Search Decisions

Decision Text

ARMY | BCMR | CY2013 | 20130015641
Original file (20130015641.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

		IN THE CASE OF:	  

		BOARD DATE:	  15 May 2014

		DOCKET NUMBER:  AR20130015641 


THE BOARD CONSIDERED THE FOLLOWING EVIDENCE:

1.  Application for correction of military records (with supporting documents provided, if any).

2.  Military Personnel Records and advisory opinions (if any).


THE APPLICANT'S REQUEST, STATEMENT, AND EVIDENCE:

1.  The applicant requests a change in his reentry eligibility (RE) code to 1 and a change to his narrative reason for separation.

2.  The applicant states he was discharged for a driving while intoxicated (DWI) charge which was dismissed in civilian court.
 
3.  His application indicates he provided a Cumberland Country Magistrate disposition paper; however, this document is not available.  He provides a letter, dated 16 August 2013, from a Member of Congress.

CONSIDERATION OF EVIDENCE:

1.  The applicant enlisted in the Regular Army on 3 January 2003 for a period of 4 years.  He completed his training and was awarded military occupational specialty 92R (parachute rigger).  He remained on active duty through continuous reenlistments.  He was promoted to staff sergeant on 1 August 2009.    

2.  On 16 June 2012, he was arrested for DWI in Fayetteville, NC.

3.  On 4 September 2012, he was notified of his pending separation under the provisions of Army Regulation 635-200 (Personnel Separations – Enlisted Personnel), chapter 14, paragraph 14-12c, for misconduct - commission of a serious offense.  His unit commander cited his arrest for DWI.

4.  On 23 October 2012, he consulted with counsel and waived consideration of his case by an administrative separation board contingent upon receiving an honorable discharge.

5.  A separation board convened on 21 December 2012 and found the applicant committed the offense of DWI.  The board recommended he be separated from the Army with an honorable discharge.  On 24 January 2013, the separation authority approved the findings and recommendation of the administrative separation board and directed the issuance of an honorable discharge.

6.  On 2 April 2013, the applicant was discharged under the provisions of Army Regulation 635-200, paragraph 14-12c, with an honorable discharge by reason of misconduct.  He completed 10 years and 3 months of creditable active service.  

7.  His DD Form 214 shows:

* item 25 (Separation Authority) – Army Regulation 635-200, paragraph 14-12c
* item 26 (Separation Code) – JKQ
* item 27 (Reentry Code) – 3
* item 28 (Narrative Reason for Separation) – Misconduct (Serious Offense)

8.  Army Regulation 635-200 sets forth the basic authority for the separation of enlisted personnel.  Chapter 14 establishes policy and prescribes procedures for separating members for misconduct.  Specific categories include minor disciplinary infractions, a pattern of misconduct, commission of a serious offense, and convictions by civil authorities.  Action will be taken to separate a member for misconduct when it is clearly established that rehabilitation is impracticable or is unlikely to succeed.  A discharge under other than honorable conditions is normally appropriate for a Soldier discharged under this chapter.

9.  Army Regulation 635-200 states individuals will be assigned RE codes based on their service records or the reason for discharge prior to discharge or release from active duty.

10.  Army Regulation 601-210 (Active and Reserve Components Enlistment Program) covers eligibility criteria, policies, and procedures for enlistment and processing into the Regular Army, U.S. Army Reserve, and Army National Guard.  Table 3-1 includes a list of RE codes.

	a.  RE-1 applies to persons completing an initial term of active service who were fully qualified when last separated.

	b.  RE-3 applies persons who are not considered fully qualified for reentry or continuous service at the time of separation but disqualification is waivable.

11.  Army Regulation 635-5-1 (Separation Program Designator (SPD) Codes) prescribes the specific authorities (statutory or other directives), reasons for separating Soldiers from active duty, and the SPD codes to be entered on the DD Form 214.  SPD Code JKQ applies to Soldiers separated under the provisions of Army Regulation 635-200, paragraph 14-12c by reason of misconduct (serious offense).

12.  The SPD/RE Code Cross Reference Table, dated 15 June 2006, shows that Soldiers assigned an SPD code of JKQ will be assigned an RE code of 3.

DISCUSSION AND CONCLUSIONS:

The applicant's RE code and narrative reason for separation were administratively correct and in conformance with applicable regulations at the time of his separation.  Therefore, there is an insufficient evidentiary basis for granting the applicant's requested relief.

BOARD VOTE:

________  ________  ________  GRANT FULL RELIEF 

________  ________  ________  GRANT PARTIAL RELIEF 

________  ________  ________  GRANT FORMAL HEARING

____X____  ___X_____  ____X____  DENY APPLICATION

BOARD DETERMINATION/RECOMMENDATION:

The evidence presented does not demonstrate the existence of a probable error or injustice.  Therefore, the Board determined that the overall merits of this case are insufficient as a basis for correction of the records of the individual concerned.


      _______ _   __X_____   ___
               CHAIRPERSON
      
I certify that herein is recorded the true and complete record of the proceedings of the Army Board for Correction of Military Records in this case.


ABCMR Record of Proceedings (cont)                                         AR20130015641





3


ARMY BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS

 RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS


1

ABCMR Record of Proceedings (cont)                                         AR20130015641



2


ARMY BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS

 RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS


1

Similar Decisions

  • ARMY | DRB | CY2013 | AR20130010245

    Original file (AR20130010245.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    The applicant requests an upgrade of his discharge from general, under honorable conditions to honorable and a change to the narrative reason for discharge. The applicant was discharged from the Army on 12 June 2008, with a characterization of service of general, under honorable conditions under the provisions of Chapter 14, paragraph 14-12c, AR 635-200, for misconduct (serious offense), a Separation Program Designator code (SPD) of JKQ and an RE code of 3. However, after examining the...

  • ARMY | DRB | CY2013 | AR20130001317

    Original file (AR20130001317.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    The separation authority waived further rehabilitation and directed the applicant’s discharge with a characterization of service of general, under honorable conditions. Army Regulation 635-5-1 (Separation Program Designator (SPD) Codes) provides the specific authorities (regulatory or directive), reasons for separating Soldiers from active duty, and the SPD codes to be entered on the DD Form 214. However, Army Regulation 635-5-1 (Separation Program Designator (SPD) Codes) provides the...

  • ARMY | DRB | CY2013 | AR20130009010

    Original file (AR20130009010.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    IN THE CASE OF: Mr. BOARD DATE: 2 December 2013 CASE NUMBER: AR20130009010 ___________________________________________________________________________ Board Determination and Directed Action After carefully examining the applicant’s record of service during the period of enlistment under review and notwithstanding the examiner’s Discussion and Recommendation which follows, the Board determined that the characterization of service was too harsh based on the applicant’s length and quality of...

  • ARMY | DRB | CY2013 | AR20130005478

    Original file (AR20130005478.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    The applicant requests an upgrade of his discharge from general, under honorable conditions to honorable and a change to his reentry eligibility (RE) code. The evidence contained in the applicant’s service record indicates that on 20 September 2012, the unit commander notified the applicant of initiation of separation action under the provisions of Chapter 14, paragraph 14-12c, AR 635-200, by reason of misconduct (serious offense) for driving a motor vehicle while under the influence of...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2011 | 20110001778

    Original file (20110001778.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    On 5 August 1987, the applicant's immediate commander notified the applicant of his intent to initiate separation action against him under the provisions of paragraph 14-12c of Army Regulation 635-200 (Personnel Separations – Enlisted Personnel) due to misconduct for commission of a serious offense with an under honorable conditions (general) discharge. The commander cited the applicant's two DWI offenses. The applicant waived consideration of his case by an administrative separation board...

  • ARMY | DRB | CY2013 | AR20130002467

    Original file (AR20130002467.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    The applicant requests an upgrade of his discharge from general, under honorable conditions to honorable, to change the narrative reason for his discharge, and to reenlist. On 20 April 2012, the separation authority waived further rehabilitation and directed the applicant’s discharge with a characterization of service of general, under honorable conditions. EVIDENCE SUBMITTED BY THE APPLICANT: The applicant provided DD Form 293 (Application for the Review of Discharge or Dismissal from the...

  • ARMY | DRB | CY2013 | AR20130017612

    Original file (AR20130017612.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    On 14 February 2013, the General Court-Martial Convening Authority approved the waiver request, waived further rehabilitation and directed the applicant’s discharge with a characterization of service of under other than honorable conditions. The record confirms that the applicant’s discharge was appropriate because the quality of his service was not consistent with the Army's standards for acceptable personal conduct and performance of duty by military personnel. Board Vote: Character...

  • ARMY | DRB | CY2013 | AR20130013154

    Original file (AR20130013154.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    The applicant requests to upgrade the characterization of his service from general, under honorable conditions to fully honorable, and to change the narrative reason for his discharge. He was discharged as a SPC/E-4. EVIDENCE SUBMITTED BY THE APPLICANT: The applicant provided an affidavit in support of warrantless arrest, dated 30 September 2012; county court document indicates, on 21 March 2013, a motion to dismiss a case against the applicant was granted because no officer was available...

  • ARMY | DRB | CY2014 | AR20140000067

    Original file (AR20140000067.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    The applicant was discharged from the Army on 1 February 2013, with a characterization of service of UOTHC under the provisions of Chapter 14, paragraph 14-12c, AR 635-200, for misconduct (serious offense), with a Separation Program Designator code (SPD) of JKQ and an RE code of 4. Army Regulation 635-5-1 (Separation Program Designator (SPD) Codes) provides the specific authorities (regulatory or directive), reasons for separating Soldiers from active duty, and the SPD codes to be entered...

  • ARMY | DRB | CY2013 | AR20130014488

    Original file (AR20130014488.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    On 22 March 2013, the separation authority, waived further rehabilitation and directed the applicant’s discharge with a characterization of service of general, under honorable conditions under the provisions of AR 635-200, paragraph 14-12c, for the commission of serious offenses. Army policy states that an under other than honorable conditions discharge is normally considered appropriate; however, a general, under honorable conditions or an honorable discharge may be granted. Army...