Search Decisions

Decision Text

ARMY | BCMR | CY2013 | 20130015627
Original file (20130015627.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

		IN THE CASE OF

		BOARD DATE:	  26 June 2014

		DOCKET NUMBER:  AR20130015627 


THE BOARD CONSIDERED THE FOLLOWING EVIDENCE:

1.  Application for correction of military records (with supporting documents provided, if any).

2.  Military Personnel Records and advisory opinions (if any).


THE APPLICANT'S REQUEST, STATEMENT, AND EVIDENCE:

1.  The applicant requests correction of his record to show he was retired in the rank/grade of sergeant (SGT)/E-5 instead of specialist (SPC)/E-4.

2.  The applicant states he was not allowed to get promoted to SGT/E-5.  He was falsely accused of being the ringleader of a group who stole one million dollars worth of audio/video equipment and assaulted four Latino Soldiers (who cleared his name).  He was wrongfully jailed and because of his mental health, he is now able to talk about the situation.

3.  The applicant provides:

* a DD Form 214 (Certificate of Release or Discharge from Active Duty)
* a letter from the St. Petersburg, Florida Regional Office of the Department of Veterans Affairs (VA)
* a Record of Admission to St. Mary's Medical Center, West Palm Beach, FL
* an Outpatient Meds Summary rendered by the VA Medical Center, West Palm Beach, FL
* a historical list of his appointments rendered by the VA Medical Center, West Palm Beach, FL
* a Jewish War Veterans of the United States Life Membership Certificate




CONSIDERATION OF EVIDENCE:

1.  Title 10, U.S. Code, section 1552(b), provides that applications for correction of military records must be filed within 3 years after discovery of the alleged error or injustice.  This provision of law also allows the Army Board for Correction of Military Records (ABCMR) to excuse an applicant's failure to timely file within the 3-year statute of limitations if the ABCMR determines it would be in the interest of justice to do so.  While it appears the applicant did not file within the time frame provided in the statute of limitations, the ABCMR has elected to conduct a substantive review of this case and, only to the extent relief, if any, is granted, has determined it is in the interest of justice to excuse the applicant's failure to timely file.  In all other respects, there are insufficient bases to waive the statute of limitations for timely filing.

2.  The applicant enlisted in the Regular Army on 17 September 1985.

3.  His record contains the following pertinent documents:

	a.  A DA Form 2-1 (Personnel Qualification Record - Part II) which shows he was promoted to the rank/grade of SPC/E-4 on 1 December 1986.

	b.  A DA Form 2A (Personnel Qualification Record - Part I) dated 14 November 1991 which shows in Section II (Qualification Data):

		(1)  Item 1, that he was promoted to the rank/grade of SPC/E-4 on 1 December 1986.

		(2)  Item 31, that he currently had 540 promotion points which became effective in July 1991.

		(3)  Item 32, that he previously had 667 promotion points which became effective in March 1990.

	c.  Department of the Army, U.S. Total Army Personnel Command, Orders D111-12, dated 5 June 1992, which show he was released from assignment and duty because of physical disability incurred while entitled to basic pay and under conditions which permitted his retirement for permanent physical disability.  These orders also show:

		(1)  his effective date of retirement was 26 June 1992

		(2)  He was placed on the retired list on 27 June 1992

		(3)  his retired grade was SPC/E-4

		(4)  his percentage of disability was 30 percent.

	d.  A DA Form 3713-E (Data for Retired Pay), dated 5 June 1992, which shows his rank grade as SPC/E-4 for the following categories:

* Active Grade
* Retired Grade
* Highest Grade
* Retired Pay

	e.  Fitzsimons Army Medical Center, Aurora, CO, Orders 115-23, dated 18 June 1992, which show he was reassigned to the U.S. Army Transition Center, Fitzsimons Army Medical Center, Aurora, CO, with a reporting date of 26 June 1992.  The additional instructions stated that he would be placed on the Permanent Disabled Retired List on 27 June 1992 in the grade of SPC with a disability rating of 30 percent.

	f.  His DD Form 214 which shows he was honorably retired on 26 June 1992 due to permanent disability in the rank/grade of SPC/E-4.  This document also shows his effective date of pay grade as 1 December 1986.

4.  His record is void of any indication he was ever promoted to the rank/grade of SGT/E-5.

5.  His record is void of any disciplinary action showing that he was removed from the promotion standing list.

6.  The applicant provides:

	a.  a letter from the St. Petersburg, Florida Regional Office of the VA, dated 17 July 2013, which certified that he was receiving service-connected disability compensation on a monthly basis as a result of a 30 percent disability rating.

	b.  a Record of Admission to St. Mary's Medical Center, West Palm Beach, FL, dated 1 December 2012, which shows he was admitted for psychiatric treatment for a diagnosis of major depression with psychosis.

	c.  an Outpatient Meds Summary rendered by the VA Medical Center, West Palm Beach, FL, dated 11 December 2012, which shows that he was prescribed three different medications at the time.
	d.  a historical list of his appointments during the period 7 October 2010 through 4 December 2012, rendered by the VA Medical Center, West Palm Beach, FL, on 11 December 2012.

	e.  a certificate which shows he was awarded a life membership in the Jewish War Veterans of the United States on 25 January 2011.

7.  Army Regulation 600-200 (Enlisted Personnel Management System), in effect at the time, prescribed the policies and procedures for advancement, promotion, and appointment of enlisted Soldiers on active duty.  Paragraph 7-6e provides that Soldiers (E-1 through E-8) are nonpromotable and will not be advanced or promoted to a higher grade when under a current suspension of favorable personnel actions or when an officer having general court-martial authority, or a higher authority, determines that a Soldier should have been under suspension of favorable personnel action.  Paragraph 7-28 lists numerous reasons for which a promotion authority can remove a Soldier from the promotion standing list, to include adverse action resulting from misconduct.

DISCUSSION AND CONCLUSIONS:

1.  Evidence clearly shows the applicant was promoted to the rank/grade of SPC/E-4 on 1 December 1986.

2.  Evidence also shows that he was in a promotable status on 14 November 1991.

3.  His record is void of evidence showing that he was subjected to disciplinary action.  However, by his own admission he was accused of being the ringleader of a group who stole one million dollars worth of audio/video equipment and assaulted four Latino Soldiers, and then subsequently jailed.  Therefore, it is not unreasonable to presume that a suspension of favorable personnel actions was placed upon his records or that he was administratively removed from the promotion standing list as a result of adverse action.

4.  The applicant's record is void of any evidence showing he was ever promoted to the rank/grade of SGT/E-5 at any time during his service.  In the absence of evidence to show he was not flagged and he was otherwise eligible for promotion at the time of his retirement, there is no basis for promoting him to SGT/E-5 on the Retired List.




BOARD VOTE:

________  ________  ________  GRANT FULL RELIEF 

________  ________  ________  GRANT PARTIAL RELIEF 

________  ________  ________  GRANT FORMAL HEARING

___X____  __X____  ___X____  DENY APPLICATION

BOARD DETERMINATION/RECOMMENDATION:

The evidence presented does not demonstrate the existence of a probable error or injustice.  Therefore, the Board determined that the overall merits of this case are insufficient as a basis for correction of the records of the individual concerned.



      _______ _  X_____   ___
               CHAIRPERSON
      
I certify that herein is recorded the true and complete record of the proceedings of the Army Board for Correction of Military Records in this case.


ABCMR Record of Proceedings (cont)                                         AR20130015627





3


ARMY BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS

 RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS


1

ABCMR Record of Proceedings (cont)                                         AR20130015627



2


ARMY BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS

 RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS


1

Similar Decisions

  • AF | BCMR | CY2002 | BC-2002-02513

    Original file (BC-2002-02513.DOC) Auto-classification: Approved

    RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS AIR FORCE BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS IN THE MATTER OF: DOCKET NUMBER: 02-02513 INDEX CODE: 128.02 COUNSEL: NONE HEARING DESIRED: NO _________________________________________________________________ APPLICANT REQUESTS THAT: The departure address in item 1 on his AF Form 766, Extended Active Duty (EAD) Order, dated 25 March 2002, be changed to reflect his Home of Record (HOR) address. The remaining relevant facts pertaining to this application, extracted...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2014 | 20140019088

    Original file (20140019088.txt) Auto-classification: Approved

    Chapter 2 contains guidance on the preparation of the DD Form 214 and states that items 4a and 4b show the active duty grade or rank and pay grade at time of separation and are obtained from the Soldier's records (promotion or reduction orders). The grade or rank in which he is serving on the date when his name is placed on the temporary disability retired list or, if his name was not carried on that list, on the date when he is retired. There is no evidence in his records and he provides...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2011 | 20110003923

    Original file (20110003923.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    The applicant states he received an Article 15 due to an arrest for disorderly conduct. The PEB recommended that the applicant be placed on the temporary disability retired list (TDRL) with reexamination in October 2011. After a review of his official records including his PEB and the Article 15, the AGDRB determined the highest grade in which he satisfactorily served for the purpose of disability retirement was E-4 which was the grade he held at the time of retirement.

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2014 | 20140017949

    Original file (20140017949.txt) Auto-classification: Approved

    The applicant requests correction of his DD Form 214 (Certificate of Release or Discharge from Active Duty), for the period ending on 24 May 1991, to show in: * Item 4a (Grade, Rate, or Rank) – his rank as corporal (CPL) instead of specialist (SPC) * Item 11 (Primary Specialty) – his secondary (S) military occupational specialty (MOS) of 95B (Military Police (MP)) 2. Therefore, the evidence of record is sufficient to warrant correction of item 4a of his 1991 DD Form 214 to show his rank as...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2010 | 20100028858

    Original file (20100028858.txt) Auto-classification: Approved

    The applicant requests correction of his record to show he was retired in the rank/grade of sergeant (SGT)/E-5. He also provides: * a Certificate of Retirement showing his rank as SPC * a memorandum, dated 2 September 2009, and Retiree Account Statement, dated 29 September 2009, from DFAS showing his rank as SGT * a Chronological Record of Medical Care, dated 17 June 2010, showing his DOB as 8 March 1984 and his rank as SGT 13. He states his DOB is 8 March 1984; however, his record shows...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2009 | 20090000624

    Original file (20090000624.txt) Auto-classification: Approved

    a. Paragraph 7-11 (Determination of qualifications and enlistment grades) provides that ACASP applicants must present valid evidence of completion of required civilian training to enlistment authorities. The evidence of record shows the applicant enlisted in the USAR in the grade of E-4 under the ACASP on 4 November 2006 with an assurance of attending the school course for MOS 68V2O (Respiratory Specialist). The evidence of record shows that the online DA Pamphlet 611-21, printed on 12...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2010 | 20100016248

    Original file (20100016248.txt) Auto-classification: Approved

    IN THE CASE OF: BOARD DATE: 6 January 2011 DOCKET NUMBER: AR20100016248 THE BOARD CONSIDERED THE FOLLOWING EVIDENCE: 1. The evidence of record shows the applicant was promoted to SGT/E-5 by official orders on 1 February 2008. As a result, the Board recommends that all Department of the Army records of the individual concerned be corrected by: a. amending Orders 040-0043, issued by Headquarters, Fort Stewart, GA, on 9 February 2010, to show his current and retired rank as SGT, pay grade...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2008 | 20080011262

    Original file (20080011262.txt) Auto-classification: Approved

    The applicant requests, in effect, correction of his DD Form 214 (Certificate of Release or Discharge from Active Duty) to show his two tours in Korea, 1989 and 1992, and to show that he was awarded the Korea Defense Service Medal. Although his two tours are currently and correctly shown in item 5 (Overseas Service) of his DA Form 2-1, there is no provision to list periods of foreign service independently on his DD Form 214. The applicant served in Korea during the qualifying period for...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2012 | 20120011786

    Original file (20120011786.txt) Auto-classification: Approved

    The applicant states due to administrative errors in her unit, she had problems maintaining her promotable status after beginning a medical evaluation board (MEB) when her Army Physical Fitness Test (APFT) expired under the new promotion system in June 2011. Chapter 2 contains guidance on the preparation of the DD Form 214 and states that items 4a and 4b show the active duty grade or rank and pay grade at time of separation and are obtained from the Soldier's records (promotion or reduction...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2010 | 20100030085

    Original file (20100030085.txt) Auto-classification: Approved

    On 26 October 2010, he was honorably retired and placed on the Temporary Disability Retired List (TDRL). Army Regulation 600-8-19 (Enlisted Promotions and Reductions) states, per the provisions of 10 USC 1372, Soldiers on a promotion list at the time of retirement for disability will be retired for disability at the promotion list grade. As a result, the Board recommends that all Department of the Army records of the individual concerned be corrected by: a. promoting him to SGT/E-5...