Search Decisions

Decision Text

ARMY | BCMR | CY2013 | 20130017895
Original file (20130017895.txt) Auto-classification: Approved

		IN THE CASE OF

		BOARD DATE:	    10 July 2014

		DOCKET NUMBER:  AR20130017895 


THE BOARD CONSIDERED THE FOLLOWING EVIDENCE:

1.  Application for correction of military records (with supporting documents provided, if any).

2.  Military Personnel Records and advisory opinions (if any).


THE APPLICANT'S REQUEST, STATEMENT, AND EVIDENCE:

1.  The applicant requests award of the Army Good Conduct Medal (AGCM).

2.  The applicant states, between his service in the Regular Army (RA) and his service in the Army National Guard (ARNG) he has met the requirement for award of the AGCM.

3.  The applicant provides copies of his DD Form 214 (Certificate of Release or Discharge from Active Duty), dated 6 June 2007 and his National Guard Bureau (NGB) Form 22 (Report of Separation and Record of Service), dated 12 June 2005.

CONSIDERATION OF EVIDENCE:

1.  Title 10, U.S. Code, section 1552(b), provides that applications for correction of military records must be filed within 3 years after discovery of the alleged error or injustice.  This provision of law also allows the Army Board for Correction of Military Records (ABCMR) to excuse an applicant's failure to timely file within the 3-year statute of limitations if the ABCMR determines it would be in the interest of justice to do so.  While it appears the applicant did not file within the time frame provided in the statute of limitations, the ABCMR has elected to conduct a substantive review of this case and, only to the extent relief, if any, is granted, has determined it is in the interest of justice to excuse the applicant's failure to timely file.  In all other respects, there are insufficient bases to waive the statute of limitations for timely filing.

2.  The applicant enlisted in the RA on 17 October 2000.  After completing 9 months of net active service this period, he was discharged under honorable condition (general) on 30 August 2001, due to misconduct.  He was not awarded the AGCM.

3.  On 3 December 2003, the applicant enlisted in the ARNG.  After completing 1 year, 6 months, and 10 days of net service this period, he was honorably discharged on 12 June 2005, for the purpose of immediate enlistment in another component of the Armed Forces.

4.  On 13 June 2005, the applicant again enlisted in the RA.  After completing 1 year, 11 months, and 24 days of net active service this period he was retired on  6 June 2007, due to physical disability (temporary).

5.  Army Regulation 600-8-22 (Military Awards) states the AGCM is awarded to individuals who distinguish themselves by their conduct, efficiency, and fidelity during a qualifying period of active duty enlisted service.  This period is 3 years except in those cases when the period for the first award ends with the termination of a period of Federal military service.  Although there is no automatic entitlement to the AGCM, disqualification must be justified.

DISCUSSION AND CONCLUSIONS:

1.  The applicant's contentions have been noted.  His first period of active duty enlisted service ended with him receiving a general discharge due to misconduct and his ARNG service was not active duty service.  He was not eligible for award of the AGCM for these periods of service.

2.  However, he subsequently enlisted in the RA on 13 June 2005.  He served for a period of 1 year, 11 months, and 24 days when he was retired due to physical disability.  There is no evidence of record to show his commander disqualified him for the award.  Because he had not previously been awarded the AGCM, this period of service qualified him for his first award of the AGCM.  

BOARD VOTE:

___X____  ___X____  ___X____  GRANT FULL RELIEF 

________  ________  ________  GRANT PARTIAL RELIEF 

________  ________  ________  GRANT FORMAL HEARING

________  ________  ________  DENY APPLICATION

BOARD DETERMINATION/RECOMMENDATION:

The Board determined the evidence presented is sufficient to warrant a recommendation for relief.  As a result, the Board recommends that all Department of the Army records of the individual concerned be corrected by:

	a.  awarding him the Army Good Conduct Medal (1st Award) for the period  13 June 2005 to 7 June 2007; and

	b.  showing, in addition to the awards already shown on his DD Form 214, for the period ending 7 June 2007, that his awards include the Army Good Conduct Medal (1st Award).



      _________X__________
               CHAIRPERSON
      

I certify that herein is recorded the true and complete record of the proceedings of the Army Board for Correction of Military Records in this case.

ABCMR Record of Proceedings (cont)                                         AR20130017895



3


ARMY BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS

 RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS


1

ABCMR Record of Proceedings (cont)                                         AR20130017895



2


ARMY BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS

 RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS


1

Similar Decisions

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2013 | 20130000395

    Original file (20130000395.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    The applicant contends his 28 July 2005 DD Form 214 should be corrected to show award of the AGCM (2nd Award) because he completed more than 7 years of military service, but he was only awarded the AGCM (1st Award). d. Thus, the evidence of record fails to show that the applicant's service in the NDARNG qualified him for award of the AGCM (1st Award). Records show the applicant entered active duty in the RA on 22 December 2000 and he was awarded the AGCM (1st Award).

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2012 | 20120006800

    Original file (20120006800.txt) Auto-classification: Approved

    The evidence of record shows the applicant appears to meet the criteria for the first award of the AGCM for his honorable period of active duty. Therefore, he should be awarded the AGCM (1st Award) for his honorable period of active Federal service from 18 August 2008 through 25 August 2009 and his DD Form 214 should be corrected to show this award. As a result, the Board recommends that all Department of the Army records of the individual concerned be corrected by: a. awarding him the...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2013 | 20130009368

    Original file (20130009368.txt) Auto-classification: Approved

    His DD Form 214 for this period of service shows he was awarded the AGCM; however, due to the lack of corresponding orders, it is unclear whether this entry reflects an AGCM received for this period of active duty or for his previous RA service. If he had been awarded the AGCM for his RA service he would not have been eligible for the AGCM for his 1 year of active duty USAR service. As a result, the Board recommends that all Department of the Army records of the individual concerned be...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2015 | 20150004532

    Original file (20150004532.txt) Auto-classification: Approved

    Army Regulation 600-8-22 (Military Awards) provides policy, criteria, and administrative instructions concerning military awards and decorations. The applicant contends his request for removal of the AGCM disqualification documents that are filed in his OMPF should be reconsidered because he was not notified of or given the opportunity to respond to the commander's proposed disqualification action and he subsequently received the AGCM for the cited period of service. The evidence of record...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2013 | 20130002381

    Original file (20130002381.txt) Auto-classification: Approved

    The applicant requests, in effect, correction of item 12a (Date Entered Active Duty This Period) of his DD Form 214 (Certificate of Release or Discharge from Active Duty) for the period ending 3 February 2011. The applicant states: * this DD Form 214 shows he entered the service on 3 November 1987 and separated on 3 February 2011 * the date of entry is incorrect * he was born on 18 December 1972 * if he had entered the service on the date listed on this DD Form 214, he would have been 14...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2014 | 20140000734

    Original file (20140000734.txt) Auto-classification: Approved

    The applicant contends that his records should be corrected to show award of the AGCM (1st Award) because he served a qualifying period of active Federal military service. The evidence of record shows the 442nd QM Company was awarded the Meritorious Unit Commendation for the period 15 September 2006 to 10 September 2007. As a result, the Board recommends that all Department of the Army records of the individual concerned be corrected by: a. awarding him the Army Good Conduct Medal (1st...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2012 | 20120009142

    Original file (20120009142.txt) Auto-classification: Approved

    The applicant requests, in effect, correction of his DD Form 214 (Certificate of Release or Discharge from Active Duty) for the period ending 18 June 1999 to add the following awards: * Meritorious Service Medal (MSM) (2nd Award) * Army Commendation Medal (ARCOM) (5th Award) * Army Achievement Medal (AAM) (5th Award) * Army Superior Unit Award (ASUA) (2nd Award) * Army Good Conduct Medal (AGCM) (4th Award) * National Defense Service Medal (NDSM) (2nd Award) * Noncommissioned Officer (NCO)...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2012 | 20120002391

    Original file (20120002391.txt) Auto-classification: Approved

    The applicant's service records are contained in the interactive Personnel Electronic Records Management System (iPERMS) and show: * he enlisted in the U.S. Army Reserve (USAR) on 13 September 2002 for a period of 6 years * he was awarded military occupational specialty (MOS) 21N (Construction Equipment Supervisor) * his military education included completion of the Primary Leadership Development Course (PLDC) on 24 September 2005 and the Basic NCO Course (BNCOC) on 13 August and 17 October...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2014 | 20140012421

    Original file (20140012421.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    He served 12 months on active duty while deployed to Iraq so he qualifies for the first award of the AGCM as stated in Army Regulation 600-8-22 (Military Awards). Ready Reserve enlisted personnel ordered to active duty under Title 10, U. S. Code, are eligible for award of the AGCM. Additionally, his NCOER indicates numerous deficiencies during his period of active duty service.

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2012 | 20120022442

    Original file (20120022442.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    The applicant requests correction of two DD Forms 214 (Certificate of Release or Discharge from Active Duty) to show award of the Army Good Conduct Medal (AGCM) (2nd Award), Overseas Service Ribbon (OSR), Korea Defense Service Medal (KDSM), and U.S. Army Recruiter Badge. The applicant contends that his two DD Forms 214 should be corrected to show award of the KDSM, OSR, U.S. Army Recruiter Badge, and AGCM (2nd Award). Therefore, in view of all of the foregoing, there is insufficient...