Search Decisions

Decision Text

ARMY | BCMR | CY2013 | 20130018042
Original file (20130018042.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

		IN THE CASE OF:	  

		BOARD DATE:	  5 June 2014

		DOCKET NUMBER:  AR20130018042 


THE BOARD CONSIDERED THE FOLLOWING EVIDENCE:

1.  Application for correction of military records (with supporting documents provided, if any).

2.  Military Personnel Records and advisory opinions (if any).


THE APPLICANT'S REQUEST, STATEMENT, AND EVIDENCE:

1.  The applicant requests to change the Separation Code and Narrative Reason for Separation on his DD Form 214 (Certificate of Release or Discharge from Active Duty).

2.  The applicant states his record does not reflect the financial, family medical, and mental hardships related to his military service which resulted in him being unable to complete 24 months of active duty service.  Therefore, he does not qualify for certain Department of Veterans Affairs (VA) benefits he and his family would like to make use of.

3.  The applicant provides a document from the VA. 

CONSIDERATION OF EVIDENCE:

1.  Title 10, U.S. Code, section 1552(b), provides that applications for correction of military records must be filed within 3 years after discovery of the alleged error or injustice.  This provision of law also allows the Army Board for Correction of Military Records (ABCMR) to excuse an applicant's failure to timely file within the 3-year statute of limitations if the ABCMR determines it would be in the interest of justice to do so.  While it appears the applicant did not file within the time frame provided in the statute of limitations, the ABCMR has elected to conduct a substantive review of this case and, only to the extent relief, if any, is granted, has determined it is in the interest of justice to excuse the applicant's failure to timely file.  In all other respects, there are insufficient bases to waive the statute of limitations for timely filing.
2.  The applicant enlisted in the Regular Army on 18 January 1994.

3.  On 8 November 1994, a local bar to reenlistment was imposed against the applicant.  The evidence shows the applicant received counseling on 10 occasions for repeated unsuitable actions reflecting adversely on the applicant and the Army.  It also appears the applicant was having financial difficulties.  On 17 November 1994, the local bar to reenlistment was approved.  The applicant did not appeal the local bar to reenlistment.

4.  On 17 November 1994, the applicant requested early separation from the Army under the provisions of Army Regulation 635-200 (Personnel Separations), paragraph 16-5(b), due to his locally imposed bar to reenlistment.  

5.  On 12 December 1994, the approving authority approved the request for early separation under the provisions of Army Regulation 635-200, paragraph 16-5(b), for a locally imposed bar to reenlistment and directed the applicant be issued an honorable characterization of service and transferred to the Individual Ready Reserve.

6.  On 24 January 1995, the applicant was honorably released from active duty after serving for a total of 1 year and 7 days of active service.  The DD Form 214 he was issued shows in item:

	a.  25 (Separation Authority), Army Regulation 635-200, paragraph 
16-5b; 

	b.  26 (Separation Code), "MGH"; and

	c.  28 (Narrative Reason for Separation), non-retention on active duty.  

7.  References:

   a.  Army Regulation 635-200 sets forth the basic authority for the separation of enlisted personnel.  Chapter 16 covers discharges caused by changes in service obligations.  Paragraph 16-5 applies to personnel denied reenlistment and provides that Soldiers who receive Department of the Army imposed or locally imposed bars to reenlistment, and who perceive that they will be unable to overcome the bar, may apply for immediate discharge.  

   b.  Army Regulation 635-5-1 (Separation Program Designator (SPD) Codes) provides the specific authorities (regulatory or directive), reasons for separating Soldiers from active duty, and the SPD codes to be entered on the DD Form 214.  The SPD code of "MGH" is the appropriate code to assign Soldiers separated under the provisions of Army Regulation 635-200, chapter 16-5b, for non-retention on active duty.
      
   c.  Army Regulation 635-5 (Separation Documents), in effect at the time, established the policies and procedures for completion and distribution of the DD Form 214.  It states that item 26 will list the SPD code and item 28 will list the narrative reason for separation based on regulatory or other authority and can be cross-referenced with Army Regulation 635-5-1. 

DISCUSSION AND CONCLUSIONS:

1.  The evidence shows the applicant requested early separation under the provisions of Army Regulation 635-200, paragraph 16-5(b).

2.  By regulation, the applicant's assigned SPD code of "MGH" was the proper code to assign enlisted members separated under the provisions of Army Regulation 635-200, paragraph 16-5(b), by reason of non-retention on active duty.  Therefore, there is no basis for changing his SPD code.

3.  The ABCMR does not grant requests solely for the purpose of making an applicant eligible for benefits.  Every case is individually decided based upon its merits when an applicant makes his or her request.  

BOARD VOTE:

________  ________  ________  GRANT FULL RELIEF 

________  ________  ________  GRANT PARTIAL RELIEF 

________  ________  ________  GRANT FORMAL HEARING

____X____  ___X_____  ___X_____  DENY APPLICATION











BOARD DETERMINATION/RECOMMENDATION:

The evidence presented does not demonstrate the existence of a probable error or injustice.  Therefore, the Board determined that the overall merits of this case are insufficient as a basis for correction of the records of the individual concerned.




      _______ _   __X_____   ___
               CHAIRPERSON
      
I certify that herein is recorded the true and complete record of the proceedings of the Army Board for Correction of Military Records in this case.

ABCMR Record of Proceedings (cont)                                         AR20130018042



3


ARMY BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS

 RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS


1

ABCMR Record of Proceedings (cont)                                         AR20130018042



4


ARMY BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS

 RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS


1

Similar Decisions

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2012 | 20120009824

    Original file (20120009824.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    d. a DA Form 4187 (Personnel Action), signed and dated by the applicant, which shows she requested early separation from the Army under the provisions of Army Regulation 635-200, paragraph 16-5(b), due to a locally imposed bar to reenlistment. On 8 May 1996, the approving authority approved the request for early separation under the provisions of Army Regulation 635-200, paragraph 16-5(b), for a locally imposed bar to reenlistment and directed the applicant be issued an honorable discharge...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2001 | 2001058910C070421

    Original file (2001058910C070421.rtf) Auto-classification: Denied

    The applicant requests correction of military records as stated in the application to the Board and as restated herein. The MGIB, as outlined in Title 38, United States Code, chapter 30, section 1411b, provides for soldiers who entered the service after 30 June 1985 to contribute $1,200.00 to the program during their first 12 months of service. The records reflect that an education counselor did counsel the applicant that he would receive partial MGIB benefits.

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2002 | 2002075483C070403

    Original file (2002075483C070403.rtf) Auto-classification: Denied

    The applicant requests correction of military records as stated in the application to the Board and as restated herein. Pertinent Army regulations provide that prior to discharge or release from active duty, individuals will be assigned RE codes, based on their service records or the reason for discharge. The is no evidence in the available records, and the applicant has provided no evidence, that shows irregularity in the assignment of his RE code.

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2001 | 2001056479C070420

    Original file (2001056479C070420.rtf) Auto-classification: Denied

    The applicant requests correction of military records as stated in the application to the Board and as restated herein. She provides her Certificate of Release or Discharge from Active Duty, DD Form 214; her Request for Reenlistment or Extension in the Regular Army, DA Form 3340-R, dated 3 March 1997; her Enlistment/Reenlistment Document Armed Forces of the United States, DD Forms4/1 and 4/2 dated 2 October 1997; her Statements for Enlistment, DA Form 3286, undated; and her Declination of...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2001 | 2001063984C070421

    Original file (2001063984C070421.rtf) Auto-classification: Denied

    The applicant requests correction of military records as stated in the application to the Board and as restated herein. Chapter 16-5b of that regulation establishes policy and procedures, and provides authority for the voluntary separation of soldiers denied reenlistment due to a locally imposed bar to reenlistment. Chapter 3 of that regulation prescribes basic eligibility for prior service applicants for enlistment.

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2002 | 2002070467C070402

    Original file (2002070467C070402.rtf) Auto-classification: Denied

    I certify that hereinafter is recorded the record of consideration of the Army Board for Correction of Military Records in the case of the above-named individual. The applicant requests correction of military records as stated in the application to the Board and as restated herein. The record clearly shows that he voluntarily submitted a request for immediate separation based on his being barred from reenlistment.

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2013 | 20130012743

    Original file (20130012743.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    The applicant requests correction of item 28 (Narrative Reason for Separation) of his DD Form 214 (Certificate of Release or Discharge from Active Duty) to show hardship or early out. It states the SPD code of KGF is the appropriate code to assign to Soldiers separated under the provisions of Army Regulation 635-200, paragraph 16-5b and "locally imposed bar to reenlistment" is the corresponding narrative reason for separation. The evidence of record confirms a bar to reenlistment was...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2011 | 20110013231

    Original file (20110013231.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    The applicant requests, in effect, correction of item 28 (Narrative Reason for Separation) of his DD Form 214 (Certificate of Release or Discharge from Active Duty) to show "early release due to the convenience of the government" vice "locally-imposed bar to reenlistment." However, the DD Form 214 he was issued shows he was honorably released from active duty on 14 July 1992 under the provisions of Army Regulation 635-200 (Personnel Separations - Enlisted Personnel), paragraph 16-5b, by...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2011 | 20110002024

    Original file (20110002024.txt) Auto-classification: Approved

    However, his official records contain a DA Form 4187 (Personnel Action), dated 13 March 1996, wherein the applicant requested separation under the provisions of Army Regulation 635-200 (Personnel Separations - Enlisted Separations), paragraph 16-5. Army Regulation 635-5 (Separation Documents) states, in pertinent part, that in item 18 of the DD Form 214 for enlisted Soldiers with more than one enlistment period during the time covered by this DD Form 214, enter “Immediate Reenlistments this...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2005 | 20050017468C070206

    Original file (20050017468C070206.doc) Auto-classification: Approved

    This regulation in effect at the time of the applicant’s separation stated that the SPD code of KGF was the appropriate code to assign to Soldiers separated under the provisions of paragraph 16-5b of Army Regulation 635- 200, by the reason of locally imposed bar to reenlistment. The evidence of record shows that the applicant was discharged at his own request, based on his perception that he could not overcome his locally imposed bar to reenlistment. In accordance with Army Regulation...