Search Decisions

Decision Text

ARMY | BCMR | CY2013 | 20130019770
Original file (20130019770.txt) Auto-classification: Approved

		IN THE CASE OF:	  

		BOARD DATE:	    4 December 2013

		DOCKET NUMBER:  AR20130019770 


THE BOARD CONSIDERED THE FOLLOWING EVIDENCE:

1.  Application for correction of military records (with supporting documents provided, if any).

2.  Military Personnel Records and advisory opinions (if any).


THE APPLICANT'S REQUEST, STATEMENT, AND EVIDENCE:

1.  The applicant requests a review of the military disability evaluation pertaining to a mental health condition.

2.  The applicant states, in effect, the case file should be reviewed in accordance with the Secretary of Defense directive for a comprehensive review of members who were referred for a disability evaluation between 11 September 2001 and 
30 April 2012 and whose mental health diagnosis was changed during that process.

3.  The applicant submitted an application through the DOD Physical Disability Board of Review (PDBR) Mental Health Special Review Panel (SRP).

CONSIDERATION OF EVIDENCE:

1.  The PDBR SRP conducted a comprehensive review of the applicant’s submissions and records for evidence of inappropriate changes in the diagnosis of a mental health condition during processing through the military disability system.  

2.  The Department of Defense memorandum, dated 27 February 2013, directed the Service Secretaries to conduct a review of mental health diagnoses for service members completing a disability evaluation process between 11 September 2001 and 30 April 2012 in order to determine if service members were disadvantaged by a changed diagnosis over the course of their physical disability process.
3.  In the processing of this case, an advisory opinion was obtained from the PDBR SRP and the applicant was provided a copy.

4.  The applicant did not respond to the advisory opinion.

DISCUSSION AND CONCLUSIONS:

1.  After a comprehensive review of the applicant’s case, the SRP determined by unanimous vote that the applicant’s prior permanent retirement be modified to reflect that the applicant was placed on the Temporary Disability Retired List (TDRL) at 90 percent (50 percent mental health rating in accordance with Department of Veterans Affairs Schedule for Rating Disabilities (VASRD) 4.129 for a period of 6 months) and then a change in diagnosis to Post-Traumatic Stress Disorder (PTSD) at 70 percent, with a permanent combined 90 percent disability retirement.

2.  The SRP first considered whether the applicant’s diagnosis had been changed to the applicant’s disadvantage through the course of his processing through the Disability Evaluation System.  It determined that no such change in diagnosis took place.  Therefore, the applicant did not appear to meet the inclusion criteria in the Terms of Reference of the Mental Health Diagnosis Review Project.

3.  Additionally, the SRP considered the possible contribution of the effects of traumatic brain injury (TBI) to the clinical picture.  In reviewing the entirety of the record, an independent psychiatrist concurred with the formulation stated in the VA Compensation and Pension exam of May 2010 that a large portion of the applicant’s behavioral symptoms as well as other symptoms such as headache and tinnitus could be a result of TBI.

4.  The SRP unanimously agreed that sufficient evidence supports that a highly stressful event severe enough to bring about the applicant’s release from active military service did occur and that the application of VASRD 4.129 is appropriate in this case.

5.  The SRP unanimously agreed that equity favors giving this applicant the benefit of section VASRD 4.129 for re-rating following a constructive TDRL period  (in addition to the PEB's 50 percent rating level application at his prior retirement date).

6.  The SRP agreed that the record did not support a mental health rating higher than 50 percent at the time of the PEB or for entry into a TDRL period.  However, the applicant had as an additional complication to this case the overlap between mental health symptoms and symptoms of TBI.

7.  The SRP unanimously concluded that, based on the available data, a permanent disability diagnosis of PTSD with a rating of 70 percent at the end of the 6-month constructive period of TDRL, had it occurred, most closely fit the available data.  Given the total disability picture, and TDRL and permanent disability rating schema, there was no benefit to re-evaluating any separate component of TBI at the time of permanent separation.

8.  The available evidence shows the SRP’s assessment should be accepted.

BOARD VOTE:

___X____  ___X____  ___X____  GRANT FULL RELIEF 

________  ________  ________  GRANT PARTIAL RELIEF 

________  ________  ________  GRANT FORMAL HEARING

________  ________  ________  DENY APPLICATION

BOARD DETERMINATION/RECOMMENDATION:

The Board determined that the evidence presented was sufficient to warrant a recommendation for relief.  As a result, the Board recommends that all Department of the Army records of the individual concerned be corrected by modifying his prior determination to reflect that the applicant was placed on the TDRL at 90 percent (50 percent mental health rating in accordance with VASRD 4.129 for a period of 6 months) and then a change in diagnosis to PTSD at       70 percent, with a permanent combined 90 percent disability retirement.




      _______ _  X  ___   ___
               CHAIRPERSON
      
I certify that herein is recorded the true and complete record of the proceedings of the Army Board for Correction of Military Records in this case.
ABCMR Record of Proceedings (cont)                                         AR20040003532



3


ARMY BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS

 RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS


1

ABCMR Record of Proceedings (cont)                                  AR20130019770



3


ARMY BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS

 RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS


1

Similar Decisions

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2013 | 20130021006

    Original file (20130021006.txt) Auto-classification: Approved

    The PDBR SRP conducted a comprehensive review of the applicant's submissions and records for evidence of inappropriate changes in the diagnosis of an MH condition during processing through the military disability system. The SRP considered the appropriateness of the changes in the MH diagnoses and physical evaluation board (PEB) fitness determination, and, if unfitting, whether the provisions of the Department of Veterans Affairs Schedule for Rating Disabilities (VASRD), section 4.129, were...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2014 | 20140009054

    Original file (20140009054.txt) Auto-classification: Approved

    The SRP considered if there was evidence for a VASRD Section 4.130 rating higher than 50 percent at time of placement on the TDRL. The next higher 100 percent rating required “total occupational and social impairment.” The SRP noted the VA neurologist’s statement and neuropsychology testing results regarding possible embellishment or malingering; and the service neurologist’s inability to draw conclusions due to an unsatisfactory examination. After due deliberation in consideration of the...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2014 | 20140008198

    Original file (20140008198.txt) Auto-classification: Approved

    The applicant requests a review of the military disability evaluation pertaining to a mental health (MH) condition. Its first assessment with regard to the MH condition, under SRP guidelines, was to judge (based on a preponderance of evidence) whether an MH diagnosis was changed or unfairly eliminated during the Disability Evaluation System (DES) proceedings. Furthermore, the conclusion that there was a separately unfitting TBI at permanent retirement was challenged by the observations...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2014 | 20140009095

    Original file (20140009095.txt) Auto-classification: Approved

    There was no evidence in the record of recurrent suicidal behaviors, no recorded visits to the emergency room for MH treatment, no recurrent psychiatric hospitalizations and no impairment in thinking or judgment at the time of separation. After due deliberation in consideration of the preponderance of the evidence, the SRP concluded that the application of VASRD Section 4.129 was applicable in this case with a 50 percent disability rating. UNFITTING CONDITION VASRD CODE TDRL...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2013 | 20130019745

    Original file (20130019745.txt) Auto-classification: Approved

    The applicant requests a review of the military disability evaluation pertaining to a mental health condition. The PDBR SRP conducted a comprehensive review of the applicant’s submissions and records for evidence of inappropriate changes in the diagnosis of a mental health condition during processing through the military disability system. The record in evidence suggested the applicant was not placed on the TDRL and was given a permanent rating of 30 percent.

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2014 | 20140006943

    Original file (20140006943.txt) Auto-classification: Approved

    The applicant requests a review of the military disability evaluation pertaining to a mental health (MH) condition. The PDBR SRP conducted a comprehensive review of the applicant's submissions and records for evidence of inappropriate changes in the diagnosis of an MH condition during processing through the military disability system. After due deliberation in consideration of the preponderance of the evidence, the SRP agreed that conceding reasonable doubt, a fair permanent rating...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2014 | 20140015303

    Original file (20140015303.txt) Auto-classification: Approved

    The PDBR SRP conducted a comprehensive review of the applicant’s submissions and records for evidence of inappropriate changes in the diagnosis of a MH condition during processing through the military disability system. At the time of permanent disability disposition and removal from the TDRL, the PEB rated the PTSD at 30 percent. Personality disorder was not noted to be a consistent diagnosis in prior or subsequent exams and the SRP discussed any potential decrease in PTSD rating under...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2014 | 20140004976

    Original file (20140004976.txt) Auto-classification: Approved

    The PDBR SRP conducted a comprehensive review of the applicant’s submissions and records for evidence of inappropriate changes in the diagnosis of a mental health condition during processing through the military disability system. The SRP considered the appropriateness of changes in the mental health diagnoses, Physical Evaluation Board (PEB) fitness determination; and if unfitting, whether the provisions of VASRD Section 4.129 were applicable, and a disability rating recommendation in...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2014 | 20140007675

    Original file (20140007675.txt) Auto-classification: Approved

    The SRP considered the appropriateness of changes in the MH diagnoses; the physical evaluation board (PEB) fitness determination; if unfitting, whether the provisions of VASRD, section 4.129, were applicable; and a disability rating recommendation in accordance with VASRD, section 4.130. The SRP noted that while the PEB had placed the applicant on the TDRL, application of VASRD, section 4.129, required a minimum disability rating of 50 percent with re-evaluation. As a result, the Board...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2015 | 20150003882

    Original file (20150003882.txt) Auto-classification: Approved

    The SRP recommended no change to the physical evaluation board (PEB) adjudication of the permanent retirement rating of 30 percent for the unfitting mental health condition. The SRP reviewed the records for evidence of inappropriate changes in diagnosis of the applicant's MH condition during processing through the military Integrated Disability Evaluation System (IDES). The SRP noted that the PEB assigned a disability rating of 30 percent without application of VASRD Section 4.129 (Mental...