuously served until he was retired by reason of permanent disability having completed over 20 years of active duty service.

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2011 | 20110013908

    Original file (20110013908.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    Counsel also states that the applicant respectfully disagrees with the Board’s conclusion that the trailer which injured his foot was not designed primarily for military service, and in no way subjected the applicant to a hazard peculiar to military service. Counsel contends that the applicant should be awarded CRSC based on evidence that the ammunition trailer which fell on the applicant’s foot was in fact, an instrument of war. He has not provided conclusive evidence that shows the...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2011 | 20110023266

    Original file (20110023266.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    There is no documentation that shows he had an injury or disability which may have been combat-related or caused by an instrumentality of war. A determination that a disability is the result of an instrumentality of war may be made if the disability was incurred in any period of service as a result of such diverse causes as wounds caused by a military weapon, accidents involving a military combat vehicle, injury or sickness caused by fumes, gases, or explosion of military ordnance,...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2010 | 20100007357

    Original file (20100007357.txt) Auto-classification: Approved

    He also requests that correction be made to his DA Form 199 (Physical Evaluation Board (PEB) Proceedings), dated 1978. The applicant requests his DA Form 199 be corrected to show his disability resulted from an instrumentality of war. As a result, the Board recommends denial of so much of the application that pertains to award of the Purple Heart and Military Outstanding Volunteer Service Medal or correction of his DA Form 199.

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2014 | 20140009718

    Original file (20140009718.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    The applicant states: a. his DA Form 199, item 10a, should be corrected to reflect "The Soldier's retirement is based on a disability received in the line of duty [LOD] as a direct result of armed conflict or caused by an instrumentality of war incurred in the LOD while simulating war"; and b. his request for reconsideration is based on incorrect information contained in the "Discussions and Conclusions" portion of the decisional document. His record contains a DA Form 2173 (Statement of...