IN THE CASE OF: Mr.
BOARD DATE: 19 June 2013
CASE NUMBER: AR20130001317
___________________________________________________________________________
Board Determination and Directed Action
After carefully examining the applicant's record of service during the period of enlistment under review and considering the Discussion and Recommendation which follows, the Board determined the discharge was both proper and equitable and voted to deny relief.
Presiding Officer
I certify that herein is recorded the true and complete record of the proceedings of the Department of the Army Discharge Review Board in this case.
THE APPLICANTS REQUEST AND STATEMENT:
1. The applicant requests an upgrade of his discharge from general, under honorable conditions to honorable and a change to the narrative reason for separation.
2. He states, in effect, CSM H made a predisposed decision to chapter him out of the Army to make an example of him. His defense counsel argued the discharge was improper. The applicant and the State of Alaska entered into an agreement to dismiss all charges in the case, contingent on him performing 80 hours of community service. He was awarded numerous awards and decorations.
DISCHARGE UNDER REVIEW INFORMATION:
a. Application Receipt Date: 17 January 2013
b. Discharge Received: General, Under Honorable Conditions
c. Date of Discharge: 26 October 2012
d. Reason/Authority/SPD/RE: Misconduct (Serious Offense), AR 635-200, Chapter 14, paragraph 14-12c, JKQ, RE-3
e. Unit of assignment: B Co, 3-21st Infantry Regiment, Fort Wainwright, AK
f. Current Enlistment Date/Term: 20 July 2012, 3 years
g. Current Enlistment Service: 3 months, 7 days
h. Total Service: 2 years, 6 months, 7 days
i. Lost time: None
j. Previous Discharges: RA-(100420-120719)/HD
k. Highest Grade Achieved: E-4
l. Military Occupational Specialty: 11B10, Infantryman
m. GT Score: 98
n. Education: 12 years
o. Overseas Service: Southwest Asia
p. Combat Service: Afghanistan (110510-120428)
q. Decorations/Awards: ARCOM, AAM, NDSM, ACM-W/2 CS, GWOTSM, ASR, OSR, NATOMDL
r. Administrative Separation Board: No
s. Performance Ratings: None
t. Counseling Statements: No
u. Prior Board Review: No
SUMMARY OF SERVICE:
The applicant's record shows he enlisted in the Regular Army on 20 April 2010, for a period of 3 years and 16 weeks. He was 19 years old at the time of entry and had completed 12 years of education. He was trained in and awarded military occupational specialty (MOS) 11B10, Infantryman. He reenlisted 20 July 2012, for 3 years and was 21 years old at the time. He was serving in Alaska, when his discharge was initiated. He achieved the rank of SPC/E-4. His record also shows he served a combat tour and earned awards of an ARCOM and an AAM.
SEPARATION FACTS AND CIRCUMSTANCES
1. The evidence contained in the applicants service record indicates that on 13 September 2012, the unit commander notified the applicant of initiation of separation action under the provisions of Chapter 14, paragraph 14-12c, AR 635-200, by reason of misconduct-commission of a serious offense for being arrested by civil authorities for carrying a loaded weapon while drunk with a blood alcohol content (bac) of .249% (120818).
2. Based on the above misconduct, the unit commander recommended a general, under honorable conditions discharge and advised the applicant of his rights.
3. On 19 September 2012, the applicant consulted with legal counsel, was advised of the impact of the discharge action and submitted a statement on his behalf. The unit commander subsequently recommended separation from the Army and waiver of further rehabilitative efforts. The intermediate commander reviewed the proposed action and recommended approval with a general, under honorable conditions discharge.
4. The separation authority waived further rehabilitation and directed the applicants discharge with a characterization of service of general, under honorable conditions.
5. The applicant was discharged from the Army on 26 October 2012, with a characterization of service of general, under honorable conditions under the provisions of Chapter 14, paragraph 14-12c, AR 635-200, for misconduct (serious offense), a Separation Program Designator code (SPD) of JKQ and an RE code of 3.
6. The applicants service record does not contain any documented evidence of unauthorized absences or time lost or any recorded actions under the Uniform Code of Military Justice (UCMJ).
EVIDENCE OBTAINED FROM THE APPLICANT'S RECORD:
The applicant received three negative counseling statements, two were dated 20 August 2012 and one dated 24 August 2012, for a weapon and alcohol related incident, and making a false official statement to an NCO.
EVIDENCE SUBMITTED BY THE APPLICANT:
The applicant provided a DD Form 293/with an issues page; Chapter 14 discharge packet, thirty-five pages; medical documents, twelve pages; DD Form 214; and Discharge Orders 289-0206.
POST-SERVICE ACTIVITY:
The applicant did not provide any with the application.
REGULATORY AUTHORITY:
1. Army Regulation 635-200 sets forth the basic authority for the separation of enlisted personnel. Chapter 14 establishes policy and prescribes procedures for separating members for misconduct. Specific categories include minor disciplinary infractions, a pattern of misconduct, and commission of a serious offense, to include abuse of illegal drugs, convictions by civil authorities and desertion or being absent without leave. Action will be taken to separate a member for misconduct when it is clearly established that rehabilitation is impractical or unlikely to succeed. Army policy states that an under other than honorable conditions discharge is normally considered appropriate; however, a general, under honorable conditions or an honorable discharge may be granted.
2. Army Regulation 635-200, paragraph 3-7a, provides that an honorable discharge is a separation with honor and entitles the recipient to benefits provided by law. The honorable characterization is appropriate when the quality of the members service generally has met the standards of acceptable conduct and performance of duty for Army personnel, or is otherwise so meritorious that any other characterization would be clearly inappropriate. Whenever there is doubt, it is to be resolved in favor of the individual.
3. Army Regulation 635-200, paragraph 3-7b, provides that a general discharge is a separation from the Army under honorable conditions. When authorized, it is issued to a Soldier whose military record is satisfactory but not sufficiently meritorious to warrant an honorable discharge. A characterization of under honorable conditions may be issued only when the reason for the Soldiers separation specifically allows such characterization.
4. Army Regulation 635-5-1 (Separation Program Designator (SPD) Codes) provides the specific authorities (regulatory or directive), reasons for separating Soldiers from active duty, and the SPD codes to be entered on the DD Form 214. It identifies the SPD code of "JKQ" as the appropriate code to assign enlisted Soldiers who are discharged under the provisions of Army Regulation 635-200, Chapter 14-12c, misconduct (serious offense).
5. The SPD Code/RE Code Cross Reference Table shows that a Soldier assigned an SPD Code of "JKQ" will be assigned an RE Code of 3.
DISCUSSION AND RECOMMENDATION:
1. The applicants request for an upgrade of the characterization of his discharge and a change to the narrative reason for separation was carefully considered. However, after examining his military record, the issues and documents submitted with the application, there are insufficient mitigating factors to merit an upgrade of the applicant's discharge or a change to the narrative reason for separation.
2. The record confirms that the applicants discharge was appropriate because the quality of his service was not consistent with the Army's standards for acceptable personal conduct and performance of duty by military personnel. It brought discredit on the Army, and was prejudicial to good order and discipline. By the misconduct, the applicant diminished the quality of his service below that meriting an honorable discharge. The applicants record of service was marred by violations of the UCMJ, and three negative counseling statements.
3. The applicant provided no independent corroborating evidence demonstrating that either the command's action was erroneous or that his service mitigated the misconduct or poor duty performance.
4. The applicant requested a change to the narrative reason for separation. However, Army Regulation 635-5-1 (Separation Program Designator (SPD) Codes) provides the specific authorities (regulatory or directive), reasons for separating Soldiers from active duty, and the SPD codes to be entered on the DD Form 214. It identifies the SPD code of "JKQ" as the appropriate code to assign enlisted Soldiers who are discharged under the provisions of Army Regulation 635-200, Chapter 14, paragraph 14-12c, for misconduct (serious offense). The regulation further stipulates that no deviation is authorized.
5. Further, the SPD Code/RE Code Cross Reference Table shows that a Soldier assigned an SPD Code of "JKQ" will be assigned an RE Code of 3.
6. The applicant contends CSM H made a predisposed decision to chapter him out of the Army to make an example of him. However, the record does not contain any indication or evidence of arbitrary or capricious actions by the command and all requirements of law and regulation were met and the rights of the applicant were fully protected throughout the separation process. The character of the applicants discharge is commensurate with his overall service record.
7. The applicant further contends his defense counsel argued the discharge was improper. However, there is a presumption of regularity in the conduct of governmental affairs that shall be applied in any review unless there is substantial credible evidence to rebut the presumption. The applicant bears the burden of overcoming this presumption through the presentation of substantial and credible evidence to support this contention. There is no evidence in the record, nor has the applicant produced any evidence to support the contention the discharge was improper and he did not commit a serious offense.
8. The applicant also contends he and the State of Alaska entered into an agreement to dismiss all charges in the case, contingent on him performing 80 hours of community service.
However, Army Regulation 635-200, in pertinent part, stipulates that a Soldier may be separated when action is taken that is tantamount to a finding of guilty, if a punitive discharge authorized for the same or a closely related offense under the Manual for Courts Martial.
9. The applicant additionally contends he was awarded numerous awards and decorations. The applicants service accomplishments and the quality of his service prior to the incident that caused the initiation of discharge proceeding were carefully considered. However, this service was determined not to be sufficiently mitigating to overcome the reason for discharge and characterization of service granted.
10. Therefore, the reason for discharge and the characterization of service being both proper and equitable, recommend the Board deny relief.
SUMMARY OF ARMY DISCHARGE REVIEW BOARD HEARING:
Type of Hearing: Records Review Date: 19 June 2013 Location: Washington, DC
Did the Applicant Testify: NA
Counsel: None
Witnesses/Observers: NA
Board Vote:
Character Change: 0 No Change: 5
Reason Change: 0 No Change: 5
(Board member names available upon request)
Board Action Directed:
Issue a new DD Form 214: No
Change Characterization to: No Change
Change Reason to: No Change
Change Authority for Separation: NA
Change RE Code to: NA
Grade Restoration to: NA
Other: NA
Legend:
AMHRR - Army Military Human Resource Record FG - Field Grade IADT Initial Active Duty Training RE - Reentry
AWOL - Absent Without Leave GD - General Discharge NA - Not applicable SCM- Summary Court Martial
BCD - Bad Conduct Discharge HS - High School NIF - Not in File SPCM - Special Court Martial
CG - Company Grade Article 15 HD - Honorable Discharge OAD - Ordered to Active Duty UNC - Uncharacterized Discharge
CID - Criminal investigation Department MP Military Police OMPF - Official Military Personnel File UOTHC - Under Other Than Honorable Conditions
ADRB Case Report and Directive (cont) AR20130001317
Page 6 of 6 pages
ARMY DISCHARGE REVIEW BOARD (ADRB)
CASE REPORT AND DIRECTIVE
1
ARMY | DRB | CY2013 | AR20130005478
The applicant requests an upgrade of his discharge from general, under honorable conditions to honorable and a change to his reentry eligibility (RE) code. The evidence contained in the applicants service record indicates that on 20 September 2012, the unit commander notified the applicant of initiation of separation action under the provisions of Chapter 14, paragraph 14-12c, AR 635-200, by reason of misconduct (serious offense) for driving a motor vehicle while under the influence of...
ARMY | DRB | CY2015 | AR20150002650
The evidence contained in the applicants service record indicates that on 22 September 2014, the unit commander notified the applicant of initiation of separation action under the provisions of Chapter 14, paragraph 14-12c, AR 635-200, by reason of misconduct (serious offense) for driving a vehicle while intoxicated. Based on the above misconduct, the unit commander recommended a general, under honorable conditions discharge and advised the applicant of her rights. The applicable Army...
ARMY | DRB | CY2013 | AR20130015991
He completed 5 years, 11 months, 10 days of active duty service. The DD Form 214 indicates that on 6 February 2013, the applicant was discharged under the provisions of Chapter 14, AR 635-200, for misconduct (serious offense), with a characterization of service of general, under honorable conditions. A characterization of under honorable conditions may be issued only when the reason for the Soldiers separation specifically allows such characterization.
ARMY | DRB | CY2012 | AR20120010089
Applicant Name: ????? Facts and Circumstances: The evidence of record shows that the unit commander notified the applicant of initiation of separation action under the provisions of Chapter 14, paragraph 14-12c, AR 635-200, by reason of misconduct, commission of a serious offense, for driving under the influence, with a general, under honorable conditions discharge. On 29 November 2007, the separation authority waived further rehabilitative efforts and directed the applicants discharge...
ARMY | DRB | CY2013 | AR20130002876
IN THE CASE OF: Mr. BOARD DATE: 12 August 2013 CASE NUMBER: AR20130002876 ___________________________________________________________________________ Board Determination and Directed Action After carefully examining the applicants record of service during the period of enlistment under review, hearing his testimony and notwithstanding the Discussion and Recommendation which follows, the Board determined the characterization of service was too harsh based on the overall length and quality of...
ARMY | DRB | CY2013 | AR20130011037
On 2 October 2012, the separation authority waived further rehabilitation and directed the applicants discharge with a characterization of service of general, under honorable conditions under the provisions of AR 635-200, paragraph 14-12c, for the commission of a serious offense. Army policy states that an under other than honorable conditions discharge is normally considered appropriate; however, a general, under honorable conditions or an honorable discharge may be granted. The...
ARMY | DRB | CY2013 | AR20130001090
Prior Board Review: No SUMMARY OF SERVICE: The applicant enlisted in the Regular Army on 17 August 2006 for a period of 3 years and 17 weeks. On 19 July 2011, the separation authority waived further rehabilitation and directed the applicants discharge with a characterization of service of under other than honorable conditions. There is no evidence in the record, nor has the applicant produced any evidence to support the contention that the investigation against him had come back clean.
ARMY | DRB | CY2013 | AR20130015412
On 7 May 2012, the unit commander notified the applicant of his intent to process him for separation under the provisions of Army Regulation 635-200, paragraph 14-12c, by reason of misconduct, commission of a serious offense; specifically for being cited for driving under the influence (DUI), reckless driving, and super speeding. The separation authority waived further rehabilitation and directed the applicants discharge with a characterization of service of general, under honorable...
ARMY | DRB | CY2011 | AR20110021564
Applicant Name: ????? Facts and Circumstances: The evidence of record shows that on 10 January 2004, the unit commander notified the applicant of initiation of separation action under the provisions of Chapter 14, paragraph 14-12c, AR 635-200, by reason of misconduct, commission of a serious offense, for testing positive for marijuana, with a general, under honorable conditions discharge. On 12 March 2004, the separation authority waived further rehabilitative efforts and directed the...
ARMY | DRB | CY2009 | AR20090004149
Applicant Name: ????? On 30 April 2008, the separation authority waived further rehabilitative efforts and directed that the applicant be discharged with a characterization of service of general under honorable conditions. Board Action Directed President, Army Discharge Review Board Issue a new DD Form 214 Change Characterization to: Change Reason to: NA Other: NA RE Code: Grade Restoration: No Yes Grade: NA ARMY DISCHARGE REVIEW BOARD - CASE REPORT AND DIRECTIVE Case Number...