Search Decisions

Decision Text

ARMY | BCMR | CY2013 | 20130017035
Original file (20130017035.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

	

		BOARD DATE:	  17 June 2014

		DOCKET NUMBER:  AR20130017035 


THE BOARD CONSIDERED THE FOLLOWING EVIDENCE:

1.  Application for correction of military records (with supporting documents provided, if any).

2.  Military Personnel Records and advisory opinions (if any).


THE APPLICANT'S REQUEST, STATEMENT, AND EVIDENCE:

1.  The applicant requests that the entry in item 19 (Nearest Relative) on his    DD Form 214 (Certificate of Release or Discharge from Active Duty) for the period ending 30 May 2007 (hereafter referred to as his DD Form 214) be changed. 

2.  The applicant states he remarried and his current wife should be shown in item 19.

3.  The applicant provides his DD Form 214 and marriage license.

CONSIDERATION OF EVIDENCE:

1.  Title 10, U.S. Code, section 1552(b), provides that applications for correction of military records must be filed within 3 years after discovery of the alleged error or injustice.  This provision of law also allows the Army Board for Correction of Military Records (ABCMR) to excuse an applicant's failure to timely file within the 3-year statute of limitations if the ABCMR determines it would be in the interest of justice to do so.  While it appears the applicant did not file within the time frame provided in the statute of limitations, the ABCMR has elected to conduct a substantive review of this case and, only to the extent relief, if any, is granted, has determined it is in the interest of justice to excuse the applicant's failure to timely file.  In all other respects, there are insufficient bases to waive the statute of limitations for timely filing.

2.  The applicant, a U.S. Army Reserve (USAR) Soldier at the time, served on active duty in support of Operation Enduring Freedom during the period 1 June 2005 through 30 May 2007.    

3.  He provides a marriage license showing he married Y----- B--- on 2 December 2007.

4.  Army Regulation 635-5 (Separation Documents), in effect at the time, prescribed the separation documents that were to be prepared for Soldiers on retirement, discharge, release from active duty service, or control of the Active Army.  It established standardized policy for preparing and distributing the DD Form 214.  It stated the entry in item 19b would be provided by the Soldier.  The Soldier was to be advised that the name and address of a relative should be someone who would know their location and address at all times.

DISCUSSION AND CONCLUSIONS:

1.  By regulation a Soldier provides the name and address for entry in item 19b at the time of the preparation of the DD Form 214.

2.  A DD Form 214 is to reflect information correct at the time of separation from active duty.  He married Y----- B--- after his release from active duty and the preparation of the DD Form 214.  Therefore, there is no basis for changing the entry in item 19b of his DD Form 214 at this time.

3.  In addition, the purpose of this entry on the DD Form 214 is in case the Army has a need to contact the member in the short term.  It was never intended to be continuously updated with new contact information.

BOARD VOTE:

________  ________  ________  GRANT FULL RELIEF 

________  ________  ________  GRANT PARTIAL RELIEF 

________  ________  ________  GRANT FORMAL HEARING

__X______  __X_____  __X_  DENY APPLICATION


BOARD DETERMINATION/RECOMMENDATION:

The evidence presented does not demonstrate the existence of a probable error or injustice.  Therefore, the Board determined that the overall merits of this case are insufficient as a basis for correction of the records of the individual concerned.




      _______ _  X _______   ___
               CHAIRPERSON
      
I certify that herein is recorded the true and complete record of the proceedings of the Army Board for Correction of Military Records in this case.

ABCMR Record of Proceedings (cont)                                         AR20130017035



3


ARMY BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS

 RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS


1

ABCMR Record of Proceedings (cont)                                         AR20130017035



2


ARMY BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS

 RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS


1

Similar Decisions

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2013 | 20130021668

    Original file (20130021668.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    The applicant requests correction of his DD Form 214 (Certificate of Release or Discharge from Active Duty) in item 19b (Nearest Relative) to show the name and address of his current spouse vice that of his former spouse. The evidence of record shows the applicant was married to his former spouse, Ms. YDT, at the time he was discharged and issued a DD Form 214. _______ _ X_______ ___ CHAIRPERSON I certify that herein is recorded the true and complete record of the proceedings of the Army...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2013 | 20130021668

    Original file (20130021668 .txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    The applicant requests correction of his DD Form 214 (Certificate of Release or Discharge from Active Duty) in item 19b (Nearest Relative) to show the name and address of his current spouse vice that of his former spouse. The evidence of record shows the applicant was married to his former spouse, Ms. YDT, at the time he was discharged and issued a DD Form 214. _______ _ X_______ ___ CHAIRPERSON I certify that herein is recorded the true and complete record of the proceedings of the Army...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2010 | 20100021390

    Original file (20100021390.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    The applicant requests, in effect, correction of his DD form 214 (Certificate of Release or Discharge from Active Duty) to change items 19a (Mailing Address After Separation) and 19b (Nearest Relative) from his former spouse to his current spouse. He provided a copy of his DD Form 214 that shows in item 19a the same address as listed on his DD Form 93. The evidence of record, which he provided along with his application, shows he was married to B------ R. W---- at the time of his separation.

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2009 | 20090005310

    Original file (20090005310.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    Application for correction of military records (with supporting documents provided, if any). The applicant requests, in effect, that item 19a (Mailing Address after Separation) and item 19b (Nearest Relative) of his DD Form 214 (Certificate of Release or Discharge from Active Duty) be corrected. The address and nearest relative listed in items 19a and 19b of the applicant's DD Form 214 would have been provided by him at the time it was prepared and he authenticated the DD Form 214 with his...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2008 | 20080002110

    Original file (20080002110.txt) Auto-classification: Approved

    IN THE CASE OF: BOARD DATE: 26 June 2008 DOCKET NUMBER: AR20080002110 THE BOARD CONSIDERED THE FOLLOWING EVIDENCE: 1. The applicant requests that item 19a (Mailing Address after Separation) on his DD Form 214 (Certificate of Release or Discharge from Active Duty) be corrected to show an address in Milroy, IN. The applicant was not available to sign his DD Form 214, and it is possible the office that prepared his DD Form 214 was not aware that he was married or that his spouse resided in...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2013 | 20130011489

    Original file (20130011489.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    The applicant requests items 19a (Mailing Address After Separation) and 19b (Nearest Relative) of his DD Form 214 (Certificate of Release or Discharge from Active Duty) for the period ending 18 September 1997 be corrected to show his current address and spouse. The DD Form 214 is a snapshot in time and is a reflection of the applicant's record of active Army service at the time of his REFRAD. However, it appears his address and nearest relative changed after he was REFRAD; therefore, there...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2013 | 20130007346

    Original file (20130007346.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    The applicant would have been the one to provide this name and address on his DD Form 214. _________X________________ CHAIRPERSON I certify that herein is recorded the true and complete record of the proceedings of the Army Board for Correction of Military Records in this case. ABCMR Record of Proceedings (cont) AR20130007346 3 ARMY BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS 1 ABCMR Record of Proceedings (cont) AR20130007346 2 ARMY BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2011 | 20110003959

    Original file (20110003959.txt) Auto-classification: Approved

    The applicant requests his DD Form 214 (Certificate of Release or Discharge from Active Duty) be corrected to show in: * Item 12d (Total Prior Active Service) - unspecified, requires calculation * Item 12e (Total Prior Inactive Service) - unspecified, requires calculation * Item 13 (Decorations, Medals, Badges, Citations and Campaign Ribbons Awarded or Authorized) - Army Reserve Components Achievement Medal (ARCAM) (2nd Award) * Item 18 ( Remarks) - Change Mechanic Clasp to Wheeled Vehicle...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2013 | 20130001110

    Original file (20130001110.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    The applicant's military personnel records do not contain a DD Form 458 (Charge Sheet), separation packet, or his originally-issued DD Form 214 pertaining to his discharge on 2 February 1996. The applicant's reissued DD Form 214 erroneously shows he entered active duty on 21 November 1981 and he was discharged on 2 February 1996 under the provisions of Army Regulation 635-200 (Personnel Separations – Enlisted Personnel), chapter 10, in lieu of trial by court-martial with an under honorable...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2010 | 20100029724

    Original file (20100029724.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    Application for correction of military records (with supporting documents provided, if any). The applicant requests correction of his DD form 214 (Certificate of Release or Discharge from Active Duty) to change item 19a (Mailing Address After Separation) to read xxxx D- V---i Blvd., Decatur, GA 300345 and item 19b (Nearest Relative) to show his current spouse, E---l R. H----y. Therefore, the Board determined that the overall merits of this case are insufficient as a basis for correction of...