Search Decisions

Decision Text

ARMY | BCMR | CY2013 | 20130017737
Original file (20130017737.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

		
		BOARD DATE:	  28 May 2014

		DOCKET NUMBER:  AR20130017737 


THE BOARD CONSIDERED THE FOLLOWING EVIDENCE:

1.  Application for correction of military records (with supporting documents provided, if any).

2.  Military Personnel Records and advisory opinions (if any).


THE APPLICANT'S REQUEST, STATEMENT, AND EVIDENCE:

1.  The applicant requests approval to transfer his Post-9/11 GI Bill benefits to his eligible family members.

2.  The applicant states while he was serving on active duty under Title 10 and as a reservist under Title 32, and prior to retiring, he went numerous times to the Retirement Services Officer (RSO) and he was told by the counselors and supervisors that because he was a reservist, he was not entitled to their services because the RSO was only for active duty personnel.  He feels that he was never properly informed of his benefits before retiring as a reservist.  As of today, he has not been informed of his entitlements and benefits.  Had he been afforded the same opportunities as an active duty Soldier, he would not be requesting a correction of his military records now.  

3.  The applicant provides a letter from the Department of Veterans Affairs (VA).

CONSIDERATION OF EVIDENCE:

1.  The applicant's U.S. Army Human Resources Command Form 249-E (Chronological Statement of Retirement Points) indicates he served in the Regular Army from 30 June 1975 to 29 October 1978 and the U.S. Army Reserve (USAR) from 30 October 1978 to 7 September 2007 (retired).  

2.  Orders issued by the U.S. Army Human Resources Command, as amended, show he was ordered to active duty from his retired status for a period of 1,095 days effective 14 September 2008 with an end date of 13 September 2011 and assigned to Fort Stewart, GA.

3.  On 10 July 2009, the Army released the Post 9/11 GI Bill Implementation Policy which identified and established responsibilities, eligibility criteria, benefits, and detailed guidance on the administration of the program.  

4.  On 9 September 2011, he completed a DD Form 2648-1 (Preseparation Counseling Checklist for Reserve Component Service Members Released from Active Duty) wherein he requested additional information regarding education and training.  The internet address for the VA GI Bill information website is included in the DD Form 2648-1.

5.  He was placed on the Retired List on 30 August 2012.

6.  There is no evidence in his military records showing he attempted to transfer the benefits prior to leaving military service or evidence showing he was given false or no information about the rules for transferring educational benefits.

7.  He provides a letter from the VA, dated 13 September 2013, addressed to the applicant's Representative in Congress, indicating the applicant inquired about transferring benefits under the Post 9/11 GI Bill.  The VA indicated that because the applicant was not on active duty, he should contact his branch of service regarding the Post 9/11 GI Bill.  

8.  The Post-9/11 Veterans Educational Assistance Act of 2008 is described under Title V of the Supplemental Appropriations Act of 2008, Public Law 
110-252, House of Representatives, 2642.  In July of 2008, Congress passed a law for the Post-9/11 GI Bill which went into effect on 1 August 2009.  Public Law 110-252, section 3319, provides the eligibility requirements necessary to transfer unused educational benefits to family members.  A service member may execute transfer of benefits only while serving as a member of the Armed Forces. 

DISCUSSION AND CONCLUSIONS:

1.  The applicant requests approval to transfer his Post-9/11 GI Bill benefits to his eligible family members.

2.  The law governing the transferability of unused Post-9/11 GI Bill benefits places legal limitations on transferability.  Members must register and complete transfer prior to leaving the service.

3.  Department of Defense and the Army conducted massive public campaigns that generated major communications on the transfer of education benefits under the Post-9/11 GI Bill through military, public, and social media venues.  He has not provided sufficient evidence which shows he was deprived of information broadly disseminated through the public campaigns.

4.  The Army has generally granted relief to members who left the service within the first 90 days after implementation of the program on 1 August 2009.  In this case, the applicant's last day in the service was 29 August 2012, over 3 years after the implementation of the program.  As a result, equity relief in this case would not be appropriate given that it would be contrary to law.

5.  In view of the foregoing, there is no basis to grant the requested relief.

BOARD VOTE:

________  ________  ________  GRANT FULL RELIEF 

________  ________  ________  GRANT PARTIAL RELIEF 

________  ________  ________  GRANT FORMAL HEARING

___X_____  __X______  _X____  DENY APPLICATION

BOARD DETERMINATION/RECOMMENDATION:

The evidence presented does not demonstrate the existence of a probable error or injustice.  Therefore, the Board determined that the overall merits of this case are insufficient as a basis for correction of the records of the individual concerned.




      _______ _  X _______   ___
               CHAIRPERSON
      
I certify that herein is recorded the true and complete record of the proceedings of the Army Board for Correction of Military Records in this case.

ABCMR Record of Proceedings (cont)                                         AR20130017737



3


ARMY BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS

 RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS


1

ABCMR Record of Proceedings (cont)                                         AR20130017737



3


ARMY BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS

 RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS


1

Similar Decisions

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2011 | 20110006277

    Original file (20110006277.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    A service member is considered to be retirement eligible if he or she has completed 20 years of active duty or 20 qualifying years of reserve service. The policy further states the Secretaries of the Military Departments will provide active duty participants and members of the Reserve Components with qualifying active duty service individual pre-separation or release from active duty counseling on the benefits under the Post-9/11 GI Bill and document accordingly and maintain records for...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2014 | 20140013228

    Original file (20140013228.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    The applicant requests correction of his records to show he transferred his educational benefits to his dependents under the Transfer of Education Benefits (TEB) provision of the Post-9/11 GI Bill prior to retiring from active duty. Records show the applicant was referred to a website www.ebenefits.va.gov for information on his education benefits. Considering all the evidence and information presented by the applicant, together with the evidence of record, there is no basis for granting...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2010 | 20100022691

    Original file (20100022691.txt) Auto-classification: Approved

    The applicant requests, in effect, correction of his records to show he applied for the Post-9/11 GI Bill Transferability Program in order to transfer his education benefits to his dependents before he retired from active duty on 30 September 2009. The evidence further shows the applicant did, in fact, apply to the VA for Post-9/11 GI Bill eligibility prior to his separation from active duty for retirement and the VA confirmed it had his application prior to his retirement. As a result,...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2010 | 20100014463

    Original file (20100014463.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    There is no evidence of record which shows the applicant elected to transfer Post 9/11 GI Bill benefits to his dependents prior to his retirement on 31 October 2009. The policy further states the Secretaries of the Military Departments will provide active duty participants and members of the Reserve Components with qualifying active duty service individual pre-separation or release from active duty counseling on the benefits under the Post 9/11 GI Bill and document accordingly and maintain...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2013 | 20130004112

    Original file (20130004112.txt) Auto-classification: Approved

    The applicant requests an exception to policy to transfer educational benefits to his family member under the Transfer of Educational Benefits (TEB) provision of the Post-9/11 GI Bill. The program was implemented in July 2009 and he retired on 31 October 2009. As a result, the Board recommends that all Department of the Army records of the individual concerned be corrected by showing the applicant filed his application and the Army approved his request to transfer Post-9/11 GI Bill...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2011 | 20110020085

    Original file (20110020085.txt) Auto-classification: Approved

    The applicant states: * He had already outprocessed and was on transition leave at the time this program was implemented * He did not get the information or was not informed of the requirements to declare family members he could transfer his MGIB benefits to prior to retiring * The information available at the time of his retirement was conflicting and confusing * He retired on 31 August 2009 and like many others, little information was available about this program 3. The advisory official...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2014 | 20140008374

    Original file (20140008374.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    THE APPLICANT'S REQUEST, STATEMENT, AND EVIDENCE: The applicant requests an exception to policy to transfer educational benefits under the Transfer of Educational Benefits (TEB) provision of the Post-9/11 GI Bill to eligible dependents. On 22 June 2009, DOD established the criteria for eligibility and transfer of unused educational benefits to eligible family members. A service member is considered to be retirement eligible if he or she has completed 20 years of active duty or 20...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2013 | 20130010604

    Original file (20130010604.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    The applicant requests an exception to policy to transfer educational benefits to his daughter under the Transfer of Education Benefits (TEB) provision of the Post-9/11 GI Bill. None of the briefings stated anything about the policy to transfer his educational benefits while serving on active duty. He contends that he was not counseled about the TEB Program prior to leaving active duty service.

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2013 | 20130005263

    Original file (20130005263.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    The applicant requests approval for transfer of his Post-9/11 GI Bill benefits to his eligible family members. The applicant provides a DD Form 214 (Certificate of Release or Discharge from Active Duty), outprocessing notes, and Education Center notes. He contends that he was not counseled prior to his discharge; however, the evidence of record shows he declined further counseling in regard to the Post 9/11 GI Bill education benefits on 21 May 2012.

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2013 | 20130002317

    Original file (20130002317.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    Service members had to be serving on active duty or as a member of the Selected Reserve at the time of transfer of educational benefits to his or her dependents on or after 1 August 2009. Although significant measures were made by the Department of Defense (DOD), the Department of Veterans Affairs (VA), and the Army to disseminate the information to all Soldiers within all Army components during the initial phase of the program, many Soldiers who left the service during the first 90 days of...