Search Decisions

Decision Text

ARMY | BCMR | CY2009 | 20090007904
Original file (20090007904.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

			BOARD DATE:	  8 October 2009

		DOCKET NUMBER:  AR20090007904 


THE BOARD CONSIDERED THE FOLLOWING EVIDENCE:

1.  Application for correction of military records (with supporting documents provided, if any).

2.  Military Personnel Records and advisory opinions (if any).


THE APPLICANT'S REQUEST, STATEMENT, AND EVIDENCE:

1.  The applicant requests, in effect, a promotion and award of the Army Reserve Components Achievement Medal (ARCAM).

2.  The applicant states, in effect, that he was originally enlisted in the Junior Reserve Officers’ Training Corps (ROTC) in the rank of private first class (PFC)/pay grade E-3 during high school, that he enrolled in the Senior ROTC in the Simultaneous Membership Program (SMP) with the U.S. Army Reserve (USAR), that he transferred to the Indiana Army National Guard, and that he completed the Senior ROTC Advanced Camp in the summer of 1990.  He contends that due to the transfers and the SMP he believes his records got lost and with the completion of Senior ROTC Advanced Camp that it would equate to basic noncommissioned officer schooling.  He also claims that 4 years of service should at least warrant the rank of specialist (SPC)/pay grade E-4, possibly the rank of sergeant (SGT)/pay grade E-5, since he enlisted in the rank of PFC/pay grade E-3. 

3.  The applicant provides no documentary evidence in support of his application.

CONSIDERATION OF EVIDENCE:

1.  Title 10, U.S. Code, section 1552(b), provides that applications for correction of military records must be filed within 3 years after discovery of the alleged error or injustice.  This provision of law also allows the Army Board for Correction of Military Records (ABCMR) to excuse an applicant’s failure to timely file within the 3-year statute of limitations if the ABCMR determines it would be in the interest of justice to do so.  While it appears the applicant did not file within the time frame provided in the statute of limitations, the ABCMR has elected to conduct a substantive review of this case and, only to the extent relief, if any, is granted, has determined it is in the interest of justice to excuse the applicant’s failure to timely file.  In all other respects, there are insufficient bases to waive the statute of limitations for timely filing.

2.  The applicant enlisted in the USAR on 17 January 1989.  He was ordered to active duty on 9 May 1989 for training and was released from active duty on 
17 August 1989.  

3.  On 8 January 1990, the applicant signed an Army Senior ROTC student contract.  

4.  The applicant enlisted in the Indiana Army National Guard on 21 November 1990 in the rank of SGT/cadet for a period of 6 years and 8 weeks and he signed an SMP agreement.    

5.  Orders, dated 19 May 1991, show the applicant was reduced from SGT/E-5 to PFC/E-3 effective 9 April 1991 for disenrollment from the Army ROTC program.

6.  On 15 June 1992, the applicant was honorably discharged from the Indiana Army National Guard in the rank of PFC/E-3 and assigned to the USAR Control Group (Annual Training) to complete his remaining service obligation.  His National Guard Bureau Form 22 (Report of Separation and Record of Service) shows his rank as PFC/E-3.  This form also states, in pertinent part, "SMP THIS PERIOD:  901121-920615."  Orders, dated 21 January 1997, show the applicant was honorably discharged from the USAR in the rank of PFC.

7.  Item 18 (Appointments and Reductions) on the applicant's DA Form 2-1 (Personnel Qualification Record) shows he was reduced from SGT/E-5 to PFC/E-3 on 9 April 1991. 

8.  There are no orders which show the applicant was subsequently promoted to SPC/E-4 or SGT/E-5 prior to discharge from the Indiana Army National Guard or the USAR. 

9.  There are no orders for the ARCAM in the available records.  

10.  The applicant’s U.S. Army Reserve Personnel Command Chronological Statement of Retirement Points, dated 29 September 2009, shows that he had 
1 year of qualifying service for a Reserve retirement (17 January 1989 to 
16 January 1990).  
11.  Army Regulation 600-8-22 (Military Awards) provides, in pertinent part, that the ARCAM was established by the Secretary of the Army on 3 March 1971.  The ARCAM is authorized for award to Army personnel in the rank of colonel and below for exemplary behavior, efficiency, and fidelity while serving as a member of an Army National Guard or Army Reserve troop program unit or as an individual mobilization augmentee.  Since 3 March 1972 the medal has been authorized on completion of 4 years service with a Reserve Component unit.  Individuals must have completed 4 years of qualifying service on or after 3 March 1972 and before 28 March 1995.  Beginning on 28 March 1985, the period of qualifying service for award of the ARCAM was reduced from 4 to 3 years.  This change is not retroactive.  Such years of qualifying service must have been consecutive.  A period of more than 24 hours between Reserve enlistments or officer’s service will be considered a break in service.  Credit toward earning the award must begin anew after a break in service.  

DISCUSSION AND CONCLUSIONS:

1.  The applicant's contentions pertaining to his promotion were carefully considered.  However, orders show he was reduced from SGT/E-5 to PFC/E-3 for disenrollment from the Army ROTC program.  There is no evidence of record which shows he was subsequently promoted to any other rank/grade following this reduction on 9 April 1991.  Therefore, there is insufficient evidence on which to grant him a promotion.  

2.  Since the applicant had only 1 year of qualifying service, there is no basis for granting his request for the ARCAM.

BOARD VOTE:

________  ________  ________  GRANT FULL RELIEF 

________  ________  ________  GRANT PARTIAL RELIEF 

________  ________  ________  GRANT FORMAL HEARING

____x___  ____x___  ____x___  DENY APPLICATION







BOARD DETERMINATION/RECOMMENDATION:

The evidence presented does not demonstrate the existence of a probable error or injustice.  Therefore, the Board determined that the overall merits of this case are insufficient as a basis for correction of the records of the individual concerned.



      _______ _   __x_____   ___
               CHAIRPERSON
      
I certify that herein is recorded the true and complete record of the proceedings of the Army Board for Correction of Military Records in this case.

ABCMR Record of Proceedings (cont)                                         AR20090007904



3


ARMY BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS

 RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS


1

ABCMR Record of Proceedings (cont)                                         AR20090007904



2


ARMY BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS

 RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS


1

Similar Decisions

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2014 | 20140015368

    Original file (20140015368.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    As a new issue, he requests the issuance of a DD Form 214 for his Reserve Officers' Training Corps (ROTC) Advanced Camp service in 1988 and that this DD Form 214 show his pay grade as E-5. Regarding the correction of his DD Form 214 for the period ending 19 May 1991 to show his pay grade as E-5, the evidence of record, as well as that provided by the applicant, does not support the granting of this request. c. As further evidence he no longer held the pay grade of E-5 after disenrollment...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2015 | 20150003309

    Original file (20150003309.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    On 29 July 1992, VAARNG published Orders 146-57 discharging him from the ARNG and assigning him to the U.S. Army Reserve (USAR) Control Group (Annual Training) effective 31 July 1992 by reason of being an unsatisfactory participant, in accordance with chapter 8 of National Guard Regulation (NGR) 600-200 (Enlisted Personnel Management). This regulation states that a member is an unsatisfactory participant when he or she accrues nine or more unexcused absences from scheduled drills during a...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2009 | 20090015475

    Original file (20090015475.txt) Auto-classification: Approved

    The applicant states that he was never paid at the correct enlisted pay grade although his enlistment contract clearly shows he enlisted as a PFC. The applicant provides in support of his application a copy of his DD Form 4 (Enlistment/Reenlistment Document) and allied documents, dated 17 November 2006; a copy of his SGLV Form 8286 Servicemembers Group Life Insurance Certificate), dated 30 March 2007; a copy of Orders 229-1026, issued by the Joint Forces Headquarters, NYARNG, on 26 October...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2001 | 2001065542C070421

    Original file (2001065542C070421.rtf) Auto-classification: Denied

    APPLICANT STATES : That he meets the eligibility requirements for promotion to major but that the computer at the U. S. Army Reserve Personnel Command (AR-PERSCOM) does not show that he has completed the Infantry Officer Advanced Course, so he has not been considered for promotion. On 8 January 1986, the Army Board for Correction of Military Records (ABCMR) responded to a request from the applicant, case number AC 85-00251, to correct his commissioning as a USAR officer from 23 August 1983...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2010 | 20100013229

    Original file (20100013229.txt) Auto-classification: Approved

    The applicant provides: * DD Form 4 (Enlistment/Reenlistment Document – Armed Forces of the United States), dated 30 November 1984 * DD Form 214 (Certificate of Release or Discharge from Active Duty) for the period ending 27 September 1985 * Joint Uniform Military Pay System – Army Leave and Earnings Statements (LES's) for the months of July 1985 through June 1987 * Orders 14-5, U.S. Army Third Reserve Officers' Training Corps (ROTC) Region, Senior Program, dated 19 May 1987 * Orders 93-6,...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2007 | 20070012856

    Original file (20070012856.TXT) Auto-classification: Denied

    The applicant provides the following documentary evidence in support of his application: a. Self-authored letter, dated 4 September 2007; b. DD Form 214, dated 31 July 1989; c. DD Form 215, dated 18 April 1990; d. XXC-FH Form 53 (Agreement Form), dated 7 February 1963; e. DD Form 44 (Record of Military Status of Registrant), dated 11 February 1963; and f. Headquarters, XX United States Army Corps, Letter Order 11-0286, dated 30 November 1965, subject: Discharge [from the U.S. Army Reserve...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2007 | 20070009525

    Original file (20070009525.txt) Auto-classification: Approved

    The applicant provided an Air Force Service History that shows he earned 15 retirement points (membership points only) in RYE 12 December 1988. Therefore, the certificate alone is insufficient evidence to show he should be granted active duty points for attendance at airborne training. At this time there is insufficient evidence to show the applicant earned 50 retirement points, or a qualifying year, in RYE 12 December 1990.

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2003 | 2003087251C070212

    Original file (2003087251C070212.rtf) Auto-classification: Denied

    The applicant requests correction of military records as stated in the application to the Board and as restated herein. APPLICANT REQUESTS: That her DD Form 214 (Certificate of Release or Discharge from Active Duty) be corrected to show her pay entry basic date (PEBD) as 29 August 1988 and her basic active service date (BASD) as 16 February 1989. EVIDENCE OF RECORD : The applicant's military records show:

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2011 | 20110021703

    Original file (20110021703.txt) Auto-classification: Approved

    The applicant states: * he was paid at the E-3 rate rather than the E-5 rate while he was a Simultaneous Membership Program (SMP) cadet in the South Carolina Army National Guard (ARNG) * he made numerous attempts to correct the error * it was not until July 2010 that the State of South Carolina published orders promoting him to E-5 for the period beginning 18 October 2001 and ending 8 May 2003, before being commissioned upon college graduation * National Guard Regulation 600-100...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2009 | 20090002753

    Original file (20090002753.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    The applicant requests correction of his records to show award of the National Defense Service Medal and the Army Commendation Medal; any other awards, decorations, and campaign ribbons he may have earned; and promotion to the next higher grade. Army Regulation 600-8-22 (Military awards) provides for award of the National Defense Service Medal. With respect to award of the National Defense Service Medal, the evidence of record shows that the applicant was ordered to ADT and entered active...