IN THE CASE OF:
BOARD DATE: 19 June 2014
DOCKET NUMBER: AR20130017222
THE BOARD CONSIDERED THE FOLLOWING EVIDENCE:
1. Application for correction of military records (with supporting documents provided, if any).
2. Military Personnel Records and advisory opinions (if any).
THE APPLICANT'S REQUEST, STATEMENT, AND EVIDENCE:
1. The applicant requests, in effect, an adjustment of his date of rank (DOR) to captain (CPT)/O3 in the Maryland Army National Guard (MDARNG) from 3 July 2013 to either February or April 2013.
2. He states, in effect, he returned from a deployment in August 2012, but due to the military reintegration policy he was not eligible to transfer into an O3 slot at his new unit until 90 days after he returned, which would have been November. It took a couple of months for the transfer to go through and although his packet was completed, with the exception of a paragraph and line number, it could not be submitted. It was not officially submitted until February 2013, which was when the transfer was finally completed. Therefore, he requests at a minimum that his effective date of promotion be backdated to reflect his date of eligibility into the new unit or at worst, the date of his State recognition.
3. He provides Orders:
* HO-264-0028, dated 21 September 2011
* HO-094-0040, dated 4 April 2013
* 228-1087, dated 16 August 2012
* 041-004, dated 10 February 2013
CONSIDERATION OF EVIDENCE:
1. After having prior service as an enlisted Soldier in the ARNG, on 22 May 2008 he executed an oath of office as a Reserve commissioned officer in the rank of second lieutenant and was granted Federal recognition by the ARNG. He attended and completed the Signal Basic Officer Leadership Course from
30 June to 22 October 2010. He was promoted to 1LT on 22 October 2010.
2. On 24 August 2011, he was ordered to active duty in support of Operation New Dawn. He served in Kuwait/Iraq from 8 October 2011 to 10 August 2012 and he was honorably released from active duty on 8 September 2012. His
DD Form 214 (Certificate of Release or Discharge from Active Duty) shows his last duty assignment as the 1204th Combat Support Battalion.
3. Orders 041-004, dated 10 February 2013, show the applicant was reassigned from Company C (Signal), 1204th Aviation Support Battalion to Headquarters and Headquarters Company, 1st Battalion, 224th Aviation (Security and Support) Battalion. The effective date was listed as 7 February 2013.
4. His record is void of any evidence that shows he was in an O3 position.
5. On 17 March 2013, he was ordered to active duty in support of Operation Joint Guardian.
6. Orders 108-039, issued by MDARNG promoted him to CPT/O3 with an effective date and DOR of 18 April 2013. Additional instructions stated that the effective date of his promotion would be the date permanent Federal Recognition orders were published.
7. Special Orders Number 169 AR, dated 10 July 2013, issued by the National Guard Bureau granted him Federal Recognition for his promotion to CPT in the ARNG with an effective date and DOR of 3 July 2013.
8. He served in Kosovo from 21 April 2013 to 14 January 2014. He was honorably released from active duty on 14 March 2014.
9. Per Title 10, U.S. Code, section 1552, the Army Board for Correction of Military Records acts on behalf of the Secretary of the Army in correcting Army records. This statute does not provide the Board with authority to correct a determination reserved under law to the Secretary of Defense.
10. Army Regulation 135-155 (Promotion of Commissioned Officers and Warrant Officers, Other Than General Officers) prescribes policy and procedures used in the selection and promotion of commissioned officers of the ARNG of the United States and commissioned and warrant officers of the U.S. Army Reserve. Table 2-1 (Time in Grade Requirements for Commissioned Officers, Other Than Commissioned Warrant Officers) of this regulation outlines the service requirements for promotion and indicates that for promotion to CPT the minimum years in the lower grade is 2 years and the maximum years in the lower grade is 5 years.
11. Army Regulation 135-155 also specifies that the unit commander will initiate position vacancy promotion procedures and forward a memorandum listing all unit officers eligible for promotion consideration. The memorandum will include the following information: rank of position, branch, area of concentration, position title, unit, Unit Identification Code, location of unit, table of organization and equipment/table of distribution and allowances number, PARA (paragraph)/LINE number, and date of position vacancy.
12. National Guard Regulation 600-100 (Commissioned Officers - Federal Recognition and Related Personnel Actions) provides procedures for processing all applications for Federal recognition of ARNG commissioned officers. Chapter 8 provides for promotions. It indicates that unit vacancy promotions of qualified officers are based on the recommendations of the member's immediate commander, properly endorsed by all commanders concerned and the Adjutant General. It also provides procedures for processing all applications for Federal recognition by the NGB.
13. Title 10, U.S. Code, section 14308(f) states that the effective date of a promotion of a Reserve commissioned officer in the Army who is extended Federal recognition in the next higher grade in the ARNG shall be the date in which such Federal recognition in that grade is so extended.
DISCUSSION AND CONCLUSIONS:
1. The applicant's contention that his promotion effective date and DOR to CPT should be adjusted from 3 July 2013 to either February or April 2013 was carefully considered. However, there is insufficient evidence to support this request.
2. The applicant's DOR to 1LT is 22 October 2010. The earliest he would have qualified for consideration for promotion would have been 22 October 2012. By regulation, an officer must meet all promotion requirements and a promotion packet containing all required documents must be forwarded to the Chief, NGB. The effective date of a promotion will be the date Federal recognition in the higher grade is extended.
3. The evidence of record shows he was extended Federal Recognition on
3 July 2013. Based on a review of the documents presented and the material provided, there is no evidence of error or injustice for his promotion date to CPT. Therefore, no effective relief can be granted.
BOARD VOTE:
________ ________ ________ GRANT FULL RELIEF
________ ________ ________ GRANT PARTIAL RELIEF
________ ________ ________ GRANT FORMAL HEARING
____x___ ___x_____ ___x___ DENY APPLICATION
BOARD DETERMINATION/RECOMMENDATION:
The evidence presented does not demonstrate the existence of a probable error or injustice. Therefore, the Board determined that the overall merits of this case are insufficient as a basis for correction of the records of the individual concerned.
_______ _ _x______ ___
CHAIRPERSON
I certify that herein is recorded the true and complete record of the proceedings of the Army Board for Correction of Military Records in this case.
ABCMR Record of Proceedings (cont) AR20130017222
3
ARMY BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS
RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS
1
ABCMR Record of Proceedings (cont) AR20130017222
2
ARMY BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS
RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS
1
ARMY | BCMR | CY2012 | 20120001273
Based on the required completion of 5 years TIG, his promotion eligibility for CPT by a mandatory promotion board is 13 March 2013. The regulation states ARNG officers will be considered for promotion by mandatory promotion boards, and promotion to CPT required completion of 5 years of maximum TIG as a first lieutenant. The evidence of record shows the applicant was appointed in the MDARNG as a 1LT effective 13 March 2009 with an adjusted DOR of 13 March 2008.
ARMY | BCMR | CY2013 | 20130021056
The applicant states: a. Later that year, while he was deployed, he received an email from an Army Medical Department (AMEDD) officer stating he was still branched in MS. c. He submitted another branch transfer packet and again he received orders from the MDARNG saying his transfer was complete and he was awarded AOC 13A. In October 2013, the MDARNG appointed the applicant as an FA officer and he received Federal recognition as an FA officer effective 8 October 2013.
ARMY | BCMR | CY2013 | 20130008984
He was promoted to first lieutenant/O-2 with an effective date and a DOR of 10 August 2004. Title 10, U.S. Code, section 14502(e)(2) provides that an officer who is promoted to the next higher grade as the result of the recommendation of an SSB convened under this section shall, upon such promotion, have the same date of rank, the same effective date for the pay and allowances of that grade, and the same position on the RASL as the officer would have had if the officer had been recommended...
ARMY | BCMR | CY2014 | 20140010152
On 20 August 2004, the CAARNG published State Orders 233-1101 appointing him in the ARNG in the rank of CPT as an SP officer, effective 18 August 2004. Discussion: [Applicant] believes he should have received a promotion date effective 2 February 2009 because of the 4-year delay in correcting and processing his DA Form 5074-1-R for creditable service in a required grade. As a result, the Board recommends that all Army National Guard and Department of the Army records of the individual...
ARMY | BCMR | CY2014 | 20140013547
The applicant's records contain an NGB Form 62E (Application for Federal Recognition as an ARNG Officer or Warrant Officer and Appointment as a Reserve Commissioned Officer or Warrant Officer of the Army in the ARNG of the United States), dated 27 February 2010, which shows she requested Federal recognition and appointment in the ARNG as a 1LT Judge Advocate (JA). (5) On 5 May 2014, the applicant received a corrected date for Federal recognition to 1LT effective 1 October 2010. c. The...
ARMY | BCMR | CY2014 | 20140017585
The applicant provides: * reassignment orders, dated 12 July 2013 * screenshot of DA Board Results * statement from a Chief Warrant Four, Arkansas Army National Guard (ARARNG) * Headquarters, 142d Field Artillery Brigade, ARARNG, memorandum, dated 6 January 2014, subject: Recommendation for Promotion of Officer (First Lieutenant (1LT) (Applicant)) * NGB Form 89 (Proceedings of a Federal Recognition Examining Board) * ARARNG Orders 042-828, dated 11 February 2014 * ARARNG Orders 254-821,...
ARMY | BCMR | CY2013 | 20130013480
The applicant requests his Federal Recognition (FEDREC) date and date of rank (DOR) to captain (CPT) (pay grade O-3) be corrected to 13 September 2012. The applicant provides copies of: * California Army National Guard (CAARNG) Orders 97-1045 showing he was transferred to a Plans Officer position in the 40th Brigade Support Battalion (BSB) * CAARNG Orders 103-1060 showing he was ordered to Active Guard Reserve Duty as a Plans Officer effective 15 April 2012 * CAARNG Orders 258-1013 showing...
ARMY | BCMR | CY2013 | 20130007974
The NGB and state recommend the applicant receive partial administrative relief in that her effective date of promotion and DOR be adjusted to 9 January 2013, the date the Secretary of Defense approved the scroll. Title 10, U.S. Code, section 14308(f) states that the effective date of a promotion of a Reserve commissioned officer in the Army who is extended Federal recognition in the next higher grade in the ARNG shall be the date in which such Federal recognition in that grade is so...
ARMY | BCMR | CY2014 | 20140020955
His packet was submitted in July 2012 with the New Mexico State Recognition Board results, dated 20 July 2012, and State Orders for promotion, dated 26 July 2012. The applicant provides copies of the following: * National Guard Bureau (NGB) Form 89 (Proceedings of a Federal Recognition Examining Board (FREB)) * Orders Number 208-004 * FY 2013 DA Reserve Component Board Schedule * Special Orders (SO) Number 137 AR * two emails * Suspense for Submission of Applications for the Federal...
ARMY | BCMR | CY2013 | 20130005257
The applicant requests: * correction of his date of rank (DOR) to chief warrant officer two (CW2) from 19 February 2013 to 10 November 2012 and his time in grade (TIG) * compensation for the wages he lost as a result of his delayed promotion 2. However, given the fact that the State published the promotion order on 21 November 2012 and the fact that delays in his packet being processed both at the State level and at NGB were no fault of the applicant, and now based on Public Law 112-239, as...