Search Decisions

Decision Text

ARMY | BCMR | CY2013 | 20130012743
Original file (20130012743.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

		IN THE CASE OF:	  

		BOARD DATE:	  11 March 2014

		DOCKET NUMBER:  AR20130012743 


THE BOARD CONSIDERED THE FOLLOWING EVIDENCE:

1.  Application for correction of military records (with supporting documents provided, if any).

2.  Military Personnel Records and advisory opinions (if any).


THE APPLICANT'S REQUEST, STATEMENT, AND EVIDENCE:

1.  The applicant requests correction of item 28 (Narrative Reason for Separation) of his DD Form 214 (Certificate of Release or Discharge from Active Duty) to show hardship or early out.

2.  The applicant states he was given an early out due to hardship and personal reasons but item 28 of his DD Form 214 omits the term hardship or early out.

3.  The applicant provides his DD Form 214.

CONSIDERATION OF EVIDENCE:

1.  Title 10, U.S. Code, section 1552(b), provides that applications for correction of military records must be filed within 3 years after discovery of the alleged error or injustice.  This provision of law also allows the Army Board for Correction of Military Records (ABCMR) to excuse an applicant's failure to timely file within the 3-year statute of limitations if the ABCMR determines it would be in the interest of justice to do so.  While it appears the applicant did not file within the time frame provided in the statute of limitations, the ABCMR has elected to conduct a substantive review of this case and, only to the extent relief, if any, is granted, has determined it is in the interest of justice to excuse the applicant's failure to timely file.  In all other respects, there are insufficient bases to waive the statute of limitations for timely filing.

2.  The applicant enlisted in the Regular Army on 20 February 1990 and he held military occupational specialty 16D (Hawk Missile Crewmember).  On or about 8 July 1990, he was assigned to the 3rd Battalion, 52nd Air Defense Artillery Regiment, Germany.  

3.  He received nonjudicial punishment under the provisions of Article 15, Uniform Code of Military Justice, as follows on:

* 14 January 1991, for being disrespectful to his superiors
* 29 May 1991, for sleeping while on guard duty
* 21 October 1991, for disobeying a lawful order

4.  On 20 November 1991, a bar to reenlistment was placed against him for the three Article 15s and the numerous negative counselings he received for his unsatisfactory performance and conduct.

5.  On 27 November 1991, he submitted a request for immediate separation under the provisions of Army Regulation 635-200 (Personnel Separations – Enlisted Personnel), paragraph 16-5b, as he felt he could not overcome the locally-imposed bar to reenlistment.  

6.  On 1 December 1991, the separation authority approved his request and directed the issuance of an Honorable Discharge Certificate.  On 10 December 1991, he was discharged accordingly.

7.  The DD Form 214 he was issued shows the following entries in:

* item 25 (Separation Authority) Army Regulation 635-200, paragraph 16-5b
* item 26 (Separation Code) KGF
* item 28 Locally Imposed Bar to Reenlistment

8.  Army Regulation 635-200, in effect at the time, set forth the basic authority for the separation of enlisted personnel.  Paragraph 16-5b of the regulation specified that Soldiers denied reenlistment could be voluntarily separated before the expiration of their term of service.  Soldiers who perceived that they would be unable to overcome a locally imposed bar to reenlistment could request immediate separation.  The service of Soldiers separated under this paragraph would be characterized as honorable.  

9.  Army Regulation 635-5-1 (Separation Program Designator (SPD) Codes) provides the specific authorities (regulatory or directive), reasons for separating Soldiers from active duty, the SPD codes to be entered on the DD Form 214 and the corresponding narrative reason for separation.  It states the SPD code of KGF is the appropriate code to assign to Soldiers separated under the provisions of Army Regulation 635-200, paragraph 16-5b and "locally imposed bar to reenlistment" is the corresponding narrative reason for separation.

DISCUSSION AND CONCLUSIONS:

1.  The evidence of record confirms a bar to reenlistment was placed against the applicant on 20 November 1991 and he subsequently requested discharge under the provisions of Army Regulation 635-200, paragraph 16-5b as he felt he could not overcome the bar.  He was discharged accordingly on 10 December 1991.

2.  His narrative reason for discharge was assigned based on the fact that he was discharged under the provisions of Army Regulation 635-200, paragraph
16-5b.  The only valid narrative reason for separation permitted under that paragraph is "locally imposed bar to reenlistment" which is properly reflected on his DD Form 214.

3.  In view of the foregoing, he is not entitled to the requested relief.

BOARD VOTE:

________  ________  ________  GRANT FULL RELIEF 

________  ________  ________  GRANT PARTIAL RELIEF 

________  ________  ________  GRANT FORMAL HEARING

___x____  ____x___  ____x ___  DENY APPLICATION

BOARD DETERMINATION/RECOMMENDATION:

The evidence presented does not demonstrate the existence of a probable error or injustice.  Therefore, the Board determined that the overall merits of this case are insufficient as a basis for correction of the records of the individual concerned.



      _______ _   _x______   ___
               CHAIRPERSON
      
I certify that herein is recorded the true and complete record of the proceedings of the Army Board for Correction of Military Records in this case.



ABCMR Record of Proceedings (cont)                                         AR20130012743





3


ARMY BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS

 RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS


1

ABCMR Record of Proceedings (cont)                                         AR20130012743



2


ARMY BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS

 RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS


1

Similar Decisions

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2012 | 20120001158

    Original file (20120001158.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    The applicant requests, in effect, removal of the narrative reason for separation from his DD Form 214 (Certificate of Release or Discharge from Active Duty). He claims he entered service in the delayed entry/enlistment program (DEP) on 20 August 1991 which would give him 2 years of military service. On 5 August 1993, the applicant submitted a DA Form 4187 (Personnel Action) requesting immediate separation from the Army under the provisions of Army Regulation 635-200 (Personnel Separations...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2001 | 2001057186C070420

    Original file (2001057186C070420.rtf) Auto-classification: Denied

    In accordance with Army Regulation 15-185, the application and the available military records pertinent to the corrective action requested were reviewed to determine whether to authorize a formal hearing, recommend that the records be corrected without a formal hearing, or to deny the application without a formal hearing if it is determined that insufficient relevant evidence has been presented to demonstrate the existence of probable material error or injustice. The applicant requests...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2005 | 20050017468C070206

    Original file (20050017468C070206.doc) Auto-classification: Approved

    This regulation in effect at the time of the applicant’s separation stated that the SPD code of KGF was the appropriate code to assign to Soldiers separated under the provisions of paragraph 16-5b of Army Regulation 635- 200, by the reason of locally imposed bar to reenlistment. The evidence of record shows that the applicant was discharged at his own request, based on his perception that he could not overcome his locally imposed bar to reenlistment. In accordance with Army Regulation...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2007 | 20070011478

    Original file (20070011478.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    The regulation shows that the separation program designator "KGF" as shown on the applicant’s DD Form 214 specifies the narrative reason for discharge as "Locally Imposed Bar to Reenlistment" and that the authority for discharge under this separation program designator is "Army Regulation 635-200, chapter 16, paragraph 16-5b." The applicant requested discharge under the provisions of Army Regulation 635-200, chapter 16, paragraph 16-5(b) on 31 August 1990; and, his request was approved by...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2006 | 20060010877C071029

    Original file (20060010877C071029.doc) Auto-classification: Denied

    James R. Hastie | |Member | The Board considered the following evidence: Exhibit A - Application for correction of military records. The evidence of record shows the applicant received a locally-imposed bar to reenlistment in July 1991 for refusing to attend PLDC. It appears she may have been offered early separation as part of a troop reduction program; however, her voluntary separation was processed under the provisions of Army Regulation 635-200, paragraph 16-5b because she did...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2006 | 20060017042

    Original file (20060017042.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    The applicant requests, in effect, that his Reentry (RE) Code "3" be changed to RE "1" on his DD Form 214 (Certificate of Release or Discharge from Active Duty), with a separation date of 1 August 1991, in order to reenlist in the Regular Army. Pertinent Army regulations provide that prior to discharge or release from active duty, Soldiers will be assigned reentry codes, based on their service records or the reason for discharge. The evidence shows that the applicant was discharged under...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2003 | 2003090622C070212

    Original file (2003090622C070212.doc) Auto-classification: Approved

    The Board considered the following evidence: Exhibit A - Application for correction of military records. The applicant requests, in effect, a change to the narrative reason for separation and reentry (RE) code of RE-3 listed on his 1 July 1993 separation document (DD Form 214). On 9 May 1993, the appropriate approving authority approved the separation request on the applicant and directed that he be discharged by reason of bar to reenlistment under the provisions of chapter 16,...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2011 | 20110011176

    Original file (20110011176.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    The applicant requests correction of his records to show he completed 2 full years of service. On 1 October 1987, the applicant submitted a DA Form 4187 (Personnel Action) requesting immediate separation from the Army under the provisions of Army Regulation 635-200 (Personnel Separations - Enlisted Personnel), paragraph 16-5b(1), by reason of inability to overcome a locally imposed bar to reenlistment. Army Regulation 635-200 sets forth the basic authority for the separation of enlisted...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2009 | 20090010347

    Original file (20090010347.txt) Auto-classification: Approved

    THE APPLICANT'S REQUEST, STATEMENT, AND EVIDENCE: 1. The applicant states, in effect, that his separation and RE codes are in error because he was not told why he was being barred from reenlistment. The SPD code of “KGF” had a corresponding RE Code of “4.” The regulation also specified that an RE Code of RE-3 would be applied when there was a locally imposed bar to reenlistment and the Soldier had less than 18 years active service.

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2013 | 20130003165

    Original file (20130003165.txt) Auto-classification: Approved