Search Decisions

Decision Text

ARMY | BCMR | CY2013 | 20130016079
Original file (20130016079.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

		IN THE CASE OF:	   

		BOARD DATE:	  23 April 2014

		DOCKET NUMBER:  AR20130016079 


THE BOARD CONSIDERED THE FOLLOWING EVIDENCE:

1.  Application for correction of military records (with supporting documents provided, if any).

2.  Military Personnel Records and advisory opinions (if any).


THE APPLICANT'S REQUEST, STATEMENT, AND EVIDENCE:

1.  The applicant requests correction of his DD Form 214 (Report of Separation from Active Duty) to show he received a General Educational Development (GED).

2.  The applicant states he received a GED through the University of Maryland when he was in Hohenfels, Germany, in 1977.  He states his DD Form 214 shows he finished 11 years of school.

3.  The applicant provides a copy of his DD Form 214.

CONSIDERATION OF EVIDENCE:

1.  Title 10, U.S. Code, section 1552(b), provides that applications for correction of military records must be filed within 3 years after discovery of the alleged error or injustice.  This provision of law also allows the Army Board for Correction of Military Records (ABCMR) to excuse an applicant's failure to timely file within the 3-year statute of limitations if the ABCMR determines it would be in the interest of justice to do so.  While it appears the applicant did not file within the time frame provided in the statute of limitations, the ABCMR has elected to conduct a substantive review of this case and, only to the extent relief, if any, is granted, has determined it is in the interest of justice to excuse the applicant's failure to timely file.  In all other respects, there are insufficient bases to waive the statute of limitations for timely filing.

2.  The applicant enlisted in the U.S. Army Reserve (USAR) on 5 November 1976, in pay grade E-1.  His DD Form 1966/2 (Record of Military Processing – Armed Forces of the United States) shows he was not a high school graduate at the time of his enlistment.  He enlisted in the Regular Army on 9 November 1976.

3.  The applicant completed training as a tactical wire operations specialist.  He arrived in Germany on 14 March 1977.  He was assigned to C Battery, 3rd Battalion, 60th Air Defense Artillery.  He was promoted through the ranks to pay grade E-3.

4.  On 19 January 1979, the applicant departed Germany en-route to the United States.  He was discharged under honorable conditions on 22 January 1979.  

5.  Item 20 (Highest Education Level Successfully Completed (In Years)) on his DD Form 214 is marked "11."

6.  Item 42 (Education Level) "Civilian and Code" on the applicant's DA Form 2 (Personnel Qualification Record – Part I) shows he had 3 years of high school.

7.  Item 17 (Civilian Education and Military Schools) on his DA Form 2-1 (Personnel Qualification Record – Part II) does not show he completed a GED course.

8.  A review of the applicant's Army Military Human Resource Record (AMHRR) fails to reveal that he ever received a GED while he was in the Army.

9.  Army Regulation 635-5 (Personnel Separation – Separation Documents) is the authority for the preparation of the DD Form 214.  The regulation in effect at that time provides that item 20 include education completed in military service as well as education completed prior to service.

DISCUSSION AND CONCLUSIONS:

1.  The applicant's contentions have been noted.

2.  There is insufficient evidence in his AMHRR, and the applicant has not provided sufficient evidence, showing that he received a GED while he was in the Army.  Therefore, it should not be shown that he did on his DD Form 214.

3.  In view of the foregoing, the applicant's request should be denied.




BOARD VOTE:

________  ________  ________  GRANT FULL RELIEF 

________  ________  ________  GRANT PARTIAL RELIEF 

________  ________  ________  GRANT FORMAL HEARING

___x____  ___x____  ___x____  DENY APPLICATION

BOARD DETERMINATION/RECOMMENDATION:

The evidence presented does not demonstrate the existence of a probable error or injustice.  Therefore, the Board determined that the overall merits of this case are insufficient as a basis for correction of the records of the individual concerned.




      _______ _   _x______   ___
               CHAIRPERSON
      
I certify that herein is recorded the true and complete record of the proceedings of the Army Board for Correction of Military Records in this case.

ABCMR Record of Proceedings (cont)                                         AR20130016079



3


ARMY BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS

 RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS


1

ABCMR Record of Proceedings (cont)                                         AR20130016079



2


ARMY BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS

 RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS


1

Similar Decisions

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2009 | 20090004306

    Original file (20090004306.txt) Auto-classification: Approved

    The applicant requests that item 12f (Foreign Service) and item 16 (High School Graduate or Equivalent) on his 1980 DD Form 214 (Certificate of Release or Discharge from Active Duty) be corrected to show he served 6 months in Germany and that he completed his General Education Diploma (GED). According to item 5 (Oversea Service) on his DA Form 2-1 (Personnel Qualification Record – Part II), the applicant, while assigned to Fort Hood, was sent to Germany with his unit in a temporary duty...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2014 | 20140012333

    Original file (20140012333 .txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    The applicant contends that his 28 April 1977 DD Form 214 should be corrected to show he received a high school diploma (in 1975) and two years of college credit (as of 1979), and also his service in Korea. There is no evidence of record and the applicant provides insufficient evidence to show he completed any additional civilian education prior to his discharge on 28 April 1977. c. Item 20 of his 28 April 1977 DD Form 214 shows he completed 11 years of high school and zero (0) years of...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2013 | 20130001467

    Original file (20130001467.txt) Auto-classification: Approved

    While it appears the applicant did not file within the time frame provided in the statute of limitations, the ABCMR has elected to conduct a substantive review of this case and, only to the extent relief, if any, is granted, has determined it is in the interest of justice to excuse the applicant's failure to timely file. His DD Form 214 shows in: a. item 13, the: * Meritorious Service Medal * Army Good Conduct Medal (2nd Award) * Senior Parachutist Badge * Army Commendation Medal (2nd...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2009 | 20090010925

    Original file (20090010925.txt) Auto-classification: Approved

    Application for correction of military records (with supporting documents provided, if any). The applicant requests, in effect, correction of his DD Form 214 (Report of Separation from Active Duty) to show his highest level of education/training, award of the Army Commendation Medal, and that he was promoted to specialist five (SP5)/pay grade E-5. Therefore, it would be appropriate to correct his DD Form 214 to show this award.

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2011 | 20110000822

    Original file (20110000822.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    A DD Form 4 (Enlistment/Reenlistment Document - Armed Forces of the United States), DA Form 3286 (Statements for Reenlistment), and AE Form 1385-R (Statement), show the applicant reenlisted in the RA for a period of 4 years on 10 October 1979. a. A Standard Form 180 (Request Pertaining to Military Records) and letter from the applicant show the applicant requested correction of his DD Form 214 to show his GED high school equivalency. The evidence of record shows the applicant completed a...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2005 | 20050004098C070206

    Original file (20050004098C070206.doc) Auto-classification: Approved

    The applicant requests correction of item 16 (High School Graduate or Equivalent) on his DD Form 214 (Certificate of Release or Discharge from Active Duty) and item 17 (Civilian Education and Military Schools) on his DA Form 2-1 (Personnel Qualification Record) to show he obtained his General Equivalency Diploma (GED). Item 17 on the applicant's DA Form 2-1 does not show that he obtained his GED. The Board determined that the evidence presented was sufficient to warrant a recommendation...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2014 | 20140019149

    Original file (20140019149 .txt) Auto-classification: Approved

    The applicant states that he obtained his General Educational Development (GED) while serving on active duty and item 16 of his DD Form 214 should be corrected to reflect "yes" instead of "no." The applicant's military record includes a DD Form 1966/2 (Record of Military Processing – Armed Forces of the United States) prepared during his enlistment processing. The DD Form 1966/2 prepared during the applicant's enlistment processing and the DA Form 2-1 completed upon his entry on active...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2014 | 20140002219

    Original file (20140002219.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    Application for correction of military records (with supporting documents provided, if any). The applicant requests correction of his DD Form 214 (Certificate of Release or Discharge from Active Duty) to show in: * Item 13 (Decorations, Medals, Badges, Citations and Campaign Ribbons Awarded or Authorized) the Army Good Conduct Medal * Item 14 (Military Education) the Law Enforcement Course was 16 weeks vice 8 weeks in duration and add the Military Police Investigator course 2. The...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2009 | 20090018237

    Original file (20090018237.txt) Auto-classification: Approved

    Application for correction of military records (with supporting documents provided, if any). The applicant requests, in effect, removal of lost time in item 29 (Dates of Time Lost During this Period) on her 1992 DD Form 214 (Certificate of Release or Discharge from Active Duty). When the applicant's 1992 DD Form 214 was issued, her 4 day period of AWOL (890917-890920) was recorded in item 29.

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2008 | 20080013457

    Original file (20080013457.txt) Auto-classification: Approved

    There is no indication in the applicant’s records that he was advanced beyond the rank/grade of PV2/E-2 during his active military service. Item 18 (Appointments and Reductions) of the applicant’s DA Form 2-1 shows the applicant’s ranks and dates of rank as follows: PVT/E-1, 9 May 1977; PV2/E-2, 10 November 1977; PVT/E-1, 7 March 1978; PV2/E-2, 1 March 1979; PVT/E-1, 28 September 1979; and PV2/E-2, 17 March 1980. Therefore, he is entitled to correction of his records to show he completed...