Search Decisions

Decision Text

ARMY | BCMR | CY2013 | 20130015789
Original file (20130015789.txt) Auto-classification: Approved

		IN THE CASE OF:	  

		BOARD DATE:	  1 May 2014

		DOCKET NUMBER:  AR20130015789 


THE BOARD CONSIDERED THE FOLLOWING EVIDENCE:

1.  Application for correction of military records (with supporting documents provided, if any).

2.  Military Personnel Records and advisory opinions (if any).


THE APPLICANT'S REQUEST, STATEMENT, AND EVIDENCE:

1.  The applicant requests correction of his DD Form 214 (Report of Separation from Active Duty) for the period ending 1 October 1975 to show his social security number (SSN) as 574-XX-XXXX.

2.  The applicant states his SSN is an obvious typographical error and he discovered it while considering entering the Department of Veterans Affairs (VA) benefit program.

3.  The applicant provides:

* DD Forms 214 for the periods ending 3 August 1974 and 1 October 1975
* Social Security Administration SSN Printout
* VA Form 21-4138 (Statement in Support of Claim), dated 22 August 2013

CONSIDERATION OF EVIDENCE:

1.  Title 10, U.S. Code, section 1552(b), provides that applications for correction of military records must be filed within 3 years after discovery of the alleged error or injustice.  This provision of law also allows the Army Board for Correction of Military Records (ABCMR) to excuse an applicant's failure to timely file within the 3-year statute of limitations if the ABCMR determines it would be in the interest of justice to do so.  While it appears the applicant did not file within the time frame provided in the statute of limitations, the ABCMR has elected to conduct a substantive review of this case and, only to the extent relief, if any, is granted, has determined it is in the interest of justice to excuse the applicant's failure to timely file.  In all other respects, there are insufficient bases to waive the statute of limitations for timely filing.

2.  The applicant entered active duty as a member of the Army National Guard on 6 December 1973 and he was honorably released from active duty on 3 August 1974.  His DD Form 214 for this period of service shows his SSN as 574-XX-XXXX.

3.  The applicant enlisted in the Regular Army on 7 January 1975.  He was honorably released from active duty on 1 October 1975.  He completed 8 months and 25 days of active service with no lost time.  His DD Form 214 for this period shows his SSN as 547-XX-XXXX.

4.  The applicant's military records include documents showing various SSN's.  However, his DD Form 398 (Statement of Personal History), DD Form 4 (Enlistment Contract – Armed Forces of the United States), DD Form 1584 (National Agency Check Request), DA Form 2-1 (Personnel Qualification Record – Part II), and previous DD Form 214 show his SSN as 574-XX-XXXX.

5.  The applicant provided a document from the Social Security Administration and his DD Form 214 for the period ending 3 August 1974 showing his SSN as 574-XX-XXXX.

6.  Army Regulation 635-5 (Separation Documents), in effect at the time of the applicant's separation, prescribed the separation documents that must be prepared for Soldiers on retirement, discharge, or release from active duty service or control of the Active Army.  It established standardized policy for preparing and distributing the DD Form 214.  The regulation stated the DA Form 2-1 and documents filed in the Military Personnel Records Jacket were the primary sources for information for entries on the DD Form 214.

DISCUSSION AND CONCLUSIONS:

1.  The evidence of record confirms the applicant entered active duty and served under the SSN 574-XX-XXXX.  As a result, the SSN entered on the applicant's DD Form 214 for the period ending 1 October 1975 appears to be a typographical error.

2.  In view of the foregoing, it would be appropriate at this time to correct his DD Form 214 for the period ending 1 October 1975 by replacing the current SSN with the SSN shown on his DD Form 4.


BOARD VOTE:

___x____  ___x____  ___x_____  GRANT FULL RELIEF 

________  ________  ________  GRANT PARTIAL RELIEF 

________  ________  ________  GRANT FORMAL HEARING

________  ________  ________  DENY APPLICATION

BOARD DETERMINATION/RECOMMENDATION:

The Board determined the evidence presented is sufficient to warrant a recommendation for relief.  As a result, the Board recommends that all Department of the Army records of the individual concerned be corrected by amending his DD Form 214 for the period ending 1 October 1975 by replacing the current SSN with the SSN shown on his DD Form 4.



      ___________x______________
               CHAIRPERSON
      
I certify that herein is recorded the true and complete record of the proceedings of the Army Board for Correction of Military Records in this case.

ABCMR Record of Proceedings (cont)                                         AR20130015789



3


ARMY BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS

 RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS


1

ABCMR Record of Proceedings (cont)                                         AR20130015789



2


ARMY BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS

 RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS


1

Similar Decisions

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2011 | 20110004253

    Original file (20110004253.txt) Auto-classification: Approved

    The applicant requests correction of the social security number (SSN) shown on his DD Form 214 (Report of Separation from Active Duty) for the period ending 14 May 1975. Item 3 (SSN) of his DD Form 214 shows his SSN as "XX7-XX-XXXX." Item 2 (SSN) of his DA Form 20 (Enlisted Qualification Record) and several documents in his military personnel records jacket show his SSN as "XX7-XX-XXXX."

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2011 | 20110002587

    Original file (20110002587.txt) Auto-classification: Approved

    The applicant requests correction of his DD Form 214 (Armed Forces of the United States Report of Transfer or Discharge) for the period ending 3 October 1969 to show his social security number (SSN) as "xx7-xx-xxxx" instead of "xx6-xx-xxxx." He provides his: * DD Forms 214 for the period ending 1 September 1966 and 3 October 1969 * Honorable Discharge Certificate, dated 24 August 1972 * Social security card CONSIDERATION OF EVIDENCE: 1. Therefore, he is entitled to correction of this DD...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2013 | 20130020253

    Original file (20130020253.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    His DA Form 20 (Enlisted Qualification Record) shows his SSN as "570-XX-XXXX." No documents in his records show he used the requested SSN during his military service. ___________x____________ CHAIRPERSON I certify that herein is recorded the true and complete record of the proceedings of the Army Board for Correction of Military Records in this case.

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2015 | 20150000725

    Original file (20150000725.txt) Auto-classification: Approved
  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2011 | 20110016182

    Original file (20110016182.txt) Auto-classification: Approved

    Application for correction of military records (with supporting documents provided, if any). A review of documents contained in the applicant's military personnel records show his SSN appears as both "352-XX-XXXX" and "357-XX-XXXX" on several documents dated throughout his tenure of service. Item 13 (Employment SSN) of the applicant's DD Form 398 (Statement of Personal History), dated 8 August 1967, shows his SSN as "352-XX-XXXX."

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2011 | 20110002670

    Original file (20110002670.txt) Auto-classification: Approved

    The applicant requests correction of item 3 (Social Security Number (SSN)) of his DD Form 214 (Armed Forces of the United States Report of Transfer or Discharge) to show "XX7-XX-XXXX" instead of "XX6-XX-XXXX." Item 3 of his DD Form 214 shows his SSN as "XX6-XX-XXXX." Although the evidence of record shows SSN "XX6-XX-XXXX" was used when he was inducted into the Army of the United States in 1969 and upon his release from active duty in 1971, his 1972 and 1975 USAR records show SSN "XX7-XX-XXXX."

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2013 | 20130006651

    Original file (20130006651.txt) Auto-classification: Approved

    The applicant requests correction of his DD Form 214 (Armed Forces of the United States Report of Transfer or Discharge) to show his social security number (SSN) as 257-XX-XXXX. The applicant states his SSN is incorrect on his DD Form 214; however, all other documents in his records reflect the correct SSN. As a result, the Board recommends that all Department of the Army records of the individual concerned be corrected by deleting the current entry from item 3 of his DD Form 214 and...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2012 | 20120022848

    Original file (20120022848.txt) Auto-classification: Approved

    The applicant requests correction of his DD Form 214 (Report of Separation from Active Duty), ending on 30 July 1974, to show his social security number (SSN) as "xx7-xx-xxxx" instead of "xx9-xx-xxxx." His DD Form 47 (Record of Induction) listed his service number; it did not list his SSN. He also completed a DD Form 398 in connection with this enlistment and listed his SSN with the numbers as "xx7-xx-xxxx."

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2011 | 20110009749

    Original file (20110009749.txt) Auto-classification: Approved

    The applicant requests correction of his DD Form 214 (Armed Forces of the United States Report of Transfer or Discharge) to show his social security number (SSN) as "x71-xx-xxxx" instead of "x17-xx-xxxx." Item 13 (Employment SSN) of the applicant's DD Form 398 (Statement of Personal History), dated 3 October 1968, shows his SSN as “x71-xx-xxxx.” The document contains his signature. The DD Form 214 he was issued at the time shows his SSN as “x17-xx-xxxx.” 7.

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2011 | 20110007843

    Original file (20110007843.txt) Auto-classification: Approved

    A review of the applicant's OMPF shows the SSN he claims is correct is shown on the following documents: * DD Form 398 (Statement of Personal History), dated 14 May 1974 * DA Form 873 (Certificate of Clearance and/or Security Determination), dated 1 August 1974 * DA Form 428 (Application for Identification Card), dated 20 November 1974. Item 3 (SSN) of the DD Form 214 he was issued at the time shows the TIN he was assigned at the time of his enlistment. As a result, the Board recommends...