Search Decisions

Decision Text

ARMY | BCMR | CY2013 | 20130017886
Original file (20130017886.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

		IN THE CASE OF:	  

		BOARD DATE:	    23 October 2013

		DOCKET NUMBER:  AR20130017886 


THE BOARD CONSIDERED THE FOLLOWING EVIDENCE:

1.  Application for correction of military records (with supporting documents provided, if any).

2.  Military Personnel Records and advisory opinions (if any).


THE APPLICANT'S REQUEST, STATEMENT, AND EVIDENCE:

1.  The applicant requests a review of the military disability evaluation pertaining to a mental health condition.

2.  The applicant states, in effect, the case file should be reviewed in accordance with the Secretary of Defense directive for a comprehensive review of members who were referred for a disability evaluation between 11 September 2001 and 
30 April 2012 and whose mental health diagnosis was changed during that process.

3.  The applicant submitted an application through the DOD Physical Disability Board of Review (PDBR) Mental Health Special Review Panel (SRP).

CONSIDERATION OF EVIDENCE:

1.  The PDBR SRP conducted a comprehensive review of the applicant’s submissions and records for evidence of inappropriate changes in the diagnosis of a mental health condition during processing through the military disability system.  A copy of the SRP recommendation was forwarded to the applicant.

2.  The Department of Defense memorandum, dated 27 February 2013, directed the Service Secretaries to conduct a review of mental health diagnoses for service members completing a disability evaluation process between 11 September 2001 and 30 April 2012 in order to determine if service members were disadvantaged by a changed diagnosis over the course of their physical disability process.
DISCUSSION AND CONCLUSIONS:

1.  After a comprehensive review of the applicant’s case, the SRP determined by unanimous vote that there be no change to his disability and medical retirement. 

2.  The SRP considered the record in evidence best supported the 50% rating for Temporary Disability Retired List (TDRL) entry and there was insufficient reasonable doubt in accordance with the Department of Veterans Affairs Schedule for Rating Disabilities §4.3 or §4.7 for recommending a 70% TDRL entry rating. 

3.  The SRP agreed at the time of permanent retirement that the record adequately demonstrated that although the applicant’s symptoms had not significantly improved since initiation of the TDRL, he remained stable and his symptoms reflected the criteria for the 50% disability rating.  The higher rating of 70% requires demonstration of impairment in most areas was not supported by the record.  The 2-year remote-from-separation Compensation & Pension evaluations were adjudged post-separation worsening and not indicative of the covered individual's condition at the time of removal from the TDRL. 

4.  After due deliberation in consideration of the preponderance of the evidence, the SRP concluded that there was insufficient cause to recommend a change in the Physical Evaluation Board adjudication for the applicant’s mental health conditions at TDRL placement or permanent retirement. 

5.  The available evidence shows the SRP’s assessment should be accepted.  

BOARD VOTE:

________  ________  ________  GRANT FULL RELIEF 

________  ________  ________  GRANT PARTIAL RELIEF 

________  ________  ________  GRANT FORMAL HEARING

___X____  ___X___  ___X____  DENY APPLICATION







BOARD DETERMINATION/RECOMMENDATION:

The evidence presented does not demonstrate the existence of a probable error or injustice.  Therefore, the Board determined that the overall merits of this case are insufficient as a basis for correction of the records of the individual concerned.  




      _______ _   _X____   ___
               CHAIRPERSON
      
I certify that herein is recorded the true and complete record of the proceedings of the Army Board for Correction of Military Records in this case.

ABCMR Record of Proceedings (cont)                                         AR20040003532



3


ARMY BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS

 RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS


1

ABCMR Record of Proceedings (cont)                                  AR20130017886



2


ARMY BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS

 RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS


1

Similar Decisions

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2013 | 20130019770

    Original file (20130019770.txt) Auto-classification: Approved

    The PDBR SRP conducted a comprehensive review of the applicant’s submissions and records for evidence of inappropriate changes in the diagnosis of a mental health condition during processing through the military disability system. After a comprehensive review of the applicant’s case, the SRP determined by unanimous vote that the applicant’s prior permanent retirement be modified to reflect that the applicant was placed on the Temporary Disability Retired List (TDRL) at 90 percent (50...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2013 | 20130019729

    Original file (20130019729.txt) Auto-classification: Approved

    The applicant requests a review of the military disability evaluation pertaining to a mental health condition. The PDBR SRP conducted a comprehensive review of the applicant’s submissions and records for evidence of inappropriate changes in the diagnosis of a mental health condition during processing through the military disability system. As a result, the Board recommends that all Department of the Army records of the individual concerned be corrected by changing his unfitting condition...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2014 | 20140009057

    Original file (20140009057.txt) Auto-classification: Approved

    The applicant requests a review of the military disability evaluation pertaining to a mental health (MH) condition. The PDBR SRP conducted a comprehensive review of the applicant’s submissions and records for evidence of inappropriate changes in the diagnosis of a mental health condition during processing through the military disability system. The SRP further agreed that physical evaluation board (PEB) adjudication of unfitting PTSD was supported by the evidence; therefore, the diagnosis...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2014 | 20140009095

    Original file (20140009095.txt) Auto-classification: Approved

    There was no evidence in the record of recurrent suicidal behaviors, no recorded visits to the emergency room for MH treatment, no recurrent psychiatric hospitalizations and no impairment in thinking or judgment at the time of separation. After due deliberation in consideration of the preponderance of the evidence, the SRP concluded that the application of VASRD Section 4.129 was applicable in this case with a 50 percent disability rating. UNFITTING CONDITION VASRD CODE TDRL...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2013 | 20130019225

    Original file (20130019225.txt) Auto-classification: Approved

    The applicant requests a review of the military disability evaluation pertaining to a mental health condition. After a comprehensive review of the applicant’s case, the SRP recommended his unfitting condition diagnosis be changed to Post-traumatic Stress Disorder (PTSD), and his prior separation be modified to reflect he was placed on the Temporary Disability Retired List (TDRL) at 50% for PTSD (plus 10% for the back condition) for the duration of his TDRL period and then a permanent PTSD...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2014 | 20140014271

    Original file (20140014271.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    The applicant states, in effect, the case file should be reviewed in accordance with the Secretary of Defense directive for a comprehensive review of members who were referred for a disability evaluation between 11 September 2001 and 30 April 2012 and whose mental health diagnosis was changed during that process. The PDBR SRP conducted a comprehensive review of the applicant’s submissions and records for evidence of inappropriate changes in the diagnosis of a mental health condition during...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2013 | 20130019745

    Original file (20130019745.txt) Auto-classification: Approved

    The applicant requests a review of the military disability evaluation pertaining to a mental health condition. The PDBR SRP conducted a comprehensive review of the applicant’s submissions and records for evidence of inappropriate changes in the diagnosis of a mental health condition during processing through the military disability system. The record in evidence suggested the applicant was not placed on the TDRL and was given a permanent rating of 30 percent.

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2014 | 20140014515

    Original file (20140014515.txt) Auto-classification: Approved

    The applicant requests a review of the military disability evaluation pertaining to a mental health (MH) condition. The PDBR SRP conducted a comprehensive review of the applicant’s submissions and records for evidence of inappropriate changes in the diagnosis of a MH condition during processing through the military disability system. The SRP reviewed the records for evidence of inappropriate changes in a diagnosis of the applicant's MH condition during processing through the military...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2014 | 20140015809

    Original file (20140015809.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    The SRP reviewed the records for evidence of inappropriate changes in diagnosis of the MH condition during processing through the military Disability Evaluation System (DES). The SRP acknowledged the Compensation and Pension (C&P) examiner’s assessment and diagnosis of PTSD; however, there was insufficient clinical evidence to support that the Diagnostic and Statistical Manual for Mental Disorders, Fourth Edition, (DSM-IV) diagnostic criteria were met since there was no clear evidence in...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2014 | 20140009060

    Original file (20140009060.txt) Auto-classification: Approved

    In this case, however, the SRP concluded that there was not sufficient evidence to support a conclusion that a highly-stressful event severe enough to bring about the Veteran’s release from active military service occurred and that the application of VASRD Section 4.129 was not appropriate. The SRP noted that the debate therefore focused on a 50 percent versus 70 percent rating. The PEB quoted the VASRD Section 4.130 criteria in assignment of a 30 percent rating, but the SRP considered if...