Search Decisions

Decision Text

ARMY | BCMR | CY2013 | 20130017279
Original file (20130017279 .txt) Auto-classification: Denied

		
		BOARD DATE:	  8 July 2014

		DOCKET NUMBER:  AR20130017279 


THE BOARD CONSIDERED THE FOLLOWING EVIDENCE:

1.  Application for correction of military records (with supporting documents provided, if any).

2.  Military Personnel Records and advisory opinions (if any).


THE APPLICANT'S REQUEST, STATEMENT, AND EVIDENCE:

1.  The applicant requests correction of his DD Form 214 (Armed Forces of the United States Report of Transfer or Discharge) to add the Vietnam “Support” Medal or the Armed Forces Expeditionary Medal (AFEM).

2.  The applicant states:

   a.  he served at Camp Smith Marine Base in Honolulu, Hawaii;
   
   b.  he was assigned to the War Room and held a top secret clearance;
   
   c.  he received top secret information regarding the Vietnam War, prepared presentations and drawings, and presented this information to Flag Officers of the Army, Marines, Air Force, and Navy; White House representatives; congressmen, defense personnel, and President Lyndon B. Johnson; and
   
   d.  he wants to receive the Vietnam “Support” Medal or AFEM to show his support during the Vietnam War.
   
3.  The applicant provides:

* Representative in Congress letter with Tasker and Privacy Act Statement
* Self-authored statement
* Xeroxed photograph


CONSIDERATION OF EVIDENCE:

1.  Title 10, U.S. Code, section 1552(b), provides that applications for correction of military records must be filed within 3 years after discovery of the alleged error or injustice.  This provision of law also allows the Army Board for Correction of Military Records (ABCMR) to excuse an applicant's failure to timely file within the 3-year statute of limitations if the ABCMR determines it would be in the interest of justice to do so.  While it appears the applicant did not file within the time frame provided in the statute of limitations, the ABCMR has elected to conduct a substantive review of this case and, only to the extent relief, if any, is granted, has determined it is in the interest of justice to excuse the applicant's failure to timely file.  In all other respects, there are insufficient bases to waive the statute of limitations for timely filing.

2.  The applicant’s military record shows he enlisted in the Regular Army on 21 October 1968.  He was trained in and awarded military occupational specialty 81A (General Draftsman).

3.  His DA Form 20 (Enlisted Qualification Record) contains a single entry in Item 31 (Foreign Service) that shows he arrived in the U.S. Army Pacific (USARPAC), specifically in Hawaii, on 14 May 1969.  His record is void of any documents or orders showing he was ever assigned to or served in the Republic of Vietnam (RVN).  

4.  On 25 August 1970, the applicant was honorably released from active duty (REFRAD) after completing 1 year, 10 months, and 5 days of active military service.  The DD Form 214 issued to him at that time shows, in Item 22c (Foreign Service), he completed 1 year, 3 months, and 10 days of overseas service in USARPAC.  Item 30 (Remarks) contains a blank entry next to the heading "RVN:" which indicates the applicant served no time in the RVN.  

5.  Army Regulation 600-8-22 prescribes the policy for the Army awards program. 

   a.  Paragraph 2-12 contains guidance on awarding the AFEM.  It states, in pertinent part, that the AFEM is authorized for participants in military operations within a specific geographic area during a specified time period.  An individual, who was not engaged in actual combat or equally hazardous activity, must have participated in operations or in direct support of operations for 30 consecutive or 60 nonconsecutive days.  It further indicates that it was authorized for service in the RVN for the period from 1 July 1958 to 3 July 1965, and for evacuation operations from 29 to 30 April 1975.  The Vietnam Service Medal was authorized for service in the RVN for the period after 3 July 1965 through 28 March 1973. 

   b.  Paragraph 2-13 of the awards regulation contains guidance on awarding the Vietnam Service Medal.  It states, in pertinent part, that it was authorized for service in the RVN after 3 July 1965 through 28 March 1973.  

DISCUSSION AND CONCLUSIONS:

1.  The applicant contends his DD Form 214 should be corrected to add the Vietnam “Support” Medal or the AFEM to document his service in support of the Vietnam War.  There is insufficient evidence to support this claim.

2.  The evidence of record confirms the applicant served overseas in Hawaii for 1 year, 3 months, and 10 days, as evidenced by his DA Form 20 and he also confirm this service.  There is no evidence of record to show he ever served in the RVN during this enlistment.  

3.  In respect to the applicant's request for award of the Vietnam “Support” Medal, he is advised that there is no such medal within the Department of the Army's official list of authorized awards.  In the event he was seeking the award of the Vietnam Service Medal, he did not perform any service in the RVN, and therefore he is not entitled to this award.

4.  Finally, there is no evidence of record to show the applicant satisfied the regulatory criteria necessary for the award of the AFEM.   Inasmuch as he did not participate in any military operations within a specific geographic area during a specified time period, there is an insufficient evidentiary basis to support granting him this award.

BOARD VOTE:

________  ________  ________  GRANT FULL RELIEF 

________  ________  ________  GRANT PARTIAL RELIEF 

________  ________  ________  GRANT FORMAL HEARING

____X____  ____X____  __X__  DENY APPLICATION


BOARD DETERMINATION/RECOMMENDATION:

The evidence presented does not demonstrate the existence of a probable error or injustice.  Therefore, the Board determined that the overall merits of this case are insufficient as a basis for correction of the records of the individual concerned.




      _______ _ X  _______   ___
               CHAIRPERSON
      
I certify that herein is recorded the true and complete record of the proceedings of the Army Board for Correction of Military Records in this case.



ABCMR Record of Proceedings (cont)                                         AR20130017279





3


ARMY BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS

 RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS


1

ABCMR Record of Proceedings (cont)                                         AR20130017279



2


ARMY BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS

 RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS


1

Similar Decisions

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2013 | 20130017279

    Original file (20130017279.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    Application for correction of military records (with supporting documents provided, if any). The Vietnam Service Medal was authorized for service in the RVN for the period after 3 July 1965 through 28 March 1973. b. Paragraph 2-13 of the awards regulation contains guidance on awarding the Vietnam Service Medal. There is no evidence of record to show he ever served in the RVN during this enlistment.

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2011 | 20110011836

    Original file (20110011836.txt) Auto-classification: Approved

    The applicant requests: a. correction of his DD Form 214 (Armed Forces of the United States Report of Transfer or Discharge) to show his service in the Republic of Vietnam (RVN), to show the Vietnam Service Medal (VSM) in lieu of the Armed Forces Expeditionary Medal (AFEM), and to show the RVN Campaign Medal with Device (1960); and b. correction of his DA Form 20 (Enlisted Qualification Record) to show he typed 70 words per minute and to show his security clearance was "TS/C," not "TS." The...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2008 | 20080012238

    Original file (20080012238.txt) Auto-classification: Approved

    The applicant requests that his DD Form 214 (Armed Forces of the United States Report of Transfer or Discharge) be corrected to reflect his Vietnam service, the Vietnam Service Medal (VSM), and all authorized awards. The regulation in effect at the time provides, in pertinent part, that the total active duty performed outside of the continental United States for the period covered by the DD Form 214 will be entered in item 24c. As a result, the Board recommends denial of so much of the...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2013 | 20130019301

    Original file (20130019301.txt) Auto-classification: Approved

    The applicant requests reconsideration of correction of his DD Form 214 (Armed Forces of the United States Report of Transfer or Discharge) to show: a. his service in Vietnam and Korea; and b. award of the Vietnam Service Medal. The applicant states: * his Congressman helped him obtain additional documents from his medical records which show he served more than 5 months in Vietnam * he obtained notarized eyewitness statements from former fellow unit members who confirm his service in...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2010 | 20100022206

    Original file (20100022206.txt) Auto-classification: Approved

    c. The RVN Campaign Medal with Device (1960) was awarded by the Government of Vietnam to all members of the Armed Forces of the United States for qualifying service in Vietnam during the period 1 March 1961 through 28 March 1973. The evidence of record confirms he served an honorable period of active duty service between 18 March 1963 and 7 March 1966; therefore, he is entitled to award of the NDSM and to have this award added to his DD Form 214. As a result, the Board recommends that all...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2008 | 20080017359

    Original file (20080017359.txt) Auto-classification: Approved

    The applicant requests, in effect, that the records of his disabled father, a former service member (FSM), be corrected to show he was awarded the Army Commendation Medal (ARCOM), Philippine Defense Medal, Philippine Independence Medal, Combat Infantryman Badge (2nd Award), and all awards he is entitled to based on service in the Republic of Vietnam (RVN). The applicant also states that based on the FSM's RVN service, he believes he should have been awarded the Vietnam Service Medal,...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2010 | 20100001074

    Original file (20100001074.txt) Auto-classification: Approved

    The applicant requests correction of his military records to show award of the Vietnam Expeditionary Medal [correctly known as the Armed Forces Expeditionary Medal (AFEM)] for Thailand, the National Defense Service Medal (NDSM), and any other medals or awards he may be authorized. The evidence of record shows that based on his active duty during a qualifying period, the applicant is eligible for the NDSM. There is no evidence, nor did the applicant provide any evidence, that shows the 44th...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2012 | 20120018881

    Original file (20120018881.txt) Auto-classification: Approved

    Army Regulation 672-5-1 (Military Awards), in effect at the time, provided that the Army Good Conduct Medal was awarded to individuals who completed a qualifying period of active duty enlisted service. The applicant's service in the RVN qualified him for award of the AFEM. As a result, the Board recommends that all Department of the Army records of the individual concerned be corrected by: a. awarding him the Army Good Conduct Medal (1st Award) for the period 18 July 1961 through 13 July...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2014 | 20140014159

    Original file (20140014159.txt) Auto-classification: Approved

    Army Regulation 672-5-1 (Military Awards), in effect at the time, provided that the AGCM was awarded to individuals who completed a qualifying period of active duty enlisted service. The applicant was authorized the AFEM for his service in the RVN and his records show he was awarded the service medal. As a result, the Board recommends that all Department of the Army records of the individual concerned be corrected by: a. awarding him the Army Good Conduct Medal (1st Award) for the period 6...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2011 | 20110017257

    Original file (20110017257.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    The regulation in effect at the time of the applicant's separation specified that item 24c of the DD Form 214 would contain the total amount of active duty served outside the continental limits of the United States during the period covered by the DD Form 214 and the last overseas theater in which the service was performed (e.g., USARPAC). The evidence of record clearly shows he served in Vietnam. _______ _ X______ ___ CHAIRPERSON I certify that herein is recorded the true and complete...