Search Decisions

Decision Text

ARMY | BCMR | CY2013 | 20130013480
Original file (20130013480.txt) Auto-classification: Approved

		IN THE CASE OF:

		BOARD DATE:    27 August 2013

		DOCKET NUMBER:  AR20130013480 


THE BOARD CONSIDERED THE FOLLOWING EVIDENCE:

1.  Application for correction of military records (with supporting documents provided, if any).

2.  Military Personnel Records and advisory opinions (if any).


THE APPLICANT'S REQUEST, STATEMENT, AND EVIDENCE:

1.  The applicant requests his Federal Recognition (FEDREC) date and date of rank (DOR) to captain (CPT) (pay grade O-3) be corrected to 13 September 2012.
 
2.  The applicant states that his promotion packet appeared before the September 2012 State FEDREC Board and was forwarded electronically to the National Guard Bureau (NGB) shortly thereafter.  His State's promotion orders show an effective date of 13 September 2012.  Per National Guard Regulation (NGR) 600-100 (Commissioned Officers – Federal Recognition and Related Personnel Actions) paragraph 8-1, the promotion of officers is a function of the State.  The paragraph and line number he was assigned to is an O-3 position and he was assigned to that position and a subsequent command position from 15 April 2012 onward.

3.  The applicant provides copies of:

* California Army National Guard (CAARNG) Orders 97-1045 showing he was transferred to a Plans Officer position in the 40th Brigade Support Battalion (BSB)
* CAARNG Orders 103-1060 showing he was ordered to Active Guard Reserve Duty as a Plans Officer effective 15 April 2012
* CAARNG Orders 258-1013 showing he was promoted to CPT effective 
13 September 2012 in paragraph 103, line number 02 
* manning document for 40th BSB
* NGB letter showing he was promoted to CPT in the Reserve of the Army and Army National Guard with a DOR and effective date of 8 March 2013
* Departments of the Army and the Air Force, NGB Orders Number 74 AR showing he was granted FEDREC as a CPT effective 8 March 2013
* CAARNG Orders 84-1284 showing he was transferred to the company commander position effective 2 February 2013
* page 23, NGR 600-100
* Army Board for Correction of Military Records (ABCMR) Record of Proceedings Docket Number AR20080000573, dated 29 April 2008

CONSIDERATION OF EVIDENCE:

1.  The applicant is currently serving as a CPT in the CAARNG.

2.  His records show he accepted the oath of office as a Reserve Commissioned Officer in the CAARNG as a second lieutenant on 13 June 2008.

3.  He was promoted to first lieutenant with an effective date of 13 December 2009.

4.  He completed the Adjutant General Captains Career Course on 13 April 2012.

5.  CAARNG orders show he was transferred to a CPT Plans Officer position effective 15 April 2012.

6.  He was promoted to CPT with an effective date and DOR of 13 September 2012.  Federal recognition of the promotion was granted on 8 March 2013.

7.  NGR 600-100, paragraph 8-7 - Eligibility for Promotion states, in part, that to be considered for Federal Recognition and subsequent Reserve of the Army promotion following State promotion to fill a unit vacancy, an ARNG commissioned officer must:

	a.  have a minimum of 2 years promotion service in the lower grade. 

	b.  complete any officer basic course (OBC) equivalent course listed in appendix E of that regulation.

	c.  have been assigned and served creditably for at least 1 year in a position for which the grade of CPT is authorized. 

8.  Title 10, U.S. Code, section 14038, paragraph (f), states the effective date of a promotion of a Reserve commissioned officer of the Army who is extended Federal recognition in the next higher grade in the ARNG under section 307 or 310 of Title 32 shall be the date on which such Federal recognition in that grade is so extended.  In addition, the Reserve Officer Personnel Management Act, section 1-2, provides that the effective date of promotion and DOR for an officer who is promoted under the position vacancy system will be the date the Chief, NGB, extends Federal recognition.

9.  Title 10, U.S. Code, section 12203, provides that appointments of Reserve officers in the grades of lieutenant colonel and below shall be made by the President.  This authority has been delegated to the Secretary of Defense via Executive Order 13384, section 1, dated 27 July 2005.

10.  Per Title 10, U.S. Code, section 1552, the ABCMR acts on behalf of the Secretary of the Army in correcting Army records.  This statute does not provide the Board with authority to correct a determination reserved under law for the Secretary of Defense.

DISCUSSION AND CONCLUSIONS:

1.  The applicant was promoted by the CAARNG to CPT effective 13 September 2012, but he was not granted FEDREC until 8 March 2013.  

2.  The available evidence indicates the applicant was fully eligible for promotion  and it was the intention of the CAARNG to promote the applicant to CPT effective 13 September 2012.  There is no available evidence showing the applicant caused the delay in the granting of the FEDREC.  As such, it would be appropriate to adjust his date of rank as a CPT to 12 September 2012.

3.  Title 10, U.S. Code, section 1552, the statutory authority for the ABCMR, gives the Board broad authority to correct Army records to remove errors or to remedy an injustice; however, the authority granted by this statute is not unlimited.

4.  The ABCMR may only correct Army records.  The Board has no authority to correct records created by the other services or the Department of Defense.

5.  Any correction by the ABCMR must comport with other laws.  The Board may not ignore a requirement contained in or an outcome dictated by another statute.  Typically, the ABCMR achieves this by changing an operative fact in the record, thereby making a correction in compliance with that statute.  Where officer personnel issues are involved that require approval by the Secretary of Defense, the Board's hands are often tied.

6.  Consequently, based on the authorities cited above, any correction to the applicant's effective DOR would effectively amend the Secretary of Defense's action and goes beyond the authority of this Board.

7.  However, when a valid appointment has been accomplished, the Board may take action to grant an officer an earlier DOR if warranted by the facts in the case.  Based upon this guidance, and as a matter of equity, it would be appropriate to grant the applicant partial relief by amending his DOR to CPT to 13 September 2012.  His effective date of promotion to CPT should remain 8 March 2013.

BOARD VOTE:

________  ________  ________  GRANT FULL RELIEF 

___X___  ___X____  ___X____  GRANT PARTIAL RELIEF 

________  ________  ________  GRANT FORMAL HEARING

________  ________  ________  DENY APPLICATION

BOARD DETERMINATION/RECOMMENDATION:

1.  The Board determined the evidence presented is sufficient to warrant a recommendation for partial relief.  As a result, the Board recommends that all Department of the Army and State ARNG records of the individual concerned be corrected by amending the applicant's DOR to CPT to read 12 September 2012.  

2.  The Board further determined the evidence presented is insufficient to warrant a portion of the requested relief.  As a result, the Board recommends denial of so much of the application that pertains to changing his promotion effective date.



      _______ _   X_____   ___
               CHAIRPERSON
      
I certify that herein is recorded the true and complete record of the proceedings of the Army Board for Correction of Military Records in this case.

ABCMR Record of Proceedings (cont)                                         AR20100013074



3


ARMY BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS

 RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS


1

ABCMR Record of Proceedings (cont)                                         AR20130013480



2


ARMY BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS

 RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS


1

Similar Decisions

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2013 | 20130011721

    Original file (20130011721.txt) Auto-classification: Approved

    He provided copies of the following: * Orders Number 170-1013, issued by the CAARNG, dated 18 June 2014, promoting him to CPT effective 14 June 2012 * email correspondence between himself and a staff member of the CAARNG, dated 23 and 24 July 2012, which pertained to the status of his promotion packet * An OPM update, dated 24 July 2012, which advised him to apply to the ABCMR for an adjustment of his DOR of CPT * Special Orders Number 367 AR, issued by the NGB, dated 19 October 2012,...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2014 | 20140012048

    Original file (20140012048.txt) Auto-classification: Approved

    Officers who are Federally recognized in a particular grade and branch shall be tendered an appointment in the same grade as Reserve commissioned officers of the Army with assignment to the ARNG of the United States if they have not already accepted such appointment. d. Paragraph 10-15b states temporary FEDREC may be granted by an Federal Recognition Board (FREB) to those eligible when the board finds that the member has successfully passed the examination prescribed herein, has subscribed...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2014 | 20140004818

    Original file (20140004818.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    The Board also determined he should be entitled to relief but stated the Board only had the authority to change the DOR and did not have the authority to change the effective DOR as that may amend the Secretary of Defense's action. In that case, the applicant's promotion to CPT as an ARNG JA was also delayed due to an administrative error regarding the submission of his Federal recognition paperwork and he was also deployed during the time of the injustice. The Board concluded "Based on...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2013 | 20130021087

    Original file (20130021087.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    The applicant states her DOR for CPT and MAJ should reflect the date the California Army National Guard (CAARNG) state promotion orders were effective and not the later date the Federal recognition orders were issued because officer promotions are a state function. (1) Army Regulation 135-155 (Promotion of Commissioned Officers and Warrant Officers Other than General Officers), paragraph 4-21b(2) states, "Unit officers selected by a mandatory board will have a promotion date and effective...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2014 | 20140013213

    Original file (20140013213.txt) Auto-classification: Approved

    The applicant requests, in effect, adjustment of her date of rank (DOR) to captain (CPT) to an earlier DOR the Army Board for Correction of Military Records (ABCMR) considers to be reasonable and fair. The Reserve Officer Promotion Act states, "The effective date of promotion and date of rank of an officer who is promoted under the position vacancy system is the date the Chief, NGB, extends Federal recognition. The applicant contends her DOR for promotion to CPT in the CAARNG should be...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2014 | 20140002710

    Original file (20140002710.txt) Auto-classification: Approved

    (3) on 17 July 2007, the applicant was recommended for promotion by the Commander of the PAARNG. The Reserve Officer Promotion Act states, "The effective date of promotion and date of rank of an officer promoted under the vacancy system is the date the Chief, National Guard Bureau extends Federal recognition. The applicant contends his DOR for promotion to CPT should be adjusted from 29 November 2007 to 17 August 2006, when he first became eligible for promotion to CPT.

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2013 | 20130015535

    Original file (20130015535.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    The applicant states the Pennsylvania Army National Guard (PAARNG) failed to advise him that college transcripts were required as part of the Unit Vacancy Promotion (UVP) packet. The applicant contends that his records should be corrected to show he was promoted to CPT (O-3) effective and with a DOR of 17 May 2012 because the PAARNG failed to advise him that college transcripts were required as part of the UVP packet. Records show the applicant was properly promoted and granted FEDREC of...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2011 | 20110023170

    Original file (20110023170.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    However, the FY11 NDAA does not stipulate the DOR for WO promotions nor does it state that the effective date cannot be the WO's date of eligibility for promotion. b. NGB, Arlington, VA, memorandum (corrected copy), dated 26 July 2011, subject: Guidance Concerning Applications for the FEDREC of WOs (ARNG-HRH Policy Memorandum #11-015), that provides guidance to reduce processing time for applications for the federal recognition of ARNG WO initial appointments and appointments to a higher...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2012 | 20120019865

    Original file (20120019865.txt) Auto-classification: Approved

    The applicant was promoted by the ALARNG to the rank of CPT on 27 June 2011. Title 10, USC, section 14308(f) (Effective date of promotion after FEDREC), states the effective date of a promotion of a Reserve commissioned officer of the Army or the Air Force who is extended FEDREC in the next higher grade in the ARNG or the Air National Guard under section 307 or 310 of Title 32 shall be the date on which such FEDREC in that grade is so extended. This statute does not provide the Board with...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2012 | 20120009988

    Original file (20120009988.txt) Auto-classification: Approved

    The applicant's correction of his DOR to CPT was delayed as a result of his initial FEDREC for 1LT never being processed. Once this action was corrected and FEDREC was granted for his 1LT promotion, the applicant's packet was resubmitted to NGB FEDREC Branch with an order being published on 20 December 2011 granting him a DOR to CPT of 19 December 2011. c. Considering the error was no fault of the applicant, he should receive full administrative relief and be awarded all pay and benefits...